What Time Is It Really?

Printed in the  Spring 2024 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Keene Douglas "What Time Is It Really?" Quest 112:2, pg 2

By Douglas Keene
National President

Douglas_KeeneWe use time and space to locate ourselves in the physical universe, and yet they present great mysteries. These two define the four dimensions which we use to orient ourselves, determine our relationship to objects on our planet, and even locate it within the greater vastness.

I recall when I was a teenager first coming to the realization of the infinity of time and space. I was perplexed by this paradox: logic would seem to dictate that each of these entities simultaneously could not be infinite and yet could not be less than infinite. No matter how they were defined, there would always have to be something before and beyond.

While this mental conundrum could be frightening to some (including my mother), I found it fascinating that these measures, which seemed so familiar, could be so indecipherable. To me it implied something mysterious and wonderful, something greater than ourselves.

The American novelist William Faulkner famously wrote, “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.” Apparently he was suggesting that we carry our past with us, as it is an integral part of ourselves. He may have been more correct than he suspected in that when time is suspended, past, present, and future merge into the ever present now.

Albert Einstein once quipped, “The only reason for time is so that everything doesn’t happen at once.” More seriously, he wrote in a letter to the grieving family of a dying friend: “People like us who believe in physics know the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” He recognized that in physics, time depends on motion and gravitation, shown in his Special Theory of Relativity. The rate at which time passes changes depending on your frame of reference.

From the Theosophical perspective, H.P. Blavatsky wrote: “Time is only an illusion produced by the succession of our states of consciousness as we travel through eternal duration, and it does not exist where no consciousness exists in which the illusion can be produced” (Secret Doctrine, 1:37).

Both Einstein and Blavatsky refer to the passage of time as an illusion. Merriam-Webster defines illusion as “a misleading image presented to the vision” or “perception of something objectively existing in such a way as to cause misinterpretation of its actual nature.” This differs from a delusion, where “a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary.” HPB’s reference to illusion suggests we are perceiving time incorrectly, although the basis of this misperception nevertheless exists.

Sloka 1 in The Secret Doctrine reads: “The Eternal Parent (Space), wrapped in her ever-invisible robes, had slumbered once again for seven eternities.”

This introduces the concept of eternity. Here we have not one eternity, but seven. Eternity is not merely an enormous period of time, but understood as infinite time by some (if the concept of time can be applied at all). The passage appears to be metaphorical, but what is its inner meaning?

Sloka 2 goes on to say: “Time was not, for it lay asleep in the infinite bosom of duration.”

Here time is not infinite, but absent. Could this be the same thing? This strains the rational mind, and even the imagination. How can entities and events occur in the absence of time?

The early Theosophist Gottfried de Purucker wrote:

Time exists most emphatically, it is an illusion, a maya, which merely means we find it very difficult to understand it and do not understand it exactly as it should be understood; but that is not time’s fault, that is our fault. Our understanding is too weak to grasp it as it is, as it exists. Therefore, we call it a maya to us. In English we say an illusion. Yes, but illusion does not mean something that does not exist. If it did not exist, obviously it would not be an illusion. It means something which deludes our understanding, an illusion or a delusion to us.

We now have the concepts of time, eternity, and duration. How do these three relate to each other, and more importantly, what was meant by these terms in our foundational literature, particularly The Secret Doctrine?

HPB did not see eternity as endless or infinite. It was merely a long passage of time, as we see in the following passage from the Collected Writings: “We Westerns are foolish enough to speculate about that which has neither beginning nor end, and we imagine that the ancients must have done the same. They did not, however: no philosopher in days of old ever took ‘Eternity’ to mean beginningless and endless duration.” She used the term duration to indicate timelessness, with the absence of past, present, and future. When questioned about this difference between time and duration, she offered the following response:

Q. What is the difference between Time and Duration?
A. Duration is; it has neither beginning nor end. How can you call that which has neither beginning nor end, Time? Duration is beginningless and endless; Time is finite.
Q. Is, then, Duration the infinite, and Time the finite conception?
A. Time can be divided; Duration—in our philosophy, at least—cannot. Time is divisible in Duration—or, as you put it, the one is something within Time and Space, whereas the other is outside of both. (Blavatsky, Collected Writings, 10:308, 310)

We may get a small taste of this distinction in dreams. Although we often dream in sequences, time is fluid. We may feel an urgency to find someone or something, but then we find ourselves in another place, which is not clearly before or after. Scientists tell us that in the time it takes to roll out of bed until we hit the floor, we may experience a dream, seemingly lasting for hours, before we awaken.

We must ask ourselves, “How can this knowledge help?” As we struggle in our often fragile lives and in an uncertain world, how are we to understand timelessness?

Part of the answer is to be aware that timelessness can and does exist, however foreign it might be to us in our day-to-day (lower) mind. As we stretch ourselves in seeking the higher mind and beyond, to the buddhic consciousness, we also reach beyond the constraints of time, including mortality. The cycle of birth and death can only exist within time, and someday we will be able to step outside the prison of our own perspective, which constrains us to maya (illusion). There is a comfort in knowing that timelessness exists, where there is no need to race the clock.

There is a divine presence which can hold us and protect us. We can find it, for it is hidden deep within ourselves, containing our own truest Self, in the higher reaches of our being. In that space we can find the radiant light that holds the secrets there for us.  As Annie Besant has written: “There is a peace that passeth understanding; it abides in the hearts of those who live in the eternal; there is a power that maketh all things new; it lives and moves in those who know the self as one.”

Let us seek it together.

 


Rising Up into the Divine: World Mystics on the Ascent of Your Soul

Rising Up into the Divine: World Mystics on the Ascent of Your Soul

by Lucia Lena Hodges
Winchester, Ore.: Inner Sound Press, 2023; 420 pp. paper, $19.99.

H.P. Blavatsky declared that her work was a synthesis of philosophy, science, and religion. The same might be said for Lucia Lena Hodges’ newly self-published book, Rising Up into the Divine: World Mystics and the Ascent of Your Soul. Like HPB’s work, Hodges traces the various paths laid down by earlier mystics and spiritual teachers and how they influenced the teachings of subsequent followers.

Hodges, who describes herself as a “spiritual seeker” and “independent scholar,” presents us with a well-researched book that is a journey through many spiritual traditions and beliefs, philosophical systems, and science, from ancient Eastern and Middle Eastern understanding to modern quantum physics.

Hodges begins with her own experience at age twelve, when she felt the need to look up and had the realization that many of the adults in her life had “forgotten about the most important Person in the world.” When she looked a bit higher, she “realized in awe that some part of me actually was God.” In her exploration through libraries, Hodges encountered far more than her Catholic upbringing taught her, and she began to question.

Over the course of four years—much of it during the isolation of the pandemic—Hodges researched how each of these great teachers and traditions “reflected a bit of the beautiful light of the One in their own particular shade of vibrancy.” She came to “realize that ultimate Truth is not relative but rather a Divine constant, analogous to the speed of light which shines true in all frames of reference.” She intuitively weaves the threads of many of the worlds’ mystics, philosophers, and scientists from ancient to modern times to reveal the inner path.

Quoting extensively from the best-known writings and spiritual teachers, Hodges shows the similarity of their revelations through the ages as their traditions evolved, each building on themes that came before: heaven and the idea of ascent; the “universal framework” of the Trinity, including a personal Trinity; levitation and miracles; inner light and sound; spirit and soul; and many others. The word “up” especially seems to fascinate Hodges as she explores the etymology of that word in relation to God (One chapter is entitled “So Why Is God Up?”).

In the section titled “Steps into the Science of Spirituality,” Hodges begins with the eighteenth-century Swedish visionary Emanuel Swedenborg, a true Renaissance man who not only mastered many of the arts and sciences of his time but became aware of both the inner and outer worlds as a mystic. Many spiritually guided people who came after Swedenborg were greatly influenced by his writings, including Emerson, whose essay on Swedenborg paid homage to his greatness.

Hodges covers Theosophy extensively throughout the book (one chapter is “Why Should We Believe Theosophists?”). HPB’s writings, including The Secret Doctrine and The Voice of the Silence, play a large role in Hodges’ book. Hodges also refers to the ideas of Annie Besant and C.W. Leadbeater in their book Occult Chemistry and in Leadbeater’s books The Monad, The Inner Side of Things, and The Inner Life, as well as others. On the topic of levitation and whether it is possible, Hodges quotes Leadbeater’s book The Astral Plane: “Occult science is acquainted with a means of neutralizing or even entirely reversing the attraction of gravity, and it is obvious that by the judicious use of this power all the phenomena of levitation may be easily produced.”

She includes several twentieth-century influencers of the modern spiritual path, including Mark and Elizabeth Clare Prophet of the Summit Lighthouse, under whom Hodges studied for many years, and Ernest Holmes, founder of the Science of Mind (aka Religious Science), and she traces the history of the New Thought tradition. Many of these groups were clearly affected by the Theosophical Society and adopted ascended Masters as part of their teachings, as Hodges notes.

Hodges includes quantum physicists in her collection of those contributing to the spiritual path. For example, John Hagelin, a Harvard particle physicist who is the leader of the Transcendental Meditation movement in the United States, “proposed that consciousness is the ultimate unified field theory.”

Theosophists will find Hodges’ book an interesting journey, filled along the way with familiar names and teachings. Like HPB in her day, she astutely connects the dots, offering a comprehensive view of the three prongs of science, philosophy, and religion. Her hope for this book is that it will help the reader “ascend into your own higher consciousness, should you choose this challenging but exciting adventure.”

Clare Goldsberry

Clare Goldsberry’s latest book, The Illusion of Life and Death, was reviewed in Quest, spring 2022.

                                                           


The Metaphysics of Cocreation

Printed in the  Spring 2024 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Nesky, Andrew "The Metaphysics of Cocreation" Quest 112:2, pg 2

By Andrew Nesky

Andrew NeskyWestern consciousness has lived in generally prosperous circumstances for a very long time. In circumstances of general peace and plenty, greed and egoism have few barriers to their growth and ascension to authority. Saying no to egoism and pleasure-seeking is difficult under the direst circumstances but is much more difficult when times are good.

Egoism relies on the relative stability of the unearned resources it steals. Even though it can’t make more of the resource it plunders, it has no hesitancy about taking the last of it. When ego is in control of such resources, it isn’t long before they are undermined. We are in a time when personal, social, and even physical resources are in dire jeopardy of being pulled out from under our feet.

No one can embrace a paradigm that leads to personal and social destruction without being dangerously lost in an egotistic worldview—and yet, in our age, many would destroy what they cannot replace. This path requires ignorance of the deadly cost of the ego’s success.

In earlier ages, it was difficult for ego to gain the level of undue advantage it has now. Corrupt styles of egoism were not empowered and usually died on the vine. It was more challenging to harness the immediate, rapt attention of the masses and feed the throng ego-fortifying candy.

Never has there been a time when so many ego addicts can be cultivated. Unfortunately, our modern era has created a paradigm where we can instantly communicate with billions. We can cater to the most extreme and flawed perspectives by connecting and validating the minority that espouses them. At this moment, our collective disdain for egoism must be cultivated and advertised, or it will inevitably bring our destruction.

The ongoing work of adult consciousness is simple: it is ordained by the universe itself. It is the work that began at the creation of modern human consciousness as it was described in Genesis and must be continued for humanity to prosper.

The secret is that the universe runs not on simple creation, but on cocreation, a process by which the creation beyond our comprehension joins with our ability to create meaning in every moment. Rather than explain this mystery in technical concepts, it is better to express it allegorically.

 

The Cocreation

The Adena people, a native Indian tribe, were common to [the panhandle] of West Virginia . . . during the Woodland Period, an era lasting from about 1000 BC to 700 AD . . . A hunter-gatherer society, [the Adena] were referred to as the “mound builders.”

Stephen and Stacy Soltis, West Virginia, Off the Beaten Path: A Guide to Unique Places

                                                                       

Long ago, in the unspoiled wilderness of North America, humans and God lived together. In this time, there were many quiet places where they talked to each other; God gave direction, and his children listened and performed his tasks. As they progressed in their understanding, their Father gave them more important work, until finally they grew beyond childhood. Shedding the cloak of their childish identity, they found they had new ears for new sounds. For the first time, they heard the voice their Father used to describe the most crucial labor: the creation of the universe.

In the time before the world, God began the divine project. His children were seeds sown in his last solitary act. Having planted creation, the Creator retired, for to impress form any further would yield only soulless statuary. It was now time to wait, watch, and tend the Garden—for growth must originate from within.

Born from the flesh of Mother Earth and given life from the heart of their Father, the children grew. It was his wish that they grow straight and tall, and that one day they would bear the good fruit of the Garden’s renewal.

Now in its time, as the seeds of wisdom began to develop inside the people, they saw they were created by their Father’s will and that their hearts beat from his own. They learned that all they needed could be found in the song sung from their Father’s heart and that by following the music, they would find themselves in the places that were made for them before time began. The children learned beyond all doubt that their only duty was to continue their Father’s Way.

With the barest of tools, Native American villagers quarried bushel after bushel of earth from the body of the Great Mother, as their Father had done when he first made the Garden. Entire tribes moved like unending lines of ants, carrying their sacred treasure to the place God provided for his purpose. As each new generation consecrated their season by bringing their offerings to the sacred project, earth was piled upon generations of earth until mounds as high as seven men and so vast that an entire village could fit onto their hilltops grew to meet new horizons.

On the evening of the day the last earth was carried to the mound, the workers mounted the new land and began to consecrate their universe to their Father. The tribe sang, danced, and prayed throughout the time of darkness until it was time for the darkness to pass.

Hearing the footsteps of Light’s messenger at the eastern edge of the universe, the villagers turned toward the sound and began to make day. As the footsteps grew closer, the tribe sang praises to Sun, the great messenger of Light. With great zeal, they called out, promising their help with his journey. When at last the edges of Sun’s cargo painted the new world’s first misty horizon, the people of God took Sun’s hand. While their Father pushed, they pulled: from their lips came words of encouragement and welcome. As their Father lifted Sun from beneath the world, dedicated human minds, hearts, and bodies encouraged and steadied Sun’s journey through time to the place at the top of the sky.

By lending their hand to the labor of nature, the people’s added strength and attention caused pale existence to flush with the hearty, rosy-cheeked glow of renewed richness, vitality, and goodness. From this first successful dawn, the children inherited their birthright. Taking their place at their Father’s side, they grasped his yoke and with him turned forward the Wheel of Life.

Andrew Nesky is president of the Pittsburgh Lodge of the TSA. This article is adapted from his book Roots of Discord: The Metaphysics of Human Suffering; A Warning.

 

About the Author:

Andrew Nesky has diverse credentials in many areas. He is a 32nd Degree Freemason and has twice been elected to the position of Worshipful Master of a Masonic Lodge. As a spiritual leader and educator Andrew has held a long Presidency for the Theosophical Society in Pittsburgh. He is an actor with hundreds of stage and screen performances. Mr. Nesky has achieved awards in competitive public speaking and debate and has coached many high-level competitors in those events. He is a nationally recognized security and fire system expert and was awarded instructor of the year by the American security industry in 2021. You can view his pioneering webcasted talk show investigating science, philosophy, and spirituality “Outer Streams” on YouTube.


From the Editor's Desk - Spring 2024

Printed in the  Spring 2024 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Smoley, Richard "From the Editor's Desk" Quest 112:2, pg 2

Richard SmoleyTime, says one serviceable definition, is the measure of change.

But if, as we know, everything changes, what constant can we measure change against?

The answer in ordinary human terms is simple: we measure time by cycles that are (from our point of view) stable, notably the apparent rotations of the sun and moon around the earth. (We may not live in a geocentric world from a scientific point of view, but from a human point of view, the earth remains the center of our universe.)

We often hear that the universe is 13.7 billion years old (or some such number). I find this claim baffling. What could constitute a year in the enormous expanses of time before there was a sun or an earth to go around it? Atomic decay is ostensibly a more objective measure, but how do we know even that atomic decay took place at a constant rate in the early stages of the universe? Was even the speed of light a constant at that point?

I leave this question to physics. In any case, philosophical and scientific explorations of time indicate that it is not what it appears to be; many say it is illusory. This is all very well, but even those who make such claims remain under time’s yoke, like the rest of us.

For some clarification, we can go to that most cryptic of all Kabbalistic texts, the Sefer Yetzirah (“Book of Formation”):

Ten sefirot of nothingness: they are measured by ten without end: the boundless beginning and the boundless end, the boundless good and the boundless evil, the boundless above and the boundless below, the boundless east and the boundless west, the boundless north and the boundless south.

There is no really satisfactory translation for sefirot: principles is one more or less adequate word (the form is plural in Hebrew). Perhaps a better one is dimensions.

In fact, if we look at this passage from this perspective, it becomes startlingly clear. We see a universe with one dimension of time (the boundless beginning and the boundless end); three dimensions of space (the boundless above, below, north, south, east, and west); and what would appear to be a kind of moral dimension (the boundless good and the boundless evil).

This “moral dimension” appears to be out of place, but actually it fits in perfectly. Up to that point, we have the three familiar spatial dimensions and one dimension of time, which appears to move unilaterally in a single direction. But motion remains absent.

Good and evil provide this motion. The good is what we perceive to be desirable, what we move toward. Otherwise there is no motion. As someone once said, you would not even go into the next room if you did not think that you would benefit somehow.

Similarly, evil is what we move away from. What we perceive as bad, we avoid. (Of course this all becomes more complicated in day-to-day life.)

Notice that motion here is, like time, unilateral. You can only move in one direction at a time.

Going further, it would seem that this “good” and “evil” in fact create and constitute time, since motion towards and motion away dictate both motion and change. If there were no motion, there would be no change and no time.

At this point, we can see that this dimensionality lies at the heart of human experience, and is universal. People worship all sorts of gods and demons and have all sorts of ideas of the universe ranging from the sublime to the delusory; but every last person has an above and a below, a front and back and right and left. These are the coordinates by which we construct our experience.

In the eighteenth century, Immanuel Kant overturned Western thought by proving that we do not perceive reality as it actually is: we perceive it through a range of cognitive structures that he called the categories. There are twelve, according to Kant, and if you run your eyes down the list, you will see that they are equally fundamental to our perception of the world, for example, unity, plurality, causation, limitation, and negation. No science fiction writer, no matter how brilliant or daft, has ever been able to construct a world, even in the imagination, in which there is no causation or negation.

The great esoteric traditions suggest that there are realities beyond those that we experience, and when these traditions come to describe these realities—for example, what The Secret Doctrine calls “an Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immutable Principle on which all speculation is impossible”—they admit that their descriptions fail. Nothing can be said about this reality, including, strictly speaking, that nothing can be said about it (because even that is saying something about it).

In short, contemplation suggests that time is itself a limited category, a framework for experiencing the world that is useful in its own place but false when projected onto larger contexts.

In such instances, I think, a dual kind of intelligence is called for: one that says both that we cannot apprehend realities beyond categories such as time and that we have the right, even the duty, to try.

Richard Smoley


Memories of Dora Kunz

Printed in the  Spring 2024 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Abdill, Ed "Memories of Dora Kunz" Quest 112:2, pg 40-43

By Ed Abdill

I met Dora Kunz at the very first member meeting of the Theosophical Society I attended. I had been told that Dora was clairvoyant, and never having met a clairvoyant, I was fascinated. Dora and I soon became friends, and our friendship lasted until her death at age ninety-five in 1999. Dora and I got along well together, and we enjoyed a similar sense of humor.

In 1959, when I joined the New York Theosophical Society (NYTS), members ate dinner in our lecture hall before Wednesday night meetings. This was at 5:30 p.m. Dinner consisted of a vegetarian casserole, a salad, and dessert. In 1959, the cost for the dinner was $1.50. A meditation led by Dora followed dinner at 7:00 p.m., and the meeting began at 7:30. The casserole was prepared at home, one week by Dora and the next week by Emily Sellon. The two women lived next door to each other in Port Chester, a suburb of New York. After transporting dinner all the way to our lecture hall, on the train or by car, they would heat it in time for dinner.

Once I was in the kitchen with Dora when she dropped the casserole face down on the floor. Immediately she said, “Close the door.” I did, and she scooped it up, careful not to take the part that touched the floor. She put it back in the dish, and we all happily ate the scooped-up casserole, no one being the wiser.

 

Dora was born Theodora Sophia van Gelder in Java, Dutch East Indies, in 1904. She lived an isolated life on her father’s sugar plantation, with no playmates other than her brothers. Her mother was also clairvoyant, so when Dora saw a nature spirit or someone who’d recently died, so did her mother. It wasn’t until Dora grew older that she realized that others couldn’t see what she or her mother saw.

Dora’s experience was similar to that of a clairvoyant boy in nineteenth-century England who kept a diary. No one in his family had a clue about clairvoyance. Portions of the boy’s diary have been published anonymously in a book entitled The Boy Who Saw True. Portions of it are quite funny. Neither the boy nor his family had any words to describe what he saw.

One night, he wrote that he’d asked his mother why her “lights” (aura) turned pink when she kissed him goodnight. He added, “Mother looked at me strangely and said she would take me to the eye doctor next morning.” Another time, he saw his dead uncle sitting on a chair in their home. Someone was about to sit there, and the boy exclaimed, “Don’t sit on Uncle!” His parents reprimanded him for speaking in such a way about the dead.

Even as a child, Dora said whatever she decided to say, often shocking people with her bluntness. She told me that one day when she was in elementary school in Java, a teacher asked each child in her class what religion they were. When it was Dora’s turn, she said, “I’m a heathen.”

Dora told us her parents never cared what she ate, but they did care that she meditated. We asked how she meditated as a child. At five years old, her mother took her to the meditation room in their home and said, “Let’s just sit here and think about how much we love one another.”

When she was eleven, the prominent clairvoyant Theosophist Charles W. Leadbeater (often called CWL) asked Dora’s parents if he could take her to Australia to a young people’s group he had started. I believe he wanted to train clairvoyants and other psychic children for Theosophical work. Dora’s parents left the decision up to her, asking her to go to the meditation room and meditate on the proposal.

Dora was very shy at the time and spoke no English. Her parents were sure she wouldn’t go, but she surprised them by saying yes. She thought it was the right thing to do. Her parents kept their word and allowed her to travel to Australia with Leadbeater

 CWL and the children lived on the outskirts of Sydney in a large building called the Manor. (Incidentally, when my wife, Mary, and I first traveled to Sydney, we stayed at the Manor, and Mary took a bath in a tub once used by Leadbeater.) The Manor training program took place at the time of the First World War. Many Australian soldiers were killed during the war, and mothers who knew about Leadbeater’s clairvoyant ability frequently sent him letters asking if he could contact their deceased sons and report back on how they were doing on the other side.

Leadbeater got so many of these letters that he couldn’t answer them all, so he turned them over to Dora and asked her to look up the dead and write to the mothers. She took on the job and wrote to the mothers. Typical of Dora, she called the task “writing about the Deaders.”

After she came to the United States to marry Fritz Kunz, an American, Dora learned American history from A to Z. She believed she should know the history of the country in which she lived. Politically, Dora and Fritz were both Democrats. Dora wrote frequent letters to her congressional and state representatives. Once, during a politically controversial time, she proffered some advice. She said we shouldn’t get angry while listening to a politician with whom we disagreed, but instead we should think of what we believe to be right.

Dora knew the damaging effects of anger and gave practical advice on how to overcome it. She was extremely practical and had common sense. If someone wanted to know the color of their aura, or something about their future, Dora was apt to say, “Don’t be an idiot,” and she’d walk away from them. If, however, someone was seriously ill, psychologically or physically, Dora would do whatever she could to help them. She never took money for her service. If anyone insisted on paying, she would tell them they could donate to the Theosophical Society.

Dora had an enormous vocabulary, but her strength wasn’t in words. In fact, she seldom finished a sentence and would frequently say, “You know what I mean,” even though the other person often didn’t. Also, Dora was Mrs. Malaprop personified. She would mix metaphors such as, “The proof of the pudding is in the eating,” and, “the acid test.” It would come out as, “That’s the acid pudding.” Dora had a keen sense of humor, and she could laugh at herself, especially when someone pointed out something like “the acid pudding” to her.

She also had the unique ability to see an individual’s potential almost at first clairvoyant glance. When Dora became president of the Theosophical Society in America, she asked me if I’d fill out her unexpired term as president of the NYTS. I agreed and was later elected president.

One day, Dora called me from the national headquarters to ask me if I would speak at the upcoming convention. She said I would have to talk for about twenty minutes, and I would be presenting with a lovely woman from the CIA. She knew I always cooperated with her, so when my response was no, I could almost hear her shock.

After a pause, I said, “Dora, I could never speak with someone from the CIA.”

She realized her mistake. She’d meant the CIIS—California Institute of Integral Studies—and she burst into her characteristic cackle of laughter. Of course, I agreed to do the talk, and it went well.

An amusing incident occurred at the NYTS many years ago, when Dora still lived in New York. We had an extremely difficult member who would follow anyone’s remarks with, “You said, but Theosophy clearly teaches . . .” The woman made the meetings so unpleasant that people didn’t want to attend, and attendance soon dwindled to three or four people.

One evening, Dora was upstairs in the library just above the lecture hall. The woman was at the meeting downstairs, once again pontificating. Although no one argued or raised their voices, people were very irritated with her. At the height of the tension, Dora came into the hall and defused the situation. I later asked her what had brought her downstairs at the precise moment we needed her. Dora said, “Well, I was sitting there and noticed a lot of prickly stuff coming up through the floor, and I thought, ‘Is that a Theosophical meeting going on down there?’”

Dora met Fritz Kunz in Australia, where they fell in love. They traveled to the United States to be married, and their wedding was hardly a traditional, joyous occasion. Both came to the wedding from different cities. A justice of the peace was to perform the ceremony. Apparently Dora was in a foul mood, so much so that the officiant stopped the ceremony and asked her, “Do you really want to get married?”

Of course she did, and the two of them made a delightful couple. They had one son, Johnny, and they remained together until Fritz died in 1972.

 

Dora had a habit of suddenly ending a phone conversation by simply hanging up. Here is an amusing report of a phone conversation she had with my dear friend, John Algeo, who passed away on October 13, 2019. John was a distinguished professor of English who also served as president of the Theosophical Society in America, and once as vice president of the international body.

Dora was a unique person. She made an indelible impression on almost everyone who knew her. For example, I remember with crystal clarity my first contact with Dora. It was over the telephone. I was sitting at supper one spring evening when the phone rang. I answered it, identified myself, and then the conversation went like this:

She: This is Dora Kunz calling from Wheaton.

Me: Oh, hello, how are you? It’s nice to . . .

She: I understand you can talk.

Me: Well, I do so from time to time. I’m not . . .

She: Can you come this summer to the convention and talk?

Me: Well, I suppose I could, though I hadn’t . . .

She: I understand you can talk on the Bhagavad Gita.

Me: Well, yes, I have done so at the Atlanta Lodge, but . . .

She: Fine, you’ll come then. (Click. The phone went dead.)

Of course, I went to convention and talked on the Bhagavad Gita.

For years, every telephone conversation I had with Dora went more or less like that one; it was not something Dora invented especially for me. It was her usual telephonic style. In fact, it was not until I had been in the president’s office at Olcott, the national headquarters of the TS in America, for about four years that I had a telephone conversation with Dora that she ended by saying, “Goodbye” before the inevitable click let me know the conversation was irrevocably over. I was so amazed by her goodbye that I went around the rest of the day telling people about it. And no one believed me.

Dora did not intend to be rude. She was just a remarkably focused person who had no small talk. She used to say of herself, with a cock of her head and wide-open eyes, “I’m a prrrractical girl.” Chitchat was just not in her line, not part of her modus operandi. If she ever found herself in a situation where the discourse veered toward what she considered the inane, her glance would dart about, she would give a twitch or two, and then, before anyone realized it, she would be gone. She seemed, in fact, just to dematerialize. 

I learned to meditate in the weekly meditation class Dora conducted before the NYTS members’ meeting. Dora had a way of stimulating something within people that, for lack of a better expression, raised their consciousness. It wasn’t what she said, but what she did silently.

For me, meditation has been the pearl of great price. Through meditation, many thousands, including myself, have identified with the inner self. The awareness of the inner self does not come as soon as one begins a regular practice of meditation. A sense of peace is the first step. For most, it takes months or even years before a shift in consciousness arises, and when it does, suddenly there is only eternity. Out of necessity, we must revert to brain consciousness to live in this world. Yet we never forget that shift in consciousness. We can inhere in the eternal.

For inspiring me to meditate, I owe Dora a debt that I can only repay by helping others to learn to meditate. I facilitate meditation workshops and help individuals who ask my advice about meditation. Meditation changed me. Over the years I became more patient, did not panic as often, and became able to let anger and anxiety go more quickly.

When I first consulted Dora about a personal problem, she took one look at my aura and said, “Your experiences in the army disgusted you, didn’t they?” I didn’t need a clairvoyant to tell me that, but I was astounded at how quickly she recognized it, especially since I had never told her anything about my experiences in the army.

Dora had an uncanny ability to spot thought forms in the aura. Habitual thought patterns remain in the aura and are visible to a gifted clairvoyant. Clearly she saw my thoughts of unpleasant experiences in the army.

On another occasion, years later at our Theosophical camp in upstate New York, I consulted Dora about the possibility that I had prostate cancer.

Before she addressed my question, she said, “You’re depressed. You don’t want to do anything now, do you?”

I hadn’t even realized I was depressed, but no sooner had she said this, I knew she was right. She told me to look at the trees once I got home and notice how beautiful they were. I followed her advice, and a few days later, I saw her at the NYTS. She looked concerned, but quickly smiled and said, “Eddie, you look so much better.” I didn’t look any different physically, but my aura—my emotional and mental nature—had improved. I said, “Of course I do, Dora. I did what you asked me to do.”

 

When the Roman Catholic Church began saying mass after noon and before midnight, members of the Liberal Catholic Church (LCC) wanted to know why Bishop Charles Leadbeater, one of the church’s founders, stated that the mass should not be recited during those hours. Bishop Vreeda contacted Bishop Pitkin, who officiated in the NY LCC and authorized him to invite Dora to witness a mass held at 5:00 in the evening. Dora consented, and before the mass, she asked Bishop Pitkin what he wanted to know.

The bishop asked her to psychically investigate whether or not an angel came when invoked at the beginning of the mass. He also wanted to know whether nine orders of angels appeared just before the prayer of consecration and whether the wafers of the Host were consecrated. He also asked her to interrupt the service if she thought that for any reason he shouldn’t continue.

Bishop Pitkin later told me that Dora sat through the entire service respectfully. When asked for her assessment, she said the angels did appear and the wafers were consecrated. However, at the breaking of the Host, the energy that’s supposed to flood the neighborhood in blessing was grounded through the people present. In other words, the energy may have helped those present, but the energy intended to help the neighborhood had been lost.

Years later, I asked Dora about it, and I suggested that perhaps it had something to do with the position of the sun at the time. She agreed.

For more information on clairvoyant observations of the sacraments, I recommend Leadbeater’s Science of the Sacraments. The book describes what he and others saw happening on the inner planes during the administration of the sacraments. As a young girl, Dora, along with four other sensitives, assisted in the investigations. Before Leadbeater included anything in the book, he required that all five sensitives agree they had seen what he saw.

That’s the mark of a scientist—one in spirit, at least.

Ed Abdill is former vice president of the Theosophical Society in America. This passage has been excerpted from his new book, Journey to the Real: Memoirs of a Theosophist (Lady Jane Press; available on Amazon). His other works include The Secret Gateway: Modern Theosophy and the Ancient Wisdom Tradition.


Subcategories