The Theosophist Who Was Nearly President: The “Heart Trust” of Henry A. Wallace

Printed in the  Fall 2024  issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Orvetti, Peter, "The Theosophist Who Was Nearly President: The “Heart Trustof Henry A. Wallace"  Quest 112:4, pg 34-36

By Peter Orvetti

peter orvettiOn July 20, 1944, the second night of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Florida Senator Claude Pepper pushed through the sweltering crowd in an attempt to reach the podium. The event scripted by party leaders—the hostile replacement of the incumbent vice president on Franklin D. Roosevelt’s ticket with a more malleable senator from Missouri—was going off the rails. Progressive delegates chanted the name of the vice president, and Senator Pepper wanted to force a vote to save him while the crowd was hot. Seeing Pepper approach, and with gesticulating party insiders cajoling him to act, the convention chair brought down the gavel, ending the proceedings for the night.

The next night, with passions cooled and deals cut, Harry Truman was nominated as FDR’s running mate. Less than nine months later, Truman—not Henry Agard Wallace, mystic, chela, and erstwhile Theosophist—would become president of the United States.

History turns on such moments. If Pepper had made it to the stage, the closing days of World War II and the course of the fragile peace that followed would have looked quite different. Historians have mused that a President Wallace would have been loath to use the atomic bomb against Japan and would have pursued a more conciliatory (or, as some have argued, more naive) policy toward the Soviet Union.

FDR was not prone to sentimentality. He had anointed Wallace, then agriculture secretary, as his vice-presidential pick in 1940 to shore up support among farmers and liberals. By 1944, Roosevelt needed to bolster a different coalition. Roosevelt also knew that his health was failing and that the candidate he selected would probably become president sometime during the next four years. Wallace had to go.

But Roosevelt liked Wallace personally, in part because of Wallace’s interest in esoteric matters. Roosevelt had little personal interest in the worlds beyond this one, but his beloved mother had been interested in Asian mysticism, and FDR liked to listen to Wallace speak on the subject. These friendly conversations stand in sharp contrast to how FDR’s advisors and other Wallace opponents would use Wallace’s occult interests as a weapon against him in the years ahead.

Henry A WallaceHenry Wallace (1888‒1965) was an unlikely politician. The vice presidency was the first and only office to which he was elected, and a decade before he rose to that office, few in Washington knew who he was. Wallace was an Iowa crop scientist and livestock breeder; seed and poultry companies he founded still thrive today. He was also the editor of an agriculture journal founded by his grandfather: Wallace’s Farmer, which is still being published under the title Wallaces Farmer. Wallace was blunt, long-winded, and had a tendency toward pomposity; he was not the sort who seemed likely to enter public life.

The Wallaces were Presbyterians, but young Henry, an insatiable reader, developed an interest in comparative religion, with a particular interest in traditions rooted in the land. His discovery of the works of the Theosophist Irish poet and essayist George William Russell, who published under the pseudonym Æ, resulted in a correspondence between the two, and in 1919, Wallace attended his first meeting of the Theosophical Society’s Des Moines branch. Wallace joined the TS several years later and even helped to organize a local branch of C.W. Leadbeater’s Liberal Catholic Church.

In 1927, Dmitry Nikolaevich Borodin, a Russian agronomist who had been working on seed exchanges between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, came to Des Moines to deliver a speech. There he met the young editor of Wallace’s Farmer, and when he learned of Wallace’s interest in spirituality, he urged him to familiarize himself with the mystical Russian artist Nicholas Roerich.

A few months later, while on a business trip to New York, Wallace visited the Roerich Museum, an imposing twenty-four-story art deco skyscraper and the first museum in the U.S. dedicated solely to a single artist. When he stepped through the door, Wallace froze and stood in silence for long enough for the receptionist to seek help. The museum’s vice president, Roerich acolyte Frances Grant, asked the visitor if he was feeling ill. Wallace assured her that he was not; rather, he said he was experiencing “vibrations” from a Tibetan prayer mat near the entrance.

Roerich had a knack for nurturing relationships with powerful people, but the obscure farm journalist was at the time beneath his attention. Wallace met Roerich at the museum in 1929, but it was a cursory encounter. Wallace and Grant corresponded regularly, but the Russian sage paid Wallace little heed. That would change in the new decade.

The Wallaces had been Republicans for generations, but the calamity of the Great Depression led Wallace to break with tradition and endorse Roosevelt in his magazine in 1932. FDR swept the traditionally Republican Midwest in his landslide victory that November, and Wallace was rewarded with Cabinet consideration. The two men had met just once before the election, and it had not gone well, so Wallace considered the new president-elect’s interest to be a matter of courtesy. Instead, Roosevelt, seeking radical and innovative solutions to the crisis, made Wallace his secretary of agriculture—a position much more prominent then than it is today.

Secretary Wallace went from obscurity to national prominence nearly overnight, becoming a favorite of progressives and New Dealers for his radical, try-anything approach to righting the nation’s farm policies. He also saw his post as a means to spread the Ancient Wisdom to a larger audience. He attended the 1934 annual convention of the TSA, and that same year he persuaded FDR to add the Great Seal of the United States, with its Eye of Providence hovering above an unfinished pyramid, to a redesign of the dollar bill, where it remains to this day.

Roerich had brought the image—also known as the “All-Seeing Eye”—to Wallace’s attention. But this was not the only way in which Roerich would influence Wallace’s official actions, to the secretary’s ultimate regret.

Roerich and his wife, Helena, had developed a plan to carve a spiritual kingdom out of East Asia, based on the principles of their Agni Yoga system, with its capital in the mystical city of Shambala and possibly with Roerich himself as king. (Roerich began insisting that he was the reincarnation of Tibet’s greatest leader, the seventeenth-century Fifth Dalai Lama, though whether he truly believed this or used the claim as a political tool remains up for debate.) Roerich easily convinced Wallace to place him and his son on a Department of Agriculture expedition to collect drought-resistant grasses in the Gobi Desert, and then got Wallace to put him in charge of the expedition, outranking experienced researchers and scientists, over the objections of Wallace’s top advisors.

The expedition was a disaster, and Wallace broke with Roerich for good, even having the Russian mystic audited by the Internal Revenue Service. In 1935, Wallace resigned from the Theosophical Society, but this was a result of his painful education in political realities as a result of the Roerich affair and not because he had terminated his esoteric quest. He was still, as he had told a friend years before, “a searcher for methods of bringing the Inner Light to outward manifestation.” He had simply realized that as a public figure—and one with nascent presidential ambitions—he had to keep it to himself.

In the five years following the Roerich expedition, the public scandal died down, eclipsed by Wallace’s prominent and successful role in forging agriculture policy. By 1940, Roosevelt felt it safe to name Wallace as his running mate as he sought an unprecedented third term. Frances Grant, ever loyal to Roerich and furious with Wallace over his spurning of her teacher, reached out to anti-Roosevelt operatives with a bombshell: there were letters.

In the period of their acquaintance, and while he was already serving in the Cabinet, Wallace had penned multiple letters to Roerich, sometimes starting with the greeting “Dear Guru.” In these missives, Wallace referred to himself as “Galahad” and to FDR as “the Flaming One.” In one representative segment, Wallace wrote, “Long have I been aware of the occasional fragrance from that other world which is the real world. But now I must live in the outer world and at the same time make over my mind and body to serve as fit instruments for the Lord of Justice.” In another, he recounted a dream in which he was talking with Roosevelt and “was amazed to see that instead of eyes there was swirling black smoke. And out of the mouth came swirling black smoke.”

One Democratic donor who opposed Wallace’s vice-presidential nomination said of him, “He was so much the prophet, an unworldly man of mysterious leanings and ideas, that it was obvious to all who knew him that he would only make the country a mighty strange president.” But Roosevelt pushed him through anyway, daring the Republicans to use the so-called “Guru Letters” against him.

Republicans did acquire the letters, but their presidential nominee, industrialist Wendell Willkie, refused to use them. In part, this was because Willkie feared the Democrats would retaliate by spreading unsubstantiated stories of an extramarital affair. But also Willkie—an uncommonly idealistic politician who would later become a leading advocate for a democratic world government—just thought it would be wrong to do so.

When Wallace was dumped from the ticket four years later, after an uneventful term as vice president, the Guru Letters were barely mentioned. They only came to light in 1948, when Wallace ran a third-party candidacy against the incumbent Truman and Republican Thomas Dewey on a platform of peace and accommodation with the Soviet Union. Wallace never stood a chance, but any hopes of a respectable showing were lost after right-wing syndicated columnist Westbrook Pegler splashed excerpts across the nation’s newspapers. Wallace limped to a fourth-place finish with just over 2 percent of the national popular vote, trailing even the segregationist Strom Thurmond.

Wallace lived on for nearly two decades after that defeat, gradually withdrawing from the public sphere and returning to his first love, crop science. Whatever metaphysical pursuits he engaged in until he died in 1965 he kept to himself. But Wallace seemed to never abandon the view he espoused in an essay titled “Statesmanship and Religion,” published at the height of his prominence in the 1930s:

We need a “heart trust”—a trust in the innate goodness of the human heart when it has not been warped by the mammon worship, the false science, and the false economics of the nineteenth century . . . I cannot but feel that the destiny of the world is toward far greater unity than that which we now enjoy, and that in order to attain such unity it will be necessary for the members of the different races, classes, and creeds to open their hearts and minds to the unfolding reality of the immediate future in a way which they have never done before.

Sources

Culver, J.C., and J.  Hyde. American Dreamer: A Life of Henry A. Wallace. New York: Norton, 2001.

Kleinman, M.L. “Searching for the ‘Inner Light’: The Development of Henry A. Wallace’s Experimental Spiritualism.” The Annals of Iowa 53, no. 3 (1994), 195–218.

McCannon, J. Nicholas Roerich: The Artist Who Would Be King. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2022. Reviewed in Quest, spring 2024.

Steil, B. The World That Wasn’t: Henry Wallace and the Fate of the American Century. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2024.

Peter Orvetti is a writer and former divinity student residing in Washington, D.C., who writes frequently for Quest.

 


Exploring the Craft of Freemasonry

Printed in the  Fall 2024  issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Digitalis, Raven, "Exploring the Craft of Freemasonry"  Quest 112:4, pg 20-22

By Raven Digitalis

Raven DigitalisFreemasonry, or Masonry for short, is a fraternal order that is often considered to be shrouded in secrecy. Actually it is not a secret society, but is better described as a society that happens to have a few secrets. Masonry is a global spiritual brotherhood with long-held traditions and solid codes of ethics. It has had a lasting influence on both Western history and a wide array of esoteric systems.

It is said that to become a Mason, one must know a Mason. That individual can vouch for the applicant’s character, which is followed by a meeting with members of the lodge. The Craft of the Masons consists of three primary degrees (called the Blue Lodge). Additionally, there are a number of optional “addenda” degrees expressed in the branches of the York Rite and Scottish Rite.

Masonry makes use of symbolism derived from ancient Egypt, Hermetic philosophy, alchemical principles, stories of the Knights Templar, the legend of King Solomon’s Temple, select stories from the Bible, and numerous other ancient milieus.

Freemasonry in its present form originated in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as a development of the late medieval stonemasons’ guilds of Scotland and England. The organization is officially styled the Ancient Free and Accepted Masons (AFAM). The “Free and Accepted” portion of the name is derived from around 1640, when ordinary men were permitted to join operative Masonic clubs, which had up to that point consisted of men working in building trades. These nonoperative Masons were called accepted Masons because they were allowed to join the Masonic fraternities without necessarily holding careers in “operative” building trades. In modern times, only a handful of initiated Masons work as actual stonemasons or architects. The United Grand Lodge of England was established in 1717, a date generally taken to mark the modern history of the Craft.

A well-known phrase used by Masons to describe the Craft is, Making good men better.” Masonry’s goal is to help men alchemize their minds and emotions through lesson, discourse, and brotherhood, helping refine their characters into spiritual gold.

Craft Symbolism

The Craft of the Freemasons makes use of countless esoteric symbols and philosophies. While we don’t have room for great detail here, readers are invited to research the numerous books and articles that examine Masonic symbolism in depth. Just be sure to keep away from the articles that discuss Satanic or Illuminati conspiracies: Masonic lodges are much more concerned with raising money for charity than with raising demons! In her monumental Isis Unveiled, H.P. Blavatsky professes, “The accusations against Masons have been mostly half guess-work, half-unquenchable malice and predetermined vilification. Nothing conclusive and certain of a criminal character has been directly proven against them.”

As far as Masonic secrets are concerned, don’t believe the hype. Virtually anything about the organization, including its secret words, grips, and gestures, can be researched on the Internet. Like many other initiated Masons, I personally don’t see much of a problem with this, because regardless of how many “secrets” are exposed online, they remain theoretical, empty of meaning. Perhaps these “exposed” secrets can be understood intellectually on some level, but this is hardly comparable to the actual practice of learning these codes within the paradigm of a loving, fraternal brotherhood. Masonry is experiential, not merely theoretical.

smybol Some esoteric symbols within Freemasonry are strictly initiatory, while others are quite common. The square and compass is easily the best-known Masonic symbol and is found in all Masonic lodges around the world. The emblem is also common on virtually all “brotherly bling,” such as rings, necklaces, pocket watches, compasses, pocket knives, coins, and bumper stickers, and so on. It is also a popular tattoo!

The simple symbolism of the architectural square is to “square” our actions with virtuous conduct. The compass represents keeping our actions within “due bounds” (meaning the restraint of immoral behaviors). During initiation, a Mason is given various meanings of the divine letter “G,” which graces the interior of the symbol.

Another highly popular Masonic symbol is the Eye of Providence. In simplest terms, the Eye of Providence represents the eye of God. Identifying the “God” in this equation is up to individual practitioners themselves. This symbol takes a multitude of forms and is commonly depicted atop a pyramid. Freemasonry utilizes a hefty amount of ancient Egyptian symbolism, and the pyramid is no exception; after all, could there be a better symbol of humankind’s architectural genius? The Eye of Providence and pyramid are famously depicted on the back of the American dollar bill. This certainly seems appropriate considering that many of the nation’s Founding Fathers were Freemasons, including George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and James Monroe.

Masonic Evolution

Masonry and its offshoots are social clubs: nonprofit organizations that perform a wide variety of civic and social work to raise funding and awareness for individuals in need, whether they be school kids, the elderly, or those with disabilities, and so on. Just look at the work of the Shriners, whose hospitals provide treatment to children with illnesses and injuries. (Although being a Freemason is a prerequisite for becoming a Shriner, the organizations are separate.)

Freemasonry is historically a masculine brotherhood, though a number of Masonic appendant bodies (allied organizations) are predominantly female, such as the Order of the Eastern Star, Daughters of the Nile, and Job’s Daughters International. Others are male-oriented, such as the Shriners and the Order of DeMolay (the latter being a character-building organization for young men between the ages of thirteen and twenty-one).

Traditional Freemasonry prohibits women from being initiated, and modern Masonry upholds this principle chiefly for the sake of tradition. Nonetheless, something called Adoptive Masonry exists exclusively for women, while Co-Masonry welcomes all gender identities. But these branches are often considered clandestine and have challenging relationships with traditional brotherhoods because they utilize traditional (male) Masonic lessons and initiations rather than independent structures.

Masonry also prohibits the initiation of atheists, since the organization requires members to be believe in a “supreme being” or higher power, although, again, the nature of this higher power is up to individual interpretation. Regardless of Masonry’s emphasis on certain Judeo-Christian and biblical allegories within their initiations, the Craft is open to a wide variety of spiritually minded individuals who embrace positive spiritual paths.

One of the “Old Charges” of Freemasonry, which has its origin at least as far back as 1723, is called Concerning God and Religion, and has long been read by many lodges at the Entered Apprentice (first) degree ritual for new brothers of the Craft. This charge asserts that all good men are candidates for Masonry regardless of one’s religious preference. A section of it reads as follows : 

[In] ancient Times Masons were charg’d in every Country to be of the Religion of that Country or Nation, whatever it was, yet ’tis now thought more expedient only to oblige them to that Religion in which all Men agree, leaving their particular Opinions to themselves; that is, to be good Men and true, or Men of Honour and Honesty, by whatever Denominations or Persuasions they may be distinguish’d; whereby Masonry becomes the Center of Union, and the Means of conciliating true Friendship among Persons that must have remain’d at a perpetual Distance.

Masonry distinctly celebrates religious and spiritual diversity, recognizing the forces of honor and honesty as the center of union. Virtually every modern metaphysical school of thought has ties with Freemasonry in some manner.

Masonry in the New Age

Although the term “New Age” did not become widely used until the 1960s and ’70s, many ideas and outlooks prevalent in Freemasonry have become integrated with New Age thought and its innumerable derivations. The New Age movement includes a massively expansive and evolving collection of ancient wisdom, Indigenous practice, and century-spanning philosophical approaches. Of these, ancient ideas expressed in Freemasonry are aplenty.

Masonic philosophical threads are present in H.P. Blavatsky’s presentation of the Ageless Wisdom teachings, which sought to encompass spiritual, moral, and scientific achievements across numerous world religions, cultures, and orders. This is also in line with the evolution of New Age thought, which itself is considered an “approach” rather than a system or religion. The same can be said for Freemasonry.

According to the Universal Co-Masonry website, “Blavatsky was a Russian aristocrat whose childhood was heavily influenced by Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism. She spent her formative years in the vast library of her great-grandfather, a well-known Mason. It is very likely she came to know of the Masonic teachings of the Fraternity and that of Rosicrucianism during this time.”

To conclude this article on an interesting note, one of Masonry’s distinct phrases is “so mote it be,” which has been utilized since at least the fifteenth century. This is an archaic form of “so it shall be.” During the time as chaplain in my own Masonic lodge, Sentinel Lodge 155 in Missoula, Montana, it was my duty to conclude the opening prayers with “Amen,” which was followed by all other brothers stating, “So mote it be.” This is part of the standard Masonic procedure for opening a lodge as a sacred meeting ground, and is one of the steps performed for every stated meeting around the world.

In its current incarnation, particularly considering its plentiful offshoots and associated organizations, Freemasonry is here to stay as an evolving brotherhood aimed at self-improvement and the betterment of communities and the world at large. To that, I say, Amen! So mote it be.

Sources

Blavatsky, H.P. Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology. New York: J.W. Bouton, 1877.

Greer, John Michael. The New Encyclopedia of the Occult. St. Paul, Minn.: Llewellyn, 2003.

Hughan, William James. Constitutions of the Freemasons. London: R. Spencer, 1869.

Kinney, Jay, ed. The Inner West: An Introduction to the Hidden Wisdom of the West. New York: Penguin, 2004.

“Theosophy and Freemasonry: The Influence of Blavatsky on Universal Co-Masonry.” Universal Co-Masonry website: https://www.universalfreemasonry.org/en/masonic-theosophy-freemasonry.

Raven Digitalis is the author of the Empath’s Trilogy, consisting of The Empath’s Oracle, Esoteric Empathy, and The Everyday Empath, as well as the Shadow Trilogy of A Gothic Witch’s Oracle, A Witch’s Shadow Magick Compendium, and Goth Craft. Raven has been an earth-based practitioner since 1999, a priest since 2003, a Freemason since 2012, and an empath all of his life. He holds a degree in cultural anthropology from the University of Montana, jointly operated a nonprofit Pagan temple for sixteen years, and is a professional Tarot reader, editor, card-carrying magician, and animal rights advocate: www.ravendigitalis.comwww.facebook.com/ravendigitalis; www.instagram.com/ravendigitalis.

PHOTO CREDIT:

Forrest Hardin Photography


Co-Masonry Revealed

Printed in the  Fall 2024  issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Rees, Julian, "Co-Masonry Revealed"  Quest 112:4, pg 28-32

By Julian Rees

Julian ReesWhat would you say if you knew there was a worldwide pursuit of nonreligious, secular spirituality over three hundred years old? It is called Freemasonry, a pursuit that has been wrongly characterized in many ways: as a rich men’s social club, as an excuse to dress up in elaborate regalia, as a sinister movement whose aim is worldwide domination, as a charitable foundation whose primary aim is the relief of distress, as a men-only organization acting as a refuge from marital encumbrances, and many more.

The truth is quite different. While it is true that worldwide, Freemasonry is largely an all-male pursuit, there is a vibrant branch, existing since 1893, of liberal, nondogmatic, bigender Freemasonry firmly grounded in a spiritual path, the pursuit of self-knowledge, liberty of conscience, the perfection of humankind, equality of men and women, and the erection of an edifice dedicated to the perfection of humanity, harmony and balance, tolerance, and equality.

Paramount amongst these values is self-knowledge. One of the simplest but most important symbols is the point within a circle. Self-knowledge is represented here by access to the still, small point in the interior of each human being.

circle point

Freemasonry at its richest form of expression is an esoteric pursuit, engaging both men and women in the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain, whose supreme council is in Paris but which is found in many countries.

This Order started in 1893 when Marie (or Maria) Deraismes (1828‒94), an ardent feminist and proponent of women in Freemasonry, was initiated into a Masonic Lodge in the town of Le Pec near Paris by male Freemasons sympathetic to her cause.

The world of Freemasonry was scandalized at this innovation and refused to accept it. But the founders persevered and initiated even more women, and in this they were supported and energized by Georges Martin. Together with prominent Theosophist Annie Besant, they founded the New Masonic Order. Besant founded the British arm of the Order, and C.W. Leadbeater, another Theosophist, also became a member.

In this Order, a person aspiring to be a Freemason is initiated using a ceremonial with echoes of the ancient Mystery traditions, such as the Mithraic and Eleusinian. Today in our tradition we define Freemasonry as “an initiatory system containing the keys to the ancient mysteries, which are experienced through a series of mystery dramas designed to open up and deepen awareness and understanding.” These mystery dramas are codified in three degrees:

            1. The first degree, that of initiation, which is a complex allegory of death of the self in order to be re-born; renewal; acquisition of spiritual light; paths leading to self-knowledge.

            2. The second degree, that of passing, incorporating an allegory of the passage through life, and development of the intellectual faculties, while emphasizing the intellect of the heart (intuition) over that of the brain.

            3. The third degree, that of raising, is an allegory of death and the human aspiration to triumph over death to be reborn. It is a development of aspects of the first degree.

 All three degrees make use of symbolism. The tradition is based on that of stonemasons, from whose symbols allegories are devised. For Freemasons, an allegory is a form of nonverbal communication. To pick a simple example, we have the first degree Freemason, who is called an Entered Apprentice, engaged in allegorically sculpting a rough cuboid stone to make of it a perfect, smooth, six-sided cube. The allegory, which the candidate is personally invited to decode, is that of the perfection of one’s own character. One will meet with many such allegories on this journey.

The First Degree

tracing board for 1st degree  
Tracing Board for 1st Degree.  

But first let us begin at the beginning. Once an aspirant has met socially with many members of the lodge, she or he will be balloted for in an open lodge meeting. (Henceforth in this article, the pronoun he should be taken to mean either she or he.)  If the ballot is in his favor, he will come to the lodge on an appointed day when he will be prepared for the ceremony of initiation. This preparation consists of disarranging his clothing, removing all money and metallic objects such as jewelry, removing one shoe, placing a blindfold over his eyes, and placing a rope with a running noose about his neck. This allegory is manifold: the candidate comes spiritually devoid of light; he needs to direct his attention inwardly; he comes without material encumbrances; he is submissive; he is disoriented; he places his trust in those around him; they place their trust in him.

At the door of the lodge, the candidate is met with two dangers: one if he tries to rush forward, the other if he is reticent and holds back. This allegory teaches him to persevere steadily. Once inside the lodge, after the Master recites a prayer invoking divine aid, the candidate is led round to be verbally examined by two of the senior officers of the Lodge: the Senior Warden and the Junior Warden. During this perambulation, he is presented to the elementals of earth, air, fire, and water:

Ho! Elementals of the Earth, who guard the right side of the Second Portal. Behold! A blinded child of mortality, seeking Immortality, approacheth. Earth to Earth he gives you of your own. As he thus recognises you, so shall you henceforth always recognise him as one of the Brethren. Open your ranks, that he may come near to the Warden of your Gate.

Finally the candidate is verbally examined by the Master. He then kneels at an altar placed near the center of the lodge and swears a vow of fidelity to Freemasonry and to the lodge in particular.

The culmination of the ceremony of initiation is the presentation of the working tools, which in this degree are the twenty-four-inch gauge, the common gavel, and the chisel. Apart from their operative uses, the allegorical uses are explained to the aspirant. The common gavel represents the driving force of humanity; the chisel passively receives the blows of the gavel but is in itself capable of very fine, creative work; the gauge not only measures the work, but in a figurative sense measures the other two, by allegorically tempering the blows of the gavel and encouraging the chisel to be more assertive.

 A summary of this degree might say that the aspirant gives up physical, material freedom in order to attain for a different, greater freedom as a Freemason.

Each degree in Freemasonry uses what is called a tracing board as a means of displaying some of the allegories in a visual form and to encourage meditation on them. The first-degree tracing board shows the sun and moon and seven stars. Beneath those is what is called the Blazing Star, emblematic of the divine presence. Beneath that is Jacob’s Ladder, a conduit between the terrestrial and the celestial, displaying emblems of faith, hope, and charity. The ladder rests on the Bible or another holy book, itself resting on an altar. On the Bible are displayed the square and compasses, and on the front of the altar is the point within a circle mentioned earlier. The three pillars, of the Ionic, Doric, and Corinthian orders, represent wisdom, strength, and beauty respectively. The rough-hewn stone and the polished stone are shown, as are the working tools, the gavel, chisel, and twenty-four-inch gauge, as well as a square, level, and plumb rule, emblematic of morality, equality, and truth. The whole stands on a white and black checkered pavement, representing light and darkness, good and evil, joy and sorrow, fortune and misfortune, life and death.

 As mentioned earlier, the second degree deals with the passage through life, the aspirant increasing and developing intellectually and morally. After entering the lodge, the Apprentice passes five stages, named the senses, the arts, natural science, benefactors of humanity, and service:

1. The senses are touch, hearing, sight, taste, and smell.

2. The arts mentioned are architecture, sculpture, painting, music, and poetry.

3. The natural sciences are mathematics, geometry, philosophy, biology, and sociology.

4. Benefactors of humanity are sages, artists, scientists, inventors, and legislators.

5. Service. The aspirant is exhorted to adopt the maxim the highest ideal of life is to serve.

Three working tools are presented to the newly created Fellow Craftsman: the square, level, and plumb rule, emblems of morality, equality, and truth respectively. 

The Second Degree

  tracing board 2nd Degree
  Tracing Board for 2nd Degree.

The second degree tracing board directly reflects part of the Solomonic legend. It depicts the entrance to King Solomon’s Temple, flanked by two pillars, terrestrial and celestial. Within the Temple is a winding staircase comprising three, five, and seven or more steps: three denoting the Master of the Lodge and the two Wardens; five denoting the five senses and also the five noble orders of architecture, which are the Tuscan, Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, and Composite; and seven denoting the liberal arts and sciences, namely grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy.

This staircase leads, on the upper level, to the middle chamber of the Temple, where the Fellow Craftsmen went to receive their wages, and is allegorically the halfway point towards unity with the Divine. Indeed, above the open door of the Middle Chamber we can clearly see the Tetragrammaton, the biblical four-lettered name of God: yod, heh, waw, heh (יהוה).

The staircase turns through an angle of ninety degrees, which is important on two levels. Ninety degrees is of course a square angle, and the square is an ever-present symbol in Freemasonry. Moreoever, turning through ninety degrees as the Craftsman ascends allows him to view the surrounding objects from different angles, underscoring one principal aspect of Freemasonry: to decode the allegory of a given symbol, we need to regard that symbol from different angles, physically and figuratively.

The Third Degree

tracing board 3rd Degree  
Tracing Board for 3rd Degree. 

The third degree is often regarded as the true initiation. At its core, it deals with emergence from darkness to light, from life through death to rebirth, from ignorance to knowledge, from chaos to order, from despair to hope and joy. It also deals with strong bonds of true fraternity, interdependency, and love.

When the aspirant—now a Fellow Craft Freemason—is admitted to the third degree, all is in darkness. Unlike the first degree, where the aspirant was the only one in darkness due to his blindfold, here all the brethren are in darkness, except for a very faint light in the east at the Master’s pedestal. This is to emphasize that all the brethren need to take part in the ceremony to come; the Fellow Craftsman will need all the energy, all the support that he can get.

Under the care and protection of the Deacon, the Fellow Craft now perambulates the lodge in the same way as in the two preceding degrees. When that has been accomplished, he finds himself standing in the west, facing the glimmering light across the floor of the lodge. He needs to progress towards the light, literally as well as symbolically. But at his feet he may be able to see that he is standing on the brink of a grave. In order to approach light, therefore, he has to traverse the very negation of light and life, namely the ultimate symbol of death. Should he not succeed in negotiating this perilous path, the light will not be attainable. The grave over which he steps is not the grave destined to contain his own dead body, but rather the one where his own lower self now lies buried, and over which he has to walk before attaining the heights toward which he is now well advanced. Self-sacrifice and self-negation are essential before the candidate can be raised to a higher plane.

The Deacon instructs the candidate to step over the grave with three steps, from one side to the other and back again. After this, still under the guidance of the Deacon, he approaches the Master and the glimmering light; he kneels and swears a further vow, after which the Master creates, receives, and constitutes him a Master Mason. He then raises the candidate up to a standing position. Remember that all is still in nearly total darkness.

A little drama is then enacted, recounting the death of Hiram Abiff, in Masonic lore the principal architect of King Solomon’s Temple, in which three disenchanted craftsmen seek to obtain the secrets of the third degree from Hiram, threatening him with death if he refuses to communicate them. Hiram exhorts them to work hard at their task of building so that in time they may earn the right to those secrets, but it is to no avail, and Hiram is slain. The newly made Master Mason in this ceremony is made to play the part of Hiram, and when he “dies,” he is laid down onto the emblem of the grave which he earlier traversed on his journey towards light. A Masonic writer, Colin Dyer, once wrote:

As the Master was present in the lodge, his light remained, as the spiritual and moral teaching which he gave would still be with a Brother at the time of death, although those grand luminaries, the sun and moon, would no longer be of use to him. By the help of this teaching, he would triumph over death and succeed to life eternal, symbolised not only by the raising itself, but by the restoration of general light to the lodge.

Two attempts, summarizing the signs and words of the first two degrees, fail to raise Hiram from his death, but the Master of the Lodge tries a third way, which is successful. The Master now addresses the new Master Mason:

Let me now beg you to observe that the Light of a Master Mason is but darkness—visible; the darkness symbolises that mysterious veil which the eye of human reason cannot penetrate unless assisted by the Light which is from above.

These words, originally written during the Age of Enlightenment, are interesting in that, although human reason was regarded by the Enlightenment as practically sacrosanct, due observance is still paid to the power of the Divine in assisting us to penetrate the veil separating us from knowledge of our own true nature: as a divine spirit which happens to inhabit a human body.

The Master continues:

Guide your reflections to that most interesting of all human studies, the inner meaning of life, the knowledge of yourself . . . continue to listen to the voice of nature, which bears witness that even in this perishable frame resides a vital and immortal principle.

The culmination of the degree is the communication by the Master to the new Master Mason of the five points of fellowship: fraternity, support, keeping another’s wants in mind;, respecting confidences, and defending another’s character. These are accomplished by an intimate embrace.

It will be remembered that in the second degree the Fellow Craft passes into the middle chamber of King Solomon’s Temple to receive his wages. From there, having been raised to the degree of Master Mason, he proceeds to the Sanctum Sanctorum, where he symbolically stands face to face with God. Therefore in the third degree tracing board, we see the porch to the Sanctum Sanctorum, the dormer window which gives it light, and the checkered pavement of the first degree.

At the top of the board we see a sprig of acacia, which was said to mark the initial burial place of Hiram Abiff, the working tools of the third degree, which are the skirret, pencil, and compasses. We see skull and crossbones as emblems of mortality, and a plumb rule, a level, and a heavy maul, which are said to be the implements with which Hiram was slain.      

Whether by accident or design, the legend and symbolism of Freemasonry owes much to the ancient Mysteries, chief amongst them the Eleusinian and Mithraic. In the Eleusinian Mystery tradition, neophytes were initiated in stages, part of which consisted in wandering in the dark, confused and disoriented. Their subsequent purification parallels the removal of money and valuables from the Masonic aspirant before his initiation. Eleusinian initiates reported that the experience transformed them and removed the fear of death. The Eleusinian initiate was also promised benefits in the afterlife.

In the Mithraic tradition, the Mithraeum bears remarkable similarity to the Masonic Temple; both are earthly representations of the cosmos through which souls pass in their process of reincarnation or evolution. Both temples have vaulted ceilings lined with stars. The space is windowless, closed to the outside, or with strategic openings. The Mithraic temple, like the Masonic Temple, is a timeless place where mysteries are performed, members of the community are initiated, earthly matters are deliberated, and, ultimately, brotherhood among the brethren is forged. Both spaces are rectangular in form.

Mithraea often contained shallow depressions, where a coffin containing the body of the symbolically deceased brother was situated. Both Masonic and Mithraic initiations are preceded by the symbolic death of the aspirant, to be reborn leaving his profane life behind. In any case, to be initiated in either tradition, moral integrity is a must.

Another point in common between the two brotherhoods is the importance given to the gesture of shaking hands. An initiate into the mysteries of Mithras is known by the Greek term syndexios, meaning one who has exchanged the handshake. This gesture represents agreement and fraternity.

In Mithraism, the initiate undertakes not to communicate the mysteries that have been revealed during an initiation—it is Mithras himself who is the guarantor of the promises. The meaning of initiation, in both traditions, lies not in a set of actions, gestures and words, but in the experience itself, in the transformative effect of the ceremony on the aspirant.

Freemasonry remains to this day the greatest representative of a tradition, based on equality and fraternity, that binds its members together in a chain that stretches from the past and reaches into the future.

Julian Rees is a member of the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women, formerly known as Co-Masonry. He is the author of a number of works on Freemasonry, chief among them being More Light: Today’s Freemasonry for Men and Women and Tracing Boards of the Three Degrees in Craft Freemasonry Explained.


Freemasonry for Men and Women: Liberty, Equality, and the Restoration of Women to Ancient Masonry

Printed in the  Fall 2024  issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Chounramany, Noy, "Freemasonry for Men and Women: Liberty, Equality, and the Restoration of Women to Ancient Masonry"  Quest 112:4, pg 20-22

 By Noy Chounramany

If Masonry is really anything, it is a presentment by symbol and by legend of the great fundamental truths of human life and human evolution.

                                                                                                                                           —Annie Besant 33°

Noy ChounramanyAlthough the better-known traditions of Freemasonry prescribe that only men may become Freemasons, in reality women have been a part of Masonry and the ancient Mysteries since time immemorial and have an ancient and equitable right to become Freemasons. The involvement of women was vital to the success of the ncient Mysteries, to which Freemasonry has often been speculatively linked. Moreover, women were employed as operative stonemasons throughout history and were admitted as members of Masonic lodges before the establishment of the first Grand Lodges of Freemasonry.

Operative Stonemasons to Speculative Freemasons

Masonry teaches us to master ourselves. That is something we can do and must do to succeed. We are here to transform ourselves from rough into perfect ashlars.

                                                                                                                                —Louis Goaziou 33°

The traditions and documents of the medieval operative stonemasons serve as the direct foundation for speculative Freemasonry. To distinguish between the two, operative stonemasons work with stone and build physical structures, whereas speculative Freemasons figuratively build temples of their ideal selves by working to embody morals, ethics, and philosophical idioms that are illustrated by the imagery, symbols, and tools of operative stonemasonry.

      The Baals Bridge Square
  The Baal’s Bridge Square, dated 1507.

Through historical documents and relics, we know that medieval operative stonemasons upheld a culture of inner reflection and self-work. Lodge constitutions of operative stonemasons obliged their members to follow certain moral and ethical guidelines, and some even encouraged the pursuit of the seven classical liberal arts and sciences (grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy). The Baal’s Bridge Square (dated 1507) is a Masonic relic that was discovered beneath the foundation stones of Baal’s Bridge in Limerick, Ireland. This brass square was brought to light in 1830 during a reconstruction of the bridge and contains the following engraved inscription: “I Will Strive to Live with Love & Care, Upon the Level, by the Square.”

During the seventeenth century, stonemasons began to admit those who were not part of the craft into their lodges. John Boswell, third Laird of Auchinleck, is the first documented nonstonemason to have attended a meeting of stonemasons on June 8, 1600, at the Lodge of Edinburgh held at Holyrood Palace in Edinburgh, Scotland. The first known admission and initiation of nonstonemasons into a Masonic Lodge occurred on July 3, 1634: Lord William Alexander, Sir Anthony Alexander, and Sir Alexander Strachan of Thornton were admitted and initiated into the Lodge of Edinburgh (Mary’s Chapel) No. 1, located in Edinburgh, Scotland.

As these and other such members were not operative stonemasons, they came to be known as Accepted Masons, who speculate upon the symbols and teachings of ancient Masonry.

Experts are split on the precise origin and meaning of the Masonic usage of the word free of the compound word “Freemason.” Some say that it is derived from the idea that stonemasons were free citizens, not being enslaved or in servitude, while others opine that it stems from the social norm that allowed stonemasons to freely travel from town to town and country to country in the pursuit and practice of their trade. There are others who propose that free is a reference to the technique of stonemasons building with free-standing stones. It has also been proposed that Freemason etymologically originates from the French frère (brother): hence frèremaçon (brother mason). As each symbol of Freemasonry may hold many meanings and interpretations, perhaps the free in Freemason refers to all of these points and more.

Women Builders

The skilled crafts and trades of history did not prohibit women from training or employment. Dr. Zahi Hawass, world-renowned Egyptologist and former minister of antiquities in Egypt, has been quoted as saying, “We now know with certainty that the pyramids were built by Egyptian men and women.”

Women also worked in the crafts and trades throughout medieval Europe. There are many historical examples of women being commissioned as painters, sculptors, glass makers, cartwrights, and shipwrights. In addition, women were trained and employed in textiles, carpentry, and stonemasonry. For example, a woman from Norwich, England, known as Gunnilda the Mason is mentioned in the 1256 Calendar for Close Rolls of the reign of Henry III. Operative stonemasonry honored women with the title of “Dame” and were authorized to oversee construction work and supervise craftsmen, as is documented in the records of the Corpus Christi Guild at York and in the Lodge Minutes of Mary’s Chapel in Edinburgh.

Women in the Masonic Old Charges

The medieval documents of operative stonemasons are collectively known as the Masonic Old Charges. These Old Charges have been cited to form the “landmarks,” guidelines, and traditions establishing the constitutions, bylaws, and regularity of speculative Freemasonry. Significantly, several of the Masonic Old Charges mention the inclusion of women.

The Regius Poem, also known as the Halliwell Manuscript, is the oldest extant Masonic Old Charge. It is dated to approximately 1390‒1450 and makes several references to women: 

In that honest craft to be perfect,
And so each one shall teach the other,
And love together as sister and brother.
The tenth article is for to know,
Among the craft, to high and low,
There shall no master supplant another,
But be together as sister and brother.
That no craving be made to thee,
Nor to thy fellows in no degree,
To man or to woman, whoever he be,
Pay them well and truly, for that will we.

Both the Harleian Manuscript No. 1942 (dated 1660‒70) and the Lodge of Hope Manuscript (dated 1680) obligate and charge apprentices to respect, obey, and serve Dames. The controversial York Manuscript No. 4 (dated 1693) specifically mentions the Masonic obligation of women: “The one of the elders takeing the Booke and that hee or shee that is to bee made mason shall lay their hands thereon and the charge shall bee given.”

Although some allege that this excerpt is  no more than a scribal error, York No. 4 certainly exhibits a consistency with the many Masonic Old Charges that mention the inclusion of women.

Perhaps the most incontrovertible fact confirming the originally accepted inclusion of women in Masonry is in the case of Mary Bannister of Barking, England. The 1713 member rolls of the London Company of Masons document Bannister as paying dues and being admitted for a seven-year apprenticeship.

The mounting evidence is clear: Masonry was gender-inclusive before it became a gender-exclusive institution; the exclusion of women from Freemasonry was an innovation to the established traditions of ancient Masonry. In the nineteenth century, Albert Mackey 33° (secretary general of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States) stated in his famous Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: “The law which excludes women from initiation into Freemasonry is not contained in the precise words in any of the Old Constitutions . . . But in the Charges compiled by Anderson and Desaguliers, and published in 1723, the word woman is for the first time introduced and the law is made explicit.”

Women and the Ancient Mysteries

The Co-Masonic Order is distinguished from the rest of the Masonic world by the admission of women on equal terms with men. In this, it is introducing no innovation into the body of Masonry, but rather restoring one of the ancient landmarks which was forgotten during the confusion of the Mysteries with the operative Masonry of the Middle Ages. In both Egypt and Greece, as we have seen, women were admitted to the Mysteries and were able to penetrate into the inmost sanctuaries as well as men.

                                                                                                                                        —C.W. Leadbeater 33°

Within lore and mythos, Freemasonry has been described as both a safekeeper of ancient wisdom and a lineage bearer of the ancient Mysteries. When we look to the past, we discover many parallels and similarities between the rituals, symbols, and secrets of Freemasonry with those of indigenous systems all over the world. For example, some of the traditional postures and gestures associated with Freemasonry are mirrored in artistic portrayals of ancient deities, kings, queens, priests, and priestesses. The square, compasses, and skirret (measure) are prominent symbols of Freemasonry which are also associated with the ancient Chinese primordial consort deities Fuxi and Nuwa, who are credited with the creation of humans and imparting various arts and sciences to humanity. As with the various pillars of Freemasonry, ancient Egyptian columns often held intrinsic meanings and were often presented as symbolical expressions, for example: obelisks alluding to the deities Ra or Aten and the djed pillar referring to the Osirian myth. Humanity’s oldest known megaliths have been unearthed at the Anatolian Neolithic site of Göbekli Tepe and feature round ceremonial and ritual structures incorporating megalithic T-shaped pillars decoratively carved with symbolical images: prominent twin pillars positioned at the center of each temple-like structure, being then enclosed by circular walls built around evenly spaced outer pillars.

Women often held prominent positions in many of the ancient Mystery traditions and religious cults. Ancient Mesopotamia had institutionalized priestesses of varying authority, with some holding great wealth and ownership of land. Ancient Egyptian cults had high temple priestesses and female servants of the gods. The Greco-Roman Mysteries had women initiates and priestesses and were open to participants of all social classes and genders. Furthermore, the famed Oracle of Delphi and the Phrygian Sibyl were esteemed positions held exclusively by women.

Co-Freemasonry: Freemasonry for Men and Women

Mixed gender Freemasonry is not a new cult, but a humanist philosophy that hopes to introduce its values in society. Human rights, peace between all the nations on earth, freedom, equality, fraternity: these are the precepts of mixed gender Freemasonry with which we hope to brighten justice, tolerance, and solidarity.

                                                                                                                           —Georges Martin 33°

 During the nineteenth century, several Freemasons began lobbying the established Masonic Grand Lodges for the restoration of women to ancient Masonry. Leading this charge was the accomplished French politician and Freemason Dr. Georges Martin (1844–1916). Before serving as senator of Seine, France, in 1885–91, he was known as “Doctor of the Poor” for his inclination to waive the bills of his financially burdened patients. In French politics, Martin invested himself into causes such as creating the Paris department of health, reopening various charity offices, and supporting the equality, rights, and suffrage of women. His Masonic journey began as he was initiated into Freemasonry on March 21, 1879, by the Lodge “Union and Beneficence” (Union et Bienfaisance) under the jurisdiction of the Central Grand Lodge (restructured as the Grande Loge de France, 1894). Martin then advanced to the thirty-third degree of the Scottish Rite as a member of Lodge “Scottish Jerusalem” (La Jerusalem Écossaise) under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Council of France. In 1880, twelve lodges of the Supreme Council of France declared independence and restructured themselves as the Grande Loge Symbolique Écossaise (“Symbolic Scottish [Rite] Grand Lodge”), counting Georges Martin as a prominent cofounder.

Through the efforts of several members of the Grande Loge Symbolique Écossaise—Martin most significantly—the Lodge “Free Thinkers” (Les Libres Penseurs) amended their rules and bylaws to allow the prerogative to initiate women. Author, playwright, and women’s rights activist Marie Adélaïde Deraismes (1828– 94) was considered, proposed, and approved to be admitted as a new member of the Lodge. Deraismes and fourteen other women were then regularly initiated into Freemasonry on January 14, 1882. On this occasion, Deraismes was quoted as saying: “If the feeble support that I may be able to render you cannot be effective, that fact in itself is small and of little import, but it well has another importance. The door that you have opened to me will not be closed upon me and all the legion that follows me.”

Unfortunately, the initiation of these women caused a great uproar across the Masonic landscape, leading to the revocation of all allowances to admit women into Freemasonry and the temporary closure of the French lodge. As a consequence, Deraismes instantly became a Freemason without a Masonic community or lodge.

Despite the hurdles, Martin continued to lobby the Masonic world for the equal inclusion of women. Stonewalled for over ten years, he eventually collaborated with Marie Deraismes and others to form La Respectable Loge Le Droit Humain (“The Respectable Lodge, the Human Right”), becoming the world’s first mixed-gender Freemasonic Lodge on March 14, 1893. With growing membership and momentum, on April 4, 1893, the Grande Loge Symbolique Écossaise Mixte de France Le Droit Humain (“Symbolic Scottish [Rite] Mixed Grand Lodge of France, the Human Right”) was founded as the world’s first mixed-gender Freemasonic Grand Lodge, affirming the equality of men and women and the absolute freedom of conscience (French laïcité). Now known as the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain, the Order is nondogmatic and gender-inclusive, and works seamlessly from the first to the thirty-third degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.

Mixed-gender Freemasonry arrived in the U.S. on October 18, 1903, with the Masonic initiation of French emigrant Louis Goaziou into the Mixed Order of Le Droit Humain. The following days mark the first organized U.S. initiations of women into Freemasonry and the founding of the country’s first mixed-gender Freemasonic Lodge: Alpha Lodge No. 301 (established October 25, 1903 in Charleroi, Pennsylvania). Installed as the first presiding Master of Alpha Lodge, Goaziou (1864–1937) was a Pennsylvanian coal miner turned social reformer and worker’s rights activist. He established a printshop and worked as the chief editor of several social, political, and labor newspapers and pamphlets promoting the freedom, equality, and general welfare of all members of society. Through his selfless work and efforts to grow mixed-gender Freemasonry in the U.S., in 1908 Goaziou was elected as the first president of the American Federation of the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain (formerly known as the American Federation of Human Rights, Le Droit Humain).

Theosophy and Co-Freemasonry

For more than a century, the intersection of esoteric, humanistic, and altruistic work of individual Theosophists and Le Droit Humain Freemasons has resulted in a shared history of human solidarity and universal brotherhood. There is perhaps no greater example than that of Annie Besant (1847–1933). In addition to her tremendous social, political, and Theosophical work, Besant is also remembered as one of the greatest historic champions of Le Droit Humain. Travelling to the headquarters of Le Droit Humain in Paris, Annie Besant was initiated into Freemasonry on July 27, 1902. Returning to Great Britain, she labored to form the first mixed-gender Freemasonic Lodge in London: Lodge Human Duty No. 6 (established September 26, 1902). Besant then worked to cofound the British Federation of Le Droit Humain and served as its first Grand Commander. She further helped to establish and grow lodges of Le Droit Humain not only in Great Britain, but also in Ireland, India, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Burma (today’s Myanmar), Ceylon (today’s Sri Lanka), Indonesia, and Malaysia.

Several of the historically preeminent buildings of the Theosophical Society were dedicated by the ceremonies of ancient Masonry. Annie Besant ceremoniously laid the cornerstones of the Adyar Rising Sun of India Co-Masonic Temple in 1909 and the administrative building of the Theosophical Society, Adyar, in Madras (Chennai), India on July 27, 1913. With news media present, Besant also presided over the August 29, 1926 cornerstone laying ceremony of the headquarters of the Theosophical Society in America, being assisted by an entire Masonic assembly, including Le Droit Humain American federation president Edith Armour; TSA president L.W. Rogers; former TSA president A.P. Warrington; Theosophist and Liberal Catholic Church bishop Irving S. Cooper; and Marie Poutz, resident head of the Krotona Institute of Theosophy and American Esoteric School from 1939 to 1951. The entrance archway of the Theosophical Society in America on North Main Street was also dedicated with a Masonic ceremony, conducted by L.W. Rogers in 1940.

Prominent Theosophists who were also members of the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain include C.W. Leadbeater, James I. Wedgwood, Geoffrey Hodson, and Francesca Arundale. Past international presidents of the Theosophical Society who were members of Le Droit Humain include Besant, George S. Arundale, C. Jinarajadasa, N. Sri Ram, John B.S. Coats, and Radha Burnier. Presidents of the Theosophical Society in America such as A.P. Warrington, L.W. Rogers, Joy Mills, John Algeo, and Betty Bland can also be found within the membership rolls of Le Droit Humain.

Freemasonry for Men and Women Today

As Marie Deraismes prophetically remarked upon her initiation, the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain, now existing for 131 years, has gender-inclusive lodges, jurisdictions, and federations in over sixty countries with global membership composed of men and women Freemasons fraternally united and working to concretize the principles of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity for all people.

Sources

Algeo, John. “Blavatsky, Freemasonry, and the Western Mystery Tradition.” Blavatsky Lecture, delivered at the Summer School of the Theosophical Society in England, July 28, 1996.

Chassagnard, Guy. The Old Charges of the Craft: From the Stone Mason to the Free Mason. Figeac, France: Segnat, 2016.

Gordon, John S. Esoteric Egypt. Rochester, Vt.: Bear & Co., 2015.

Historical Committee, Supreme Council of the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain. An Outline on the Origins and Development of the Order of International Co-Freemasonry Le Droit Humain. Sart-Bernard, Belgium: Mukanda Press, 1993.

Kidd, Karen. Haunted Chambers: The Lives of Early Women Freemasons. New Orleans: Cornerstone, 2009.

Leadbeater, C.W. Glimpses of Masonic History. Adyar, India: Theosophical Publishing House, 1926.

Lorente-Bull, Darren. The Other Brotherhood: When Freemasonry Crossed the English Channel. London: Falcon, 2018.

Rees, Julian, and Lorente-Bull, Darren. More Light: Today’s Freemasonry for Men and Women. Purley, England: Hexalpha, 2017.

Tillett, Gregory. “The Esoteric within the Exoteric: Esoteric Schools Within the Theosophical Movement.” Paper presented to the Theosophical History Conference, San Diego, June 1992.

Weisse, John A. The Obelisk and Freemasonry. Whitefish, Mont.: Kessinger, 1993.

The website of the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain American Federation is www.freemasonryformenandwomen.org.

Noy Chounramany, Theosophist and Freemason, writes and speaks on topics such as comparative religion, spirituality, and esotericism. He is currently serving the Theosophical Society in America as a national speaker, central district director, and general secretary of the Canton Study Center. He served as the American Federation president of the International Order of Freemasonry for Men and Women Le Droit Humain from 2021 to 2022 and is currently serving as the local president of the Hopewell Masonic Group of Canton, Ohio.


A Secular Sangha

Printed in the  Fall 2024  issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Trull, David, "A Secular Sangha"  Quest 112:4, pg 17-19

By David Trull

David TrullEvery Sunday growing up, I walked to Catholic church with my family. On the way, we passed a Masonic temple. It was made of glittering white stone, and over the entrance hung a strange symbol that often caught my eye: a compass with what looked like a face in the middle. When I asked my parents what went on there, they shrugged. When I pressed further, my Dad said, “Some people say mysterious rituals, but I think it’s mostly just spaghetti dinners and canned-goods drives.”

At the start of summer, our church hosted a carnival, kicked off by a raucous parade. As a little kid, I would join my siblings, who would rush out in bare feet and watch as the cars full of marching bands and pickup trucks decked in streamers blared past.

Our favorite part was the fleet of minicars, piloted by old guys in Vietnam vet or Navy baseball caps. They would zip between the floats and toss out Tootsie Rolls. When I asked who the heck those guys were, my mom told me they were Shriners and were part of the Masonic temple. I wasn’t sure how to reconcile the silly cars and Tootsie Rolls with that imposing edifice.

I later learned that Freemasonry grew out of the crafts guilds formed in the 1500s. While initially intended to facilitate and regulate the practice of stonemasonry, over time it transcended its initial function and became a fraternal order dedicated to service and self-improvement. Members advance through three degrees, which mirror the ranks of a craftsman: Apprentice, Fellowcraft, and Master Mason.

Freemasons keep their rituals and teachings secret, but their public face is one of community service. They often fund and run children’s hospitals and burn units. Although I came across plenty of online chatter about bizarre rituals and schemes for world domination, it seems much of this talk stems from works of fantasy like Dan Brown’s novel The Lost Symbol. There is nothing people love more than a secret society to blame for all the world’s problems, I suppose.

The Masons and their communal self-improvement efforts came to mind when I read the book Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, by Robert Putnam, while living in a Tibetan Buddhist community. Bowling Alone, published in 2000, traces the decline of American social capital since the 1950s (an era of robust civic and social participation). The book describes how Americans once filled their free time with bowling leagues, public clubs like Elks Lodges and the Freemasons, church and charity organizations, and informal gatherings like Sunday dinners or poker nights. It asserts that this civic and neighborhood participation cements social ties, fosters a safe and trusting society, and facilitates generational transfer. To the cosmopolitan eye, church bake sales and Elks Club suppers might appear painfully provincial, but they are the brick and mortar of society, Putnam insists.

I couldn’t help but feel that Putnam had a point. My formative years unfolded over a strange period in history: born early enough to experience the last gasp of the postwar American high, ripe with community and togetherness, and late enough to watch that wave recede from shore. When I was small, our neighborhood was vibrant and active, we knew many of our neighbors, and there was a palpable sense of local pride. By the time I left for college, however, the local church had closed, the parades were no more, the Shriners and their wacky cars had vanished, and people were becoming enamored with novel online communities like Facebook and MySpace. The whole nation felt sadder and more pointless, just a collection of houses, their windows flickering with TV light.

At the time I was reflecting on this, I was introduced to the concepts of Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha. Buddha is the teacher, Dharma the teachings, and Sangha the community of Buddhist practitioners. The rinpoche (meaning precious one, an honorific name for a lama) under whom I studied placed special emphasis on Sangha. Even within a tradition as focused on the individual mind as Buddhism, he said, participation in a community oriented toward enlightenment was critical.

This came as a bit of shock, as I had sought out Buddhism during a somewhat misanthropic stage of my life. I had become fed up with the rat race and had grown pessimistic about the possibilities of friendship and relationships, which seemed to lead only to trouble and disappointment. When I told Rinpoche that I felt I needed less community, not more, he told me that Sangha is the antidote for individualism. Too much focus on the self, even when well-intentioned, engenders suffering. More pain awaited me, he warned, if I sought to make myself an island.

Long story short: I ultimately learned the lesson Rinpoche meant to teach, first through a Buddhist Sangha and then through a circle of new friends. The experience humbled me and showed me the inestimable value of simple togetherness. I could not spend my life alone in meditation or esoteric ritual and expect to find happiness. That was part of it, but I needed others to serve and be served by.

Though they are not Buddhist, I realized that organizations like the Freemasons offer a form of secular Sangha. One of the Mason mottos is, “Making good men better,” as succinct a summary of Sangha as you are likely to find. It leaves room for individual effort (it implies one must be a “good man” to begin with: it does not promise to build one from scratch) yet acknowledges that personal and spiritual growth requires mutual support and a community in which to serve.

While most of the social clubs and community organizations described in Bowling Alone have withered and died, the Masons have demonstrated a particular resilience (they currently have six million members worldwide) that makes me think they will survive (and perhaps thrive) in the years ahead. One reason, I think, is that they incorporate a greater spiritual depth than organizations like the Elks Lodge, but another reason is that they carefully thread the needle between modern and premodern wisdom in two ways.

First, belief in a higher power is a precondition for membership. The applicant does not have to believe in a specific manifestation of God (Jesus or Allah), but the door is closed to atheists. While Freemasonry is modern (or even postmodern) in its flexibility as to the particular form of the higher power, it harks back to an earlier age in insisting that there is something beyond us and the harsh gaze of scientific reductionism. The toughest stretch of my spiritual path came when I realized that I could not live without God. Sure, I could do without the angry, shaming patriarch of my traditional Catholic upbringing and the vanilla prosperity gospel God of the megachurches, but I required something beyond myself, a force driving evolution that offers me a role in its unfolding. The Masons understand that we cannot just “move on” from God.

Second: male-only membership. It feels almost dirty, in these postmodern times, to mention a rule like this. Everything ought to be open to all genders, we profess. While I would almost always agree with this, I think it is wise to recognize the value of single-sex spaces. After all, we observe the polarity of masculine and feminine at work in the unfolding of the universe: how can we deny these forces exist? And if these are polarized powers, perhaps they need space to grow and replenish away from the pressure of their opposite. It is a heartbreaking phenomenon of our time that even a hint of male-oriented spirituality is considered inherently toxic and cancerous, something to snuff out.

While the limitations of the old paradigm are clear, I think we, in our haste, stand to lose much of what was good in the traditional paradigm. The Masons are not afraid to incorporate aspects of the traditional worldview into their modern pursuits while refusing to engage in the destructive “us versus them” arguments so common in the past, and I think this is a sterling example that other spiritual communities should follow. Freemasonry is about becoming better humans, not about feeling better by shoving others out of the circle.

This capacity for integration makes me wonder if the Freemasons, although they have ancient roots, might serve as a model for the type of Sangha we ought to form in this “time between worlds,” as educational theorist Zak Stein calls it. We are bidding farewell to a universe governed by traditional religion and hierarchy and stepping into an uncertain spiritual future. The journey will be painful and the end result unclear. To ease the agony of transition, one of our most urgent tasks is to construct communities of practice in which we can collectively level up.

To be alive now is oftentimes to be lonely. We are either competing against others for scarce resources or fighting for dominance in the space of ideas, struggling for the right to dictate the new paradigm. Much public rhetoric now revolves around crushing the “enemy,” whoever that might be. Self-development often appeals to selfishness (“make tons of money and leave the losers in the dust”) and nets handsome profits for those who peddle it. There is little sense that we are in this thing together, or that we need each other, and the glaring absence of community only exacerbates this feeling. It is unclear where we are meant to go, and whom we should go there with. We need sangha now more than ever.

The Freemason motto is “Ordo ab chao,” Latin for “Order from chaos.” In the beginning, this applied to stonemasons as they laid a foundation and transformed a pile of bricks into a home or a church; now it applies to society. How to bring order from chaos? Service, commitment to self-improvement, and community. While spiritual quests and lofty philosophy hold wild appeal (and the Masons have that too), I’ve come to realize that without Sangha, they are insufficient. To build something that will last, something that will stand, we need the esoteric things, of course, but beforehand, the foundation must be laid, sometimes with things as simple as spaghetti dinners and canned-goods drives.

David Trull has worked as a fireworks salesman, forensic tax researcher, railroad logistician, teacher, songwriter, and musician. He studied philosophy through a Great Books immersion program at Thomas Aquinas College in Ojai, California. A lifelong autodidact, he has advanced his explorations through a self-designed curriculum focused on the intersection of philosophy and theology. Raised in St. Louis, Trull now orbits between Santa Barbara, California, and the San Francisco Bay Area.


Subcategories