Hearing Voices

Stories submitted to Professor Quaesitor

Originally printed in the NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2007 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: "Hearing Voices." Quest  95.6 (NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2007): 211-217.
 

In the January-February 2006 issue of Quest, our Thinking Aloud piece acquainted us with several stories, some personal, others more well known, of people who heard voices. As these types of occurrences fall under the unexplained laws of nature, or powers latent in humanity, the Third Object encourages us to investigate them. Professor Quaesitor invited readers to share their experiences of "Hearing Voices."

As one reader had a question about the nom de plume of Professor Quaesitor, we would first like to share a little background and give a short Latin lesson to help explain. We have excerpted some of the correspondence between Jim Caffrey and John Algeo, to whom his letter was forwarded. Reader, Jim Caffrey wrote:

I am writing in response to the Thinking Aloud article "People Who Hear Voices" in the January-February 2006. Yet, as I started to address my remarks, I puzzled at the nom de plume of Professor Quaesitor and was further confused by the results of a Google search on "Quaesitor" which yielded:

Quaesitors are the investigators, lawyers and judges of hermetic politics. They decide in matters of hermetic politics, particularly regarding the Code, keeping structure in the Order of Hermes. A Quaesitor must devote some of his time to investigate when charges are brought up.

Quaesitoris are the magistrates of the Order of Hermes, with a dash of Inquisitor thrown in for good measure. They represent the authority of the Tribunal, and [it] is their duty to hold court, investigate complaints, and pass judgment on those who commit crimes against the Order.

My confusion is concerned with the apparent uneasy fit between the definitions of Quaesitor and the subject matter of hearing voices, as well as why respondents are not asked to share their experiences directly with the researcher, be it yourself or someone else. Please forgive my confusion and concerns, but a name, even a nom de plume, is important.

John Algeo replied:

 

Dear Jim:
The Olcott staff has forwarded your message because I was involved in the genesis of the "hearing voices" matter—though now it seems several eons ago to me. I am currently in India so have not seen the issue of the Quest in which the piece appeared and was not aware of its publication at all. Indeed, I had forgotten all about it, but here is the background:

 

A while ago, I was still involved with the production of the Quest magazine because I had edited it for some years. A physician in Baltimore, a very long-time Theosophist, sent me his account of "hearing voices." I thought it was striking and would make an interesting piece for the magazine, but that it would be better if it were the beginning of a series, so that is what I proposed to the magazine, and as somebody needed to be responsible for selecting pieces to appear as follow-ups, I proposed an old friend mine, Prof. Quaesitor. I am quite sure that his name has nothing to do with either of the uses you Googled. It is just from the Latin source from which they also apparently were derived. That Latin source, I believe, means something like "an inquirer, one who asks questions, one who is on a quest." Prof. Quaesitor is a curious fellow—well, I mean he is curious about things, but doubtless others might regard him as a curiosity himself, so perhaps "curious fellow" should be understood in both senses.

I will inquire of the editorial department of the Quest what their intentions are regarding this topic, and I will happily refer your message to the professor, assuming of course that you are amenable to having it published.

With all good wishes from,

Professor Quaesitor and me, John Algeo, International Vice President of the Theosophical Society

The following articles are accounts from readers who were kind enough to share with us their personal experiences of hearing voices, what it meant to them, or how it affected their lives whether or not they had an explanation. Occasionally the "voices in our heads" are loud enough for us to hear, but it is up to us, individually to understand what they are saying.

 

Shifting Awareness
Jim Caffrey

 

I did appreciate the Thinking Aloud article relating hearing voices stories to the Third Object.  Such a subject could use more exposure. My more memorable memories of hearing voices date back to the early 1980s, when I held a go-go job as district manager for a specialty contracting firm. I ran a small office in Northern New Jersey and one evening after work was rushing to drop-off some materials at an overnight service. It was the first time I visited this particular location, which was on a busy truck route just off an even busier highway. I had parallel parked in front of the place and after completing my drop-off, walked quickly out and got in my car.

In the go-go nature of my job, I often rushed around. I practically opened the car door, sat in the seat and turned the ignition in one seamless motion. Continuing, I put my left hand on the steering wheel and shifted into Drive with the intent of "seamlessly" pulling out into the busy side street. An unmistakable (male) voice spoke (perhaps in the center of my head) saying, "Look in your side view mirror." I quickly looked and saw a large truck bearing down too fast in the lane next to my car and I jammed on the brakes. Had I moved the car two feet, I could have easily died.

 

 
My next memory did not involve a life-threatening situation, but was as real to me as the first. A year later, on a beautiful Sunday morning, I was driving south on the Garden State Parkway towards the seaside town of Cape May. It was springtime and following a technical conference, I took advantage of a hotel stay in nearby Atlantic City to visit this vacation Mecca and hopefully secure a house rental for August. Few cars were on the road and I was not minding the speed limit. (However, this was on my mind as I occasionally slowed down and then sped up.) At one point, while going over a small rise, I heard a male voice ask in a courteous way, "Why are you speeding?" I took note, but ultimately ignored the question and warning. One or two minutes later, rounding a curve, I passed a patrol car in-waiting. The officer asked courteously if everything was all right (by way of "Why were you speeding?") and, with no satisfactory answer given, I received my reward.

Since those days, there have been some other similar experiences, but I am not alarmed by them, nor do I question them—hence, they perhaps do not stand out as easily. In fact, I have been increasingly responsive to non-audible urgings or strong inclinations to do this or that. I am not aware of any handy catch phrase for these phenomena, so it is more difficult to discuss or explain. Yet, I feel the audible and non-audible experiences are related.

 

It Shall Be Provided: Choosing the Beginning beyond the End
By Elizabeth Reshower

 

My humiliation was complete. I had already lost my lover, and my job as Atlanta's first female film director, with all its glamour and prestige. I was on the verge of losing my house, because I could not pay the mortgage. In order to quiet this intense pain, I decided to kill myself—and knew just where to do it. I got out my Browning .22 rifle, and walked to the woods down the street.

The quiet, little ten-acre forest had somehow survived in its wild state, in the middle of the thriving city. Box turtles poked around under the leaves and frogs peeped from the small stream trickling beside a great hollow tree. I had gone inside that hollow tree before, and had found its embrace comforting. If I killed myself there, I thought, no one would find me for months, perhaps years. By then, all that would remain would be a mere skeleton, with a rifle hole in its skull and the weapon of death lying beside it. I longed for such oblivion.

The doorway to my death-tree was about thigh-high, so I knelt down, and pushed the gun in first, leaning it against the curving wall of the tree's interior. Then I crawled in beside it, weeping the sorrowful, self-pitying tears of a pain too deep and a fear too overwhelming to be soothed by any other means than death itself. Or so I thought.

I took off my right shoe, so my big toe could pull the trigger (a rifle is not the most expeditious tool for committing suicide), and put the end of the barrel in my mouth. Then I heard the voice.

"It will be provided," boomed into my ears from nowhere. I took the gun out of my mouth to argue.

"But I've lost my love," I wept.

"It will be provided," the voice replied. This voice did not come from outside the tree, or from any source physical that I could discern. It sounded inside my head, from beyond my ears, and originated in spirit.

"But I've lost my wonderful job, because I got into dope and can't get off it," I cried remorsefully.

"It will be provided," the voice repeated.

"But the bank is about to take my house because I can't pay the mortgage, and I'll have no place to live!"

"It will be provided."

I sat for an hour inside that great and ancient tree, arguing why I should die that day, with a voice that came from out of nowhere, and whose face I could not see. All that voice ever said was: "It will be provided."

So I got on my knees, and pushing the rifle out ahead of me, I crawled out of my living, wooden tomb to join the world again. Everything that I have ever needed has always been provided. I learned from that experience to listen to the inner voice of guidance, especially after praying for something. For example, I prayed "Oh, God, I want to travel."

The inner voice responded: "You might want to check out Decatur Presbyterian Church." So, I went there and discovered that they were organizing a mission trip to Honduras to build a medical clinic.

A more recent conversation concerned indulging my vanity by checking with a plastic surgeon about a tummy tuck. I sat in meditation, asking to be shown the way, whether or not to go ahead with the surgery. When the voice came, echoing out of the heavens, I knew just what I would do, for it spoke those ancient words of wisdom, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

I put my house on the market. During the ensuing yard sales, as I brought out the possessions I had collected over the years, they seemed like useless objects to me. Saving the essentials, such as dishes, pots, and pans, I sold off the rest of it, and began to feel lighter, as if I had lost a thousand pounds.

When my house sold I felt free at last, although until that moment I had not realized how attached to my possessions I had become. Despite the advice of friends and family to reinvest my equity in more real estate, I knew that it was time to go on that spiritual quest, and that perhaps I should look for land to buy out west along the way.

I collected the essentials for the most elemental level of survival, i.e., tent, sleeping bag, camp stove, and rifle, and added in a copy of the Mother Earth News. I was afraid to travel alone, so a young female Doberman "was provided." Her ferocious appearance belied the sweetness within her. As we left the city, driving out from under a cloud, I felt as though I were hatching from an egg, discarding and leaving the old shell behind.

That was in 1975, and it was only the beginning of my awakened awareness and spiritual growth. Many mystical coincidences led me from teacher to teacher—Lame Deer of the Lakota Sioux, the Rosicrucians, and Z. Budapest, to name a few. I was led to new places by various signs, a raccoon that crawled onto my lap, a fox in the middle of the road, a UFO, a gut feeling, or a stranger's chance remark. Some lessons were gentle, some were harsh.

I learned my power as a woman, and my connection to the She Spirit who gave birth to the Universe, and nurtures and sustains it as well. I studied many religions. I learned to be sensitive to outward signs of guidance, and to heed messages from my body and psyche. I began to manifest my will through spells and magic, quickly learning that I did not know enough to tell the Universe what I wanted, because I always left out some important factor, which ruined it all. Thus, I have learned to submit myself to the Divine Will.

Seven years later, my old truck broke down for the last time, and I lost my job. But then, two weeks later, in one glorious day, I was given a new truck and a new job. In answer to a prayer, I was assigned to use my show business talents to translate from the Bible to the stage, produce and direct, the story of Jesus himself.

Stripped of all the misrepresentation and distortion by power-seeking preachers, I saw why people have tried to live up to his teachings over the centuries. His wisdom is perhaps the most profound distillation of Divine Wisdom the world has ever known. I call myself a "Jesusian" now, which allows me to think for myself and enjoy all other paths to the Divine.

And everything that I have ever needed has always been provided.

Thank you, Holy One.

 

A Warning Voice from Beyond
By Glenda Hawley

 

All my life, I had heard people talk about the voice of God, but had never known anyone who had actually heard this voice and I had never heard it myself. I had gotten impressions and ideas that seemed to come out of the blue, but attributed them to mere passing thoughts. That changed with the following two incidents.

 

The first incident that altered my perception of God's (or some internal guidance system's voice) occurred on a summer night. I was driving through a residential area of the small town in which I live, and came to an intersection intending to make a left turn. There were no other cars nearby and the large trees growing near the intersection were heavily laden with summer foliage. The street lights filtering through the leaves left the intersection in mottled darkness.

An instant before I started my left-hand turn, I heard a distinct voice in my head command, "Don't turn!" It seemed to be a male voice and was very forceful. It startled me (to say the least) and I felt as if I could not turn. Just as I passed through the intersection, I saw a bicycle with two boys on it come out of the shadows on my left. I gasped in horror at what would have happened to those two boys if I had not heard (and heeded) the voice and had made the left turn. They both would probably have been killed or badly injured.

Needless to say, I sincerely thanked the Entity behind the guiding voice. Those boys will never know how close they came to disaster and how this voice saved them that night. For me, the incident changed my life. I now know something is guiding me. I may not always let that guidance into my awareness but I continue to work at listening better and have confidence in what I do sense. I also know hearing God's (or my Guide's) voice is not just a religious platitude. And I am beginning to believe that what we call intuition is a quieter version of the voice I heard that night. However, in that particular instance, a commanding voice was what was needed to save those two lives. An intuitional hint probably would not have been sufficient.

The second incident was not as dramatic, but it did have a strong impact on my life. At the time, I was agonizing over the decision of whether to leave my marriage of twenty-five years. My marital relationship was becoming increasingly intolerable due to my husband's controlling attitude and behavior. I felt he was trying to stamp out all the things that I valued in myself. Yet, it was extremely difficult to leave my home and all that was familiar, as well as three children still living at home.

On the particular day that I heard the guiding voice, I was sitting alone on the living room couch crying and in an agony of indecision. Suddenly, a male voice in my head clearly said, "Don't you know I go before you to prepare the way?" My tears instantly dried and I knew that I would never be alone whether I stayed or left. However, it was the assurance of support that I needed to help me make the decision to terminate my marriage.

Since then, that support has been there for me, though not always in the way I expect. Looking back, I can see the way truly has been prepared for me.

 

 

Hearing Voices Fully Sane
Judy Lyn Sweetland

 

"Take the Medicine Wheel to Switzerland." Startled, I turned and looked about me from my seat on the rocky, desert ground in Arizona. There were only small cactus plants on this hilly spot.  I looked to the mountains in front and behind me. I centered myself and resumed my meditation. Shortly, I heard the voice again, louder this time.

"Take the Medicine Wheel to Switzerland." I felt rather edgy this time. Never having experienced this sort of occurrence, I was bothered. As a registered nurse I knew about audio hallucinations. My experience led me to believe that it occurred only to people who were psychotic and had lost touch with reality. I was fully aware of who I was, where I was, and why I was in meditation in the Wheel this day. I was sane.

I stood up, exercised my body briefly, engaged in deep breathing to clear my mind, and sat down to complete my Wheel experience. Almost immediately, it came again very loud and insistent. "Take the Medicine Wheel to Switzerland!"

For the third time, I looked everywhere around me, but could see no one. I sat there trying to comprehend why I was being given this message and by whom. It began to make sense to me; so I completed my meditation and walked home relieved.

A Therapeutic Touch colleague who was living in Switzerland had asked me to come to her small town, Martigny, to give a couple of seminars to the nurses in their hospital as well as the general public. The focus of my talks was to be about the power and consequences of the projection of our unspoken thoughts. She also asked if I would be willing to give an all day workshop if there was enough interest. I had committed to do this. She was to let me know in time for me to prepare.

A few years prior, I had learned the Medicine Wheel meditation from John Redtail Freesoul. I found it to be helpful in making positive and appropriate decisions, and had begun sharing this orderly method of seeking internal wisdom beyond thought and emotion with small groups of friends.

My trip to Switzerland was in less than two weeks. I had just received a letter from Helene (this was in January 1991; before e-mail was commonplace) informing me that thirty-five people were signed up for the all day workshop. I was quite anxious as I had several responsibilities to attend to before going and had little time to prepare new material for a day long workshop.

Resolving a personal situation in order to clear my mind of that issue was important for me to do before leaving. I had just completed a personal interaction that felt complete and positive, yet left me feeling shaky. So I had gone into the Medicine Wheel to calm and center myself. The Medicine Wheel honors the wisdoms of the Four Directions. Wise spirits are invited into each direction. I followed the prescribed pattern as I always had. Although I believed in help and guidance from unseen sources, I had never heard a human voice coming from outside myself with no visible body present.

As I sat in the North contemplating this directive, I thought what a good idea the Medicine Wheel would be for the day long workshop. I had been practicing it for almost four years, informally shared it numerous times with friends, and introduced it publicly in a small workshop in a nearby community. I would need only a small amount of preparation. I could do it.

On the airplane, I reread the guide book, went over and over my notes, but began to question the wisdom of my decision. I asked myself, "What am I, a pale face, doing taking a Native American tradition to Europe?"

I began to feel panic. Thoughts of self-doubt predominated and I feared I was somehow violating an unwritten agreement not to claim knowledge of another's cultural beliefs. It was nighttime as I looked out of the window of the plane. We were over the Atlantic and the sky was clear. The full moon sent a strong beam of light straight down to the ocean below. The beam of light was a strong spiritual sign for me and though still nervous, I felt reassured.

My colleague was excited about my choice of subject. We practiced the timing with her interpreting my material into French. The day arrived. We were meeting in a basement room of the hospital. I began by explaining the sacredness of the Medicine Wheel and elicited that focus from the participants. As I said these words, a strong gust of wind came from behind me over my shoulders. There were no windows in the room and no vents blowing air. I relaxed, fully believing some form of Native American presence was with me. The workshop went smoothly and the participants were grateful for what they learned that day.

Back at home, I began to teach Medicine Wheel formally. Although today, my teaching is informal and usually individualized, practice of the Medicine Wheel continues to give me personal guidance when I am deliberating challenging decisions. I have never heard voices within the Wheel since that eventful day. I have no intellectual explanation. I can only assume that, for a reason I do not fully understand, I was fulfilling a spiritual purpose.


The Sellon Legacy

By Michael Sellon

Originally printed in the NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2007 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Sellon, Michael. "The Sellon Legacy." Quest  95.6 (NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2007): 222-225.

Theosophical Society - Michael Sellon

This is an abbreviated account of the lives of two dedicated theosophists; John A. Sellon and Emily Boenke Sellon. Although they both have passed on to new lives, their devotions still reverberate in various theosophical enterprises today.
 
Theosophy, and the international Society which furthers its universalistic vision, rushed into the lives of John Sellon's parents back in the 1920s. Barbara and Ernest Sellon quickly realized the insightful scope and social commitments of the Society, and in decisive pace joined its area center in New York City. This turning point soon drew their son into the dynamics of merging three separate lodges into one integrated center of learning and service.
 
These events created a fresh magnetism for the theosophical community, one that destined Emily Boenke to join this effort as well as meet her future husband. Barbara, impressed by Emily's bright searching nature, led her to explore the worldview of Theosophy. Emily took to the literature with an insatiable thirst. In later years, she recalled those times as one continuous stream of "Aha's!" in which a deep intuitive knowing converged—sometimes colliding—with these readings termed "Ancient Wisdom." This vital coalescence with the Sellons and Theosophy created a life work for John and Emily which persisted for the rest of their lives (sixty to seventy years).
 
The elder Sellons favored a lively social life, and in due time they were hosting visits from a number of lecturers key to the international endeavors of the Theosophical Society. One of those luminaries was J. Krishnamurti, to whom John took a special liking. Years later he would proudly proclaim—with tongue in cheek—that he "taught" Krishnaji fundamental strategies of esoteric ping-pong.
 
On a more serious side, those very same times were challenged by the onset of the Great Depression, a tragic event that imposed itself upon everyone. Indeed dire economic limitations prevailed, yet paradoxically stimulated and invoked communities to stand strong and right wrongs. This changed many lives, including those of two remarkable Theosophists, Dora and Fitz Kunz. Ernest and Barbara, along with the New York Theosophical Society, were instrumental in the Kunzes' relocation to New York. This became a deeply spiritual merger that brought the Kunzes and Sellons together in a lifetime of theosophical endeavor.
 
Together, joined by many members, they spearheaded a vibrant learning process for the New York Theosophical Society. In 1937, they created Pumpkin Hollow Farm as a regional summer camp in order to bring Theosophy into nature and create a special sense of community. The Northeast Federation of Theosophists was appropriately founded to enlarge this sense of community.
 
Of very special theosophical interest was the creation of the Foundation for Integrative Education and its scholarly edition Main Currents in Modern Thought of which Emily became co-editor and John its financial advisor. Although the new foundation lay outside the workings of the Theosophical Society, its inner life was purely Theosophical in nature, ever seeking out authors and contemporary thought that revealed main currents in science and humanities that clearly had theosophical intent. For Emily, John, and the Kunzes, the epicenter of this quest was to share new insights of the timeless, universal ground of being; the classic oneness of the cosmos that they perceived as coursing throughout modern twentieth century cultural ferment. Fritz had a very special interest in modern science, which he envisioned would play a key role in fresh revelations of universality and integrative principles. In Main Currents' retrospective issue published in November 1975, Emily wrote: "All true knowledge arises from the integration of two domains of knowing—the perceptual, aesthetic, experimental and the abstract theoretical or conceptual. Both these modes must be nurtured if we are to achieve personal integration and wholeness; both are essential for the growth and renewal of our culture." These words still ring true today.
 
The Sellons and Kunzes had an unwavering conviction that modern thought, i.e., physics, biology, etc. along with an integrative revolution in the humanities, would in some vital way impel Theosophy into a new alliance with frontline changes in world culture.
 
To this end, Emily and John Sellon wove their lives serving Theosophy. The Theosophical Society, the NYTS, Pumpkin Hollow, the Northeast Theosophical Federation, the Foundation for Integrative Education, Main Currents, national lecturing and national leadership positions created a very full life. John became a founding member of the Theosophical Investment Trust and later, he established a Charitable Trust which continues today, supporting, in part, various Theosophical centers of learning and service.
 
Their legacies are remarkable, but the one they deemed most crucial is simply Oneness, a unity permeating the entire panoply of existence.

Refections on Founders Day

Originally printed in the November-December 2000 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Marshall, Brian. "Refections on Founders Day." Quest  88.6 NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2000): pg 236.

By Brian Marshall

I'm writing this on a seventeenth of November, the day on which the Theosophical Society was founded. The year was 1875; the place, New York City; the founders: Helena Petrovana Blavatsky, Colonel Henry Steel Olcott, William Quan Judge, and others.Why was this event significant? On this date, the Ancient Wisdom, so long obscured by the materialism of the age, was given a new vehicle to shine through--the Theosophical Society.

Did Blavatsky, Olcott, and Judge found Theosophy? Of course not! Theosophy is the Perennial Philosophy, the Ancient Wisdom, the Alpha and Omega, having neither beginning nor end, much less human creators! What Blavatsky, Olcott, and Judge did was to provide a vehicle for disseminating this theo-sophia in the modern world.

Little did they know, at the time, how far reaching their work would be. As HPB put it, "Theosophist is, who Theosophy does." They did! Their work transformed the world they lived in and continues to challenge the assumptions of materialism wherever it may be found.

For me, Theosophy has been my guiding light. I first encountered Theosophy at the age of 14 in the public library. It was there that I checked out, and. avidly read, that great Theosophical classic Elementary Theosophy by L. W. Rogers. I can't say that I understood it all or that it was in the least "elementary," in the common use of that word; but it was electrifying. I knew, at an innate level, that here was a view so grand, so vast, so cosmic, that it could guide me, unveil to me its mysteries, stir my soul, and challenge my mind for the rest of my days. And it has done just that.

My first encounter with Theosophy was thirty-five years ago. In all that time Theosophy has been the one consistency in my life. I have not always been a consistent Theosophist; but Theosophy has always been consistent for me.

Theosophy and the Theosophical Society are separate; they are not synonymous. Yet, without the founding of the Theosophical Society in 1875 and, I dare say, its on-going work, who knows how long the Ancient Wisdom would have remained hidden for so many of us?

November 17 is "Founders Day" for the Theosophical Society. To found is to lay a basis upon which something else is built. We, as Theosophists, are also founders, heirs to Blavatsky, Olcott, and Judge. We are called to found lives built on altruism and openness to others, to have broad and receiving minds and spirits, to be visionaries and actors, builders of the arcanum of humanity. "Theosophist is, who Theosophy does."

It is this vision, embodied in Theosophy, incarnated in the Theosophical Society, and promulgated 125 years ago which has given my life its North Star, its lodestone, and every other metaphor for guidance. For that time, a century and a quarter ago, and for its continuing effect, I am grateful!


Brian Marshall is a life member of the Theosophical Society, having joined on his eighteenth birthday. He is at present on leave of absence from his position as a United Methodist pastor, and makes his home in Duluth, Minnesota, where he reads, writes, and contemplates the great mysteries of Theosophy.


The Theosophical Odyssey of D. M. Bennett, Part Two

Originally printed in the November - December  2001 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Bradford, Roderick. "The Theosophical Odyssey of D. M. Bennett, Part Two." Quest  89.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER  2001): 212-217.

By Roderick Bradford

We, who know something of his private life, and believe in the impartial judgment of some of our best friends in America, who knew him for years, maintain that he was made a martyr to, and has suffered for, that cause of freedom for which every right-minded man in America will stand up and will die for, if necessary. . . . we proclaim Mr. Bennett a kind, truthful, quiet, right-minded man, imperfect and liable to err, as every other mortal, but, at the same time scrupulously honest.

—H. P. Blavatsky
Collected Writings 4:79 -80

 

Theosophical Society - Roderick Bradford is a freelance writer and documentary video producer in San Diego, California. He has recently finished the manuscript of his first book, tentatively titled "TheTruth Seeker: The Biography of D. M. Bennett, the Nineteenth Century's Most Controversial Publisher and First-Amendment Martyr.The anniversary meeting of the Theosophical Society at which D. M.Bennett, the American freethinker, told his audience that the religions and morals of India were superior to those of Christianity infuriated Joseph Cook and his fellow missionaries. A full-blown brouhaha erupted after Cook published an article in the Times of India vilifying Bennett and denouncing Theosophy. Bennett was incensed by the article's "alluding to those private letters . . . the unfair remarks of Scribner's Monthly . . . replete with such malicious falsehoods as he [Cook] so well knows how to use." He and Olcott immediately drafted letters challenging Cook to a debate to be held on January 20, 1882. Bennett's letter, dated January 18, 1882, from the Crow's Nest bungalow, reads:

Sir: You have defamed my character, impugned my motives, and cast a slur upon the whole Free thought party who take the liberty of thinking for themselves. That the Indian public may know whether your several statements are true or false, I shall make on Friday evening, at 5:30, at the Framji Cowasji Institute, a public statement. On that occasion I invite you to meet me face to face and answer the statements I shall make. Your failure to do so would be construed into an inability to substantiate the reckless allegations flung out under the protection of a crowd of sympathizers. Should you plead other engagements, I may say that to meet your calumnies I have myself put off my engagement. Like yourself, I am on a voyage around the world, and have no time to waste.

For the whole truth, yours, etc., D. M. Bennett

Cook declined the invitation and returned Bennett's note unopened. The meeting went ahead as planned in order to refute the Cook slanders against Bennett and the Theosophical Society. Hundreds had to be turned away before the meeting started, and the Hall was packed to overflowing to hear the publisher and the Colonel speak. Prior to their speeches a reply from Cook was received and read to the audience:

 

Bombay, Jan. 20, 1882

Col. Olcott, of The Theosophical Society, Bombay,

Sir:

I am not open to challenges of which the evident object is to advertise infidelity. You ask me to sit on your platform with a man whose career has been described in an unanswerable article in Scribner's Monthly as "The Apotheosis of Dirt." No honorable man can keep company of this kind. For using this man as a weapon with which to attack Christianity the enlightened public sentiment of India will hold theTheosophical Society to a stern account. Men are measured by their heroes.

Several days before I received your communication I was definitely engaged to be in Poonah on the night proposed for your meeting in Bombay.

Yours, etc., Joseph Cook

During his speech, Bennett informed the audience of the history of Cook's attacks on free thinkers like himself, only because they did not believe in Christianity. Cook had been an enemy for several years and "has poured upon us all the vile epithets which he was able to command." As to his unfair trial in New York, at which Cook had been present, Bennett added, "I may say I owe, in part, at least, my conviction to the influence of Joseph Cook."

Bennett demonstrated Cook's hypocrisy by giving an overview of the "crimes of adultery and seduction" by Christian clergymen. Why wasn't Cook shocked at the crimes and immorality of the scandalous Henry Ward Beecher case? "He has never denounced Mr. Beecher in his lectures, and doubtless still recognizes him as a brother in Christ." Bennett answered Cook's repeated assertions that he was a "criminal" with the names of Socrates, Galileo, and Jesus Christ. "Does Mr. Cook, or any of his Christian friends," he argued "think any the less of Jesus because he was arrested, tried, and convicted, and executed for expressing his religious sentiments?" He gave a litany of freethinkers, including Thomas Paine, who were imprisoned but "committed no crime. . . . The catalogue of men who have been unjustly arrested, tried, convicted, imprisoned, or executed for exercising the right of thinking and expressing their thoughts is a very long one, and it embraces many of the best men who have lived."

As to Cook's remarks calling him a "poisoner of youth" and "promoter of vice," printed in the Times of India, Bennett denied ever sending a book or any "immoral circulars" to any Indian youth. "I have had no communication with the youth of Bombay, either to poison them or to give them an antidote for poison," he declared. As to Cook's statements regarding the decline of free thought: "I know this to be false, and I have good opportunities for knowing. Ten years ago there was but one Free thought journal published in the United States; now there are six."

Bennett also ridiculed Cook's attempts to "harmonize" Christianity and science. He found it "absurd and untruthful . . . to pretend that science has any connection with either the Bible or Christianity." The attempts of Cook and his fellow "Christian Scientists" to co-opt science to bolster their religion merely infuriated freethinkers. It was, after all, science that liberals believed would elevate mankind and that had always been an arrow in their quiver against superstition. He concluded his lengthy speech reviewing Christianity and using his encyclopedic knowledge of the Bible to show the audience there was nothing new about Christianity. Furthermore, he argued, Christianity had never been "a religion of love and peace, but the bloodiest religion in the world, fostering ignorance, retarding science, favoring slavery and opposing women's rights."

Damodar K. Mavalankar and Kavasji M. Shroff, the men who accompanied Olcott when he met Bennett at the steamship, also gave speeches that evening. Damodar was the Society's recording secretary and an intense young Brahmin who discarded his wealth and abandoned his caste to devote his life to Theosophy. An ascetic and seeker of occult knowledge, Damodar, according to Theosophical history, developed occult powers and eventually received messages from the Masters. Shroff was the secretary of the Bombay branch of the National Indian Association and the Bombay Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals. During his speech, he welcomed Cook to India and expressed admiration for Cook's scholarship, eloquence, and oratorical power. But he could not accept the Christian teachings. Shroff reminded Cook that "the progress of science has already given a death-blow to Christianity in Europe. . . .Christianity is not the religion for India."

Colonel Olcott spoke for an hour and a half, defending American Spiritualists and fully vindicating the Theosophical Society, showing Cook "to be simply an untruthful and malignant slanderer," Bennett reported. Following the meeting, Olcott went to Poonah, and was again maligned by Cook, who was also there to give speeches. The Colonel challenged Cook to debate him on the same platform. But the clergyman refused and went on to insult his audience at Poonah. After unsuccessfully attempting to induce the audience to join him in repeating the Lord's Prayer, a frustrated Cook blurted out a quip about "casting pearls before swine." Cook's bluster and inflammatory remarks alienated many, so his lecture tour of India was not as successful as his supporters had hoped.

+++++++

Bennett stayed in Bombay longer than planned, remaining at the Crow's Nest from January 10 to 26. While hoping to enjoy a few days rest, he spent most of his time responding to Cook's attacks—and also learning about Theosophy. In a letter to his skeptical readers in America, Bennett explained his fascination with "Occultism" and began reprinting extracts from Sinnett's book The Occult World. "Although hidden and mysterious," he wrote, " I like it for the reason that it does not claim to be miraculous or supernatural."

Admittedly anxious to see some of the paranormal phenomena he heard so much about, he was disappointed that he did not see any of the mysterious "adepts" or "Astral Brothers," as they were sometimes called."The nearest to a marvel I have had brought to my vision," he wrote, "is the writing in or upon letters received by mail by Col. Olcott." The Colonel told him that some of the letters he received by mail were occasionally mysteriously marked by one of the "invisible Brothers "living 2,000 miles away in the Himalayan Mountains. The letters were received unopened and parts often underlined in red ink with comments and suggestions about the content and the writer.

Bennett gave a detailed account of an occasion when letters arrived from the Post Office while he was sitting with Olcott. Olcott handed the letters to him for his inspection and they seemed "perfectly intact, and presented not the slightest appearance of having been opened." But after Olcott opened them with his penknife, Bennett saw the"mysterious words in red ink" and lengthy comments and "ever-attendant mystic signature." The letters came from different parts of India and Ceylon; while Bennett was skeptical, he didn't think it possible that all the red marks could have been written by the same man. He found that the "chances for collusion seemed extremely remote," and while it could be said that Olcott had "manipulated" the letters, he knew "the gentleman too well to believe him capable of such subterfuge. I believe him a strictly honest man. He possibly may be deceived himself, but he is not a deceiver."

Bennett knew it would be very hard for materialists to accept these paranormal incidents, but he thought it no harder than it would have been a century earlier to accept some of the scientific and technological wonders of the late nineteenth century. "I do not condemn this occult power as fraud or an impossibility," he declared and added,"because we of the Western world know nothing about it is not a sureproof that it has no existence."

In Bombay, Bennett heard accounts by numerous persons whom he regarded as "strictly truthful" about strange phenomena including bells, musical instruments, and "Brothers" appearing in their "astral" bodies.He was told Olcott and HPB were "entirely in rapport and recognition with these 'Astral brothers.' " Olcott assured him that, while he was still in New York, one of the masters had appeared in his "astral body."And after conversing, the Master gave Olcott an Indian shawl and handkerchief, which he showed Bennett. He was also shown a gold ring reportedly produced by Madame Blavatsky's occult power with the "aid of the Brothers."

While Bennett found Olcott an honest fellow seeker of truth, his assessment of HPB was somewhat less enthusiastic. Writing to his readers back home in America, he tried to explain Blavatsky's ability to communicate with the "Brothers," who seemingly regarded her as a"special protégé." Unlike American spiritualistic mediums, she claimed that paranormal phenomena were not produced by the dead but by living persons aided by "elementals" or "elementary spirits." And as nearly as he could understand, "she does not believe in personal immortality, and that as persons we retain our identity in the state after death." Her" distinction between personality and individuality," he confessed, "is almost too obscure for my obtuse brain." And although he admitted that some of her amazing statements and claims "stagger me not a little and put my credulity to the utmost stretch . . . I have learned to modify my prejudices. . . . I am ready to believe Hamlet was right when he assured his friend Horatio that there is in heaven and earth many things not dreamed of in his philosophy. I think I will reserve my verdict and wait for more facts."

+++++++

D. M. Bennett's skepticism concerning some of Olcott and Blavatsky's miraculous claims did not prevent him from applying to join the Theosophical Society. He approved of their work and "to show this sympathy and a desire to cooperate with them," he wrote, "I proposed to become a member of the society." After thoroughly discussing Theosophy with Colonel Olcott and Madame Blavatsky, he applied for membership. But the Cook controversy and hostile attacks by the press caused Olcott to hesitate in admitting his friend into the Society. Bennett also thought it might be harmful to the burgeoning Society to accept him as a member because of the negative publicity instigated by the "various slurs" and "foul slanders" uttered by Cook before the Bombay public and printed in the press. He expressed his concern to Olcott, who chronicled his own reservations in his Old Diary Leaves (2:331). Bennett's application would cause a troubling "dilemma" for himself and Theosophy, but would, as he admitted in his diary, "teach a lesson too much needed by us all."

Colonel Olcott feared the negative publicity generated by Cook and played out in the influential Indian press. They attacked and reviled Bennett "to such an extent," he noted, "that I hesitated to take him into membership, for fear that it might plunge us into another public wrangle, and thus interfere with our aim of peacefully settling down to our proper business of theosophical study and propaganda." His reluctance, he admitted, "was an instinct of worldly prudence, certainly not chivalric altruism." After discussing the issue with Blavatsky, "she was overshadowed by a Master who told me my duty and reproached me formy faulty judgment." The Colonel was reminded of his own imperfection and advised not to judge fellow men. "I knew that the applicant had been made the scapegoat of the whole anti-Christian party, and richly deserved all the sympathy and encouragement we could give him. I was sarcastically told to look through the whole list of our members and point out a single one without faults. That was enough; I returned to Mr. Bennett, gave him the application blank to sign, and HPB and I became his sponsors."

Apparently Sinnett also had some reservations about admitting Bennett to their ranks. He too was mildly chastened through a letter he received that month in Allahabad. He had been advised by the chela who wrote him earlier: "If you can see your way towards giving him [Bennett] a correct idea of the actual present and potential future state of Asiatic but more particularly of Indian thought, it will be gratifying to my Master." Shortly after he received a letter (no. 42) from that Master himself, enlightening him about Bennett's value to Theosophy in no uncertain terms: "Were he [Bennett] to die this minute and I'll use a Christian phraseology to make you comprehend me the better few hotter tears would drop from the eye of the recording Angel of Death over other such ill-used men, as the tear Bennett would receive for his share. Few men have suffered as he has; and as few have a more kind, unselfish and truthful heart." The Master, who signed himself "M," admonished Sinnett for seeing only Bennett's "unwashed hands, uncleaned nails and coarse language." And although Bennett was "not exactly an angel," he was morally superior to some "gentlemanly" members. "B is an honest man and of sincere heart," M asserted, "besides being one of tremendous moral courage and a martyr to boot."

About the matter of his admission, Bennett wrote, "It seems a conference was held upon the subject between Col. Olcott, Madam Blavatsky, and a few other members of the society who were present, and, as is the custom, Madam Blavatsky referred the matter to the Brothers for their advice. It seems that the desirability of every candidate for admission is referred to the Brothers, they approving of some and rejecting others. My case seems to have been laid before them, and they decided favorably upon it. The response was that I am an honest,industrious man, and well fitted to become a member of the Theosophical Society. I hope their opinion is well founded. At all events, I became a member." According to archival records of the Theosophical Society in Adyar, India, D. M. Bennett was formally admitted on January 14,1882.

In the March 1883 issue of the Theosophist, Olcott addressed what Bennett had written about his own admission. The Colonel corrected Bennett's claim that "every candidate for admission is referred to the Brothers." But "advice was indeed asked as to Mr.Bennett's admission," Olcott announced, because of the controversy surrounding the publisher of the Truth Seeker.

+++++++

After spending over two weeks at the Crow's Nest, D. M. Bennett departed from Bombay on January 26, 1882, and began his three thousand-mile-journey across the Indian continent. He traveled to Darjeeling, a scenic village at the foot of the Himalayas on a sightseeing visit. In Colombo, he found himself "famous" and learned that the Truth Seeker was popular and that several of his tracts had been translated into Sinhalese. He was well received by the local Buddhist priests, whose belief system he admired, although he found fault with their ubiquitous display of images of Buddha.

While in Colombo, he stayed at the Theosophical Society's hall,and enjoyed the "most comfortable quarters," including a cook and a room where he could write. He was surprised by all the new friends he found waiting at the stations for his arrival and providing carriages and paying his hotel and railway bills. And although he knew the Truth Seeker had subscribers in Colombo, he never dreamed he was so popular on the opposite side of the globe or that so many friends were anxious to greet him. He suspected Colonel Olcott had written on his behalf, advising those friends about the time of his arrival and asking them to meet him. "I think," Bennett wrote, "I have Col. H. S. Olcott to thank for much of this."

During his twelve days in Ceylon, Bennett was persuaded to travel to different cities and give lectures. He addressed an audience on the subject of education and women's rights, citing their accomplishments throughout the ages and informing them of the scholarship of Annie Besant and countless American women authors, editors, physicians, and lawyers. He concluded his speech by urging his listeners not to give up their religion for Christianity. He asked them to cooperate with Col.Olcott and the Theosophical Society, "whose march is in the right direction, and I am sure your lives will be spent in doing good, and that a rich reward will crown your efforts."

During his trip abroad, Bennett kept the readers of his journal apprised of his activities, including his Theosophical sojourn. His letters were printed weekly in the Truth Seeker, and his association with Colonel Olcott and Madame Blavatsky caused a good deal of criticism from subscribers. But he continued to defend his decision to join theTheosophical Society and its founders until his death, which came soon after he arrived home in New York in fall, 1882. There is no way to determine how devoted a Theosophist he would have remained, had he lived longer. His wife Mary also joined the Theosophical Society and continued as a member until her death in 1898. It is easy to understand D. M.Bennett's attraction to Theosophy, however, because of its idealistic motto: "There is no religion higher than truth."


Roderick Bradford (rodbradford51@hotmail.com) is a freelance writer and documentary video producer in San Diego,California. He has recently finished the manuscript of his first book, tentatively titled "The Truth Seeker: The Biography of D. M. Bennett,the Nineteenth Century's Most Controversial Publisher and First-Amendment Martyr." This article is abstracted from that work.


Inaugural Address November December 2001

Originally printed in the November - December  2001 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Burnier, Radha. "Inaugural Address November December 2001." Quest  89.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER  2001): 202-204

Radha Burnier

On the Commencement of her Fourth Term of Office as President of theTheosophical Society, Adyar, July 15, 2001

Theosophical Society - Radha Burnier was the president of the international Theosophical Society from 1980 till her death in 2013. The daughter of N. Sri Ram, who was president of the international Theosophical Society from 1953 to 1973, she was an associate of the great spiritual teacher J. KrishnamurtiIt is with a sense of humility and consciousness of the great responsibility cast on me as President of the Theosophical Society that I am accepting a fourth term of office. Starting with Col. Olcott, and followed by Annie Besant, we have had as Presidents and leaders men and women of exceptional endowments, who set the tone for the Society's work. Their example and discourse showed how the light of Theosophy illumines every field of human activity. Their thoughts and labors have inspired generations of people all over the world to devote themselves to world welfare rather than personal interest; all of them in their turn have activated others to live thought fully and unselfishly, and learn to tread the path to perfection, which is universal, without orthodoxies, dogmas, and meaningless rituals. It takes courage to break through old customs and out moded practices, and all outstanding Theosophists were courageous people, plowing new ground in the fields of religion, education, social relationships, and even politics. To all my distinguished predecessors I pay homage and sincerely hope that I shall prove worthy of them and of the trust reposed in me by the members who have now elected me.

Sometimes, standing on the beautiful beach at Adyar, we can see a great rush of water toward the shore, which is quickly and invisibly hauled back to the ocean by a strong undercurrent. At times there is a dramatic clash between the powerful forward swell and the unseen current carrying back the mass of water. The collision throws the waves high up,and then they fall with a crash. This seems symbolic of how the human mind repeatedly rushes toward the dry sands and rocks of sensory and material existence, not realizing that there is no escape from the mighty invisible energy that will pull it back into the vast ocean of reality. The collision between these cross currents periodically results in catastrophes that shake up the human mind and human society—but, alas only temporarily!

Such are the times when the challenges are most intense and the opportunities great. All of life is offering us opportunities all the time, but in small ways. And it takes a long while, even many incarnations, to be aware that even the small encounters with people,objects, or situations, both pleasant and seemingly unpleasant, are part of the benevolent scheme of Nature to awaken consciousness and to open our hearts to the truths of life.

We are witnessing today a blind rush for power, wealth, and enjoyment—irrespective of moral and ethical considerations. The violence, cruelty, corruption and selfishness are unprecedented because our age of technology makes a system of everything and manufactures increasingly efficient tools to be put to good or evil use.Nevertheless, by bringing into sharp focus the dire results of the struggle modern humanity carries on against Nature's laws and design, our era provides an exceptional opportunity for a deeper understanding of the human problem—the problem of egoism battling against the universe.

Krishnamurti often spoke of mediocrity as if it were a sin, or even a crime. Mediocrity, we may say, is insensitivity of mind, its failure to respond to the simple opportunities of daily life, which pave the way to spiritual awakening. Shut in a shell of self-concern, such a mind is callous and blunt to disasters and danger signals. The lesson of twentieth-century history is that the majority of people do terrible things—killing and even torturing, spying and betraying family and friends—because everybody else does it. The abominable cruelty systematically practiced on humans and animals is tolerated without a murmur by the majority of people because it is the norm of the age. Few rise up to affirm that what is wrong does not become right because a million people do it. Present-day culture, if at all it is culture, is stunting those faculties which put the human heart in touch with the source of life and health. As Light on the Path declares: "He that chooses evil, refuses to look within himself, shuts his ears to the melody of his heart." That melody is in every human heart, deeply hidden, perhaps silent, but it is there.

In the early days of the TS, members were advised by an Adept:

The Society, as a body, has a task before it which, unless performed with the utmost discretion, will cause the world of the indifferent and the selfish to rise up in arms against it. Theosophy has to fight intolerance, prejudice, ignorance, and selfishness, hidden under the mantle of hypocrisy. It has to throw all the light it can from the torch of Truth, with which its servants are entrusted. It must do this without fear or hesitation, dreading neither reproof nor condemnation.Theosophy, through its mouthpiece, the Society, has to tell the Truth in the very face of lie; to beard the tiger in its den, without thought or fear of evil consequences, and to set at defiance calumny and threats.

Many members of the Society have in fact stood up for causes which were scoffed at in their time—they braved calumny and sarcasm. But the work of the TS is not merely to try to rectify the ills and wrongs inhuman society, but also to encourage its members to go to the root of human problems, to find and understand their origin within themselves and learn to rise above the illusion-breeding, conditioned mind. Without such action it is not possible for humanity to become heir to the vast creative gifts and potential for wisdom inherent in consciousness.

One of the Objects of the Society is to investigate the hidden laws of Nature and the powers latent in man. What are these powers? Often the answer points to trivialities. But we have arrived at a stage in human history where it is not enough to undertake psychical research and arrive at some superficial findings about telepathy and other abilities that may be classified as the lower siddhis. We need to recognize the deeper meaning in the words of this Object, and study earnestly our hearts and those of our fellows, in order to avoid constantly deceiving ourselves into believing that unrealities are real. Slowly, as we plunge into the quiet depths in our own consciousness, there may be the beginning of reflection on the profound secrets of Nature, hidden in the material as well as subtle inner dimensions of both human beings and the universe.

If the universe is a mystery, it is a still greater mystery that evolution has arrived at the human mind with its irrepressible aspiration to know the truth and also to love the truth. With loss of faith in organized religion, with all its superstitions and emphasis on authority, people in general have come to trust only the truths of science, gathered by observation of the objective universe. The position has changed now with recognition that the observer has a direct impact on what is observed.

Life is not a cry, it is a song, say the wise ones. Behind the suffering and chaos, there is a plan and purpose, says Theosophy. Can we know it as a fact? Only by finding the truth about ourselves, and breaking down the internal barriers to perception. The words "universal brotherhood" are generally taken to mean that we must behave in an unbiased, friendly, and kindly manner. But it is much more than that; a true brotherhood is a living body or nucleus which is regenerative. The Universal Brotherhood of the Theosophical Society must not be a passive condition, but a dynamic, harmonizing power that embraces all in close kinship. That kinship is at a deep level; it is "the spiritual and psychic blending of man with Nature" which reveals the truth that lies hidden under the objects of sense and thereby promotes a spirit of unity and harmony. Regenerative universal brotherhood is the foundation for the emergence of a nonsectarian, nonauthoritarian religious feeling among the peoples of the world, counteracting the futile materialistic trend.

The statement was made in the Mahatma letters: "Modern science is our best ally. Yet it is generally that same science which is made the weapon to break our heads with." Since then, science has made great strides. A new picture is emerging as a modern generation of investigators and thinkers in the scientific field are putting forward views that tend to shatter the rigid materialism of the last two centuries. This change in scientific thinking helps to usher in a fresh sense of responsibility in humankind for the welfare of the earth and all its other inhabitants. Well-known writers like Professor Lewis Thomas are suggesting that the evolutionary process has been sustained,from the time of the earliest microbes, by a system of cooperation, communication, and interconnection in Nature and not by a bitter struggle for survival, as people have believed for more than a century. Others say that it cannot be taken for granted that violence is dominant in Nature; altruism and mutual support are very much a part of Nature's order. Professor Charles Birch emphasizes the place of feelings of compassion and sympathy and the existence of purpose in Nature. The concept that there is an inscrutable, universal intelligence and power, which may be called God, is no longer totally unacceptable to scientists. A whole stream of fresh thinking flowing from the scientific community promises to alter the education that future generations will receive. Science may indeed become the ally of the Wisdom-Religion; true religious awareness may possibly return to the world through the back door of science! As Arthur Hugh Clough wrote:

For while the tired waves, vainly breaking,
      Seem here no painful inch to gain,
Far back, through creeks and inlets making,
      Comes silent, flooding in the main.

And not by eastern windows only,
     When daylight comes, comes in the light.
In front, the sun climbs slow, how slowly,
     But westward, look, the land is bright!

Theosophy is in essence both science and religion. It is a call to use our reason to understand life in its varied aspects, knowing fullwell the limitations of reason. For something more than reason is needed to grasp the essence of a flower, a song, a person, let alone the truth of the vast, living universe of which we are a small part. As Annie Besant said: "Truth must come to each individual as the result of study, reflection, purity of life, and devotion to high ideals." The art of living must be practiced and the science of life learned by all of us in order to fulfill successfully the aims and objects of the Theosophical Society.


Subcategories