Synchronicity: The Gateway to Opportunity

Originally printed in the September - October 2002 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Abdill, Ed. "Synchronicity: The Gateway to Opportunity." Quest  90.5 (SEPTEMBER - OCTOBER 2002):170-174.

By Edward Abdill

Theosophical Society - Ed Abdill author of The Secret Gateway, is vice-president of the Theosophical Society in America and past president of the New York Theosophical Society. His article "Desire and Spiritual Selfishness" appeared in the Winter 2011 Quest.A good friend is desperately in need of work. She has quite literally spent her last penny. Within the month she will be homeless. She has applied for a live-in housekeeper job with a wealthy family. She has told you that she used your name as a reference. There is a business phone in your hallway that is answered by answering machine. You never pick it up. You prefer to retrieve messages. One day, passing through the hall, the phone rings. For absolutely no apparent reason you break all precedent and decide to pick it up. An unfamiliar voice is calling for your opinion of a job applicant, your friend. The prospective employer wants a face-to-face interview with you about your friend. You grant it and convince them that the woman would be an excellent employee. She is hired and, within the week, has a home, food, and an income.

Is it coincidence? Karma? Dharma? Synchronicity? Why did you just happen to be in the hall when the phone rang, and why did you pick it up when you never answer that phone? Perhaps we can never know for sure. Yet, certain universal principles may help us to better understand that curious sequence of events—first, one of the most fundamental of all Theosophical ideas: that all existent reality arises out of one eternal, immutable, and boundless principle.

Unity

What we call the "real" world is different states of being within the one, ultimately indivisible whole. Every atom, every rock, every organism, and every galaxy is a temporal state. The ultimate Real is like H2O, which exists in various states as steam, liquid water, or solid ice. Yet no matter how different each state appears, each is but a temporal manifestation of H2O.

The universe is analogous to that. Everything, including human beings, is made of the same stuff. Everything is interconnected. All is an emanation of the One. If that is so, then all action at every level will have an effect on the whole. A pebble dropped into the Pacific Ocean will eventually affect every atom of that vast ocean. A human thought sent out into the vast ocean of thought will eventually affect the whole mental field. As the poet, Francis Thompson, wrote:

Thou canst not stir a flower
Without troubling of a star.

Everything in the universe is interlinked, and any disturbance at any one point will cause an effect at all other points.

Most intelligent and educated people agree that the physical world is interconnected. We accept interdependence in ecology, for example. Sociology and economics also reveal that there is an interdependence among groups of people, obviously so in cities and nations, but likely true globally as well. Poverty in one area tends eventually to impact on all surrounding areas. Economic depression in one country is likely to affect other countries.

The Theosophical view is that interdependence exists not only in objective reality but in subjective states as well. If that is so, then synchronicity is a natural and even inevitable phenomenon under certain conditions, just as H2O goes from steam to ice under certain conditions. We know that our own thoughts and feelings affect our physical bodies, but if the entire universe is interconnected at both subjective and objective levels, then our thoughts and feelings will have effects beyond the limits of our own body.

In addition to the theory of interconnectedness of subjective and objective states, several other Theosophical principles relate to synchronicity: karma, evolution, dharma, and intuition.

Karma

Karma is the most fundamental law of the universe. Simply stated, it is "action-reaction." If objective and subjective states are interconnected, then action on any level and at any point will affect the whole.Thoughts and feelings may produce ulcers and heart attacks. Physical illness has an effect on our emotions and thoughts.

But the interconnections may not be just within a single system, such as our own body. Our thoughts and feelings may be affected by distant causes, and in turn they may have undreamed of consequences in remote places and on the distant future. Two seemingly unrelated physical events may be the end result of the same emotional, mental, or spiritual forces. Karma may help us to understand how synchronicity is possible.

Evolution

The Theosophical view of evolution is that the whole of creation, including our own bodies, arose first at the inner most subjective level—at a level that might be called Divine Mind. In this view, the outer physical world is the result of inner causes, just as any conscious action on our part arises first in the mind. The whole evolutionary process can be seen as the gradual unfolding of a subjective state. The inner order asserts itself on matter much as a magnetic field orders iron filings on a paper held above it. Evolution proceeds "within-without," but unlike a static magnetic field, the inner order is more like a dynamic field that gradually molds substance according to its own nature, thereby revealing itself in visible matter. In mystical terms, it is the Word (Logos in Greek) made flesh. In synchronicity, outer events may owe their origin to inner causes.

The primacy of the inner is not an idea peculiar to Theosophical writers. Teilhard de Chardin, the paleontologist, claims that the saber-toothed tiger has the tooth of a saber-toothed tiger because it has the soul of a saber-toothed tiger. Plotinus in the Ennead 6.9 says that those who believe the world is governed by luck or chance and depends upon material causes are far removed from the divine and from the notion of the One. Jacob Boehme, in The Signature of All Things, claims that the whole outer world and its forms are a signature (or identifying characteristic) of the inner world. Shakespeare in Hamlet writes,

There's a divinity that shapes our ends,
Rough-hew them how we will.

And an old proverb holds that coming events cast their shadows before them.

Dharma

Is there something that, as Shakespeare puts it, shapes our ends? Are we destined to be born at a particular place, live the life we live, have the relationships, joys, and sorrows that we do? The concept of dharma addresses such questions.

Neither dharma nor karma are fatalistic. They are both statements of natural law. Karma is the over-all principle, and dharma is a specific case as it relates to our own inner self. The term dharma cannot be translated easily into English. It has been defined as "duty, law, righteousness, religion, doctrine, essential nature." No single word captures its full meaning. Dharma is linked to karma (action), and to morality (right action). Annie Besant (Dharma 21) defines it as our inner nature at its current stage of evolution plus the law of growth for the next stage of evolution.

Dharma is also linked to purpose. In near death experiences, people often say that they returned because they "had something to do, had a duty to fulfill." There was some purpose in their lives and it needed to be completed.

I had a good friend, Ros Wilson, who at age 11 had a near death experience in a dental chair when the mask used to give her gas was inoperative and she was nearly asphyxiated. She found herself out of her body and saw people who asked her to come with them. She replied, "I can't go now. I have things I must do." Ros was never interested in religion, and she had no knowledge of Theosophy at the age of eleven. Yet, she knew that the task she had to do in that incarnation was not over. She was unaware of just what it was she had to do, but even at eleven she knew that there was a purpose to life.

Dharma may be thought of as an inner pressure that prods us toward self-fulfillment, toward inner growth and the development of our potential. It is always at work in human beings, but we can choose to move with it or to resist it.

When we do not heed the inner pressure, life gets more and more difficult because the inner pressure (dharma) is an expression of natural law and our essential nature. Try as we may, we cannot violate the laws of nature or the law of our own being. We may try to be something that we are not, but we can no more succeed than we can digest food for someone else. Not only is the dharma of another dangerous, it is impossible to fulfill. By analogy we might consider an acorn. It strives to become an oak tree. It can never become a rose bush, however hard it might try. Dharma is unique to the individual. We cannot fulfill another's dharma because in one sense our dharma is what we essentially are. It is the inner self unfolding, developing, and expressing itself.

Synchronicity

Carl Jung spoke of the principle of synchronicity as an explanation for how the Chinese book of oracles, the I Ching, works. He suggested that, at any given moment, the coins (or yarrow sticks) can fall in one way only and that the sticks, the book, the inquirer, and the question are all linked together. Interpretation of the I Ching, or of the tarot, or of astrological charts, is quite another matter. Interpreters run the gamut from con artists to sensitive and highly intelligent people; hence interpretations can be anything from insipid to insightful.

How do synchronistic events occur? We really do not know. All we can say is that given the likelihood that the universal principles we have considered are real, then there is at least a reasonable probability that synchronicity is a natural phenomenon. If there is indeed an interconnectedness of everything, especially of the subjective states with the objective world, then what we think, feel, and long for may bring about action in the external world because, in fact, the external world is not separate from our internal world. There is only one world.

The principles themselves are not so hard to define or even to understand in theory. But to see how each works out in detail would require the ability of an adept. We are ignorant of far more than we know. Nevertheless, whether or not we understand how it operates, synchronicity is an observable fact.

This is not to say that every seemingly synchronistic event has profound meaning. Synchronicities range from apparently insignificant ones to those charged with life-changing significance. The following cases are real examples.

My wife and I were going to see Dana Ivey in a show one Saturday. That same day the New York Times had an article about the life of an actor, written by Dana Ivey. That is the only article I have ever read by Dana Ivey, and it appeared on the day we were going to see her for the very first time in an off-Broadway play. The coincidence was fascinating, but it did not change our plans or our lives in any way.

As a woman was walking on a street in Washington, DC, she was trying to decide whether she should go on with her study of homeopathy. As she turned a corner, she came upon a statue of the founder of homeopathy, the only one she had ever seen. She continued with homeopathic studies and found them of practical value. This was an event that helped her decide to continue her studies. Yet her continued studies did not seem to be radically life altering.

Occasionally synchronistic events are potentially life saving. A woman was leaving work and began to take her usual route walking home. She met a friend she had not seen for years who was going in the same direction, but by a different street, so the woman walked with her. Later she discovered that a Mafia shoot out occurred on the street she usually walked, at just about the time she would have been there. Had she not unexpectedly met that friend, she might well have been caught in the crossfire.

Synchronistic events with life-changing significance do not occur daily. Yet, when we arrive at a point in life where the next choice may profoundly affect our future, synchronicity may precede or surround that point, or a single synchronistic event may, if we pay attention, influence us to choose wisely. After graduating from high school, I took a two-year course in Spanish, in which a conversation examination was based on a paper I had written in high school about comparative religion. The instructor of the five-student class was a Peruvian woman who happened to be a member of the Spanish-language branch of the Theosophical Society. That branch had fewer than thirty members in a city of about eight million. The day after the exam, the instructor gave me a pamphlet on Theosophy. Nothing else has ever changed my life so completely. Could it have been chance that I was in that small class taught by a woman from a tiny group of Theosophists?

Intuition

Whether or not we call such events chance, coincidence, or synchronicity, nearly everyone is aware that at least occasionally two meaningful yet seemingly unrelated events come together in time. If we are convinced that such occurrences must be chance, that will end it. On the other hand, if we clear our mind of preconceived ideas and quietly reflect on the situation, we may get an intuition that will lead us toward new and more fulfilling directions in life.

Intuition of this kind is not a psychic hunch. Rather, it is a flash of understanding. It is an insight that comes from the unknown. One moment we are hopelessly trapped. There is no possibility of escape from our dilemma. The next minute we know exactly how to free ourselves. There is no time between not knowing and knowing. It comes in a flash. It is a valid intuition that the mind comprehends.

Without a quiet and open mind, we may stare meaningful synchronistic events in the face and not see their significance, or we may assume all kinds of significance in events that have very little to do with us. To understand, the mind must be free of disturbance. It must be momentarily free of active thought. It must be as still as a mountain lake, crystal clear, and unmoved by the waves of thought. It must be a meditative mind.

Although there are no shortcuts or fool proof methods to develop our mind and intuitive faculty,meditation is a major factor in such development. Through focused intention and effort we can develop a quiet mind, an open mind, and an inquiring mind. We can bring about the conditions within ourselves that allow the light of intuition to flash into our mind and reveal the truth of any situation. Such remarkable ability does not come instantly or without concentrated effort over time. Yet the great teachers of humanity have assured us that it is possible. We can do it if we do not expect miracles. We can do it if we realize that perfecting the ability may take lifetimes. We can do it if we don't give up. We can do it if we TRY.


Edward Abdill is a former member of the national Board of Directors and past president of the New York Theosophical Society. He is a national and international lecturer for the Society. He and his wife teach and perform Scottish country dancing and play the hammered dulcimer.


Viewpoint: Change and Growth

 Originally printed in the September - October 2002 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Bland, Betty. "Change and Growth." Quest  90.5 (SEPTEMBER - OCTOBER 2002): 162.

By Betty Bland, National President

Theosophical Society - Betty Bland served as President of the Theosophical Society in America and made many important and lasting contributions to the growth and legacy of the TSA. IT HAS BEEN SAID that the only two things one can count on are death and taxes, but I would say that the two inevitable occurrences are change and growth.

When we consider the fundamental principles for understanding our universe that Madame Blavatsky gave to us in The Secret Doctrine, the unitive principle is always the first one mentioned. There is one immutable, all-encompassing, all-pervading principle, within which all of manifestation has its being. This principle is the cornerstone of the Society's first Object—that of forming a nucleus of the human brotherhood without distinctions.

Unity, however, does not mean homogeneity. Following closely on the heels of the oneness principle, the second fundamental principle is cyclicity, that is, fluctuation or ebb and flow. This second principle underlying our universe implies differentiation, differences in manifestation, and a certain tension within the system that keeps all of creation in constant motion. Change is inevitable; it is the nature of the universe.

The third fundamental principle, that of a pilgrimage for each individual, implies outgoing or seeming separation from the one and the consequent need for us to progress on a return journey. All the force of evolution is driving us forward; yet until we begin a conscious cooperation with it, our progress is slow and unintelligible.

In harmony with these principles, our predecessors wisely established term limits for the officers of the Theosophical Society in America. By building change into the system, we can have orderly growth with fresh ideas building upon the foundation previously laid. Without this mandate, we might complacently allow ourselves to become static until the inevitable crisis would catapult us into creative chaos as a precursor to growth.

We may understand this very well, but we are creatures of comfort and habit. When things are going well, we don't want to embrace change. Yet time ripens all things until it is indeed time to break free from a former skin in order to let new growth begin.

John Algeo has served us extremely well as President of the American Section these last nine years, bringing a high degree of professionalism to our classes and publications. John is a master of words, in his professional life, in his work for the Society, and in his puns at the dinner table. There have been many instances in which his words expressed what many of us felt, but could not quite define. We all thank him for that clarity and inspiration, and for his tireless service.

In his new life in Athens, Georgia, and as international Vice President, he will continue to provide a legacy for many who will follow after, who will find insight and encouragement through his wisdom as well as in his written words and research into Theosophy, its history and its contemporary applications. He and Adele will be continuing their important work along those lines.

Change and growth are certainly more appealing than death and taxes, but still they can be painful. We are sorry to say farewell to John and Adele here at Olcott, and wish them Godspeed. Meanwhile, I will find comfort in the ultimate outcome of growth as I work with you to build on the foundations so lovingly laid down by all of our predecessors. Let us turn to the new day with vision and enthusiasm. The new cycle begins.

The View from Adyar: What Is Real?

Originally printed in the September - October 2002 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Burnier, Radha. "What Is Real?" Quest  90.5 (SEPTEMBER - OCTOBER 2002): 184-185.

Radha Burnier

Theosophical Society - Radha Burnier was the president of the international Theosophical Society from 1980 till her death in 2013. The daughter of N. Sri Ram, who was president of the international Theosophical Society from 1953 to 1973, she was an associate of the great spiritual teacher J. KrishnamurtiA young woman in our neighborhood every evening relates to her child of about six a story from the Panchatantra, an ancient collection of stories about animals said to be the precursor of Aesop's Fables. The child does not accept any part of a tale that says an animal has died. No animal, from his point of view, should die; he therefore corrects the narration, and says, "No mother, he did not die, he ran away into the forest." Every time an animal is in danger in the story, especially young animals, he repeats, "He went away, he did not die."

There are other responses of children that touch the heart, if one does not dismiss them as mere childishness. A recent newspaper report about a three-year-old relates that his mother, while driving above a cliff during bad weather, went off the road, and the car and its occupants fell down ninety feet into the sea. She was drowned, and the child was thrown into freezing water in his seat. He was there for about twelve hours with no more than a little frostbite. Two winged angels robed in white watched over him, he said, and so he did not feel afraid or unprotected. He repeated this story to everyone who talked with him.

Many young children cry when their mother cries or when they see someone else crying. Perhaps the innocent consciousness in the young body, not having had experiences of material life, instinctively senses that unhappiness is not right. A young child responds naturally and therefore feels something is wrong when anyone is unhappy. Most young children are attracted by other innocents—other infants and animals, particularly young ones.

This state of innocence is usually lost as the child grows into adulthood, and the modern way of life does not help the young to preserve it. Much harm is done by encouraging children to be conscious of sex distinctions and to begin sex life at an early age; repeatedly watching violence on television helps to destroy the instinctive sense of oneness they have. The human infant, as is well known, needs protection and care for a much longer period than animals or birds. This may be part of Nature's plan to develop sensitivity in humans. The young animal left to itself is forced to struggle for survival, which includes learning mistrust, fear, aggressiveness, and other traits, all of which conspire to introduce craftiness and competitive behavior into its life. When there is insecurity and fear, aggression develops, and fear compels the mind to contrive ways of self-defence, of overcoming others. Thus a hardness sets in, and the consciousness loses its innate delicacy of response.

In most of us, there are hard attitudes, and if we are honest, we discover how and when they occur—how the innocence of infancy and the quality of being in unison with other living creatures is lost. We all have the possibility of experiencing the more subtle aspects of life, even of being aware of angelic presences, and the value of all life forms. Such sensitivity is a means to distinguish instinctively between right and wrong. Bursting into tears on seeing unhappiness elsewhere, which psychologists may dismiss as childishness, or feeling that animals are not commodities whose lives can be ended quickly, are responses of inner purity and innocence, not mere childishness.

"Is the world real?" is a question among serious students and thinkers. When it is asked, do we mean to ask whether mountains, rivers, stars, trees, and birds—that is, the world of Nature—is real? Probably it is real, being part of the one Life, the one Reality, other than which nothing exists. On the other hand, since the natural world is only a part of the total reality, it may be relatively real, not absolutely so. In the Hindu texts, it is suggested that the rivers and mountains and all of Nature are as much of the divine splendor as the Supreme chooses to reveal, for our eyes are incapable of seeing more. A fragment only of Reality is manifested as the universes, the unmanifest being the greater part of it. So the world of Nature is not unreal, being part of that Supreme existence, but neither is it real because it is only a part, not the whole. It is a means, so to speak, through which something else much vaster or greater can be glimpsed. But what sort of mind and heart can see the splendor beyond the outer forms? Not consciousness deprived of innocence. The child who shrinks from hearing that animals die is probably much nearer the truth of life than the adult who perceives everything in relation to personal survival, comfort, and advantage.

Human beings are, of course, part of the world of Nature, they are her creation; but for the present we have made ourselves aliens. Losing innocence, we have exiled ourselves from Paradise and chosen to live in a false world of machines, wars, ambition, possessions, and other attractions. This world of wickedness, which is the product of human thought, is unreal because it is based on distorted perceptions and false values. Where does mãyã inhere? Not in the trees, animals, and earth, but in the eye of the perceiver who views all as objects to possess and exploit. Those who saw the river Gangã or Kailãsa mountain as divine presences saw the same water and heap of earth with their outer eyes as we do, who reduce the river and the mountain to nothing more than inert matter.

Hence, the importance of clear perception cannot be overestimated, which means that toughening of the mind must end. If this has already taken place, at least now we must pay attention to the quality of our responses and to the development of sensitivity, which is not sentimentality. People who gush over things may imagine they are more sensitive than others, but the great seers did not indulge in emotionalism; they saw the Reality.


Radha Burnier is the international President of the Theosophical Society as well as the head of three international centers: in Ojai, California; Sydney, Australia; and Naarden, the Netherlands. She is an international lecturer who regularly speaks in countries around the world; the editor of The Theosophist, a monthly journal; and the author of several books, including Human Regeneration; No Other Path to Go; and Truth, Beauty and Goodness.


Christianity-Theosophy Conference: The Turning Point Within Christianity

Originally printed in the September - October 2002 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Jackson, Brant. "Christianity-Theosophy Conference: The Turning Point Within Christianity." Quest  90.5 (SEPTEMBER - OCTOBER 2002): 175.

Christianity-Theosophy Conference

[This is the next to last report from the November 2000 invitational Christianity-Theosophy Conference.  Brant Jackson is a member of the Board of Directors of the Theosophical Society in America, a lawyer in Atlanta, Georgia, and a student of early Christian history.]

 

By Brant Jackson

In 313 AD, the Emperor Constantine needed a new state religion to provide his newly united empire with religious unity and stability, as the older one had been thoroughly discredited during the struggles for imperial succession. Constantine selected one version of Christianity (called "Catholic," meaning "universal") out of the many different competing Christian sects, to revitalize and bring stability to the empire, and issued a proclamation (the "Edict of Milan") that promised tolerance. For the Catholic bishops, who had been persecuted as recently as 311 AD, the emperor's favor was a miracle from God. They now had political as well as religious power, but they soon found that there was a heavy price to pay for the privilege.

Consider the immense changes required to go from a church composed of small, homogenous congregations to a church required to meet the religious needs of the entire Roman empire, a collection of peoples and religions unprecedented in size and diversity. Furthermore, early Christianity did not have one single "orthodox" or official position prior to 325 AD, when Constantine called together a Council at Nicea to settle certain disputed points of faith. The chief of those was whether Christ was fully God or was more than human but less than divine.

Before the Council of Nicea, each Christian sect had been relatively homogenous and free to understand Jesus the Christ in various ways. Toleration of divergent factions was the rule within early Christianity, for no single group had the political and military power needed to suppress opposing interpretations. After 325 AD, however, this inescapable tolerance changed. Catholic bishops favored by the emperors were given the power to define a body of beliefs, tenets, and dogmas about Jesus, which would be accepted as "orthodox."

In 381 AD, another council was held at Constantinople, at which orthodoxy was further defined, and the Catholic Church was given the mandate to suppress all non-Catholic faiths, especially Christian Gnostics. With the help of the Roman state, particularly its armies and police, to enforce its dictates, the officially established Church suppressed or destroyed opposing religions within the empire and engaged in heresy-hunting within its own ranks over a period of hundreds of years.

Perhaps the most profound change that followed 381 AD was in the definition of the essential Christian experience. The early religion of Jesus may be characterized as one within the ancient wisdom tradition--H. P. Blavatsky maintained that Jesus taught a variety of theosophy. In this tradition, a person could, by work and study, strive toward the goal of self-purification and self-transformation, in emulation of Jesus' own example as an initiate.

Catholic Christianity, however, after its elevation as the state religion of the Roman empire, developed a new experience and ritual of Christianity acceptable to the Roman emperors and the many diverse peoples of their vast empire. To carry out its new mandate, faith in Jesus was substituted for self-transformation like Jesus. Christianity's four-hundred-year wisdom tradition, the theosophy taught by Jesus, was abandoned for an outward ritual based on profession of belief in a new religion of dogmas and creeds about Jesus.

The adoption of Christianity as the state religion by Constantine, and what was required of the Catholic Church in return, marked, according to H. P. Blavatsky, the major turning point in the history of Christianity. She characterized it as the point at which the new state religion "throttled" the old religion of Jesus (Secret Doctrine 1:xliv). It marked the historical demise of esoteric Christianity, which Blavatsky equated with theosophy, and the subsequent rise of what she and others in the nineteenth century called "Churchianity." It was at this point that the Christian Church lost the keys to its ancient wisdom tradition, keys that Blavatsky proposed modern Theosophy once again held out to the world after 1500 years.

 
 
 

Subcategories