The Theosophy of Immanuel Kant

By Robert Bonnell

Originally printed in the JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation:Bonnell, Robert  "The Theosophy of Immanuel Kant." Quest  95.1 (JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007):30-31.

Theosophical Society - Robert Bonnell A lifetime fellow of the Theosophical Society in America, Robert Bonnell has been a lecturer and writer on esoteric themes for over 50 years. He is President and Program Chairman for the Long Beach Theosophical Society and has held these posts for the greater part of 45 years. In addition to his work with the Long Beach Theosophical Society, Robert served on the Board of Directors of the Theosophical Society in America for six years (1996-2002).Immanuel Kant, German Philosopher (1724-1804) and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Koneisberg, was a key figure in the period referred to as the German Enlightenment. In addition to his philosophical treatises, Kant wrote extensively on the theory of the heavens, origins of the planetary systems, effects of the tides upon the earth's rotation, causes of earthquakes, volcanoes on the moon, and other subjects. His treatise on eternal peace formed the basis for the United Nations Charter. Although he was raised Lutheran, he rejected conventional doctrine early in life and regarded independent spiritual integrity as the highest form of morality. In contrast to his brilliant intellect and Prussian rigidity, Kant confessed to moments of passive contemplation and listened to the music of the spheres on numerous occasions.

 

His intellectual prowess and lifestyle displayed a dedication to his calling, which remains beyond question. Despite occasional misinterpretations of his work by thinkers and politicians of questionable integrity, Kant is considered to be Europe's most respected philosopher. In fact, it's been said that all modern philosophy must orient itself to Kant.

 

Though Kant is not at the center of Theosophy, it might be helpful for theosophists, who value varied wisdom traditions, to understand the similarities between Kantian thought and theosophy. The terms at the top of the adjacent chart are Kant's terminology, while the terms in the parentheses below are the terminology most akin to that of the Wisdom or Theosophical Tradition.

 

Kant suggested that humans have two basic ways of knowing, a priori and a posteriori. These two kinds of knowledge are key to the development of human consciousness, instrumental in the pursuit of a moral and constructive state of being—which Kant calls "Pure Reason." Kant's "Noumenal Principle," what we might call the unknowable, is that which is beyond experience but somehow involved in it—something like H.P.B's "unutterable" or Thoreau's "impersonal spectator." According to Kant, a priori knowledge emerges from this Noumenal Principle, this "unknowable." It is, in effect, a representative of the Noumenal Principle deep within the human consciousness. And it recognizes a "voice from afar," independent of human experience as we know it. The a priori knowledge that emerges from the Noumenal Principle is innate knowledge akin to Theosophy's atmic influence. It precedes human experience and serves as a sort of judge and jury (conscience).

 

For Kant, it is possible for human beings to remain largely unaware of the a priori knowledge available to them. Manifestation of a priori knowledge is dependent in part upon Time, or the readiness (precision) to manifest, and Space, or the direction of its influence. It is also dependent upon moral development. People who adhere to certain moral principles allow a priori knowledge to unfold into consciousness and become available for use—much as etheric energies blend, by way of chakras, into electromagnetic states the body can use.

 

The first moral principle necessary for the unfolding of a priori knowledge is what Kant calls the "Transcendental Aesthetic." Similar to Theosophy's concept of innate goodness, metaphysical transcendence motivates the use of a priori knowledge and also becomes the modus operandi for its use.

 

The second moral principle is Synthetic Judgment, a deductive process by which one can move the a priori toward its objective. As theosophists note "I must believe before I can understand," Kant declares that a sense of "revelation" furthers synthetic judgment and opens the way to wisdom.

 

The third moral principle is Intuition, which has been defined by Spinoza as "higher knowledge." Intuition works with Synthetic Judgment and compounds into an array of invisible insights; perhaps akin to Theosophy's spiritual awareness!

 

The fourth moral principle is Descending Will, by which one makes use of Time and Space to develop the will to enter the exalted state of Pure Reason. As Theosophy celebrates the idea whose time has come, Kant celebrates the moment in which Will carries one deeper into knowledge.

 

For Kant, a posteriori knowledge, or knowledge gained by experience, is a product of the Phenomenal Principle. It is exoteric, shadowed by the world of sense perception, and regulated to a large extent by the basic instincts of Experience and Assimilation. These two represent the physical exposure to the elemental realities of the corporeal world and an intellectual growth of the world as it is; perhaps liken to Theosophy's psychophysical confrontations. Thus, a posteriori knowledge is incomplete and in need of things outside itself. Yet it proceeds upward toward the goal of Pure Reason. Like a priori knowledge, a posteriori knowledge requires adaptations in order to proceed toward Pure Reason.

 

The first adaptation is Earthly Tribulation, which represents the trials and tribulations of the emotional mind as it seeks to satisfy our moral obligations and fulfillments; we may liken it to Theosophy's karmic interludes.

 

The second adaptation, Analytical Judgment, is the brainchild, so to speak, of the empirical path and its inductive guidelines. Because analytical judgment moderates and refines a posteriori knowledge, it may the closest Kant gets to Theosophy's middle path.

 

The third Adaptation is what Kant calls Understanding, Proper. It represents the coming forth of accumulative knowledge in highly mechanical but necessary material form, similar to Theosophy's incarnated necessities.

 

The fourth Adaptation is Ascending Will, by which Experience and Assimilation form the path of both willfulness and wellness. Thus they allow the a posteriori to enter, in a practical manner, Kant's exalted state of Pure Reason. As Theosophy celebrates the need whose karmic time has come, Kant celebrates the path by which a posteriori knowledge is transformed.

 

The remaining aspect of Kant's exalted state of Pure Reason is assigned to the Aesthetical, which cradles within it ethics, morality, goodness, and beauty. In Kantian philosophy, these nearly synonymous terms underpin the Categorical Imperative. They are something like the Vedic Tattwas, in that they are fundamental to the awakened moral state in which a human being acts for the good of all humanity. They form the basis for a sort of Nirvana.

 

As our chart illustrates, the pragmatic value of Kant's philosophy lies in its exploration of the relationship between Thought, a well-adjusted thinking process and attitude, and Action, rational behavior under all circumstances. Immanuel Kant might leave the esoteric mind somewhat unfulfilled, but we must realize the reactionary atmosphere at the time and place in which he made his ideas known. These ideas made a profound and expansive impact upon the somewhat crystallized boundaries of academic philosophy which resulted in the popular adage, "If you do not know Kant, you do not know Philosophy." Western philosophy and theology have been forced to acknowledge the basic fact of our incarnation and the sources of wisdom that lie therein.


Science and Theosophy: The Challenge of Unification Part 1

By Michael Levin

Originally printed in the JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Levin, Michael. "Science and Theosophy: The Challenge of Unification Part 1." Quest  95.1 (JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007):
25-29.

Theosophical Society - Michael Levin attended Tufts University, where he received dual B.S. degrees, in CS and in Biology. He earned a Ph.D. from Harvard University for the first characterization of the molecular-genetic mechanisms that allow embryos to form consistently left-right asymmetric body structures in a universe that does not macroscopically distinguish left from right (1992-1996); this work is on Nature's list of '100 Milestones of Developmental Biology of the Century'.

Those of us who consider ourselves "hard-core" theosophists have a commitment to a large package of ontology, or specific beliefs about the world. We not only take the general suspicions of the existence of "something important beyond the physical" seriously, as some famous scientists, noetic theorists, and New Agers do, but we also take seriously a considerable amount of detail about planes, non-corporeal beings, rounds, and chains from theosophical thinkers such as Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater. In this sense, Theosophy is one of the most naturalistic and, in a way, scientific of the various spiritual paths. Because Theosophy has so much to say about the world, it is important to consider how this set of claims meshes or conflicts with modern science—the other major way of describing and understanding the outside world.

 

As the Nobel prize-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann said, "A theory is like an animal—it is only alive as long as it is in danger." Our theosophical heritage of specific claims is at once a huge leg-up, but also potential baggage. Some systems, like Zen, are free of positive claims. They can accommodate any scientific world-view whatsoever because they have nothing to say about how the world is organized (although they offer important content along other lines, such as how one ought to relate to the world.) In this arena such systems are safe and not in danger of falsification from the advances of science, but may also be seen as sterile, to the extent that they don't contribute much positive information. They cannot be falsified but may be limited in the kind of insight they provide in regard to understanding the world. In contrast, Theosophical beliefs that there are entities living among us unseen by physical senses; that there is one soul per human body; and that our actions set in motion karmic forces which play out over lifetimes are in danger in so far as they might potentially conflict with future discoveries. As any scientist knows, propositions that are endangered in this way are the most valuable because they afford us the possibility, at least in principle, of determining whether they are true or false.

Does this matter? Maybe the important thing is just to be kind to each other and the details of how the world works are unimportant. But it does matter a great deal, even for those who are not personally driven to seek to understand the world in this fashion. If our favorite claims are found to be false, does that not throw the whole enterprise into question? As an example, consider the Christian church during the Middle Ages. When its positive claim that the Earth was at the center of a universe consisting of fixed spheres was shown to be false, it had to back off to a position where it could make no comments about the real world, but speak only to normative or moral issues—how one ought to act, rather than how the world is. This is a weak position; one theosophists cannot afford to take. One of the things that make our tradition different from many others is that it is based on a naturalistic description of important features about the universe, including the existence of a super-physical world, other sheaths/bodies, Kundalini, rebirth, karma, Masters, other entities, chains, and rounds. If all of this was disproved or shown to be conceptually useless, perhaps we could still lead a moral life, but it would hardly be Theosophy.

Worse yet, it is likely that leading a moral existence is impossible without understanding the world. Surely, knowing the right thing to do depends critically upon the facts of how things are now, and how they are likely to be changed by one's actions. In an increasingly complex society where the goals of various people and groups are often mutually incompatible, making the best choice (even without selfish motives) can be very difficult. For example, knowledge of the facts surrounding the events leading to the conception, gestation, and birth of human beings, along with aspects such as ensoulment, life plans, and karma would seem crucial to making rational decisions about the ethics of abortion, whether on the personal or societal levels. Any philosophy worth dedicating one's time to has to be based on a realistic understanding of the universe in which we live.

In the last two hundred years, science has been the way that we learn about the world. In general, Theosophy has had a very scientific attitude in the sense that the classics exhort us to not take things on faith but rather to study diligently, keep an open mind, perfect the necessary qualities, and determine the truth for ourselves. All of these strategies, without exception, are directly applicable to the modern study of science. Blavatsky's "There is no religion higher than truth" summarizes this commitment nicely. But how are those who do not have direct spiritual perception of specific details to judge the truth-value of various claims? Science has done extremely well in that department, and this suggests that it might be profitable to examine the relationship between Theosophy and science.

It is not necessary to get into the issues of precisely which Theosophical claims are more valid than others. People with varying degrees of spiritual perception disagree on particulars, of course, and there has been some disagreement and argument among the classical Theosophists themselves. My explanation is based on the fundamental Theosophical package, the works of Blavatsky, Purucker, Leadbeater, Besant, and Judge; and expanded with the works of Steiner, Bailey, Heindel, and Ouspensky.

Qualities of the Scientific Approach

There are some important qualities of the scientific approach to highlight at the forefront. The first would be consilience, The quality of consilience is of preeminent importance, and has been written about by scientists such as Richard Dawkins, Daniel C. Dennett, Heinz R. Pagels, and Edward O. Wilson. Space constraints prevent the full transmission of the truly wondrous import of this quality in modern science, but it can be roughly pictured as the way all of the parts of the scientific edifice—facts, methodology, conceptual structures, and so on—"hang together." Everything is connected to everything else and attaches perfectly at the seams. Often, results from one field enable progress in a completely different field, giving us reason to believe that we are indeed successfully investigating a coherent reality. For example, the results of logic, game theory, and statistics when applied to the data of molecular biology, genetics, and biochemistry within the Darwinian paradigm, provide a powerful edifice encompassing embryonic development, altruistic behavior, and animal communication. Descriptions of reality on completely different levels, from molecules to behavior, merge nicely to provide a coherent picture of the world we observe. For example, models from quantum theory have shed light on the largest issues concerning the origin of the universe (Greene, 2005). Though this effort is far from complete, despite claims to the contrary, the different areas of science share a coherent vision centering on reproducibility, intelligibility and rationalism, objective third-person descriptions, simplification, hierarchical emergence, and mechanistic models based on exchange of energy or information (Horgan, 1996).

Another important quality of the scientific approach is the predictive, or controlling, power of science. However one might be tempted to criticize Western society as a whole, and whatever possible harm technology may have done to some aspects of our lives, there is no denying that any system that can allow the average person the opportunity to construct a laser beam, perform heart transplants, or send objects to the moon is surely on to something real and profoundly important. No need for lifetimes of apprenticeship or secrecy here. Is there any other system, religion, or philosophy that results in even a remotely similar level of efficacy? It might be useful to step back and consider one's own intuitive expectations. If an engineer is hired to build a computerized control system for a house, it is expected to work correctly and every single time. Contrast that with the situation when someone is ill or has some sort of problem in life. A rabbi or priest will generally pray for that person, which may be comforting, but what does one realistically expect in terms of any ability to actually affect the outcome? We are told the Masters hold powers that dwarf our accomplishments and can use them at will, but it is quite clear that in terms of the ability to reliably and reproducibly understand, predict, and control the outside world, the methodology and conceptual constructs of science are the best tools we have, that is until we all become Masters ourselves.

Two more important qualities that need to be looked at are fundamental principles and specific scientific paradigms. Examples of fundamental principles include materialism, Occam's razor, the basic properties of position, energy, and mass, and the use of mathematics as the language of description. These principles have no specific proof, and are not generally at odds with Theosophy. In contrast to these general principles that guide method and theory-building in science, there are specific scientific theories that have varying degrees of evidence in their favor. Note the cumulative nature of science. Theories are discarded when better ones, which explain why the old ones worked to the extent they did, are developed and provide a more accurate or more complete explanation. A classic example is Einstein's work which showed nicely why the older Newtonian scheme worked at slow speeds and moderate sizes of objects, but then extended our ability to understand the very large and the very fast. In contrast to philosophy, where not a single issue has been satisfactorily put to rest in thousands of years even by the greatest minds, science always moves forward. The net movement of science is always towards deeper understanding and more functional control over its domain.

In time, scientific theories can of course be rejected and one ought not to throw away Theosophy just because it happens to disagree for example, with the current model of how many dimensions the universe has. In cosmology, as in other fields, such radical issues are not only hotly debated but the majority opinion can change within a few years. Nevertheless, the amazing success of science from the perspective of engineering and medicine shows that we have gotten many of the basics right. Thus, for Theosophists, there are a number of specific issues with which we have to reconcile.

One possibility is that this strategy is backwards, that Theosophy must most crucially be reconciled with the primary and very successful basic "limiting principles" of science, while the specific paradigms of today are unimportant, since their relevance changes over time (Broad, 1949). However, the basic principles are not a problem; they will serve us well if properly understood, and can be expanded as needed since no specific data hinges on their truth or falsity. In contrast, some of the conceptual structures of science are highly unlikely to be overthrown and must surely be dealt with by any Theosophist wishing a consistent world-view. Most importantly, by directly confronting these possible inconsistencies, we may begin to discard them and reach a more profound understanding of both.

A Cautionary Note

 

How has science made so much progress while completely ignoring what we are told the majority of reality is, that is six out of seven major planes being non-physical? Of course, science has made progress mostly on the physical side of reality; but it seems odd that one need know nothing whatsoever about those topics which Theosophists discuss, in order to harness nuclear energy, transplant hearts, or induce normal eyes to be formed exactly where we want them on a tadpole's tail. Perhaps we are on the verge of a great scientific entry into the spiritual dimensions. Various theosophists suggested that this was to have happened in the last century, but maybe their timing was off a bit and a unification will still occur.
 

It is important that we not fall for superficial similarities. A number of very popular New Age authors such as Capra, Dossey, Goswami, Wolf, and others make it seem as though science is moving towards the spiritual. This is a comforting thought because it allows us to have it both ways since it has been said that in time, science will move towards and embrace the spiritual. This is a dangerous attitude because without concerted effort along those lines, it simply will not happen in the necessary time-frame. The main thesis of this paper is that as things stand, science is NOT moving towards the spiritual. E=mc2 does not have anything to do with Theosophy's ether; rates of vibration and subtle energies are not in any clear way compatible with our understanding of energy; and quantum mechanics does not help with the problems of consciousness. Not to say they are incompatible, but it does nothing to help us understand what consciousness is or to solve the main problem of cognitive science--that is explaining how any third-person account of events, quantum or classical, gives rise to a conscious first person perspective. Complementarity, non-local interactions, and all the other wonders of modern physics may sound similar to various claims about psychical matters, but this analogy does not stand up to logical scrutiny of the details. Indeed, materialism, in its modern wider sense, is ever more firmly considered a fundamental pillar of science because of its increasing methodological success.

 

There is no indication that science is moving away from that direction. There are specific examples of people attempting such a unification, but generally the consilience of science and the arrow of its progress is pointing directly toward the elimination of anything non-physical when we look at the theories of such scientists as Bose, Jahn and Dunne, Laszlo, Stevenson, and others. The high-quality work along the lines of unification is a small speck in the sea of pseudoscientific and pseudo-spiritual writing on "soul physics" and such. To consider how theosophy and science might intersect, it is necessary to suspend the scientific disbelief and ignore the fact that almost any scientist will think the issues discussed in this paper are utter nonsense. To make progress along these lines, it is necessary to take both sides, thought forms as well as tensors, seriously. It is hoped that a critical, hard-nosed look at the gulf between science and theosophy may galvanize the community out of their state of blissfully optimistic patience and into useful activity driven by the opportunity of crisis.

Where Science and Theosophy Intersect: Areas of Exploration and Integration

Here is a brief overview of the scientific edifice to establish some boundaries for what it is that Theosophy must be integrated.

Physics encompasses many aspects. Basic Newtonian mechanics describes how things work at medium scales of speed and size. Thermodynamics describes the laws governing collections of objects, provides a unified view of steam engines and animal metabolism, and shows why all isolated systems eventually run down if left to their own devices. Quantum mechanics describes, with incredible precision, the action of subatomic particles. It has taught us that fundamental unpredictability is a main ingredient in the events taking place at small scales. Relativity theory covers very large and very fast-moving objects. Special relativity has shown that space and time are inextricably linked as two faces of a single entity; most strikingly, it has shown us that there is no special "now" for all observers. General relativity gives a satisfying geometrical picture of how space-time can be bent, and together with quantum cosmology, is beginning to give a detailed picture of the shape, structure, and evolution of our universe. We have learned about black holes, quasars, gravity lenses, inflationary expansion, and the big bang.

Chemistry allows us to explain the behavior of materials and make new compounds with predictable properties. Biology now comprises a synthesis of genetics, biochemistry, and cell biology that shows, on all scales, how physiological processes result from chemical reactions driven by protein blocks encoded by DNA. We now understand much of this process from the smallest scale, being able to manipulate the structure and function of living forms as desired, to the largest scale, as we uncover and understand the dynamics of the evolutionary history of the physical forms of animals from the very first cells on Earth. Computer models of Darwinian evolution demonstrate that complexity can indeed be generated by processes involving no teleological component.

Cognitive science is beginning to tackle thought and behavior. We now understand how brain mechanisms process information at many levels, from signals impinging on individual neurons in the retina to whole behavioral repertoires generated by large neural networks. The best current model for human thought is a "multiple-drafts" theory, which postulates that different structures in the brain generate behavior based on their own processing of the data they have. Investigations, of normal brains and people with revealing injuries suggest that there is no homunculus in the brain—there is no place where it all comes together and no central "I" at the base of it all who has a unified perspective (Sacks, 1998; Stich, 1996). Studies on confabulation, subconscious processing, and split-brain experiments suggest that a coherent central thinker at the center of our being is a fiction—a "narrative center of gravity" according to Daniel C. Dennett in his book Consciousness Explained.

Some important results have come from the foundations of mathematics. Turing, Gödel, and Chaitin have developed rigorous proofs concerning the limits of knowledge and predictability. While these limits are applicable within very narrow contexts, it is important to know that here, as in quantum limits on predictability, the evidence does not come from our being unable to predict something (which would then give hope that someday with better techniques we could predict it.) Instead, the unpredictability is a mathematically-derived feature and is a base axiom from which other successes are made, suggesting that it is real and not contingent on current limitations. Game theorists and work from cellular automata computer models have shown how incredible complexity and apparent design can be developed from simple systems with very few components interacting according to fixed rules.

The Consilience of Theosophy and Science Is Crucial

It is simply not tenable to say that all scientific knowledge applies only to the physical world and that other laws apply to mind-stuff and spirit. Eventually, everything has to intersect and integrate. If the spirit world has a reality and a relevance to physical life, it has to interact with the world of matter, and thus its laws must somehow be relevant for some aspect of physics. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the places where such intersections may exist, determine whether there are contradictions, and then see if the contradictions can be resolved.

References

Broad, C. D. "The Relevance of Psychical Research to Philosophy." Philosophy 24, 291-309, 1949.

Greene, Brian. The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory. Boston: WGBH Boston Video, 2005.

Horgan, John. The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1996.

Sacks, Oliver W. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1998.

Stich, Stephen P. Deconstructing the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.


The Powers of Truth and Discontent

By Anton Lysy

Originally printed in the JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Lysy, Anton  "The Powers of Truth and Discontent." Quest  95.1 (JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007):18-23.

What is it then, which makes me say what in deepest seriousness and a full knowledge of its truth I have said? What is it that makes me not only content but proud to stand for the brief moment as the mouthpiece and figure-head of this movement, risking abuse, misrepresentation, and every vile assault? It is the fact that in my soul I feel that behind us, behind our little band, behind our feeble, newborn organization, there gathers a MIGHTY POWER that nothing can withstand—the power of TRUTH!

(From H.S. Olcott's Inaugural Address in New York City, November 17, 1875.)

Long before Colonel Henry Steel Olcott (HSO) met Helena P. Blavatsky (HPB) at the site of ongoing spiritualist phenomena in Chittendon, Vermont in 1874, he had been developing his critical thinking skills in different areas of endeavor. Prior to the Civil War, Olcott worked in experimental agriculture and published a book and pamphlet on sorgho and imphee, the Chinese and African forms of sugar cane. While such studies were central to the growing development of the scientific method during this time period, this also gives us insight into the defining qualities of Olcott. His study and mastery of refining required both discernment and sensitivity for isolating variables relevant to his experimental work. And his insights reflected his humanitarian hope to help the economic development of the poor by teaching them to cultivate these foreign plants.

During the Civil War, Secretary of War Stanton appointed Olcott to investigate fraud among military suppliers. Olcott's success in collecting evidence of what he later called the "Carnival of Fraud" would establish his reputation as a competent, thorough, and fair reformer. With these plaudits from the field, he was appointed as "a special commissioner in the Bureau of Military Justice" selected to examine the alleged conspiracy behind the assassination of President Lincoln in 1865.

After the war, Olcott studied law and applied the forms of legal reasoning from precedent to areas ranging from insurance to taxation. Established professionally in New York City, he turned back to his earlier interest in Spiritualism as an investigative journalist for The New York Sun newspaper. When he first glimpsed HPB at the Eddy Farm in Chittendon, he was in the midst of utilizing various tests that he had developed to detect any possibility of fraud in producing the spiritualist phenomena seen there. He marked cabinets with tape, for example, to allow him to measure the height of the apparitions. He was thorough in looking for any covert space under floors, behind walls, or above the ceiling that could be used for faking the phenomena. He timed the intervals between the appearances and exits of different apparitions.

These methodical precautions and his experiences in Vermont were later collected and described in his People from the Other World. He was clearly at ease with the motley variety of apparitions he encountered and described one occasion when he filled his pipe with tobacco for the apparition of an Indian woman named Honto who wanted to smoke.

'there stood a smoking squaw before us, in feature, costume, and complexion the type of her race, and with no more appearance of spirituality about her than any of the women in the room, who sat there regarding her with amazement. (194)

A further strong indication of Olcott's commitment to a broad concept of scientific objectivity and verification is reflected in his dedication of this book to two prominent English scientists who had shown interest in Spiritualism, Alfred R. Wallace and William Crookes.

The meeting with HPB, however, would initiate Olcott into even more abstruse territory beyond the realms of law, taxes, insurance, philosophy, and science. Their contact had produced ignition—their chemistry as a compound had "stirred up a great and permanent fire," according to the Colonel. The pair embodied two contrasting poles of being; energy, experience, and insight had been brought together to dance alchemically as the "Two Chums"—"The Esoteric She" introduced to the "Worldly He." After years with HPB as his tutor, Olcott would describe an encounter with the astral body of an adept in Old Diary Leaves quite differently from his casual reactions to Honto and her peers:

' his eyes were alive with soul-fire; eyes which were at once benignant and piercing in glance; the eyes of a mentor and a judge, but softened by the love of a father who gazes on a son needing counsel and guidance. He was so grand a man, so imbued with the majesty of moral strength, so luminously spiritual, so evidently above average humanity, that I felt abashed in his presence, and bowed my head and bent my knee as one does before a god or a god-like personage. (379)

Clearly, determining the truth was extremely important to Olcott—honesty seemed to be part of his character as a seeker and not merely a policy. Together, Olcott and Blavatsky would form the hybrid heart of the nucleus of a grand plan for human development that would conceivably take centuries to unfold fully as our species slowly evolves and becomes all that it can be. For in getting to know her and to learn from and through her, an ongoing fire of creation had been generated that would be diffused through the society they were about to launch.

Olcott had started to learn in depth from the singular experiences of his Russian friend. Her guided travels around the world had provided her with firsthand knowledge of both esoteric and exoteric traditions. And, through the gnosis that radiated from her presence, an unprecedented vision of global interconnections and interdependencies slowly began to manifest in the interaction between these two humans who had both been born under the astrological sign of Leo. Olcott's own latent skills would later flourish as he traveled across the world for Theosophy and Buddhism.

This gnosis of transcendence was grounded on a distinction between the apprehension of absolute truth and the perception of relative truth. Knowing this difference firsthand was the fruit of the esoteric training HPB had received. She would later clarify this distinction in a paper entitled "What Is Truth?" originally published in Lucifer in February 1888.

To sum up the idea, with regard to absolute and relative truth, we can only repeat what we said before. Outside a certain highly spiritual and elevated state of mind, during which Man is at one with the UNIVERSAL MIND —he can get nought on earth but relative truth, or truths, from whatever philosophy or religion.

In his Inaugural Address, HSO alluded to this need for an elevated state of consciousness in what was probably an aside only understood by HPB:

Certainly the Theosophical Society cannot be compared to an ancient school of theurgy, for scarcely one of its members yet suspects that the obtaining of occult knowledge requires any more sacrifices than any other branch of knowledge.

As he proceeded with his Inaugural Address, Olcott expressed his understanding of the critical and systematic approach inherent in the new Theosophical Society:

If I rightly apprehend our work, it is to aid in freeing the public mind of theological superstition and a tame subservience to the arrogance of science.No, we are' but simply investigators, of earnest purpose and unbiassed mind, who study all things, prove all things, and hold fast to that which is good'We seek, inquire, reject nothing without cause, accept nothing without proof: we are students, not teachers.

The Power of Truth

Fourteen years later and still the president of the Theosophical Society, a well-seasoned Olcott would assess the progress of the work in his article "Applied Theosophy":

What the Society has hitherto done—its great merit in the eyes of some, and its terrible fault in the estimation of others—is to make people think. No one can for long belong to the Theosophical Society without beginning to question himself. He begins to ask himself: "How do I know that?" "Why do I believe this?" "What reason have I to be so certain that I am right, and so sure that my neighbours are wrong?" "What is my warrant for declaring this action, or that practice, to be good, and their opposites bad?"

The very air of Theosophy is charged with the spirit of enquiry. It is not the "skeptical" spirit, nor is it the "agnostic." It is a real desire to know and to learn the truth, as far as it is possible for any creature who is so limited by his capacities and so biased by his prejudices as is man. It is that which has raised the Theosophical Society above the level of all other aggregations or organizations of men, and which, so long as its Fellows abstain from dogmatizing, must keep it on an altogether higher plane.

The fact is that the Theosophical Society attracts persons who have got a natural disposition to examine, analyze, reflect; and when this tendency does not exist—when people join the Society from special sympathy with one or more of its Objects—they very soon begin to ponder over the problems of existence, for they find themselves involuntarily and instinctively subjecting their own pet theories and cherished weaknesses to the process of examination which is the slogan of the Society.

By the time of HPB's death in 1891, the mighty power of truth was tied to three expressions:

  1. THERE IS NO RELIGION HIGHER THAN TRUTH
    (Theosophical Society Motto)
  2. LOYALTY TO TRUTH
    Theosophical Society Creed)
  3. TO HONOR EVERY TRUTH BY USE
    Theosophical Society Ritual)

Since its beginning, then, the Theosophical Society has been concerned with a global understanding of "truth" that would allow adjustments to be made for the different languages, myths, religions, philosophies, sciences, and theories that have emerged over the centuries of human history. The tradition recognizes the importance of esoteric spiritual practices that enable truth to "unveil" and surface internally and not merely be discovered through the senses. We must thus transform ourselves consciously, one by one, if the world is ever to embody the peace, wisdom, and knowledge that we can envision as the fruition of Brotherhood.

The importance of truth has continued to be diffused through the many disciplines that have emerged since the end of the nineteenth century. The TS had been one of the groups at the 1893 World's Parliament of Religions in Chicago. A century later, the American Section of the TS was active in planning its centennial, the 1993 Parliament of the World's Religions.

Many things had changed over the hundred years, but the importance of the mighty power of truth had not diminished. Spiritual leaders from around the world in attendance were presented a Global Ethic to sign as a universal commitment. Truth was embedded within one of "Four Irrevocable Directives" of the Global Ethic:

  1. Commitment to a culture of non-violence and respect for life.
  2. Commitment to a culture of solidarity and a just economic order.
  3. Commitment to a culture of tolerance and a life of truthfulness.
  4. Commitment to a culture of equal rights and partnership between women and men.

 

The mighty power that Colonel Olcott had felt in New York in 1875 was amplified in Chicago one hundred and eighteen years later, and compiled into a book by Dr. Hans Kung called A Global Ethic: The Declaration of the Parliament of World's Religions:

Numberless women and men of all regions and religions strive to lead lives of honesty and truthfulness. Nevertheless, all over the world we find endless lies and deceit, swindling and hypocrisy, ideology and demagoguery:

Politicians and business people who use lies as a means to success

Mass media which spread ideological propaganda instead of accurate reporting, misinformation instead of information, cynical commercial interest instead of loyalty to the truth....

In the great ancient religious and ethical traditions of humankind we find the directive: You shall not lie! Or in positive terms: Speak and act truthfully! Let us reflect anew on the consequences of this ancient directive: No woman or man, no institution, no state or church or religious community has the right to speak lies to other humans....

Young people must learn at home and in school to think, speak and act truthfully. They have a right to information and education to be able to make the decisions that will form their lives. Without an ethical formation they will hardly be able to distinguish the important from the unimportant. In the daily flood of information, ethical standards will help them discern when opinions are portrayed as facts, interests veiled, tendencies exaggerated, and facts twisted....

We must cultivate truthfulness in all our relationships instead of dishonesty, dissembling, and opportunism...(29)

The Power of Discontent

In his Inaugural Address, Olcott had also declared "'we found this Society in token of our discontent with things as they are and to endeavor to bring about something better. . ." Discontent with life has been a powerful source of motivation throughout history.

As a reformer in India, Olcott worked selflessly to bring the strands of Buddhism together. He designed a flag for Buddhism and wrote a catechism of the central tenets of the Buddhist tradition. He also worked to develop schools for the children of the Untouchable caste in India, the "Panchamas" who were neglected. There were improvements to be made in all aspects of life and he was ready to initiate reform wherever he saw it was needed.

As we celebrate Colonel Olcott's life this year, do we feel the mighty power of truth behind the Theosophical Society as strongly as he did in 1875? The challenges of life on earth may require us to reassess the assumptions we have made about the truth of many things. But the vision of brotherhood grounded in truth still has the mighty power to make us work to change ourselves and to help the children and elders—all beings—who share our planet.

If human consciousness is required to generate the next stage of our evolution as a species, more and more of us need to have a long range commitment to a vision of cooperation and peace that does not waver when the inevitable resistance to that vision is encountered. Transformation will not come easily, so it is not wise to be foolishly optimistic. And since it will not come without a sustained effort requiring courage and persistence, it is also unwise to be pessimistic.

Our President-Founder and his Russian Guide set us a high standard to follow in their actions as well as their words and writings. Let us honor them by simply being honest, kind, compassionate, and altruistic beings that know in their hearts that

ALL LIFE IS ONE AND EVEN THE HUMBLEST FORMS ENSHRINE DIVINITY.


References
 
Blavatsky, H. P. "What Is Truth?" Lucifer, February 1888.
 
Kung, Hans and Karl-Josef Kuschel. A Global Ethic: The Declaration of the Parliament of the World's Religions, New York: Continuum, 1994.
 
Olcott, Henry Steel. "Applied Theosophy." The Theosophist, June 1889
 
——. Old Diary Leaves, Volume 1. Adyar: Theosophical Publishing House, 1895.
 
——. Old Diary Leaves, Volume 1. Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1895.
 
——. People from the Other World. Hartford, CT: American Publishing Co., 1875.
 
——. Sorgho and Imphee: The Chinese and African Sugar Canes. A Treatise Upon Their Origin, Varieties, and Culture. New York: A.O. Moore, 1857
 
Prothero, Stephen. The White Buddhist: The Asian Odyssey of Henry Steel Olcott. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996.

Falling Awake: The Life and Message of Joe Miller

By Richard Power and David Thompson

Originally printed in the JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Power, Richard; Thompson, David "Falling Awake: The Life and Message of Joe Miller." Quest  95.1 (JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2007):7-11,17.

The Clear Light is the source of light that lighteth everyone of humankind that cometh into the world. It is the radiance of cosmic consciousness. Yogins realize it while still in the fleshly body, and all humans glimpse it at the moment of death. It is the light of the Buddha, the Christ and all masters of life. And to the devotee in whom it shines unimpededly, it is the guru and the deliverer.

 

—W.Y. Evans-Wentz
The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation

 

I know I am nothing, no-thing, no-thing, not me, not me. I'm just a wild-assed spark of the Infinite functioning in the Finite! My viewpoint is that you surrender yourself to your deeper spiritual self, and be that spiritual self. Be who you are. And that's what you are. You're all God. You're carrying around the generator of force within you. Use it. That's what you got it for. You just needed some silly-billy like me to come along and mention it to you.

—Joe Miller

Annie Besant was a person of great importance, as an orator, a writer, and a leader—not only in the history of the Theosophical Society, but also in the history of India and in the struggle for the rights of women and children. She was at home on the world stage.

One morning in the 1920s, at the Theosophical Society in Chicago, she met a young man waiting for an elevator. "Hi, my name is Joe Miller and this is the happiest moment of my life." Besant took the young man into the library and they talked for some time.

The next day, someone told Joe that Mrs. Besant had been looking for him, but that she had left for India. The same night, the young man had a dream about her. When he woke up, he wrote her a letter in which he included a bit of poetry that had come to him after their chance encounter:

 

Of worldly jewels and riches I have none.
My strength of will surpasses all.
Thine not mine be done.

 

Sometime later, a man who had been traveling with Mrs. Besant brought Joe a message from her. She said "as far as you are concerned, when the time comes, you will know what you are supposed to do."

Over sixty years later, the Dalai Lama came to deliver a sermon at the Grace Cathedral on Nob Hill, a block away from the San Francisco Theosophical Society (SFTS) Lodge. The cathedral was overflowing with thousands of people. Joe Miller, the same young man who had stumbled into Annie Besant at the elevator, now in his eighties, was sitting with his fifth wife, Guin, in the inner vestibule. As the Dalai Lama made his way out of the cathedral, everyone sitting in the vestibule rose and placed their hands in a prayerful mudra, out of respect for this great being who is both the spiritual leader of millions of Buddhists and the worldly leader of an ancient government in exile. Then something remarkable happened: the Dalai Lama paused as he was passing the Millers (whom he had never met or known). He stepped away from his entourage, walked up to the Millers, took their hands and silently blessed them.

The story of what happened to Joe Miller in that sixty-year stretch, between his chance encounter with Annie Besant in Chicago in the early 1920s and the impromptu reverence shown to him by the Dalai Lama in the early 1990s, is a remarkable one. What was it that Joe found to do when the time came? What was it that he used his "strength of will" to achieve? Although Joe Miller's story is a tale of morality set in twentieth-century America, its import is timeless and universal. And though the story is poignantly, indeed eccentrically personal, it is also profoundly, almost cosmically, impersonal.

Spiced up with some street-smart slang (part burlesque/part beatnik), laced with obscure and arcane Sanskrit terminology, and spiked with ribald humor and hard-nosed common sense, Joe's life and teaching illuminates the deepest teachings of the great mystical traditions, both East and West, and makes them accessible in some revolutionary ways.

The School of Hard Knocks

How did Joe discover what he was supposed to do, as Annie Besant had promised he would when the time came? How did that extraordinary fruit get to ripen to its juiciness? How did the field of his life get plowed, seeded, and watered? And what was it that the Dalai Lama bowed to in Joe and his wife?

Joe Miller was born to a dirt-poor family in Minnesota.

"We didn't get the kind of clothes or grub the other kids got. I knew it too. At Christmas time, everybody would get together, and I could see that our relatives were awful fat and we were awful lean."

Show business ran in the family. His father had been kidnapped into the circus as a young boy because of his acrobatic skills, and stayed on to become a "daring young man on the high trapeze," before settling down as a housepainter. Joe, himself, only got as far as the eighth grade in school. But as a child, he had a gift for singing. And even as a child, there was a powerful and mysterious quality in his being.

"The old man and I would be working in a joint, wall-papering the place, and he'd say, 'Joe, what the hell, give us a song.' So I would sing "Irish Eyes Are Smiling" or "A Little Bit of Heaven." Once when I was singing that way, there was a sick guy in the other room. Afterward, he told his daughter that he was going to commit suicide until he heard me singing."

The "Force," as Obi Wan might say, was "strong in him." Indeed, in later life Joe was fond of invoking the Jedi mysticism of Star Wars. He would often declare, "May the Force be with you." And some of us who were fortunate enough to spend time with him saw him as our Master Yoda.

As a young man, Joe went into vaudeville and burlesque, and worked odd jobs. He drove a Wonder Bread truck, but only briefly.

"There I was, selling Wonder Bread and working the nightclubs after dark. Now that's a hell of a combination. I'd log about a hundred and twenty miles a day and then go work four or five hours in a nightclub. One fine, snowy morning, I fell asleep at the wheel, drove the truck off the road and turned it over."

He had some mystical experiences.

 

After joining the Theosophical Society, I was visiting a friend of mine back in Minnesota, on Lake Minnetonka. We were walking along and went into some trees. I smelled sandalwood incense. There was nothing like sandalwood anywhere near there. Then I just took a gentle, in-drawn breath and was filled with ecstasy. Well, it was about two years before it happened again. I wanted it to come back so bad I cried. . . After awhile, I got so that I could do that with a gentle, in-drawn breath. But it wasn't me. It was just tuning into that Thatness, the It-ness, God, love, whatever you want to call it.

 

He also had some heartbreaking human experiences.

I had a wife and two kids. The little girl loved the fat, and the boy only ate the lean. We had great times together because I was like a little kid with them. We were living in Chicago and I was working in Detroit. I took the day off, and went back. I had been tipped off she was playing around with somebody else. (Of course, I had been doing the same thing with whole chorus lines.) When I got to the door, there was a rumbling inside. Then I went to the back door and there was a guy going down the steps . . . She met someone with a lot of money . . .The divorce papers she had made up claimed "desertion," I got her to sign a paper that said I wouldn't contest it if she changed it to "incompatibility." Then they sent me a notice that they wanted to adopt the kids, but the notice wasn't sent from Chicago until three days after I would have had to notify them, so I couldn't do anything about it. I never saw the kids again . . . I never heard anything from my first two kids.

During the 1930s and 1940s, Joe traveled around the country doing gigs in hick towns and big cities. Along the way, he pursued his fascination with the mystical and the occult, "astral real estate," he would later call it. He was particularly interested in the use of color and music in healing. Wherever he went, he would look up mystics, occultists, charlatans, quacks, and true-blue experimenters, getting glimpses of inventions like the "Clauvilux" and the "Luxatone," i.e., "color organs" that could allegedly alter a person's psychic or physical condition. (Many years later, buried away in his steamer trunk, stuffed behind bookcases, and shoved underneath his and Guin's bed we would find the evidence of his explorations: prisms of all shapes and sizes, rose-tinted sunglasses, colored light bulbs and little booklets from obscure groups claiming to explain the hidden mysteries of healing with color and sound.)

Meanwhile, Joe continued to struggle in show business and in life:

"I was in LA. I had applied for a job, and I went out to see my aunt and uncle, thinking I could horn in on a Christmas dinner. But they said, 'Well, Joe, we're glad to see you, but we are going out to Christmas dinner with friends.' I didn't have a nickel. I did have a boarding room. When I got back downtown, I looked through all of my clothes and I found fifteen cents. At that time, you could get a box of soda crackers for a nickel and buy a dime's worth of cheese." He cried himself to sleep that night.

It took Joe several broken marriages, several decades of show business and odd jobs, and much inner searching before he found out what Annie Besant had been talking about and became the person that the Dalai Lama picked out of the big crowd. 

 

Cooking on the Big Burner

In the 1950s, and in the fifth decade of his own life, Joe found his bearing and set his course. It was then, as Joe would say, he "started cookin' on the big burner."

"Everything I have in this life," he told us years later, "I owe to the Theosophical Society." It was not rhetorical boast; it was a profound truth of sweeping personal and impersonal dimensions. Joe had been a member of the Theosophical Society since his early twenties, but it was only thirty years later, in the San Francisco Lodge (SFTS) that Joe found a home. He met his fifth and final wife at the Lodge. Guinevere Robinson Miller was a concert pianist, an accomplished astrologer, a graduate of University of California at Berkeley, and a dedicated member of the Theosophical Society.

Joe and Guin shared what they called "falling awake" (i.e., enlightenment) as a common goal. Working together, they said, two people could grow faster, evolving "geometrically" rather than "arithmetically." They were in many ways (family backgrounds, temperaments, education, etc.) polar opposites, but they complimented and amplified each other and, in turn, balanced one another. Together they became a force to be reckoned with.

Joe met another important person in his life at the SFTS, Agnes Kast. She was the Lodge librarian and had a knack for fitting the book to the person.

"If you came in and asked Agnes Kast for a book from the library, she wouldn't ask you what author or title you wanted, she would just walk over to one of the bookcases and get a book out and hand it to you. The happy part of it was that nine times out of ten she was right and handed you a book that would fit with what you were looking for."

Agnes introduced Joe to the work of the Tibetan Book of the Dead. It was the first in a series of four compilations of Tibetan Buddhist teachings edited and annotated by Dr. W.Y. Evans-Wentz, who like Joe, had pulled himself up by his own bootstraps. Evans-Wentz worked his way across the country, talked his way into Stanford and then into Oxford, traveled to Egypt, India, and Tibet and did some of the most important scholarly work of the century in terms of bridging Eastern and Western philosophy. And yes, of course, he too was a theosophist.

After reading his books, Joe wrote a letter to Evans-Wentz. Miraculously, like Joe's letter to Besant many years before, his letter to Evans-Wentz followed its recipient around the world, somehow fell into his hands, and got answered—from San Diego, only a few hundred miles away from Joe's own home in San Francisco. The correspondence was the spark of a unique and precious friendship, and led Joe on to deeper spiritual realizations.

I was working in a barbershop quartet—making people laugh, making people cry and hoping that on the overtone there would be some help going out to them, so that they'd come a little loose . . . I got a ticket [to see Evans-Wentz in San Diego]. I had to leave after the late show. I only had one day a week off. I looked at this guy. After all, I was talking to someone high on the hog. I didn't know how I would be received. Me, with my eighth grade education...He asked me which of his books I liked best, I told him Tibetan Yoga and Secret Doctrine. He asked me which part of it I liked best. I said I like 'Clear Light' and the 'Six Rules of Tilopa.' He said there was a book coming out that would be the answer for what I wanted to know. That's all he put out. Does he tell me the name of the book? No.

It turned out to be Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation. Joe read it to himself every morning for six months until he thought he was going to lose his mind. Suddenly, he had a breakthrough—not in his thinking, but in his being.

I was working in a burlesque house. If I did a midnight show, I wouldn't get home until three o'clock in the morning. I would go up on the roof until sunrise. And as the sun rose, all my little friends, the birds, would be singly madly, throwing themselves into it and singing. That's one of the reasons I can't eat birds, chicken, or turkey. Because they told me something, those birds were saying that each day in life we go into deep sleep and come out of it in the morning, just as the planets move around, and catch the rays from that source from which we receive our greatest energy, the sun. They felt it. They were singing the sun up. They weren't only singing that, they were singing because in their hearts they were a conscious part of it in their own way, in their form of consciousness. They'll find out how tough it is when they come into these human physical bodies later on.

Some poetry and messages came to Joe up on the roof, just as the words "of worldly jewels . . ." had previously come to him in his dream about Annie Besant back in his early twenties. This time, he heard, "The manifested universe is the keyboard upon which the master artist of spiritual reality plays the symphonic arrangement of life."

The occasional ecstasy that Joe had experienced through a "gentle, in-drawn breath" had expanded into a realization of the oneness of all life, and Joe's quest to unlock the mysterious powers of sound and light had been turned into a reverent understanding of how those mysterious powers were already unlocked and at work within everyone and everything at every moment of every day.

Joe had begun to "fall awake," and Guin was right there with him. She had sharpened her understanding with the Diamond Sutra, just as he honed his with the Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation. They began to set words from the great mystical traditions to music (e.g., the Upanishads, the New Testament, the Psalms of David, and the Sutra of Hui-Neng). They call them "Songs to Live By" and performed them at the SFTS Lodge. Joe would belt them out and Guin would accompany him on the piano. Later, Chogyam Trungpa, an important Tibetan Rinpoche whom the Millers befriended when he first came to the United States in the 1960s, would call these songs "the first American mantras."

One of the teachings that they set to music was the "Six Rules of Tilopa," the one Joe considered his favorite from Evans-Wentz's book, Tibetan Yoga and the Secret Doctrine: "Imagine not, think not, meditate not, reflect not, keep in the natural state." (130)

By this time, Evans-Wentz was older, in ill health, and living in a hotel he owned called the Keystone, but Joe and Guin wanted to share their new consciousness with him.

"We called up the hotel. We got through to his room. The nurse put him on the phone. I said, 'This is Joe Miller.' He said, 'Are you downstairs?' I said 'No, I'm in San Francisco. My wife, Guin, has written some music and I would like to have you hear it.' So she played it, and I sang it into the phone. His voice had been very feeble, but after listening to the song, he shouted 'YOU'RE THERE NOW, STAY THERE!' That was my OK from him that I had dug what it was all about." Ken Winkler, who wrote Pilgrim of Clear Light, a wonderful biography of Evans-Wentz, wrote that Evans-Wentz considered Joe Miller the only person he had met in the West who understood the doctrine of the Clear Light.

My wife and I Just Take a Walk in the Park Every Thursday

After cooking on the big burner for a while, Joe and Guin Miller were discovered by a young generation of seekers during the tumultuous decades of the 1960s and 1970s, and served as friends and inspiration for a growing number of young people until their deaths in 1992. They were an open secret. Word of them spread throughout the world. They influenced countless people in immeasurable ways, but they started no organization, they did no marketing, they offered no titles or degrees. They didn't charge money for their time or their teachings; they didn't hide behind the pretense of being special in any way. They simply shared themselves and their love for life and for truth.

Here is David Thompson's first person account of his twenty-five year friendship with Joe Miller. It offers some of the ineffable flavor of this phenomenon, a flavor that had to be "caught," because it could not be "taught":

I first met Joe Miller on one of his Thursday "walks" in Golden Gate Park. He was standing at the entryway to the park's arboretum, greeting people, hugging them, and talking with whoever was close at hand. I watched but did not go up to him, being a bit standoffish and more than a bit taken back by all the people seemingly clamoring to get near him. He spotted me, came up, stuck out his hand and said: "Hi, I'm Joe. What's your name?" We talked a bit. I told him I had seen him earlier at a Sufi dance and was interested in finding out a bit more about him and what he was up to. He said: "I'm up to nothing! My wife and I just take a walk in the park every Thursday and a bunch of kids show up to walk along with us. We celebrate various religious expressions and I give a 'rap,' which is nothing more than what's going thru my head and heart at the time."

 

He continued: "If you stick around till the end of the walk, I'll buy you and everyone else an ice-cream, thanks to Uncle Sam. See, I'm on Social Security and that's how I get the money to buy the ice-cream. I don't take any contributions and I don't advertise anything. Just walk and talk. One more thing, and remember this. If things get too crazy around here, you can always leave." He gave me a hug and was off to the next person.

 

I walked with him for a while and joined in a large group of people doing "Sufi dances." We held hands, went one way then the other, sang a song, bowed to one another, walked forward, and then outward. It was kind of like a square dance, but with a spiritual bent. After a few dances, Joe got into the middle of the circle and talked to us. Quite frankly I don't remember much about what he said except for this. He said: "I don't care if you remember one thing I say, but if you remember the feeling, then you got something to take with you —because, to feel is for real!" Then he said: "Enough of this serious stuff. Let's go feed the ducks." And we were off to the duck pond where he handed out Wonder Bread for us to break into pieces and feed to the ducks that eagerly awaited our offerings.

 

We continued the walk, taking a short break to sit beneath an enormous cypress tree where together we chanted a Buddhist mantra: "Gate, gate, para gate, para sum gate bodi swaja."

 

We finally arrived at the Pacific Ocean, and sure enough, there was Joe with a bag of ice-cream sandwiches, giving them to one and all, including the many little children who clamored about waiting for their ice-cream as if they were going to receive the keys to the universe. He gave another short talk where he summed up the experience of the walk and the essence of his "teaching." He said: "Remember one thing about all this spiritual stuff—it can't be bought, it's got to be caught."

 

Years later these words still ring clear. I found out in an instant that I could "catch it," if only I lived long enough and was lucky. But that's another story. I hung around Joe and his wife, Guin for the next twenty-five years.

 

Joe introduced me to books, music, meditation, people, prayer, thoughts, ideas and wonder. He also introduced me to the Theosophical Society in San Francisco where I attended many meetings—the Wednesday "Study Group", the Thursday "Music Hour," the Friday "Member's Meeting" (which was open to anyone who cared to visit), and the Sunday "Guest Lecturer's Meeting." During Lent, I attended the morning readings held at 6:30 a.m. when Joe read the Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation, and returned at 6:30 p.m. when Guin read the Diamond Sutra.

The Theosophical Society was Joe's window to the world. Over and over he would say: "All I have in this world I owe to the Theosophical Society." He meant it, and he lived it.

Once he said to me: "Stay still for a while. Don't go gallivanting around the world looking for some magic potion to hit you. Just stay put and watch. You will be amazed at what happens."

That's what he did. He sat in his apartment upstairs from the Theosophical Society and watched television, read books, and waited for the doorbell or telephone to ring— and ring it did. One day Ram Dass or Ken Wilber would visit, and another day some crazy kid who had taken too much LSD and thought he was the new avatar of the world. Joe listened and talked to them all. Sometimes he gave out very specific advice and other times he just said: "You have to do it for you!" Sometimes he was soft and other times he was stern. Sometimes he let one stick around his apartment all day and other times he would say: "Now get the hell out of here and go do something." The Sufis tried to make him a "Sheik," but he told them that "Sheik" was sometimes just another word for "Jerk." The Buddhists tried to make him an Abbot, but he told them that he really wasn't into titles, and besides, he already had a name: "Joe."

During the 1980s most of us were pretty fed up with the political situation in the United States, especially its leadership. But Joe would have none of our "bellyaching." He loved this country like he loved everyone who came into his presence. He refused to talk politics but insisted every Fourth of July that we stand and sing "God Bless America." It was amazing to see and hear dozens of disgruntled people standing and singing, while one voice—a very high pitched tenor—rose above all others: "...Land that I love. Stand beside her and guide her through the night with a light from above."

I loved Joe, and over the years grew closer and closer to him. He allowed me into his world and his heart. His heart was huge and in it there was room for everyone. He would often say: "You don't have to like everyone, but you do have to love everyone." He meant it and he lived it.

And he got old. In his late eighties he had a couple of strokes. He recovered from each one, but as time went on he came to realize that his time was approaching. He didn't want to die; he loved to live and intended to live to be at least one hundred. But after a short stay in the hospital, he came home and began his preparation for death. One day he got into his bed and said: "I'm going to give it a try." He died about two weeks later. But during the ensuing two weeks, his "kids" attended to him. And by his "kids," I mean those of us who were closest to him. We weren't the famous or the most literate. We were the sign painter, the cabbie, the nurse, the schoolteacher, the student, the dancer, the unemployed, and the unemployable. We sat with him, first giving him a little water and as time went on, just being there, sitting, watching, and waiting. I was one of those who sat, watched, and waited. A day before Joe died, I was sitting with him reading from the discourses of one of his favorite teachers, Ramana Maharshi. Again and again, Joe would ask us the famous question of the guru, "Who am I?" I never really understood the significance of the question, but dwelt on it many times over the years. As I sat and pondered this question, I recollected reading about the death of Ramana Maharshi. His disciples were gathered about him and one by one he said to them: "Thank you." Then he died.

When I finished the discourse, I looked at Joe who was lying in his bed looking straight above. He slowly turned and looked into my eyes and said, "Thank you."


References

Power, Richard. Great Song: Life and Teachings of Joe Miller. Athens, GA: Maypop, 1993

Winkler, Ken. Pilgrim of Clear Light: Biography of W.Y. Evans-Wentz. Berkeley, CA: Dawnfire, 1982

Evans-Wentz, W.Y. Tibetan Yoga and Secret Doctrine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954

Evans-Wentz, W.Y. Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954

Price, A.F. and Wong Mou-Lam. The Diamond Sutra and the Sutra of Hui-Neng. Boston: Shambhala, 1969


Subcategories