Guideposts for Living: Bhagavad Gita

Originally printed in the July - August 2004 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Mills, Joy. "Guideposts for Living: Bhagavad Gita." Quest  92.4 (JULY - AUGUST 2004):124-127, 132.

By Joy Mills

Theosophical Society - Joy Mills was an educator who served as President of the Theosophical Society in America from 1965–1974, and then as international Vice President for the Theosophical Society based in Adyar

The Bhagavad Gita is one of the world's great spiritual texts to which we may look for guidance for living a meaningful or a significant existence. Through centuries it has inspired thinkers, scholars, social activists, and people from all walks of life. It has been translated into nearly as many languages as are spoken on the planet, and commentaries on it have been produced throughout time. It is a work that belongs as much to the Western world as to the Eastern, for it speaks to every individual who has ever faced a seemingly insoluble problem. The Gita speaks to each one of us confronted by the existential dilemma of choice.

The Gita is one part of the great epic of India, the Mahabharata, which contains eighteen books; the Gita, which contains eighteen chapters or discourses, is part of the sixth book. The epic itself has a historical setting, but that is not our present concern, for in addition to its context as part of a great story, the Gita has both an archetypal, or universal, aspect and an individual aspect as represented by its human protagonist, Arjuna. It is both personal and transpersonal.

Central to understanding the Gita is the concept of yoga, or what has been called the path of conscious self-realization. According to the colophons, each discourse is an exposition of yoga. Yoga is both a practical discipline and the goal of self-integration, of complete harmonization of the individual soul with the Supreme Self. It is because we are dealing with that process known as yoga that the Bhagavad Gita is truly a guidepost for living—not only living the spiritual life but living in the here and now of daily existence with all its joys and sorrows.

Professor S. Dasgupta, in his History of Indian Philosophy, has stated that the Gita is not only a "system of philosophy" but more important, "a manual of right conduct and right perspective of things in the light of a mystical approach to God in self-resignation, devotion, friendship and humility." It is as such a guide to our conduct and to gaining the right perspective on all that occurs that we will look together at this beautiful text.

Let us begin at the beginning. Dharmakshetra kurukshetra are the first two words of our text, a text that is truly a gita—a song, a chant, the music or harmony of the Supreme embodied as Krishna, the mediator between the realm of the eternal and the world of our mundane existence. Dharmakshetra kurukshetra . . . in those two words we have the crux of our own dilemma, the central problem that every individual must eventually resolve.

Kshetra means, a field, a demarcated area or domain. It is where something takes place. It is here, now, this life, this existence, this present moment. And in this present moment, in this nowness of our existence, two voices are heard.

The first is the voice of dharma—not an easy word to define. Dharma is duty, righteousness, law, and lawfulness; it is truth, responsibility, order, religion. Dharma is the voice that calls us to fulfill our responsibility as a human being, whatever may be our occupation, our educational background, our place in life. Dharma sustains and nourishes our very existence, gives it its integrity, its meaning. Here and now, in the midst of this life, we must come awake to our dharma, to be what we are intended to be. So the first word of the Gita, dharmakshetra in Sanskrit, defines for us the place or field of our unique responsibility.

But of the place where the battle is to occur is not only the field of our dharma; but the second word of the text tells us it is the field of the Kurus. In terms of the epic of which the Gita is a part, this means, of course, the family from which both sides in the coming battle were descended. So at one level we can recognize that even as we are situated on the field of our individual duty, our dharma, we are also located on the field of all our relationships. But in Sanskrit, kuru is also one form of the verb "to do," so kurukshetra could also mean "the field of our doings or the field of human actions," seen in relation to the community of which we are a part.

So in these opening two words, two voices call to us: the voice of our individual dharma and the voice of our responsibility as a member of a particular community. At the outset, we know we are on the field of action in the more embracing, more encompassing field of dharma. And since each individual's dharma includes all the psychological, familial, social, and traditional laws or customs that govern each of us, as well as our duty to each of these structures, that also means that at the same time our dharma includes our responsibility, to our own inner nature. So we often find ourselves in conflict among all these obligations. In fact, conflict is inevitable. How many crossroads have you come to in your life? How many times have you asked yourself, as well as friends, relatives, elders, "What shall I do?" It may even be the question: "Shall I do what I want to do, or must I do what my parents want me to do?" And perhaps in despair we seek to abandon ourselves to no action at all, only to realize that even inaction is action.

While Annie Besant has titled the First Discourse "The Despondency of Arjuna," many translators have called it, "The Yoga of Despair." And indeed it may be suggested that despair, despondency, the darkness that may at times overwhelm us and obscure our vision of what is to be done, is in itself a yoga, or at least a stage on the yogic path to self-awakening. Often it is that very despair that drives us to seek understanding if not wisdom, to venture forth on the arduous road toward knowledge, freedom, truth. And it is here that we need to note a significant action taken by Arjuna, an action that I suggest is essential if we are to walk the path toward enlightenment. In many ways this is the first of the guideposts found in our text.

That action is described in verses 21 through 23 of the First Discourse: Simply put, Arjuna has asked his charioteer—who is Krishna of course, representative of the Supreme—to take him to the center between the two armies who have gathered for the impending battle. In the words of verse 21: "In the midst between the two armies, stay my chariot." When faced with any problem, it is essential to center ourselves, to come to the center where there is silence, and there to "stay my chariot," a metaphor for the personality. In that inner quietude we may hear the voice of the Self, of Krishna, of the One who abides beyond all opposites. It has been said that Krishna never comes uninvited. We must be still to hear his voice, and only when we are centered can we ask the question, as Arjuna did.

In the Second Discourse, in verse 54, Arjuna asks a very practical question: How does the wise person, the one who is "stable of mind," act? How does he talk, sit, and walk? Arjuna asks this question, in one form or another throughout the dialogue. For example, in the Fourteenth Discourse, verse 21, after hearing about the three qualities that compose the realm of matter, Arjuna asks, "What are the marks of him who hath crossed over the three qualities . . . ? How acteth he . . . ?" Arjuna is a practical person. He has come to Krishna, as we know, with a direct question: "What shall I do?" Of course when he asks that question at the outset of the dialogue, his mind is already made up: "I will not fight," he says and lays down his arms.

Carefully, step by step, Krishna like the true teacher he is instructs Arjuna in all that action and even inaction involve. He does not begin by talking about the individual who has achieved liberation and has transcended all relationships. Krishna does not even answer his question directly, but he pictures for Arjuna the individual who lives in the world fulfilling his responsibilities while at the same time completely detached from any desire for the fruit of action. For such an individual, actions are directed toward the welfare of the world, an emphasis that finds expression in verse 25 of the Third Discourse: "As the ignorant act from attachment to action, so should the wise act without attachment desiring the welfare of the world."

Act Arjuna will; act we all will, always remembering that action is not confined to the physical realm. For there is action of thought, of emotion, of speech and mind as well as of body. Indeed, as Krishna says in verse 17 of the Fourth Discourse, "Mysterious is the path of action" and in verse 18, "He who seeth inaction in action, and action in inaction, he is wise . . . he is harmonious even while performing all action." Yet even as we act, we must recognize, as verse 46 of the Eighteenth Discourse tells us, "All undertakings indeed are clouded by defects as fire by smoke." So it is how we act that is important, and for this Arjuna asks again and again for practical, and everyday illustrations of how the wise person talks and sits and walks and moves about in the world. And to answer this Krishna—in the Twelfth Discourse—gives Arjuna and therefore us some very practical advice. Verses 13 through 20 of that Twelfth Discourse give us some extremely useful, though not always easy, guidelines for our everyday movements in the world.

Verse 13 of the Twelfth Discourse begins on what one commentator has called a "low negative key." The verse opens with the words "He who beareth no ill-will to any being . . ." If we can pause there to examine ourselves, we will see that we like some people and dislike others; we like some beings—dogs and cats, for example—and not others—snakes and spiders, perhaps. The whole of our phenomenal life is marked by a tension between our likes and dislikes. And these are really only a manifestation of our attachments, for even our aversions are sticky attachments. So to "bear no ill-will to any being" is not quite as easy as it may first appear. Even without an active desire to do harm to another creature, we may carry a grudge against someone or feel jealousy or envy. We may feel slighted or hurt and then almost unconsciously hope that the one who has hurt us will suffer some mishap.

After that negative beginning, Krishna proceeds with the first two positive virtues, "friendly and compassionate." We are not only to remove any feeling of ill will. We are to begin by practicing friendship. Let everyone be recognized as a friend, in unconditional friendship. In the Yoga Sutras, Patanjali puts maitri at the head of all the factors that purify the mind. Sutra 33 of Section I begins with the Sanskrit words "Maitri Karuna," and Dr. Taimni translates this sutra: "The mind becomes clarified by cultivating attitudes of friendliness, compassion, gladness and indifference respectively toward happiness, misery, virtue and vice." The essence of friendliness is sympathy, even an empathy. In friendship, there is a predisposition to listen and to understand the other. This quality of friendliness goes to the very root of right relationship.

From friendliness to compassion is a natural movement of the heart. To be a friend to all that lives means that one is compassionate, caring, one to whom all life is precious. The one who is full of friendliness and sympathy naturally feels compassion for all who suffer. There needs to be an unqualified compassion, a natural flow outward. Once total friendliness and compassion flower, we begin to lose our sense of possessiveness. So the next phrase in verse 13, "without attachment and egoism." The last thing to dissolve and become nonexistent is the sense of a separate self, ahamkara or egoism. And this condition results in a state described in the concluding words of the verse, "balanced in pleasure and pain, and forgiving." When we realize that pleasure and pain "come and go impermanent" as Krishna has said in the Second Discourse, when we are free of attachment and aversion, friendly and compassionate, no longer under the sway of egoism, then forgiveness flowers within us, which is also patience and forbearance.

Verse 14 continues the list of qualities exhibited by the "sage of stable mind," the way in which action should be performed: "Ever content, harmonious, with the self controlled, resolute, with mind and Reason [Buddhi] dedicated to Me . . ." To be "ever content" implies a cheerfulness under all conditions, that cheerfulness spoken of as one of the points of good conduct in At the Feet of the Master. Krishna speaks of the same quality again in verse 16 of the Seventeenth Discourse, where it is called "serenity of mind," a serenity that cannot be disturbed by any external or internal cause, under any conditions. The whole being is in a harmonious state, with the entire personality complex under control. When the individual has achieved this harmony, then, without effort, the mind and the intelligence or Reason (as Dr. Besant translates buddhi) come to rest in the Divine. That individual, says Krishna, "is dear to Me." To be dear to Krishna is to be at home with one's soul, with one's inmost self, to be friends with that Self. Then in each of the succeeding verses, that dearness is defined, further aiding Arjuna to understand how action is to be performed.

Verse 15 declares the relationship that should exist between the wise person and the world. "He from whom the world doth not shrink away, who doth not shrink away from the world, freed from the anxieties of joy, anger, and fear . . ." Here we are reminded of the verse already cited from the Third Discourse, that all our actions are to be directed toward the welfare of the world. The "sage of stable mind," as the wise individual has been called, does not live away from the world. He may be said to be in the world but not of it. Such a person feels deep concern for our common humanity. We are to be friendly and compassionate, so that the world does not shrink away from us, nor do we turn against the world. What wisdom we have is to be employed to aid the world, to aid suffering humanity, but we do so without fear and certainly without anger.

When we make ourselves available to the world, not shrinking from that contact, what is our nature like? Verse 16 describes the attitude we should have: "He who wants nothing . . . is pure, expert, passionless, untroubled . . ." To be pure is to be untainted by worldly standards. We may not feel we are "expert" in knowing how to aid the world, but when we are "pure in heart," there is a certain knowing of what is right to do in any circumstance, which may be only to send a thought of goodwill, of peace or healing or love out into the world. So we act, as it were, without acting or, as the verse says, "renouncing every undertaking," which means that the personal self is not involved in wanting a certain outcome, expecting a certain "fruit" of the action. We are truly "untroubled," which is to be without fear.

Verse 17 continues the theme, describing the person free from all conditioning: "He who neither loveth nor hateth, nor grieveth, nor desireth, renouncing good and evil, full of devotion..." What does it mean to be full of devotion? We may say that the way of the devotee is not our way, but to be full of devotion means simply that our whole being is filled with that profound love for humanity of which the Mahatma spoke when he wrote to A. P. Sinnett (The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, Letter 33, chron.): "It is he alone who has the love of humanity at heart, who is capable of grasping thoroughly the idea of a regenerating practical Brotherhood who is entitled to the possession of our secrets . . ." And when there is such love, such devotion, there is no personal self. I am told that the Sanskrit words that Annie Besant translated as "full of devotion" are para bhakti, that imply a complete commitment of one's being to the welfare of all.

That theme is carried forward in verse 18: "Alike to foe and friend, and also in fame and ignominy, alike in cold and heat, pleasures and pains, destitute of attachment." Admittedly, all that is described here is not easily attained, but what is being portrayed is the self-realized individual. So we are brought face to face with the pairs of opposites that confront many of us every day and that cloud our perception of what is real, what is important, what is worth doing. Release from our clouded condition, caused by the opposites, comes only from becoming free from all attachments. That emphasis is permanent and constant throughout the entire Gita. We must unbind ourselves from what the Buddha called "sticky attachments." When we have ceased to be pulled back and forth between the opposites then the condition described in verse 19 is present: "Taking equally praise and reproach, silent, wholly content with what cometh, homeless, firm in mind, full of devotion," such indeed, says Krishna to Arjuna in answer to his question, is the way in which the Self-realized, the "sage of stable mind," the true knower of the Wisdom, acts in the world. Silent, not because such a person does not speak, though generally he may say little, but because even when he speaks there is none of the noise of desire, of chattering thought. Homeless, not because such a one has no home but because the entire world is his abode. In the beautiful words of The Voice of the Silence, he has "become a 'Walker of the Sky' who treads the winds above the waves, whose step touches not the waters." Yes, and "wholly content with what cometh," filled with that inner contentment that whatever comes to us is what we have called to ourselves.

Finally, then, in verse 20, Krishna tells Arjuna, "They verily who partake of this life-giving wisdom [Amrita-Dharma, the truth that is imperishable, immortal, beautiful, and therefore life-giving]. . . endued with faith [shraddha, confidence, the faith that has been called "unlearned knowledge"], I their supreme object . . . they are surpassingly dear to Me."

It is evident that the individual pictured in these eight verses of the Twelfth Discourse is one whose qualities and characteristics seem far beyond achieving. Yet, as all great scriptures tell us, as Masters of Wisdom—whether called Krishna or by some other name—have reiterated, "We have but one word for all aspirants—TRY!" Above all, such an individual lives in the world, to help the world, acting in the here and now, and so we must begin here and now, following the guideposts that have been so beautifully provided for our walking. As Krishna tells Arjuna in the Fifth Discourse, verse 23: "He who is able to endure here on earth, ere he be liberated from the body, the force born from desire and passion, he is harmonized, he is a happy man."

They say that five thousand years and more have passed since the immortal teaching was given to Arjuna. If ever the world was in need of the message of the Gita, it is surely today, when spiritual values have been negated and flouted, when material craving, greed, prejudice, fear, and hatred seem to stalk the land. But Krishna promised in verse 7 of the Fourth Discourse that whenever there is "decay of righteousness," whenever chaos rules, he would "come forth," born from age to age. We do not know how he will be born, how he may be recognized, in what race, or faith, or with what voice he will speak. But of this we may be certain: If we try to live in accordance with the guideposts we have been given, follow our own unique dharma, work for the welfare of all, his voice will be heard in our voices, his thoughts will be reflected in our thinking, his actions revealed in our actions, his presence known in our presence as we seek to bring light and love and peace into every human heart.


References

  • Besant, Annie. The Bhagavad Gita. Adyar, Chennai: Theosophical Publishing House, 1999.
  • Hao Chin, Vincente. The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett: In Chronological Sequence.
  • Adyar, Chennai: The Theosophical Publishing House, 1993
  • Taimni, I. K. The Science of Yoga. Wheaton, IL: Quest Books, 1999

.

 


Joy Mills has been a student of Theosophy for over sixty years. She has held numerous positions within the Society, including president of the American and Australian sections, international vice-president, and director of the Krotona School of Theosophy.


Archetypes, Assassination, and Attention

By John Algeo

Originally printed in the JULY - AUGUST 2005 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Algeo, John. "Archetypes, Assassination, and Attention." Quest  93.4 (JULY-AUGUST 2005):146-147

Theosophical Society - John Algeo was a Professor Emeritus of English at the University of Georgia. He was a Theosophist and a Freemason He was the Vice President of the Theosophical Society Adyar.

Archetypes are powerful things.

The original Greek meaning of the term archetype (according to Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary) was "the original pattern or model of which all things of the same type are representations or copies." But the most widespread meaning today is "an inherited idea or mode of thought in the psychology of C. G. Jung that is derived from the experience of the race and is present in the unconscious of the individual." Ultimately those two meanings amount to much the same thing, the difference in emphasis being on the origin of the archetypes.

All of us have archetypes present in our unconscious minds. And those archetypes influence our behavior: in a sense, we live up to, or act out, our archetypes. A Theosophical view of their origin might be that the archetypes were implanted in our deep minds by the Manasaputras "Sons of Mind" or Lords of the Flame, who quickened human intelligence in the early history of our species. But, whatever the origin of the archetypes, it is clear that, as we act them out in our lives, we strengthen them. And that is one source of their power.

Archetypes are powerful because they represent an "original pattern or model" in our minds but also because, as we perceive them (often unconsciously), they shape our behavior, and in turn our behavior gives them new energy, new power to influence yet further our successive behavior. The pattern of human action throughout history can thus be seen as a manifestation of the archetypes deep inside us. And our repeated action, motivated in part by such archetypes, gives them additional power to influence our future behavior.

The February 2005 assassination of the former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri is a case in point. At this writing, the identity of his assassin is unknown—and may never be known. But it is highly probable that Hariri was assassinated by a brother Moslem who disagreed with his progressive policies and his efforts to make Lebanon a free state unbound by the narrow politics of the past. That is, Hariri was Abel to another Moslem's Cain.

The Cain-Abel story is one version of the archetype of two brothers, often twins, who are opposites of each other. The archetype plays out in a number of different versions, in several of which the brothers are in conflict with each other, a conflict often ending in the killing of one brother by the other, as Cain, the farmer, killed Abel, the herdsman, out of jealousy for the attention of God.

Romulus and Remus are Roman examples. Romulus, setting out to found a city (Rome), traced the boundaries of his city on the ground and constructed the first tier of the city wall. When Remus saw what his brother was doing, he made fun of Romulus's low wall and said that it would not keep out enemies but could be easily scaled. And to demonstrate his point, he leaped over the wall. Romulus replied that, against those who thus scaled the wall, there was a defense, and struck Remus with his sword, slaying him.

Angra Mainyu and Spenta Mainyu are Persian examples. They are, respectively, the "Destructive Spirit" and the "Bounteous Spirit," two projections (or "sons") of Ahura Mazda. Angra Mainyu is responsible for all the ills of the world, a very nasty fellow, and Spenta Mainyu is responsible for all its good things, an inspiration to all people. Those two are in perpetual conflict, and will be until the end of time.

Baldr "the Beautiful" and Loki "the Trickster" are Norse examples, both sons of Odin. Baldr and his mother, Frigg, both had troubling dreams about his death. So Frigg toured the world, exacting a promise from all things that they would never harm her son. Rejoicing in Baldr's supposed immunity to danger, the gods arranged a sport in which each threw a weapon at Baldr, but all the weapons veered aside, having sworn not to harm the beautiful god. However, Loki, the perverse god, had discovered that Frigg neglected to get the promise of harmlessness from the mistletoe plant because she thought it was too young and insignificant to be a danger. Loki then fashioned a sharp dart from the mistletoe and gave it to the blind god, Hod, whose hand he guided in throwing it at Baldr and slaying him.

These archetypal stories of the conflict-torn brothers inspire and are in turn empowered by fraternal strife among humans. The assassination of one free-thinking Moslem by another narrow-minded one is just an instance of the Cain-Abel story being acted out in history. And every such action give more strength to the archetype. So how do we respond to such deep-seated influences that can have disastrous effects in our world?

There is an old saying, that we should fight fire with fire. In this case, we can oppose one archetype with another. There is a different version of the two-brothers archetype, specifically the Greek myth of the twins Castor and Pollux. They were the sons of a human mother, Leda, but they had different fathers. Castor's father was Leda's husband, Tyndareüs, the King of Sparta. But Pollux's father was the god Zeus. The brothers were inseparable; they sailed with the Argonauts in quest of the Golden Fleece and remained the firmest of friends throughout life.

When Castor, being human, died, his immortal brother Pollux went to his father Zeus and begged that he and his brother might never be separated, even by death. Zeus was so touched by the devotion of the two boys to each other, that he allowed them to share Pollux's immortality, so that together they might spend half their days in Hades, the after-death fate of humans, and half their days on Mount Olympus, the dwelling place of the deathless gods. Furthermore, Zeus set them in the heavens as the constellation Gemini, where they became guardians of all who sail upon the sea of life, and they still appear to mariners (and nowadays to aviators) as St. Elmo's fire, the phenomenon of light that plays upon ships of the sea and the air.

The archetype of Castor and Pollux is a counterpoint to that of Cain and Abel, highlighting the kind of brotherhood of which the Theosophical Society's first Object speaks. The archetype we focus upon will determine the force that manifests itself in our lives and in the history of humanity. It is a fact that newspapers, like all human attention, focus on the violent and conflictive, rather than on the peaceful and harmonious. There is an old jingle about the two principal characters in William Makepeace Thackeray's novel Vanity Fair. Those characters are the self-serving bad girl, Becky Sharp, and the altruistic good girl, Amelia Sedley (who were perhaps models for Scarlet and Melanie in Gone with the Wind). The jingle goes like this:

The moralists may preach and carp

In platitudes most deadly,

The world remembers Becky Sharp, 

And not Amelia Sedley.

When we don't pay attention, our material nature gravitates to the lowest and most violent in us: to Cain, Romulus, Angra Mainyu, Loki, and Becky Sharp. But if we attend to the example of Castor and Pollux, those "Divine Boys" (which is what their epithet, the Dioscuri, meant in Greek), we will strengthen that archetype in our own consciousness and in the consciousness of the whole world. As the book of Proverbs (23.7) says, "As we think in our hearts, so are we." We need only be attentive and keep in the forefront of our minds that which appeals to our spiritual nature and the highest in us.

Archetypes are powerful things—for evil or for good. But thought is even more powerful, for by thought we can invoke archetypes into our consciousness and into our actions. Thinking controls action. If enough human beings think in the Castor and Pollux way, they can bring peace and harmony into the world. They can balance mortality with immortality. They can create a spiritual climate in which violence and conflict, assassination and hate, recede before the advance of peace and harmony, assistance and love. There is no other way to do it. Shall we give it a thought?


One for the Road

By Betty Bland

Originally printed in the JULY-AUGUST 2005 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Bland, Betty. "One for the Road." Quest  93.4 (JULY-AUGUST 2005):124-125

Theosophical Society - Betty Bland served as President of the Theosophical Society in America and made many important and lasting contributions to the growth and legacy of the TSA.

Some time ago during a speaking tour I had to take a limo from Los Angeles to Long Beach, California. Being unfamiliar with the territory, I could give only the street address of my destination and leave the rest up to the driver, who exhibited all of the most exciting traits of his high-spirited, risk-taking fellow taxi drivers in other major cities around the world. Since he did not know the targeted destination, he decided to look up the street index and search his map while he was careening in and out of the heavy traffic on the infamous southern California freeways. For all the attention he seemed to be paying to the road in front of him, he might as well have pasted the index and map over the windshield of the car. After what seemed an eternity and a few prayers in the back seat, we finally did arrive safely—shaken, but none the worse for the wear.

Reflecting on the experience later, I realized that many of us live life in just this way. There are many resources that can be used as roadmaps for life. Some may use religious texts, some schools of psychology, or others the teachings of a guru. All may sound intriguing or erudite, or even have the ring of truth, and so we are drawn to studying and discussing them endlessly. For many Theosophists this kind of mental exploration can be exhilarating and captivating. We feel that we are just one tiny step away from knowing the secrets of life.

Scientific discoveries that confirm some of our pet theories excite us and draw us further into our theoretical explorations. Without a doubt I must affirm, as H. P. Blavatsky so often did, that science is a powerful ally in our earnest search for truth. At the empirical gross physical level, it can confirm many ideas about our universe. From those ideas we can draw implications for the meaning and purpose of life, but those ideas have no substance unless they are acted upon.

Lacking a map in unfamiliar territory we might wander aimlessly through wrong turns and dead-ends. We have a hard time finding pleasure in the trip because of our pent-up anxiety. Gradually we develop a map in our mind that serves as our guide and we reach a certain level of comfort in following the known routes. At this point, not wanting to risk a return to our former state of confusion, we may be resistant to change. We may even refuse to consider others' advice or new maps.

Maps are important and necessary. When we finally look at a detailed map it can be a real eye-opener. We may have been going the long way around, or taking the stoplight-ridden route when there was a far simpler way to go. And there may be a lovely park to traverse rather than a busy street. Maps are wonderful tools. They can give us an overview of an area as well as pinpoint details. But they are not the territory itself.

In our spiritual lives, an encounter with a source of spiritual guidebooks such as our Theosophical literature can be an exciting discovery. All of a sudden we can gain a higher view and clearer idea of detours and pitfalls. Many of us have experienced that heightened intensity of study in the early years of our Theosophical or metaphysical pursuits. A new world of understanding arises. The territory of life is far different from what we had first thought; the scheme grander and more meaningful. We discover a holistic approach that integrates all aspects of religion, philosophy, science, and the arts.

In the excitement we can become so caught up in the map that we forget it is not the territory. We become like the driver who has the map pasted across the windshield, and forget to watch the traffic, landmarks, and road signs. Self-absorption in studies becomes counterproductive, blocking the very clarity, understanding, and direction we are seeking.

As H. P. Blavatsky admonishes all Theosophists in The Key to Theosophy:

 

No working member should set too great value on his personal progress or proficiency in Theosophic studies; but must be prepared rather to do as much altruistic work as lies in his power. He should not leave the whole of the heavy burden and responsibility of the Theosophical movement on the shoulders of the few devoted workers. Each member ought to feel it his duty to take what share he can in the common work, and help it by every means in his power.

Periodically we have to remove our noses from our books and our minds from endless titillating theories in order to put our knowledge into practice, or we will never unfold our spiritual natures. Our studies provide the map, but they have to be balanced by service and meditation. Meditation is the actual vehicle that will carry us into the unfoldment of our spiritual potential, and service is the essential fuel. Both are supported by the maps found in our studies, and both require actual commitment.

Remember fellow pilgrim, when you are studying those books, that they may well be helpful maps for understanding and navigating the territory, but the trip involves engagement on the path. If our study is to be useful, every new understanding should help us discern the real from the unreal, the more important from the less important, and make us better prepared to travel. Each small step that we take on this journey is a giant leap for humankind. So let us take that first step—and the next—and the next—that begin and continue the journey of the rest of our lives.

Bon Voyage!


A Lesson Learned

By Tania Dyett

Originally printed in the July - August 2005 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Dyett, Tania."A Lesson Learned." Quest  93.4 (JULY-AUGUST 2005):148-149

dyett

I can still remember arriving at Adek. It was 1942 and the Japanese had just invaded Java, Indonesia. My mother and I had been rounded up with the other women and children and sent off to an internment camp. It had been a nightmarish trip; a train journey which had started in the afternoon and finished in the heat of the next day. Packed tightly together in compartments, we had been forced to sit on each other's knees. The air was dank and claustrophobic. Children began vomiting. One woman became hysterical and a Japanese guard came in and slapped her hard several times on the face. We just sat there, unable to help her.

For two long years Adek was our home. In that time we encountered many cruel and vicious Japanese soldiers. For the most part, their incomprehensible barking and sudden rage are a distant memory for me but I vaguely remember one soldier who slapped my face because I didn't bow when he passed on his bicycle. I recall another who gave some children sweets and then slapped their mother's face as hard as he could. She had not bowed, but instead had smiled at him with gratitude.

At Adek, girls between the ages of 15 and 25 were considered the"strong girls," healthy enough to do all the backbreaking jobs. We unloaded heavy bags of sugar, rice, and salt and carried them into the storerooms. For example, forty other girls and I once carried 300 mattresses from the train to the truck and from the truck to the dormitories. I remember carrying those mattresses almost in my sleep, the jolting train jogging my head and body with every step I took. Another time, the latrines at the camp broke down; the strong girls labored for months digging trenches to be used as an alternative.

Sometimes, women fought back. In Tiji Hapit, a camp I stayed in for some time, a Japanese guard once caught five women bartering their jewelry for pork. The guard waited until the women got their items and then pounced on them. He told them to hand over their pork and whatever money and jewelry they had. One woman got so furious with the guard that she attacked him with her knitting needle. She stuck the needle through his arm while four other women threw themselves on him, took his gun, beat him, and then ran away. The story went around the camp like wildfire. We all waited, trembling with fear, for the consequences.

A week later we saw the Japanese guard with a black eye and his arm in a sling. He patrolled the camp looking around viciously for somebody who didn't bow. But that was as far as his retribution went. If he had admitted to his superiors that he was attacked by five defenseless women, he would have lost face.

The guards often were cruel and capricious, but I remember one who was different from the rest. Takashi arrived without fanfare on one of the days we were digging trenches. Each day we had worked in the hot sun until lunchtime. A Japanese soldier would lay in the shade of a tree and make sure we weren't idle. On this day, however, the usual guard did not turn up. In his place came Takashi, small and insignificant.

We didn't take much notice of him at first. We simply went on working as usual. But Takashi did not recline under the tree as his predecessor had, instead he visited each of the trenches. He seemed greatly amused that we needed rope ladders to get in and out of them, and he tried to make conversation with us, but we couldn't speak Japanese and his Malay was very broken.

At noon, we had an hour off for lunch. All we had to eat was dry tapioca bread. It was a dirty gray color with black spots in it and had the texture of rubber. Takashi ate his lunch alone under the tree. Then something extraordinary happened. He walked over to where we sat and handed me and another girl the rest of his lunch. It was real white bread with butter on it!"Trimakasi!" I exclaimed, thanking him. He waved his hand and sat down next to us. He said something and gesticulated toward the spade. Clearly, he wanted to know what it was called."Patjoel," a girl replied. He smiled happily and repeated it. And so began Takashi's first lesson in Malay. He was a keen pupil and before we knew it our lunch hour had stretched to two hours. We could not believe our good luck.

The next day Takashi brought a bag of sweets and two packets of cigarettes. He proceeded to talk to us in sign language, waving his arms in all directions. He then covered his mouth with his hand and pointed to the sweets and cigarettes. He shook his head until he was dizzy and then jumped up and stood to attention. Then he gave himself two hearty slaps on his cheeks. We all burst out laughing and Takashi shone with delight that his effort had been a success. We all clearly understood that he did not want us to tell anybody about these gifts.

From that time on, Takashi would always bring us a treat. He continued to allow us long breaks in our digging. We soon discovered that he had a marvelous memory and remembered all the Malay words we had taught him from the previous day. We, in turn, learned some Japanese words from him.

Takashi told us that he came from a small village. He had a wife and a three year-old daughter. He asked us many questions and we told him about the history, mathematics, and geography we had learned in school. He smiled and shook his head in admiration.

One day Takashi did not appear and another guard took his place. We all missed him terribly. We didn't miss him because of the fruit he shared with us, or the sweets he gave us. We missed his gentle nature and eager smile. During the four years I was in the camp, I learned a lot. The most important thing was that the real value of people is not so much in what they think, but in what they actually do to help others. All the guards were encrusted with the social and intellectual embellishments of normal society. Only Takashi used them to benefit others. Small and insignificant Takashi, an enemy soldier and a Japanese guard, made me realize how wrong it is to dislike people because of race, color, or religion.


Subcategories