Many Paths

by Joan Price

Originally printed in the Summer 2010 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Price, Joan. "Many Paths." Quest  98. 3 (Summer 2010): 110.

Theosophical Society - Joan Price, Ph.D., is professor emeritus of philosophy at Mesa Community College, Mesa, Arizona. She is author of Philosophy through the Ages, Climbing the Spiritual Ladder, and Truth Is a Bright Star, a Native American tale for children. This essay is from the preface of her latest book, Sacred Scriptures of the World Religions: An IntroductionOnce upon a time there were six blind men who wanted to know what an elephant looked like. The first blind man felt the elephant's side. "The elephant is like a wall." The second blind man ran his hands along the elephant's tusk. "The elephant is like a smooth, taut spear." The third blind man stroked the elephant's trunk. "A snake," he said. "The elephant is like a snake." The fourth blind man ran his hands down the elephant's leg. "The elephant is like a tree." The fifth blind man stroked the elephant's ear. "The elephant is like a fan." The sixth blind man grasped the animal's tail. "The elephant is like a rope." The blind men disputed loud and long. Although each was partly right, all were actually wrong.

The ancient story of the blind men and the elephant goes to the heart of our theological wars. So often religious disputes are waged in ignorance of what the other means, thus, like the blind men and the elephant, we fight about an Ultimate Reality that none of us has seen. When we are opinionated or ignorant of our limitations because of insufficient knowledge or a smug mentality, we are as blind as if we had no eyes. In dogmatic theology as we usually understand it, we may be settling for our limitations by transforming them into absolute truths.

Another analogy, that of a mountain, may help us to understand the ultimate unity of the religions of the world: There are many paths starting at the bottom of the mountain which lead to the mountain top. Each path starts from a different geographical location with respect to climate, terrain, and biological and social conditions.  One path proceeds from the jungle, another from the desert, another from the Arctic, and another from a large city. The jungle is wet with dense growth, the desert dry and barren, the Arctic cold and remote, and the city crowded and noisy. It is the ultimate task of religion to help the inhabitants of these diverse regions to find their way up the mountain. Those starting from the desert need to carry large quantities of water, which would not be necessary for those in the jungle—in fact, would hinder them. Arctic climbers need warm, heavy clothing, which would inhibit both the desert dwellers and the jungle inhabitants. City residents might take mobile phones and GPS navigators to find their way in unfamiliar terrain.

Each group would need its own set of instructions for traveling through their particular region. For the Arctic inhabitants to insist that everyone must take warm, heavy clothing to reach the mountaintop, for the desert dwellers to advise climbers in all regions to carry large quantities of water, or for the city residents to insist that all climbers text-message daily would show a lack of understanding of the other paths.

As the paths get closer to the top of the mountain, the terrain becomes more and more similar for everyone no matter where they started. As we climb higher, we begin to see some of the other paths and the people traveling them. Only then can we recognize that the goal of the various religions is the same—to "know thyself."


Joan Price, Ph.D., is professor emeritus of philosophy at Mesa Community College, Mesa, Arizona. She is author of Philosophy through the Ages, Climbing the Spiritual Ladder, and Truth Is a Bright Star, a Native American tale for children. This essay is from the preface of her latest book, Sacred Scriptures of the World Religions: An Introduction, (Continuum, 2010).


Heaven Isn't Where You Think It Is

By Michael Byrne

Originally printed in the Spring 2010 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Byrne, Michael. "Heaven Isn't Where You Think It Is." Quest  98. 2(Spring 2010): 50-53.

Theosophical Society - Michael Byrne has twenty-five years of writing experience in nonfiction and popular science, and currently works as a technical writer at Pfizer Pharmaceutical Company in Portage, Michigan. He is also the author of several scientific articles. He received a master of science degree from Michigan State University and taught environmental science while codirector of the Horticultural Center at Western Michigan University.Admit it. You think you're going to heaven. Or at least you want to go there. It's supposed to be the reward of a lifetime, and even if we've committed a sin or two, most of us think we deserve that reward. With all the suffering we put up with in our lives, we certainly should get something! And heaven is supposed to be that something.

But where is heaven? We take it for granted that it's someplace. If we can go there, then it must be somewhere. But is it an actual place in the universe? If so, why haven't we located it? And if it's not in the universe, then how would we ever get there? Even if it is some advanced state of being or "grace," to be in this state you would still have to be located somewhere within the dimensions of reality. But where in reality does this heaven exist?

For many religions, heaven is a sacred place where God resides. It is a state that we might glimpse through meditation or prayer or attain if we live good enough lives or believe the right things. Heaven is often thought to be synonymous with the kingdom of God, or, as it is sometimes called, the kingdom of heaven. When asked about it, Jesus said that it exists right now in the present time, and also that it exists within us. "The kingdom of God is within you" (Luke 17:21; sometimes this is translated as "among you" or "in your midst"). In the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus says, "The kingdom of the father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it." So according to Jesus, heaven exists in our immediate vicinity and in the time frame of our present selves. This ideal state where God is supposed to be is not a place we have to "go" somewhere to find. And it is not something we can only find at some time in the future. It exists in the here and now.

In Eastern religions such as Buddhism, the concept of nirvana is comparable to the Western idea of heaven. Nirvana, like heaven, is a spiritual dimension that can be attained by prayer, meditation, right thinking, and right action. Also of great importance to Eastern religions are the ideas of spiritual connectedness and unity. Polar opposites, like "up" and "down," are seen as being part of some larger whole—the axis of verticality. Other examples are hot and cold, which are really extremes of temperature; happy and sad, which are extremes of emotions; and good and bad, which are extremes of valuation.

This nonpolar approach can reduce the amount of emotional content we attach to the world. If we see things as neither good nor bad but as neutral in value, we are more likely to maintain a positive attitude and are less likely to make attachments to "good" things or be repelled by "bad" things. After all, how do we really know if something is truly good or bad in the long run? If we perceive the world from this more detached perspective, we will find it easier to be at peace with ourselves and with everything that happens around us.

Eastern philosophies extend this nonpolar attitude to the universe as a whole. If there are no true polar opposites in the world, then all things are perceived as a single whole. But this is not just an intellectual supposition. It stems from the direct perception of this higher reality—a perception that is sometimes called enlightenment. We attain it not by gaining anything but by dropping our misconceptions about reality.

By observing reality in this advanced state of being, we can experience the world as a unified whole beyond space and time. It is experienced as a profound stillness, like a startling silence following a lifetime of noise. In this state, all things are experienced as being a part of oneself. One discovers that the world itself is loving, and all things are revealed as having a great beauty and inner light. Each thing is recognized as being of equal importance with all other things. This experience of no time and no space occurs in conjunction with such qualities as stillness, loving connectedness, and unity.

Of course, most of us haven't experienced this state. Yet most Americans have never been to Europe or Asia, but still believe they exist. We can't see air or sunshine, but we believe they exist. No one has ever seen the atoms that make up matter. And dogs, bats, dolphins, and elephants can all hear sounds that people can't hear. So there are definitely parts of reality we believe in even though we have not perceived them ourselves. And there are parts of physical reality that are not experienced by ourselves. On the other hand, those who have experienced the state of enlightenment, such as Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad, and Krishna, to a large extent agree about what it is like, suggesting that there is some objective validity to their descriptions.

Nevertheless, these descriptions seem to be totally at odds with our observations of physical reality. From the conventional point of view, it seems obvious that all things are separate from each other. We each go about living our separate lives every day. The seven billion people on the planet never appear to become one person. Never do we seem to be one with the trees or rocks, or with space. Nor does it seem possible that anything here on earth could be united with anything on a planet on the other side of the galaxy. In the same vein, there seems to be no way of unifying the earth of today with the earth that existed in the past or the earth that will exist in the future. Past, present, and future are all separated by time.

The dimensions of space and time are what cause objects to be separate in the physical world. Space separates people, planets, and other objects by creating distance between them. And time creates a barrier of sequence between the things of today and those of the past or future. In fact, the dimensions of space and time are what give all things their separate identities. A person is separated from all other people and things by space. And it is time that keeps us from experiencing yesterday and tomorrow at the same moment.

We perceive four dimensions in ordinary reality: objects possess height, width, and length, and appear to be moving through a single linear dimension of time. These dimensions are believed to have come into being about 14 billion years ago, with the beginning of the universe at the Big Bang. Before that point, there would have been no space or time, only an endless, eternal void. This is because eternity is not a stretch of time without end; it is actually the absence of time altogether. The same thing is true of infinity: it is not an endless tract of space but rather the lack of any space to begin with. So before the advent of space and time, there was only the eternal, infinite, primordial void. But what if the primordial void didn't go away with the advent of space and time? What if the dimensionless void is still here with us in some form or another?

That is the basis of a new theory that I have developed. I call it "0D" (zero dimensions). Just because the world of dimensions came along doesn't mean that the world without dimensions went away. 0D assumes that the ground state of reality is the dimensionless void. This primordial void was the state of reality that existed before the advent of the physical world of dimensions. If and when the physical universe ceases to exist, this endless void without dimensions will remain. Moreover, the familiar world of four dimensions could be seen as a simple overlay on what is fundamentally a universe without dimensions. At every point in space, there would be the regular complement of four dimensions as well as this underlying aspect of zero dimensions. Every point in the universe would have three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. In addition, each point would also have the underlying nondimensional aspect of the void.

In this situation, the universe would act as if it had two separate layers of reality—one with dimensions and one without. But it would be very difficult to notice the underlying nondimensional realm because our attention would be diverted by so many things in the ordinary world. We notice objects that have dimensions in space and time, but it is nearly impossible to perceive something that is devoid of these qualities. We would not notice "nothing"—unless we happen to be looking for some sort of nothing in the first place. We rarely do this, if only because we are usually so busy dealing with physical reality. But it would still be how things really are.

Every object exists in every possible dimension at every point it occupies. Therefore every object occupies all of the familiar four dimensions as well as the set of zero dimensions. All things that reside in the physical world thus reside equally in the void. Everything exists in the physical world and at the same time in the nonphysical world. A rock or a tree exists in both the physical world and the nonphysical world—that is, the void—at the same time. The same is true of a person. Even an expanse of empty space would occupy both of these worlds.

Because there is no space or time in this dimensionless void, there is nothing to differentiate one thing from another, one place from another, or one time from another. So in the realm of zero dimensions, all things must be experienced as one thing, even though from the perspective of the physical world they appear to be completely separate. Everything that exists in the physical world also exists in the void.  And everything that exists in the void exists as one thing. Consequently, everything and everyone has the potential to experience oneness—the state of being at one with all other things.

This underlying void would thus unify all things within our universe. It would even unite us with other universes that we would not normally know about. Since there is no time in the void, it would also unite all times, past, present, and future. Its very lack of time makes it eternal, for in that realm no time exists in which it could possibly cease to be. Once we realize that the ground state of reality may be dimensionless—that reality itself could be based on a dimensionless void—all the rest follows naturally.

In this way, everything is connected to all other things through the eternal and infinite void that is the ground state of reality. The underlying infinite void encompasses all times, all places, and all things. It enables us to experience all things as one thing—to experience the nonpolar connectedness, unity, and oneness described by Eastern religions.

By connecting with the nondimensional basis of reality, we could experience being the rock, being the tree, being the person, and being the expanse of space. We could experience all things together as one thing. We could also experience unification with God as part of this one reality. We would experience omniscience, omnipresence, and eternity. The apprehension of nondimensionality, the perception of the underlying void, the direct perception of true reality, the perception of the world in nonduality—these all describe heaven or nirvana.

As Jesus said, the kingdom of heaven is here right now, within and among us, although we do not readily perceive it. This also describes the underlying nondimensional layer, the primordial void or eternal realm. It is here right now at every point in the universe. If you practice meditation and prayer and if you live a good life through right action and right thought, you may find it. But whether we perceive it or not, it has always been here and will always be here. It is eternal. It existed before the advent of time, and it will still be here when everything in the material universe has disappeared, including time itself.

You can think of this place beyond space and time either as communion with God or as entering a Godlike state in communion with all things. There is, of course, a conceptual difference between these two descriptions, but from the perspective of the void, they are the same. When we find this place that is beyond space and time, we will discover that it is one place and that we are all one entity there—where we are at one with God, the universe, and all things. One thing is simply one thing—all things existing together. There can only be one of these. And whatever that may be, and whatever we may call it, we must certainly all be talking about the same one thing.

Where is this nirvana? It is right here and right now. Where is this heaven? It is among us and within us. To be there is our birthright. It is here for us to claim as our own. But there is no need to "go" somewhere to find it because it exists in all places, wherever we are, and whenever we are. And there is no need to die to get there, although when we die we will realize that we have always been there. Even without our knowing it, the void connects us all. We need only realize that it is present for each of us to enjoy. Whether in our earthly lives or after death, we will surely find our way there. And when we do, we will have found our way home.


Michael Byrne has twenty-five years of writing experience in nonfiction and popular science, and currently works as a technical writer at Pfizer Pharmaceutical Company in Portage, Michigan. He is also the author of several scientific articles. He received a master of science degree from Michigan State University and taught environmental science while codirector of the Horticultural Center at Western Michigan University.


Applied Science

By Betty Bland

Originally printed in the Spring 2010 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Bland, Betty. "Applied Science." Quest 98. 2(Spring 2010): 48.

Theosophical Society - Betty Bland served as President of the Theosophical Society in America and made many important and lasting contributions to the growth and legacy of the TSA. In 2002 at fourteen years of age, William Kamkwamba could not return to school because of extended drought and impoverishment in his small village in Malawi, Africa. Discouraged but not defeated, this entrepreneurial boy continued his education in the local library whenever his chores permitted. Some spark of hope prompted him to dream about using ideas he read about to solve problems for his family and village. He began collecting scrap plastic, bicycle and machinery parts, and scouring the dump for all sorts of odd pieces of junk.


As the villagers scoffed, his contraption grew into a sixteen-foot high curiosity—which he called his "juju" or magic. Ridicule turned to amazement when he was able to power a light bulb from the power generated by his improvised windmill. From this humble beginning, his project grew to power all the needs for his family's meager household and to pump precious water for his and other families' needs. Following the law of attraction, the more successful he was with his project, the more visitors and benefactors contributed to help his efforts. Now at twenty-three, Mr. Kamkwamba has collaborated with journalist Bryan Mealer for the 2009 publication of his story, titled The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind, and has traveled extensively for speaking engagements. He is continuing his education through a number of unique opportunities.


What began as a defeat was transformed into a heartwarming success story not because of outside help, but because this young man determined to make use of all the knowledge and opportunities he had at hand. He opened his eyes and saw the possibilities, and then committed all of his energies to developing the possibilities into realities. There was nothing earthshakingly new about what he did, but for him it was a major accomplishment. He absorbed all the knowledge at his disposal, internalized it, and acted on it in order to address his problems.


This is one of the reasons we are so fascinated with science. It provides a way of looking at our world as it is in order to understand it more fully, and by understanding to see windows of opportunity more clearly. However, factual knowledge by itself is no more than a temporary relief for an obscure mental itch unless it is transformed into usefulness through analysis, synthesis, or analogy. Without some application it will just be buried in the seas of time. We are responsible to make the best use of whatever knowledge we have available to us. It is not sufficient just to let information pass through our brains, unused, on the way to the oblivion of uselessness.


Consider how little funding is currently available to explore ways to treat chicken pox now that the vaccine has all but eliminated it—or to develop better iron lungs for polio victims—or to develop quieter typewriters now that they have been displaced by computers. Although these developments were important at the time, once their usefulness is over, they fall by the wayside. On the whole, funding for research and development follow the threads of applicability. We want to understand so that we have better control. Science is valued because it delivers facts that can make a difference in feeding the hungry, curing ills, or inspiring the dreams of possibilities in young minds.


Because in a world of measurable things, people will believe and abide by measurable things—even to the degree of hand washing and use of seatbelts. If statistics or research indicates the efficacy of a practice, we will tend to abide by those findings. Otherwise we are not convinced, nor do we change our behavior. Perhaps this is part of the reasoning behind KH's statement, "Modern science is our best ally" (Mahatma Letters, no. 65). Most of us want tangible proof. Science can convince us of deep spiritual truths if nothing else can.


Since the time that statement was written, KH's statements "that we recognize but one element in Nature (whether spiritual or physical) outside which there can be no Nature since it is Nature itself . . . and that consequently spirit and matter are one" (ibid.) have been vindicated time and again. He was saying that unity and interrelatedness permeate the universe and that universe is an interrelated whole of "spirit-matter" at every level of existence. Although such ideas seemed an impossibility at the time, through science we have come to accept that energy and matter are convertible, the consciousness or spirit of an observer influences the physical outcome of an experiment, and action on one atom can affect another, no matter the distance between them. Every day science confirms the seamless nature of our universe, and realizing this she convinces us of this reality.


These insights are not idle fancies to tickle our intellect. They have implications that translate to the personal responsibility of each one of us to recognize our innate unity with all, and in doing so we have the basis for applying altruism to every aspect of our lives. This knowledge of the unitive nature of the universe should convince us to apply these principles in active altruism. If we are so connected in every fiber of our being, then whatever we do or think impacts all others, since in the deepest sense they are not separate from us.
As Madame Blavatsky wrote in The Key to Theosophy (section 4):

The one self has to forget itself for the many selves. Let me answer you in the words of a true Philaletheian, an F. T. S., who has beautifully expressed it in the Theosophist: "What every man needs first is to find himself, and then take an honest inventory of his subjective possessions, and, bad or bankrupt as it may be, it is not beyond redemption if we set about it in earnest." But how many do? All are willing to work for their own development and progress; very few for those of others. To quote the same writer again: "Men have been deceived and deluded long enough; they must break their idols, put away their shams, and go to work for themselves–nay, there is one little word too much or too many, for he who works for himself had better not work at all; rather let him work himself for others, for all. For every flower of love and charity he plants in his neighbour's garden, a loathsome weed will disappear from his own, and so this garden of the gods—Humanity—shall blossom as a rose."

 Let us be like the young man who took advantage of every piece of information available to him and apply that practice to our life issues. If something is missing in our spiritual life, if life seems meaningless, or if we simply wonder what it is all about, then perhaps the elixir resides in putting into practice those things we already know. If we accept the scientific reality of wholeness, of our intrinsic relationship with all others, then we need to begin applying the resultant implications. If unity is a universal law, then brotherhood/sisterhood is its logical application.

Take the parts and pieces of understanding we find in our minds and hearts and use their full range of possibilities. Begin the process of building altruism into every thought and action—even if it seems out of step with the rest of our culture. Our mandate as Theosophists is altruism. Through its practice we will be able to harness untold power for the benefit of all, one flower of love and charity at a time.


A Path with Heart

By Thomas Walker

Originally printed in the Spring 2010 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Walker, Thomas. "A Path with Heart." Quest  98. 2(Spring 2010): 54-59.

For me there is only the traveling on paths that have heart, on any path that may have heart. There I travel, and the only worthwhile challenge is to traverse its full length. And there I travel, looking, looking, breathlessly.
—Don Juan (Castaneda, 11)

The ancient Egyptians were obsessed with life after death. Of course it could be said that all of us are to a point, but the Egyptians really went extra lengths to ensure a proper passage from the world of the living to the plane of the afterlife. Their texts are filled with detailed instructions about the proper preparations for the journey. They even prepared a book about it, a kind of owner's manual and travelogue rolled into one called The Egyptian Book of the Dead. But what really demonstrates their commitment is the thing Egypt is best known for, the one romantic notion that is known around the world, the stuff of Hollywood feature films and ancient legends . . . mummies!

Even today, with all the technology we're so proud of—with advanced knowledge of chemistry, magnetic resonance imaging, gas chromatography, and the like—we still aren't sure exactly how the Egyptians achieved mummification. Their climate helped: hot, dry conditions go a long way by themselves toward making mummies. However, there's more to it than that; by all accounts, the process was complicated and carefully crafted. After the body was ritually washed and perfumed, the internal organs were carefully removed for special processing. These precious tissues were placed in their own containers—solid gold jars in the case of the elite—and were arranged within the burial chamber with extra care.

The human heart was given exceptional attention, as a mark of the respect due to the organ the Egyptians felt was not only the center of emotion, but, more importantly, the center of reason and thought as well. Regarding the brain, that unimaginably complex mass of neurons and supporting tissues, the Egyptians were rather blasé. For this legendary human organ, the Egyptians had no special plan, no golden chalice. Instead, the squashy mass was unceremoniously yanked through the nostrils and—without pomp, circumstance, or ceremony—dumped into the trash. The brain wasn't given a second thought. It was the heart that was held in high regard. In that respect, the Egyptians may have been on to something big, something we are just now beginning to rediscover.

Neurochemicals have now been found throughout the tissues of the human body. Why? The short answer is that "thinking" occurs in many places in the body besides the brain. And if cells can "think," then are they also aware? Preposterous, you say? Maybe not. Memory also appears to be a function found throughout the tissues of the body, all the way down to the cellular level. Interestingly, the heart seems to be of special importance.

For eons, people have placed special significance on the heart as the seat of emotions. Science tells us the opposite: that emotion all takes place in the brain, that the heart is just a dual-action, four-chambered pump, nothing more. Yet all of us, at one time or another, have felt our own heartstrings plucked (there really are strings in the heart—the chordae tendineae, connective tissues that keep the mitral and tricuspid valves from prolapsing, at least most of the time). We have all experienced feelings of profound joy or sorrow and felt them exactly, precisely . . . in the heart.

Spiritually inclined people attribute this sensation to the heart chakra, which connects us to our higher energy bodies. Now we have some scientific evidence to corroborate this experience. We need briefly to examine the work of Paul Pearsall, Ph.D., a pioneer explorer of the world of "energy cardiology."

For starters, the human heart is unique in several ways. It is composed of its own special type of muscle tissue, which is called, appropriately enough, cardiac muscle. In addition to its own unique anatomical structure, the heart also has something other tissues don't have—an innate, inherent ability to beat, a capacity entirely independent of the brain or of any other portion of the nervous system.

A heart completely disconnected from the body and placed in a nutrient solution will continue to beat for a long time. Even more interesting is that if two hearts are placed in separate containers close together, in short order their beats will become synchronized, regulated by some unseen energy present in the tissues. If we find this phenomenon unusual, what are we to make of the recent reports from heart transplant patients who suddenly find themselves experiencing their donors' memories? Is this all just fantasy?

After working as a psychologist for hundreds of such cases, Paul Pearsall doesn't think so. Taking the lessons gained from years of working with heart transplant patients, he searched out others who were working with subtle energy and energy cardiology. He soon came upon the work of Gary Schwartz and Linda Russek. Schwartz is a professor of neurology, psychology, and psychiatry at the University of Arizona and director of the Laboratory for Advances in Consciousness and Health there. At the time Russek, who formerly taught at Harvard, was his assistant. The two scientists feel that, given the great complexity of living things, informational systems of some kind must be at work in biology, systems that modern science has failed to recognize. As a result, they have advanced their view of "info-energetics," the belief that biological energy is itself a form of information.

After combining modern biological concepts with the new findings of subtle energy and quantum mechanics, Schwartz and Russek concluded that the heart is an important center of energy in the body, and that this energy is a vital source of bioinformation. They developed their concept of energy cardiology into what they termed the "dynamic systems memory theory," which Pearsall describes as "the idea that all systems are constantly exchanging mutually influential energy, which contains information that alters the systems taking part in the exchange" (Pearsall, 13–14). The theory is based upon four central hypotheses:

1. Energy and information are the same thing. Everything that exists has energy; energy is full of information; and stored info-energy is what makes up cellular memories.
2. What we call mind or consciousness is really a manifestation of information-containing energy.
3. The heart is the primary generator of info-energy.
4. Because we are manifestations of the info-energy coming to, flowing within, and constantly being sent out from our total cellular systems, who and how we are is a physical representation of a recovered set of cellular memories. (Schwartz and Russek, 4–24)

Whether or not the heart is the major center of informational energy is subject to debate, but one thing that has been demonstrated is the concept of cellular memory. Dr. Candace Pert is a former researcher at the National Institute of Mental Health and the author of Molecules of Emotion, and has been featured in the film What the Bleep Do We Know? She is also a world-renowned authority on neuropeptides, short protein strands that are active in the central nervous system and are at the very neurological core of memory. She is among the first to demonstrate that these chemicals are active in the brain during emotional experiences. However, further study showed something that came as a shock.

These special chemicals did not exist within the brain alone. Rather they were found throughout the blood circulation system, floating to all areas of the body. But without the specialized receptor cells in the brain that the neuropeptides activate, it looked as though the neuropeptides were of no functional use to the organism as a whole. At least that was the thinking until receptors were found to exist in many places throughout the body, including the heart (of course), the immune system, and even the gastrointestinal tract. Dr. Pert commented:

In the beginning of my work, I matter-of-factly presumed that emotions were in the head or brain. Now I would say they are really in the body as well. They are expressed in the body and are part of the body. I can no longer make a strong distinction between the brain and the body. . . . the more we know about neuropeptides, the harder it is to think in the traditional terms of a mind and a body. It makes more and more sense to speak of a single integrated entity, a "body-mind." (Pert, 9)

Later, when Pearsall discussed some of his ideas about memory transfer in connection with heart transplants, Pert was not at all surprised. Pearsall recalls, "She pointed out that, since the cells in the heart are loaded with molecules that necessarily contain at least some form of memory, these memories could well come along with the heart to join with the new body and brain" (Pert, 12).

Almost from the very start of heart transplantation, strange things began to be reported. Granted, heart transplant patients go through an extremely stressful, challenging ordeal; but even allowing for that reality, something profound seemed to be happening. One of the most unusual cases was related to Pearsall by a female psychiatrist who was attending an event where Pearsall was the keynote speaker. After the presentation, the psychiatrist approached Pearsall and began relating the event to him. In short order she began to cry gently and had difficulty discussing her experience, and within a few moments Pearsall understood why. As the psychiatrist described the event:

I have a patient, an eight-year-old little girl who received the heart of a murdered ten-year-old girl. Her mother brought her to me when she started screaming at night about her dreams of the man who had murdered her donor. She said her daughter knew who it was. After several sessions, I just could not deny the reality of what this child was telling me. Her mother and I finally decided to call the police and, using the descriptions from the little girl, they found the murderer. He was easily convicted with evidence my patient provided. The time, the weapon, the place, the clothes he wore, what the little girl had said to him . . . everything the little heart transplant recipient reported was completely accurate. (Pearsall, 7)

In another instance, a family physician named Glenda had been involved in a tragic automobile crash resulting in the death of her husband. Some years later, perhaps to bring things to a close, she sought to meet the young man who had been the recipient of her husband's heart. Pearsall made the arrangements and waited in the hospital chapel with Glenda for the appointment. After a half hour had elapsed, Pearsall suggested they leave, but Glenda was hesitant. Saying she "knew" her late husband's heart was nearby, she exclaimed, "Oh no, we have to wait. He's here in the hospital. I felt him come about thirty minutes ago. I felt my husband's presence. Please wait with me."

Glenda was correct. Almost immediately a young Hispanic man and his mother hurried into the chapel, explaining that they had had difficulty finding the room and had searched for half an hour. After introductions Glenda asked to feel her husband's former heart, and as she did so, she softly said a prayer to her late husband with the words, "I love you, David. Everything is copacetic." The mother and son were shocked. That word, copacetic, was the very first one the young man had uttered after awaking from anesthesia with his new heart!

Within the next few moments, they related how the young man's tastes had changed in other ways as well. It seems, for instance, that while he had once been a practicing vegetarian, he now craved junk food. While he was formerly a heavy-metal rocker, he now only listened to vintage rock and roll. Moreover, he was frequently plagued with dreams of an automobile collision, with bright headlights getting closer and closer until a horrendous crash occurred. By the time Glenda verified that these characteristics all belonged to her late husband, everyone was in tears. Glenda frequently experienced the very same dream. Although she was a highly trained physician, with all the science background that entails, she now became a believer in the phenomenon of cellular memory transference. She knew in her heart that it wasn't all just a matter of coincidence.

In another instance, a woman received a heart transplant and almost immediately began to complain of sharp, shooting pains in her lower back. The doctors explained the pain away as a response to surgery. Years later, however, she still suffered, awakening suddenly at night with shooting pains in her lumbar area. What's more, her husband noticed a significant change in her personal tastes; she now chose very feminine attire over the casual, unisex styles she had preferred before her surgery. And once they were able to resume sex, the wife seemed preoccupied with gay fantasies, asking her husband if he ever experienced them, which came as a shock to him. This went on for three years, at which time the woman met with the parents of the donor. He had been a young gay artist who had died during a robbery. He was killed by a gunshot wound to the lower back.

Pearsall mentions that other organs besides the heart seem to demonstrate the same odd capacity to transmit memory. Although the stories of heart transplant patients are often more dramatic than others, he states: "I have never spoken to a transplant recipient who did not have a story to tell" (Pearsall, 83).

Besides the exciting stories of cellular memories and changing personalities, the heart seems to be of supreme importance in other ways as well, particularly as a source of vitally important energy and information. We may forget that the heart is an organ of considerable power. A wonderfully designed hydraulic pump, it sends the fresh, nutrient-laden blood from the lungs throughout the miles of tubes that constitute the vascular tree, contracting about once per second for every moment of our lives—sometimes a bit slower, sometimes a bit faster, but continuing with its job until it finally stutters to a stop and life itself stops with it.

There's a lot of kinetic energy associated with all this pumping, but what we're concerned with at the moment are the other forms of energy generated by the heart. For one thing, the heart is also an organ of profound electromagnetic energies. We all know of the legendary electrical activity of the brain, the wave patterns that are measured and evaluated with EEGs, but compared to the heart, the brain is an electromagnetic pipsqueak.

Only in recent times have the electromagnetic fields of living things been generally recognized. Now we know that electromagnetism is an essential part of living things, as important as genetics, cellular respiration, or any of the dozens of processes that make up life (Laszlo, 157). And the heart is an organ of powerful electromagnetic activity, operating at a level five thousand times higher than that of the human brain (Clarke).

Like so many before him, Pearsall became intrigued with the question of what coordinates the massive amounts of energy present in the human body. We know the brain does some of it, and the instructions from DNA are a major player, but part of the puzzle appears to be missing. Pearsall commented on the known energies at work, starting with the source of all cellular energy for living things, the molecule adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which fuels everything from elephants to E. coli:

A very powerful, sensitive, centrally located instrument is required to coordinate the immense energy and information generated by the billions of cellular vibrations taking place every second of our life. Multiply two million vibrations of ATP molecules by 75 trillion cells, multiply that number by the 51 to 78 billion cycles per second at which human DNA resonates and conveys its information within each cell, and multiply yet again by the energetic vibrations of the sixty or so neuropeptides that are the biochemical means by which our emotional state is manifested throughout our body. The total number would be a very rough low estimate of the energy surging within you as you read these words. (Pearsall, 103)

From his years of experience and from the work of Gary Schwartz and Linda Russek, Pearsall believes that the heart is the primary organizer of the body in ways that are just now being understood. He comments:

Every cell is literally a mini-heart humming with the energy. The ultimate biomedical illusion has been the view that the body is made of solid matter with fluid pumped through it by an unconscious heart and a powerful conscious brain that is the primary controller of the entire system. Energy cardiology suggests, however, that the heart and not just the brain is what holds this system together by a form of spiritual info-energy, in a temporary and ever-changing set of cellular memories we refer to as "the self." This "self" is the dynamic gestalt of information that might be considered the code that constitutes our soul. (Pearsall, 101; italics added)

Yes, Paul Pearsall strongly believes in the Force. He chooses to call it "L" energy, as in "life energy," but the meaning is the same. At other times he refers to it as the "fifth force," the other four being the primary forces of the universe recognized by modern physics: electromagnetism, gravity, and the strong and weak forces of atomic attraction and decay.

The heart is also important within the context of these primary forces, particularly in terms of Pearsall's preference for following one's heart rather than one's brain. As he states, "the heart has its own form of wisdom, different from that of the rational brain but every bit as important to our living, loving, working and healing" (Pearsall, 73). It is my personal belief that there are indeed two centers of focus in the body—the brain and the heart—but even if we take the idea of the heart as the center of consciousness simply as a metaphor, it still provides us with another perspective on life.

It is particularly interesting that Pearsall discusses heart problems, because cardiovascular disease has become the number one killer in industrialized nations in just a few generations. At the beginning of the twentieth century, infectious diseases were still the primary cause of death. Halfway through the century, they were replaced by cardiovascular problems—strokes and heart attacks. The traditional explanation for this change is the lack of exercise and activity resulting from the use of modern conveniences and the increased rate of atherosclerosis resulting from modern, high-fat junk diets. But there might be a little more to the picture.

In modern medicine the list of risk factors for heart disease includes high blood pressure, smoking, high cholesterol, and obesity. Yet half of the people who experience their first heart attack exhibit none of these factors. And 80 percent of those with at least three of these factors never experience a heart attack. How do we explain these discrepancies? It would appear that some other dynamic is at work.

Pearsall discovered something interesting in the years he has worked with cardiovascular disease patients. He began to inquire about . . . sex. In many cases the victims of heart disease had been celibate for long periods of time. Again and again he found that the patients had gone for a year or more without being intimate, even though most were married.

Pearsall had also worked for years as a sex counselor. He had been a director at the Kinsey Institute, had trained at the Masters and Johnson Institute, and had founded and directed a sexual dysfunction clinic in Michigan for several years. He knew a lot about human sexuality, and he was struck by the fact that so many victims of heart disease showed few of the traditional risk factors, yet had little if any sexual contact.

Pearsall immediately thought of the importance of sex to the flow of "L" energy. He became convinced of the relationship, and he felt even more confident when he discovered current research that backed up his hunch. More than 50 percent of heart attack patients had had no sexual contact of any kind for the entire year preceding their attack! This finding was published in 1996 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (DeBusk), yet the medical establishment ignored it.

Another thread in the weave comes from Dr. Dean Ornish, a leading authority on heart disease. He appears frequently on television as a guest discussing the near epidemic of cardiovascular problems in the industrialized world. Ornish has found that anger is a major factor in cardiovascular disease. Ornish is a cardiologist and a proponent of a change in lifestyle for heart patients, including diet and exercise, but he also advocates anger management and a gentler style of interacting with others.

Ornish's research has shown that reducing stress and anger, along with other lifestyle modifications, can reduce arterial clogging without the need for invasive surgery. He is convinced that in many cases this is the road to take. Of course, many people are unwilling or unable to comply with significant lifestyle changes, and consequently the medical profession can continue to emphasize bypass surgery and other invasive techniques as standard treatments.

Sexual abstinence in adults may impede the vital energy flow, as do anger and stress. All these states have a common result: they cause our muscles to tense. The result is a condition recognized both in ancient times and today; the Austrian psychiatrist Wilhelm Reich called it "muscular armoring." What we need is a change of heart; perhaps most of all, we need to decide to follow our hearts. A path with heart is one of meaning; it is a choice to pursue worthwhile things in life rather than to lust after money, power, and material objects.

Our wondrous human brain has devised heaps of modern technology to make life "easier"—things like microwaves, cable TV, computers, push-button windows, heated car seats, cell phones, Internet banking and shopping and socializing and what have you—yet people report that they are busier and more stressed out than ever. They are working more hours than people did just a generation ago. Families hardly see each other during the course of the day. Fast food has become the dietary staple; the obesity and other health problems that result have become, sadly, a worldwide phenomenon. In a typical American marriage both partners work, yet they're in hock up to their necks as they go crazy accumulating more and more "things," while the children are allowed to raise themselves.

Now more than ever, as Castaneda's don Juan recognized, "we need a path with heart."


References

Castaneda, Carlos. The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge. New York: Pocket Books, 1968.
Clarke, John. "Squids," Scientific American, (August 1994): 46–53.
DeBusk, Robert F. "Sexual Activity Triggering a Myocardial Infarction: One Less Thing to Worry About," Journal of the American Medical Association 275 (1996): 1447–48.
Pearsall, Paul. The Heart's Code: Tapping the Wisdom and Power of Our Heart Energy. New York: Broadway, 1998.
Laszlo, Ervin. Science and the Akashic Field: An Integral Theory of Everything. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 2007.
Pert, Candace. "The Wisdom of the Receptors: Neuropeptides, the Emotions, and BodyMind," Advances 3 (1986).
Schwartz, Gary, and Linda Russek. "Energy Cardiology: A Dynamic Energy Systems Approach for Integrating Conventional and Alternative Medicine," Advances: The Journal of Mind-Body Health 12 (1996): 4–24.


Thomas Walker, D. C., is a chiropractic physician, master-level martial artist, professor of natural science, and former Green Beret. This article is adapted from his book The Force Is with Us: The Higher Consciousness That Science Refuses to Accept, published in 2009 by Quest Books.

 

Subcategories