The Inside Story behind Drawing From The Heart

Undercover At Quest Books

Originally printed in theJuly - August 2004 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Dorr, Sharron. "The Inside Story behind Drawing From The Heart" Quest  92.4 (JULY - AUGUST 2004):150-151.

by Sharron Brown Dorr

This accessible guide for healing trauma—whether due to the loss of a relationship or job, illness, violence, death, or any major life change—will work for anyone even if they can't draw. As the illustrations show, simple doodles can transform a painful experience into a source of wisdom and strength.

Holistic health counselor Barbara Ganim's transformative techniques are based on current split-brain research revealing that imagery penetrates more directly than words to the deep unconscious, where true healing occurs. Hence the power of Barbara's visual exercises as a tool to release stress, set healthy boundaries, practice gratitude, increase compassion, and find inner peace.

But this is the outside story of this user-friendly book, that sparkles with illustrations and is set for release in June by Quest Books. We send it into the world with the expectant hope that it will benefit thousands of individuals who suffer.

The inside story of how Barbara came to write the book is particularly poignant, as it reflects the difficult circumstances we all share in these troubled times. Here's how she describes it:

After September 11, 2001, and like everyone else, I was shaken to the core. Even though I hadn't personally lost anyone, I felt devastated and helpless. The following Sunday, I had attended mass at Saint Paul's Episcopal Church in Wickford, Rhode Island. As the priest, Reverend Mary Canavan, spoke about the attacks, I found myself swept up in the open display of emotion people were expressing. Witnessing everyone's pain gave me the idea of offering my services pro bono to members of the congregation who had been affected by 9/11. When I later explained to Reverend Canavan that my work involved using expressive art to help people heal emotional pain and loss, she felt that people would be receptive.

The following week my plan for a seven-week, seven-step support group was announced in the church bulletin, initially called "Drawing Out the Pain: When It Hurts Too Much to Talk." In another week, the support group was full and had a waiting list. Eventually I was running two groups back-to-back in the parish hall, just one month after the destruction of the World Trade Towers.

The program was powerful. What I discovered—something that as a counselor I had always known but had never experienced directly—was that national tragedies act like a trigger igniting a need in us to reevaluate our lives. This process inevitably connects us with unresolved issues and unhealed emotions from the past. As one of my teaching colleagues put it, "September 11 has altered our lives so drastically that it has actually brought about a paradigm shift in our national consciousness. That shift wasn't like a pebble falling into a pond and causing a small ripple. It was like a boulder falling hard and deep; and when it hit bottom, it stirred up all the murky residue that had been resting unseen, in some cases for years, beneath the surface.

In ordinary times when we're confronted with painful issues, we tend to deal only with what is essential at the moment. For example, if we're in the midst of a divorce, we rarely have the energy to worry about all of our other emotional baggage or about the associated relationships that get damaged in the process. But during non-ordinary times—and 9/11 certainly was non-ordinary—our focus is more universal. Because the kind of stress that emerges in a national crisis isn't usually linked to any one person, it leaves just enough energy within most of us finally to heal old and unrelated wounds. That is precisely what I found to be true in my support groups—everyone was willing and ready to address those unhealed emotions from the past.

As the groups progressed, we began calling them "Drawing from the Heart," because we were looking to the heart for its perspective on how to transform our emotional reactions to a painful experience. This focus is quite different from the way most people attempt to deal with pain and loss—which is by talking. As I know all too well from years of experience as an expressive arts therapist, simply talking about emotional pain seldom helps people heal from emotionally devastating events; to the contrary, it often makes them feel worse. The reason is that words carry judgment, and judgment can exacerbate our painful feelings by keeping us trapped in a cycle of blame, shame, and anger. Using drawing to express what the heart feels, on the other hand, enables us to move past blame and shame and begin to see what a painful experience can teach us. Once we begin to see the experience from that perspective, true healing can begin.

To my surprise, running these sessions also helped me deal with the pain from my own past, and for that I am most grateful. As the groups evolved, my thoughts about just how important it was to deal with unhealed emotions came front and center. That's when I decided to write about this process of drawing from the heart. And even though I knew that by the time this book was published, 9/11 would be long over, I also knew that emotional pain is a fact of life. Unfortunately, it doesn't take a national crisis to create it. The seven-step process here is relevant to anyone who wants to find a gentle path to healing. May it be so for you!


Barbara Ganim, M.A.E., C.H.H.C., is Assistant Professor of Expressive Arts and Program Coordinator for the Holistic Counseling and Expressive Arts graduate programs at Salve Regina University in Rhode Island. She is coauthor of Visual Journaling: Going Deeper than Words.


Reflections on Light on the Path

Originally printed in theJuly - August 2004 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Ellwood, Robert. "Reflections on Light on the Path." Quest  92.4 (JULY - AUGUST 2004):134-138.

By Robert Ellwood

Theosophical Society - Robert Ellwood is emeritus professor of religion at the University of Southern California and a former vice-president of the Theosophical Society in America. He currently resides at the Krotona School of Theosophy.Light on the Path, together with At the Feet of the Master and The Voice of the Silence, is generally considered one of the three great short Theosophical classics of the spiritual path. Admittedly this book, transmitted through Mabel Collins, is not an easy read. I imagine I am not the only person to open this work and be put off by the famous, or infamous, opening lines about making the eyes incapable of tears, and the uncompromising list of usually admired qualities to "kill out": ambition, desire of life, desire of comfort, sense of separateness, sensation, hunger for growth. At best these might seem like admonitions suitable only for the most renunciatory of yogins, like those who hang themselves from hooks or live on only a handful of rice a day.

Yet as I have studied the book over and over, aided by such great teachers of its wisdom as Radha Burnier, who taught the book at Olcott some three years ago, and N. Sri Ram in The Way of Wisdom, I have come to see more and more power in, behind, and beneath its words, and more and more richness in its spare but forceful images, until I now would classify Light on the Path among the great spiritual treasures of the world. Indeed, I would assert that very, very few such books pack as much into as few pages as does the basic text of Light on the Path — only the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali come to mind. Not only that, but I would now say that, far from being grimly negative, Light on the Path offers a supremely, gloriously hopeful inner education, one that does not shrink from what needs to be done but proclaims the wonderful news that there is a way, that it is open to all, that the Path is well lit for those with eyes to see its light, and that at the end "its light will suddenly become the infinite light." How much more buoyant, how much more splendid, could the prospects for our oft-discouraging human journey be?

To be sure, as Sri Ram reminds us, this volume is for those who set foot on the Path in an inwardly serious and uncompromising way. It is not for beginners, or those who want one foot in each camp, worldly and spiritual, or for those whom the spiritual life is only a hobby or a subtle version of egotism. It is for those willing to do whatever it takes — but, I would add, whose enthusiasm for this great adventure is so compelling and so joyous as to make the sacrifices small in comparison. So it is that, amid the strict admonitions, Light on the Path intersperses sufficient invocations of the infinite light at the end to sustain our spirits. It like hiking down a, seemingly interminable trail in deep woods, going on and on through a green corridor of trees with little visibility on either side, becoming weary and perhaps discouraged of getting anywhere — until suddenly we break out onto a high pass that brings into sight imposing vistas: range after range of snowy peaks, deep valleys, and lush meadows under an infinite blue sky lit by a brilliant sun. This panorama thrills us with the awesome dimensions of whence we have come and the splendor of where we are going. We pause, and the weariness is gone amid the wonder and the renewed vitality.

Let us now look at Light on the Path and review what it actually says before continuing with Sri Ram's and our own exposition of it. It begins by telling us that "these rules are written for all disciples" and that we must attend to them. Then we are told that "before the eyes can see they must be incapable of tears"; the ear must have lost its sensitivity and the voice its power to wound; and the soul must have been washed in the blood of the heart. Next, as though to warn us about what it takes to reach those awesome ideals, we are instructed what to kill out: again, ambition, desire of life, desire of comfort, sense of separateness, desire for sensation, hunger for growth. What we should desire instead is "only that which is within you," "only that which is beyond you," "only that which unattainable." Moreover, we are instructed to "desire power ardently," "desire peace fervently," "desire possessions above all," and, as though to deal with such seemingly contradictory, crazy-making commands, "seek out the way by retreating within," and "by advancing boldly without."

The answer is to "seek it not by any one road" but rather to "seek it by plunging into the mysterious and glorious depths of your own inmost being." (7—8) Many ladders and byways attend such a path as this. The virtues, even the vices as they are surmounted, are means, and one can make progress only as one "grasps his whole individuality firmly" and "is to himself absolutely the way." In time, the light will grow stronger, and "you may know that you have found the beginning of the way." Finally, that light "will suddenly become the infinite light." Changing the metaphor, we can then "look for the flower to bloom in the silence that follows the storm," and a great calm will come, "such as comes in a tropical country after the heavy rain." (8—9)

This is the end of the first part of Light on the Path. There is a second part, which begins ominously: "Out of the silence that is peace a resonant voice shall arise. And this voice will say, It is not well; thou hast reaped, now thou must sow." (11) There is a coming battle, and in this battle the disciple is not to be the warrior but is to look for the warrior and let him or her fight within the aspirant, only obeying his orders. We are to be unconcerned about this battle, save to do the bidding of the warrior within, knowing that the warrior cannot lose. As the fight continues, the sounds of a song become more and more audible to your ears. At first they are only fragments, but gradually this song becomes vibrant and full. This is the music of life itself, the greatest teacher of all. In what are perhaps the finest lines of all in Light on the Path, we are told: "Life itself has speech and is never silent. And its utterance is not, as you that are deaf may suppose, a cry: it is a song. Learn from it that you are a part of the harmony; learn from it to obey the laws of the harmony." (13)

It is with this magnificent theme that the book essentially ends, as it tells us it is from the song of life, from one's own heart and those of others, as well as from "the earth, the air, and the water," that we learn the deepest secrets out of which inner development will arise. Of such human, and perhaps other, teachers, the notes to Light on the Path tell us, in another famous line, "Intelligence is impartial: no man is your enemy: no man is your friend. All alike are your teachers. Your enemy becomes a mystery that must be solved, even though it takes ages." (27) No wonder we are told that this is a path made up of many paths, not to be sought on any one road.

Furthermore, some of those teachers may teach without speech. The mysterious last words of the book are, "Listen only to the voice which is soundless. Look only on that which is invisible alike to the inner and the outer sense. Peace be with you." (17)

What are we to make of this strange treatise, which often seems superficially contradictory and yet is splendidly coherent on some deep, almost inexpressible level? How does one approach a book that, the comments say, if read in the normal way "may appear to have some little philosophy in it, but very little sense," and must be read not only between the lines "but within the words," that is, read as if "deciphering a profound cipher"? (29)

Sri Ram's approach, in a brilliant insight, is that, for all its seeming rigor, what Light on the Path is really saying is that following the Path is simply living a truly natural life. (Sri Ram 89) The text says, "Grow as the flower grows, unconsciously, but eagerly anxious to open its soul to the air. So must you press forward to open your soul to the eternal. But it must be the eternal that draws forth your strength and beauty, not desire of growth." (5)

Our part is to clear away the obstacles so that life and spirituality may unfold spontaneously, for the seed is already within, teeming with incipient life and beauty. But we must have the courage to let this priceless flower bloom of its own, without hindrance or forcing, and—in the book's other metaphor—to let the melodies of our own anthem resound in response to, and in harmony with, the song of life.

Our songs, like our lives, are affairs of many notes and counterpoints, sometimes dissonances which must be resolved, and it is this reality which lies behind the seeming contradictions of the book. Mabel Collins, in her comments on its teaching, says as much: ""Light on the Path' has been called a book of paradoxes, and very justly; what else could it be, when it deals with actual personal experience of the disciple?" (60)

But naturalness is easier said than done. Deeply embedded are the habits, the socially ingrained conventions and defensive personality quirks, the fears and lusts emanating from the world and the astral plane, that want to stifle that growth or twist it into unnatural shapes, like a plant growing in an overcrowded field or trying to follow shifting light. To be truly natural, easily and freely and yet lovingly spontaneous, is no simple task for those of us so deeply conditioned by our darkened world and, we in Theosophy would add, so readily ensnared by images and attachments coming to us from the desire realm or astral plane.

How do we know the difference between the natural and unnatural desires? First, let us recall that what is truly bodily delight is what is natural to the body in its simple, straightforward, nonverbal character; what is added on by fevered imagination and fantasy is from the brain, not the flesh, and so is of a lower spiritual—actually, lower astral—origin. The body itself wants only plain, wholesome, natural food and drink; excessive and exquisite substances catering to pampered tastes, or which supposedly affirm one's prosperity or lifestyle, or which answer to craving for intoxication or drug dreams, honor not the body but fantasies concocted on the low level from which ordinary dreams and fantasies come, and they distort our honest body/spirit nature as truly as does excessive and unhealthy asceticism. We may recall the wise and mysterious lines of the Isha Upanishad:

To darkness are they doomed who devote themselves only to life in the world, and to a greater darkness they who devote themselves only to meditation. . . .To darkness are they doomed who worship only the body, and to greater darkness they who worship only the spirit. . . .They who worship both the body and spirit, by the body overcome death, and by the spirit achieve immortality. (Prabhavananda and Manchester 27—28)

This is the task that is set before us. Personal transformation is the pathway of Theosophy and all quests for Truth. With sustained effort we can regulate our attitudes and actions, and little by little we can change our keynote to one of compassion and concern for all. Then the vibration of our being will be able to permeate the atmosphere, not with the distress of a siren, but with the call to responsible living and the music of altruism.

Hast thou attuned thy heart and mind to the great mind and heart of all mankind? For as the sacred River's roaring voice whereby all Nature-sounds are echoed back, so must the heart of him "who in the stream would enter," thrill in response to every sigh and thought of all that lives and breathes.

—Voice of the Silence


Guideposts for Living: Bhagavad Gita

Originally printed in the July - August 2004 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Mills, Joy. "Guideposts for Living: Bhagavad Gita." Quest  92.4 (JULY - AUGUST 2004):124-127, 132.

By Joy Mills

Theosophical Society - Joy Mills was an educator who served as President of the Theosophical Society in America from 1965–1974, and then as international Vice President for the Theosophical Society based in Adyar

The Bhagavad Gita is one of the world's great spiritual texts to which we may look for guidance for living a meaningful or a significant existence. Through centuries it has inspired thinkers, scholars, social activists, and people from all walks of life. It has been translated into nearly as many languages as are spoken on the planet, and commentaries on it have been produced throughout time. It is a work that belongs as much to the Western world as to the Eastern, for it speaks to every individual who has ever faced a seemingly insoluble problem. The Gita speaks to each one of us confronted by the existential dilemma of choice.

The Gita is one part of the great epic of India, the Mahabharata, which contains eighteen books; the Gita, which contains eighteen chapters or discourses, is part of the sixth book. The epic itself has a historical setting, but that is not our present concern, for in addition to its context as part of a great story, the Gita has both an archetypal, or universal, aspect and an individual aspect as represented by its human protagonist, Arjuna. It is both personal and transpersonal.

Central to understanding the Gita is the concept of yoga, or what has been called the path of conscious self-realization. According to the colophons, each discourse is an exposition of yoga. Yoga is both a practical discipline and the goal of self-integration, of complete harmonization of the individual soul with the Supreme Self. It is because we are dealing with that process known as yoga that the Bhagavad Gita is truly a guidepost for living—not only living the spiritual life but living in the here and now of daily existence with all its joys and sorrows.

Professor S. Dasgupta, in his History of Indian Philosophy, has stated that the Gita is not only a "system of philosophy" but more important, "a manual of right conduct and right perspective of things in the light of a mystical approach to God in self-resignation, devotion, friendship and humility." It is as such a guide to our conduct and to gaining the right perspective on all that occurs that we will look together at this beautiful text.

Let us begin at the beginning. Dharmakshetra kurukshetra are the first two words of our text, a text that is truly a gita—a song, a chant, the music or harmony of the Supreme embodied as Krishna, the mediator between the realm of the eternal and the world of our mundane existence. Dharmakshetra kurukshetra . . . in those two words we have the crux of our own dilemma, the central problem that every individual must eventually resolve.

Kshetra means, a field, a demarcated area or domain. It is where something takes place. It is here, now, this life, this existence, this present moment. And in this present moment, in this nowness of our existence, two voices are heard.

The first is the voice of dharma—not an easy word to define. Dharma is duty, righteousness, law, and lawfulness; it is truth, responsibility, order, religion. Dharma is the voice that calls us to fulfill our responsibility as a human being, whatever may be our occupation, our educational background, our place in life. Dharma sustains and nourishes our very existence, gives it its integrity, its meaning. Here and now, in the midst of this life, we must come awake to our dharma, to be what we are intended to be. So the first word of the Gita, dharmakshetra in Sanskrit, defines for us the place or field of our unique responsibility.

But of the place where the battle is to occur is not only the field of our dharma; but the second word of the text tells us it is the field of the Kurus. In terms of the epic of which the Gita is a part, this means, of course, the family from which both sides in the coming battle were descended. So at one level we can recognize that even as we are situated on the field of our individual duty, our dharma, we are also located on the field of all our relationships. But in Sanskrit, kuru is also one form of the verb "to do," so kurukshetra could also mean "the field of our doings or the field of human actions," seen in relation to the community of which we are a part.

So in these opening two words, two voices call to us: the voice of our individual dharma and the voice of our responsibility as a member of a particular community. At the outset, we know we are on the field of action in the more embracing, more encompassing field of dharma. And since each individual's dharma includes all the psychological, familial, social, and traditional laws or customs that govern each of us, as well as our duty to each of these structures, that also means that at the same time our dharma includes our responsibility, to our own inner nature. So we often find ourselves in conflict among all these obligations. In fact, conflict is inevitable. How many crossroads have you come to in your life? How many times have you asked yourself, as well as friends, relatives, elders, "What shall I do?" It may even be the question: "Shall I do what I want to do, or must I do what my parents want me to do?" And perhaps in despair we seek to abandon ourselves to no action at all, only to realize that even inaction is action.

While Annie Besant has titled the First Discourse "The Despondency of Arjuna," many translators have called it, "The Yoga of Despair." And indeed it may be suggested that despair, despondency, the darkness that may at times overwhelm us and obscure our vision of what is to be done, is in itself a yoga, or at least a stage on the yogic path to self-awakening. Often it is that very despair that drives us to seek understanding if not wisdom, to venture forth on the arduous road toward knowledge, freedom, truth. And it is here that we need to note a significant action taken by Arjuna, an action that I suggest is essential if we are to walk the path toward enlightenment. In many ways this is the first of the guideposts found in our text.

That action is described in verses 21 through 23 of the First Discourse: Simply put, Arjuna has asked his charioteer—who is Krishna of course, representative of the Supreme—to take him to the center between the two armies who have gathered for the impending battle. In the words of verse 21: "In the midst between the two armies, stay my chariot." When faced with any problem, it is essential to center ourselves, to come to the center where there is silence, and there to "stay my chariot," a metaphor for the personality. In that inner quietude we may hear the voice of the Self, of Krishna, of the One who abides beyond all opposites. It has been said that Krishna never comes uninvited. We must be still to hear his voice, and only when we are centered can we ask the question, as Arjuna did.

In the Second Discourse, in verse 54, Arjuna asks a very practical question: How does the wise person, the one who is "stable of mind," act? How does he talk, sit, and walk? Arjuna asks this question, in one form or another throughout the dialogue. For example, in the Fourteenth Discourse, verse 21, after hearing about the three qualities that compose the realm of matter, Arjuna asks, "What are the marks of him who hath crossed over the three qualities . . . ? How acteth he . . . ?" Arjuna is a practical person. He has come to Krishna, as we know, with a direct question: "What shall I do?" Of course when he asks that question at the outset of the dialogue, his mind is already made up: "I will not fight," he says and lays down his arms.

Carefully, step by step, Krishna like the true teacher he is instructs Arjuna in all that action and even inaction involve. He does not begin by talking about the individual who has achieved liberation and has transcended all relationships. Krishna does not even answer his question directly, but he pictures for Arjuna the individual who lives in the world fulfilling his responsibilities while at the same time completely detached from any desire for the fruit of action. For such an individual, actions are directed toward the welfare of the world, an emphasis that finds expression in verse 25 of the Third Discourse: "As the ignorant act from attachment to action, so should the wise act without attachment desiring the welfare of the world."

Act Arjuna will; act we all will, always remembering that action is not confined to the physical realm. For there is action of thought, of emotion, of speech and mind as well as of body. Indeed, as Krishna says in verse 17 of the Fourth Discourse, "Mysterious is the path of action" and in verse 18, "He who seeth inaction in action, and action in inaction, he is wise . . . he is harmonious even while performing all action." Yet even as we act, we must recognize, as verse 46 of the Eighteenth Discourse tells us, "All undertakings indeed are clouded by defects as fire by smoke." So it is how we act that is important, and for this Arjuna asks again and again for practical, and everyday illustrations of how the wise person talks and sits and walks and moves about in the world. And to answer this Krishna—in the Twelfth Discourse—gives Arjuna and therefore us some very practical advice. Verses 13 through 20 of that Twelfth Discourse give us some extremely useful, though not always easy, guidelines for our everyday movements in the world.

Verse 13 of the Twelfth Discourse begins on what one commentator has called a "low negative key." The verse opens with the words "He who beareth no ill-will to any being . . ." If we can pause there to examine ourselves, we will see that we like some people and dislike others; we like some beings—dogs and cats, for example—and not others—snakes and spiders, perhaps. The whole of our phenomenal life is marked by a tension between our likes and dislikes. And these are really only a manifestation of our attachments, for even our aversions are sticky attachments. So to "bear no ill-will to any being" is not quite as easy as it may first appear. Even without an active desire to do harm to another creature, we may carry a grudge against someone or feel jealousy or envy. We may feel slighted or hurt and then almost unconsciously hope that the one who has hurt us will suffer some mishap.

After that negative beginning, Krishna proceeds with the first two positive virtues, "friendly and compassionate." We are not only to remove any feeling of ill will. We are to begin by practicing friendship. Let everyone be recognized as a friend, in unconditional friendship. In the Yoga Sutras, Patanjali puts maitri at the head of all the factors that purify the mind. Sutra 33 of Section I begins with the Sanskrit words "Maitri Karuna," and Dr. Taimni translates this sutra: "The mind becomes clarified by cultivating attitudes of friendliness, compassion, gladness and indifference respectively toward happiness, misery, virtue and vice." The essence of friendliness is sympathy, even an empathy. In friendship, there is a predisposition to listen and to understand the other. This quality of friendliness goes to the very root of right relationship.

From friendliness to compassion is a natural movement of the heart. To be a friend to all that lives means that one is compassionate, caring, one to whom all life is precious. The one who is full of friendliness and sympathy naturally feels compassion for all who suffer. There needs to be an unqualified compassion, a natural flow outward. Once total friendliness and compassion flower, we begin to lose our sense of possessiveness. So the next phrase in verse 13, "without attachment and egoism." The last thing to dissolve and become nonexistent is the sense of a separate self, ahamkara or egoism. And this condition results in a state described in the concluding words of the verse, "balanced in pleasure and pain, and forgiving." When we realize that pleasure and pain "come and go impermanent" as Krishna has said in the Second Discourse, when we are free of attachment and aversion, friendly and compassionate, no longer under the sway of egoism, then forgiveness flowers within us, which is also patience and forbearance.

Verse 14 continues the list of qualities exhibited by the "sage of stable mind," the way in which action should be performed: "Ever content, harmonious, with the self controlled, resolute, with mind and Reason [Buddhi] dedicated to Me . . ." To be "ever content" implies a cheerfulness under all conditions, that cheerfulness spoken of as one of the points of good conduct in At the Feet of the Master. Krishna speaks of the same quality again in verse 16 of the Seventeenth Discourse, where it is called "serenity of mind," a serenity that cannot be disturbed by any external or internal cause, under any conditions. The whole being is in a harmonious state, with the entire personality complex under control. When the individual has achieved this harmony, then, without effort, the mind and the intelligence or Reason (as Dr. Besant translates buddhi) come to rest in the Divine. That individual, says Krishna, "is dear to Me." To be dear to Krishna is to be at home with one's soul, with one's inmost self, to be friends with that Self. Then in each of the succeeding verses, that dearness is defined, further aiding Arjuna to understand how action is to be performed.

Verse 15 declares the relationship that should exist between the wise person and the world. "He from whom the world doth not shrink away, who doth not shrink away from the world, freed from the anxieties of joy, anger, and fear . . ." Here we are reminded of the verse already cited from the Third Discourse, that all our actions are to be directed toward the welfare of the world. The "sage of stable mind," as the wise individual has been called, does not live away from the world. He may be said to be in the world but not of it. Such a person feels deep concern for our common humanity. We are to be friendly and compassionate, so that the world does not shrink away from us, nor do we turn against the world. What wisdom we have is to be employed to aid the world, to aid suffering humanity, but we do so without fear and certainly without anger.

When we make ourselves available to the world, not shrinking from that contact, what is our nature like? Verse 16 describes the attitude we should have: "He who wants nothing . . . is pure, expert, passionless, untroubled . . ." To be pure is to be untainted by worldly standards. We may not feel we are "expert" in knowing how to aid the world, but when we are "pure in heart," there is a certain knowing of what is right to do in any circumstance, which may be only to send a thought of goodwill, of peace or healing or love out into the world. So we act, as it were, without acting or, as the verse says, "renouncing every undertaking," which means that the personal self is not involved in wanting a certain outcome, expecting a certain "fruit" of the action. We are truly "untroubled," which is to be without fear.

Verse 17 continues the theme, describing the person free from all conditioning: "He who neither loveth nor hateth, nor grieveth, nor desireth, renouncing good and evil, full of devotion..." What does it mean to be full of devotion? We may say that the way of the devotee is not our way, but to be full of devotion means simply that our whole being is filled with that profound love for humanity of which the Mahatma spoke when he wrote to A. P. Sinnett (The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, Letter 33, chron.): "It is he alone who has the love of humanity at heart, who is capable of grasping thoroughly the idea of a regenerating practical Brotherhood who is entitled to the possession of our secrets . . ." And when there is such love, such devotion, there is no personal self. I am told that the Sanskrit words that Annie Besant translated as "full of devotion" are para bhakti, that imply a complete commitment of one's being to the welfare of all.

That theme is carried forward in verse 18: "Alike to foe and friend, and also in fame and ignominy, alike in cold and heat, pleasures and pains, destitute of attachment." Admittedly, all that is described here is not easily attained, but what is being portrayed is the self-realized individual. So we are brought face to face with the pairs of opposites that confront many of us every day and that cloud our perception of what is real, what is important, what is worth doing. Release from our clouded condition, caused by the opposites, comes only from becoming free from all attachments. That emphasis is permanent and constant throughout the entire Gita. We must unbind ourselves from what the Buddha called "sticky attachments." When we have ceased to be pulled back and forth between the opposites then the condition described in verse 19 is present: "Taking equally praise and reproach, silent, wholly content with what cometh, homeless, firm in mind, full of devotion," such indeed, says Krishna to Arjuna in answer to his question, is the way in which the Self-realized, the "sage of stable mind," the true knower of the Wisdom, acts in the world. Silent, not because such a person does not speak, though generally he may say little, but because even when he speaks there is none of the noise of desire, of chattering thought. Homeless, not because such a one has no home but because the entire world is his abode. In the beautiful words of The Voice of the Silence, he has "become a 'Walker of the Sky' who treads the winds above the waves, whose step touches not the waters." Yes, and "wholly content with what cometh," filled with that inner contentment that whatever comes to us is what we have called to ourselves.

Finally, then, in verse 20, Krishna tells Arjuna, "They verily who partake of this life-giving wisdom [Amrita-Dharma, the truth that is imperishable, immortal, beautiful, and therefore life-giving]. . . endued with faith [shraddha, confidence, the faith that has been called "unlearned knowledge"], I their supreme object . . . they are surpassingly dear to Me."

It is evident that the individual pictured in these eight verses of the Twelfth Discourse is one whose qualities and characteristics seem far beyond achieving. Yet, as all great scriptures tell us, as Masters of Wisdom—whether called Krishna or by some other name—have reiterated, "We have but one word for all aspirants—TRY!" Above all, such an individual lives in the world, to help the world, acting in the here and now, and so we must begin here and now, following the guideposts that have been so beautifully provided for our walking. As Krishna tells Arjuna in the Fifth Discourse, verse 23: "He who is able to endure here on earth, ere he be liberated from the body, the force born from desire and passion, he is harmonized, he is a happy man."

They say that five thousand years and more have passed since the immortal teaching was given to Arjuna. If ever the world was in need of the message of the Gita, it is surely today, when spiritual values have been negated and flouted, when material craving, greed, prejudice, fear, and hatred seem to stalk the land. But Krishna promised in verse 7 of the Fourth Discourse that whenever there is "decay of righteousness," whenever chaos rules, he would "come forth," born from age to age. We do not know how he will be born, how he may be recognized, in what race, or faith, or with what voice he will speak. But of this we may be certain: If we try to live in accordance with the guideposts we have been given, follow our own unique dharma, work for the welfare of all, his voice will be heard in our voices, his thoughts will be reflected in our thinking, his actions revealed in our actions, his presence known in our presence as we seek to bring light and love and peace into every human heart.


References

  • Besant, Annie. The Bhagavad Gita. Adyar, Chennai: Theosophical Publishing House, 1999.
  • Hao Chin, Vincente. The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett: In Chronological Sequence.
  • Adyar, Chennai: The Theosophical Publishing House, 1993
  • Taimni, I. K. The Science of Yoga. Wheaton, IL: Quest Books, 1999

.

 


Joy Mills has been a student of Theosophy for over sixty years. She has held numerous positions within the Society, including president of the American and Australian sections, international vice-president, and director of the Krotona School of Theosophy.


Archetypes, Assassination, and Attention

By John Algeo

Originally printed in the JULY - AUGUST 2005 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Algeo, John. "Archetypes, Assassination, and Attention." Quest  93.4 (JULY-AUGUST 2005):146-147

Theosophical Society - John Algeo was a Professor Emeritus of English at the University of Georgia. He was a Theosophist and a Freemason He was the Vice President of the Theosophical Society Adyar.

Archetypes are powerful things.

The original Greek meaning of the term archetype (according to Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary) was "the original pattern or model of which all things of the same type are representations or copies." But the most widespread meaning today is "an inherited idea or mode of thought in the psychology of C. G. Jung that is derived from the experience of the race and is present in the unconscious of the individual." Ultimately those two meanings amount to much the same thing, the difference in emphasis being on the origin of the archetypes.

All of us have archetypes present in our unconscious minds. And those archetypes influence our behavior: in a sense, we live up to, or act out, our archetypes. A Theosophical view of their origin might be that the archetypes were implanted in our deep minds by the Manasaputras "Sons of Mind" or Lords of the Flame, who quickened human intelligence in the early history of our species. But, whatever the origin of the archetypes, it is clear that, as we act them out in our lives, we strengthen them. And that is one source of their power.

Archetypes are powerful because they represent an "original pattern or model" in our minds but also because, as we perceive them (often unconsciously), they shape our behavior, and in turn our behavior gives them new energy, new power to influence yet further our successive behavior. The pattern of human action throughout history can thus be seen as a manifestation of the archetypes deep inside us. And our repeated action, motivated in part by such archetypes, gives them additional power to influence our future behavior.

The February 2005 assassination of the former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri is a case in point. At this writing, the identity of his assassin is unknown—and may never be known. But it is highly probable that Hariri was assassinated by a brother Moslem who disagreed with his progressive policies and his efforts to make Lebanon a free state unbound by the narrow politics of the past. That is, Hariri was Abel to another Moslem's Cain.

The Cain-Abel story is one version of the archetype of two brothers, often twins, who are opposites of each other. The archetype plays out in a number of different versions, in several of which the brothers are in conflict with each other, a conflict often ending in the killing of one brother by the other, as Cain, the farmer, killed Abel, the herdsman, out of jealousy for the attention of God.

Romulus and Remus are Roman examples. Romulus, setting out to found a city (Rome), traced the boundaries of his city on the ground and constructed the first tier of the city wall. When Remus saw what his brother was doing, he made fun of Romulus's low wall and said that it would not keep out enemies but could be easily scaled. And to demonstrate his point, he leaped over the wall. Romulus replied that, against those who thus scaled the wall, there was a defense, and struck Remus with his sword, slaying him.

Angra Mainyu and Spenta Mainyu are Persian examples. They are, respectively, the "Destructive Spirit" and the "Bounteous Spirit," two projections (or "sons") of Ahura Mazda. Angra Mainyu is responsible for all the ills of the world, a very nasty fellow, and Spenta Mainyu is responsible for all its good things, an inspiration to all people. Those two are in perpetual conflict, and will be until the end of time.

Baldr "the Beautiful" and Loki "the Trickster" are Norse examples, both sons of Odin. Baldr and his mother, Frigg, both had troubling dreams about his death. So Frigg toured the world, exacting a promise from all things that they would never harm her son. Rejoicing in Baldr's supposed immunity to danger, the gods arranged a sport in which each threw a weapon at Baldr, but all the weapons veered aside, having sworn not to harm the beautiful god. However, Loki, the perverse god, had discovered that Frigg neglected to get the promise of harmlessness from the mistletoe plant because she thought it was too young and insignificant to be a danger. Loki then fashioned a sharp dart from the mistletoe and gave it to the blind god, Hod, whose hand he guided in throwing it at Baldr and slaying him.

These archetypal stories of the conflict-torn brothers inspire and are in turn empowered by fraternal strife among humans. The assassination of one free-thinking Moslem by another narrow-minded one is just an instance of the Cain-Abel story being acted out in history. And every such action give more strength to the archetype. So how do we respond to such deep-seated influences that can have disastrous effects in our world?

There is an old saying, that we should fight fire with fire. In this case, we can oppose one archetype with another. There is a different version of the two-brothers archetype, specifically the Greek myth of the twins Castor and Pollux. They were the sons of a human mother, Leda, but they had different fathers. Castor's father was Leda's husband, Tyndareüs, the King of Sparta. But Pollux's father was the god Zeus. The brothers were inseparable; they sailed with the Argonauts in quest of the Golden Fleece and remained the firmest of friends throughout life.

When Castor, being human, died, his immortal brother Pollux went to his father Zeus and begged that he and his brother might never be separated, even by death. Zeus was so touched by the devotion of the two boys to each other, that he allowed them to share Pollux's immortality, so that together they might spend half their days in Hades, the after-death fate of humans, and half their days on Mount Olympus, the dwelling place of the deathless gods. Furthermore, Zeus set them in the heavens as the constellation Gemini, where they became guardians of all who sail upon the sea of life, and they still appear to mariners (and nowadays to aviators) as St. Elmo's fire, the phenomenon of light that plays upon ships of the sea and the air.

The archetype of Castor and Pollux is a counterpoint to that of Cain and Abel, highlighting the kind of brotherhood of which the Theosophical Society's first Object speaks. The archetype we focus upon will determine the force that manifests itself in our lives and in the history of humanity. It is a fact that newspapers, like all human attention, focus on the violent and conflictive, rather than on the peaceful and harmonious. There is an old jingle about the two principal characters in William Makepeace Thackeray's novel Vanity Fair. Those characters are the self-serving bad girl, Becky Sharp, and the altruistic good girl, Amelia Sedley (who were perhaps models for Scarlet and Melanie in Gone with the Wind). The jingle goes like this:

The moralists may preach and carp

In platitudes most deadly,

The world remembers Becky Sharp, 

And not Amelia Sedley.

When we don't pay attention, our material nature gravitates to the lowest and most violent in us: to Cain, Romulus, Angra Mainyu, Loki, and Becky Sharp. But if we attend to the example of Castor and Pollux, those "Divine Boys" (which is what their epithet, the Dioscuri, meant in Greek), we will strengthen that archetype in our own consciousness and in the consciousness of the whole world. As the book of Proverbs (23.7) says, "As we think in our hearts, so are we." We need only be attentive and keep in the forefront of our minds that which appeals to our spiritual nature and the highest in us.

Archetypes are powerful things—for evil or for good. But thought is even more powerful, for by thought we can invoke archetypes into our consciousness and into our actions. Thinking controls action. If enough human beings think in the Castor and Pollux way, they can bring peace and harmony into the world. They can balance mortality with immortality. They can create a spiritual climate in which violence and conflict, assassination and hate, recede before the advance of peace and harmony, assistance and love. There is no other way to do it. Shall we give it a thought?


Subcategories