Karma and Dharma: Twin Keys to the Heroic Journey

Originally printed in the November - December 2003 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Mills, Joy. "Karma and Dharma: Twin Keys to the Heroic Journey." Quest  91.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2003):204-209, 227.

By Joy Mills

Theosophical Society - Joy Mills was an educator who served as President of the Theosophical Society in America from 1965–1974, and then as international Vice President for the Theosophical Society based in AdyarIn Letter 16 of The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, a letter dealing principally with answers to questions put by Sinnett concerning Devachan, the Mahatma K. H. writes:

You can do nothing better than to study the two doctrines—of Karma and Nirvana—as profoundly as you can. Unless you are thoroughly well acquainted with the two tenets the double key to the metaphysics of Abidharma—you will always find yourself at sea in trying to comprehend the rest. We have several sorts of Karma and Nirvana in their various applications.

Such a statement deserves deep consideration, although there may be a tendency to dismiss it as simply abstruse Buddhist metaphysics, without a great deal of relevance to the more basic theosophical principles to which we have become accustomed. Karma, yes, an essential concept inherent in the theosophical worldview, necessary as a guide in our lives, but Nirvana? No, not really relevant. And if I dare to suggest, as indeed I propose to do, that the concept of Nirvana is related to, if not identical with, that less familiar principle known as dharma, there may be considerable skepticism regarding my placement of these two ideas in a central position within the theosophical framework.

Yet precisely because the human state is central to the entire metaphysic of theosophy—for that metaphysic is rooted in the proposition that Reality is realizable and is possible only through consciousness, or, more precisely, self-consciousness—it is therefore in reference to the human condition that we must seek the fundamentals of the theosophical worldview and the principles that can guide us today. Such a proposition indicates the coherence, the inner integrity, and the holistic nature of that worldview. This does not exclude paradox; indeed there is paradox and there is mystery, forever leading us onward in our quest for the realizability of the Ultimate.

To make a beginning, let us recognize that we, all humankind along with all sentient beings, are engaged in a journey, a great adventure. Whether we perceive that journey as simply a progress, a pilgrimage, through the years that separate our birthing from our dying or, on a grander scale, through all the cycles that include the numerous incarnations from our unconscious beginnings to our conscious perfectiveness, the pattern of the adventure is the same. And it is that pattern, that ordering, which we may discover and which, I suggest, constitutes one of the most exciting—if not the most challenging—concept inherent in the theosophical worldview. For the pattern is one of beauty, of the perfect proportion of all things, the essential rightness of creation itself. And we participate in that; we are held by that; we move in accordance with that divinely appointed ordering; and ultimately we are one with that, the Truth of our being, the Supreme Order whose very heart is bliss and peace.

What is the heroic journey? Is it not to live each day, each hour, each moment in full and conscious awareness of the underlying order, that cosmic harmony, in which we are rooted? Is it not to live in accordance with the law of our own best being? To live always beyond ourselves and to act in such a manner that our every action mirrors in its spontaneous rightness the cosmic act of creation itself? The heroic journey, the great adventure on which we are embarked, is the journey of the soul through our humanity to the realm of the gods; it is the journey from the bondage of nonknowing to the nirvanic freedom of luminous wisdom; it is the adventure of the spirit involving both a descent into hell and the ascent into heaven, stages symbolized in all the mystery schools and reexperienced in our lives as the painful and the happy moments produced by our own thoughts, feelings, and actions. And the twin keys to this heroic journey, the journey in which each one of us is the hero of his or her own story, are those great ideas to which many names in many traditions have been given: karma and dharma. Karma is that "one eternal Law in nature," as H. P. Blavatsky defined it, that law which she said "always tends to adjust contraries and to produce final harmony," and dharma, from which conceptually karma cannot be separated, and which has been translated in so many ways, but which as righteousness, as duty, as that which upholds, sustains, and nourishes our very being, is indeed the essence of our being: These two, karma and dharma, are but aspects of that one cosmic principle known in the Vedas as rta.

The journey may be more simply expressed: It is the way we all must take, the way from nonknowing (avidya) to knowing (vidya), from nonseeing to seeing, from nonhearing to hearing, from karma to nirvana.

St. Paul spoke of the way when he wrote to the Galatians: "Stand fast in the liberty where with Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. . . . For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty. . . .Walk in the Spirit. . . . the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law." Words full of mystical meaning, indeed, when read in the light of the concepts we are here considering: To stand fast in liberty is to become one with one's dharma, to be established in that state in which one is identified with the Christ principle that animates us and therefore to be no longer subject to that outer law that has buffeted us about for so long because we have been ignorant of its nature. To walk the world in that knowledge is to know what St. Paul called "the fruit of the spirit," that love, joy, peace, goodness, which is to realize nirvana, the extinction of the personal self, the bliss of the One Self, here and now. It is to know, as Nagarjuna, the great Buddhist sage, said, "Nirvana is samsara; samsara is nirvana; between the two there is no difference."

To come to the knowing, which is wisdom, and to answer what St. Paul termed the call to liberty, which is enlightenment or spiritual illumination, means simply, in the theosophical context, to enter upon the way or path that leads to the realization of the essential unity of life. "Who can here declare what pathway leads on to the gods?" asked the Rig Veda seer. It is that pathway which we all must take, either in full awareness of the task before us or unconsciously driven onward by the inexorable laws that govern all manifested existence.

"Man was created for the sake of choice," declares a Hebrew proverb, and choice in the way of our going is surely the most priceless of our human rights, even when our choices appear to be wrong. For the wrongness lies only in the continued experience of disequilibrium, the sense of conflict and suffering, which we all too often attribute to karma. We fail to see that karma is merely the lawfulness of existence itself and therefore productive only of what is in harmony with the causes we ourselves set in motion.

H. P. Blavatsky has pointed out that "Karma is a word of many meanings," a statement echoed in the comment by the Mahatma K.H. concerning the "several sorts of Karma." Further commenting on this concept, H. P. B. has stated that "it is owing to this law of spiritual development superseding the physical and purely intellectual, that mankind will become freed from its false gods, and find itself finally SELF-REDEEMED" (The Secret Doctrine, 2:420).

In The Theosophical Glossary, attributed to H. P. B., the term is equated with "ethical causation," and the further explication is given:

Karma neither punishes nor rewards, it is simply the one Universal Law which guides unerringly and, so to say, blindly, all other laws productive of certain effects along the grooves of their respective causations. When Buddhism teaches that "Karma is that moral kernel (of any being) which alone survives death and continues in transmigration" or reincarnation, it simply means that there remains nought after each Personality but the causes produced by it; causes which are undying, i.e., which cannot be eliminated from the Universe until replaced by their legitimate effects, and wiped out by them, so to speak, and such causes—unless compensated during the life of the person who produced them with adequate effects, will follow the reincarnated Ego, and reach it in its subsequent reincarnation until a harmony between effects and causes is fully reestablished.

But karma is only one half of the key that unlocks the meaning of existence as we travel the pathway that leads on to the gods. It is not enough to eliminate the causes we ourselves have set in motion and from which we all too often seek escape simply by generating further and still worse effects; within the context of achieving the aim of the human quest, we have an obligation to undertake our dharmic responsibility to travel the pathway that leads onward to the redemption of ourselves and the world. For we are destined to be world-redeemers, as the Self-redeemed of the world.

So dharma is the other half of the key that unlocks the meaning and purpose of existence. As the contemporary Indian philosopher S. Radhakrishnan points out in his book Indian Philosophy (1:52), dharma is the most important concept in Indian thought. This is so, as Radhakrishnan states, not as a matter of chance but as the necessary consequence of the basic postulate of an Ultimate Reality that is both immanent and transcendent. Ultimately and ideally there is, as the theosophical worldview postulates, no duality between Brahman and the universe; one is the mirror image of the other. Consequently our duty, as Radhakrishnan expresses it, is "to return from the plurality into the One" through our experiences with the plurality. As the law of morality, dharma is an invitation to perform just this task. It is the work of "becoming perfect" as the Christian scripture states; it is the task that the alchemists called the opus contra naturam, which is that work against the downward and outward flow of nature into diversity. Dharma then is the law of our best being, inspired by the one reality pervading and penetrating the entire universe, and to act according to dharma is desirable, fundamentally moral, and conducive to the fulfillment of our human state. Hence, too, dharma (from the Sanskrit root dhr, which means "to hold together, to support, to nourish") also means the characteristic nature of a thing, and the dharma of an individual is consequently the essential quality of a human being in terms of his or her moral obligations, since to be human is to be a moral or ethical entity. Krishna emphasized this fact to Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita (18:48), when he enjoined him in no uncertain terms that he had to act, even though every action carries with it its own burden of consequences: "All undertakings indeed are clouded by defects as fire by smoke." There is always karma, yet "Better is one's own duty though destitute of merit than the well-executed duty of another. He who doeth the duty (dharma) laid down by his own nature incurreth not sin" (18:47).

Here is truly the royal secret communicated by Krishna to Arjuna, as it has been communicated by every teacher to his disciples from time immemorial. We had it already noted in the words of St. Paul, although in different phraseology: "Walk in the Spirit . . . against such there is no law."

How are we to achieve that condition in which karma and dharma are unified? In the yogic literature, the path is by means of tapas, the burning away or eliminating all that is nonessential; in Buddhism, the aspirant is asked to engage in upaya, skillful means, action that reflects both wisdom (prajna) and compassion (karuna); in the Gnostic tradition, the principle of self-discipline, the regulation of one's actions in accord with one's dharma, was known as askesis, or spiritual skill, a term from which we derive our English word "asceticism."

To understand fully the concept of dharma is as difficult as to understand fully the idea of karma, although the latter has often seemed much simpler because of our tendency to give it a very simplistic definition. As the Mahatma K. H. pointed out to Sinnett, "We have several sorts of Karma and Nirvana in their various applications . . ."; as already noted, I am suggesting that Nirvana in that context—the snuffing-out of the personal, egoistic self—is nearly synonymous, or at least correlate, with the concept of dharma as the fulfillment of one's nature, a fulfillment in which the personal, egoistic desire-self is altogether dissolved. Dharma has been defined in a number of different ways in the various Sanskrit works, from the Vedas to the Dharma-shastra literature.

In terms of the individual, dharma may be said to refer to our moral obligations; in terms of society, dharma is often defined as social solidarity; while in the context of religion, dharma has been called beatitude, since that is said to characterize the essential nature of religion itself; in the context of law, dharma represents its essential property as justice. In every category, however, it represents what we may call the imperative necessity of the mundane order to reflect the cosmic order, while at the same time it also represents the potential for further growth and transformation since the dynamism of process is the characteristic feature of the cosmos.

Nowhere are these twin concepts of karma and dharma more beautifully described as characteristics of the original cosmic order than in those glorious hymns of ancient India, the Vedas, and most particularly the Rig Veda. A full examination of the Vedic concept of rta, or cosmic order, would take us far afield, but even a cursory summary may be useful in establishing the importance of recognizing that the two principles—karma and dharma—are not only intimately related but are essentially one as aspects of the fundamental structure of the universe in which we as human beings are active participants.

To understand the significance of the concept of rta in the Vedic tradition, we must turn briefly to the subject of cosmic origins as expounded in the Rig Veda. The rishis responsible for the great Vedic hymns thought of the origin of the universe as a projection into manifestation, through a process we can only call divine contemplation, of all that lies latent within the One, the Eternal That, an unfoldment from within without, as The Secret Doctrine so aptly describes it. This emanative process moves through three different stages, implying three levels or world orders. The first may be termed the primordial or transcendental level, the original emergence from the One, manifesting the cosmic order, rta, as the blueprint for all successive emanations. It is the emergence of the gods, who are, as Jeanine Miller defines them in her work on The Vedas: "personified agents of rta or cosmic order or harmony whose ordinances shine through rta, that eternal foundation of all that exists. . . . This rta implies that perfect harmony existing between the essence of being, sat, and its activity, i.e., between the inner and the outer, the latter being but the effect and in some sense, the mirror of the former."

The blueprint is thus established and the scene is prepared for that cosmic action which is in accordance with the inherent lawfulness (rta) of the entire process. As Miller states, "It implies also the spontaneous rightness observable in the majestic movement of the stars, the recurrence of the seasons, the unswerving alternation of day and night, the unerring rhythm of birth, growth, death of each form of life, that rhythm which is the very breath of the divine action."

So at the primordial level, rta expresses itself as the differentiating principle whereby the One becomes the two poles of manifestation, the two become the three, and the three the many. The constant transformation points to a law of becoming, of change, and adjustment, to which all creation, all successive emanations will be subject, all being subservient to the one law of transformation or harmony (rta), that law which reveals the ordered course of the universal pattern. As the Rig Veda puts it: "By law (rta) the herds of the universe (i.e. the stars) have entered the cosmic orbit. Firmly fixed are the foundations of rta shining in beauty, manifold are its beauteous forms" (4:23).

In the natural process of emanation, then, the first level gives rise to the second, the intermediate level, where the gods themselves manifest and function. Here the universal law, rta, provides the dynamics for the unfolding in every realm of activity throughout the entire manifested system, each god or deva performing his task in perfect harmony: "one-minded, one-intentioned, unerringly move together to the one purposeful accomplishment" (Rig Veda 6:9).

Such is the beautiful description of the action of the intelligent forces in the universe; their solidarity, their essential righteousness, their concerted activity are the unique features of their manifestation, marking them as agents of the law of harmony, by which, through which, and in which they live and perform their various tasks:

One is the mighty godhood of the shining-ones. (Rig Veda 3:55)

Denizens of heaven, flame-tongued, thriving through the law, they abide brooding in the womb of law. (Rig Veda 10:65)

True observers of the law, faithful to the law, righteous leaders, bounteous to every man. (Rig Veda 5:67)

Law abiding, born in law, sublime fosterers of law . . . (Rig Veda 7:66)

Herdsmen of the supreme law, whose decrees are truth. (Rig Veda 10:63)

So the gods, intelligent agents of the law—not to be anthropomorphized at their loftiest levels and yet to be seen as the products of former systems who have won their immortality through past eonic cycles—reveal rta, the cosmic order, embodying it in their very being, since they are established in that nirvanic state in which their nature is both compassion and truth, bliss and knowledge.

Finally then, as a natural emanation through the cosmic action of the gods, there arises the phenomenal world where the individual rules and by virtue of his or her freedom disrupts the divine equilibrium, shatters the original cosmic harmony underlying all things, and suffers the consequences (karma) in their progress along the pathway of return, that pathway that leads on to the gods, enlightenment, and illumination.

What is known as rta or cosmic order exhibits itself in the transcendental and intermediate realms as dharma, the law of becoming in accordance with the rightness of one's being, the inner obedience to that duty which marks one's place in the cosmic scheme; there, in those inner realms, a certain state that has been called "karmalessness" obtains, a state of nirvana since there is the extinction of all sense of separateness, of a personal self, in that "oneminded, one-intentioned" harmonious action which accords with truth (satya). Yet because of rta, cosmic order, there is that aspect of the law which we experience in this phenomenal universe, which we call karma, failing to recognize that the term itself simply means action, although too often, since our actions disrupt the harmony of the universal order, we attribute to karma the concept values of goodness and badness.

While we have grossly oversimplified the great Vedic tradition and have necessarily omitted from so brief a survey other and equally important aspects of the entire process of the emanation of a manifested universe (this in itself the subject matter of the entire first volume ofThe Secret Doctrine), I suggest we begin to see the magnificence and splendor of the theosophic vision in terms of its relevance for us who are embarked on the human phase of the journey that leads onward to . . . what shall we call that unknown goal toward which all creation moves? How shall we define a culmination still unknown to us, and yet which we dimly sense and in our profounder moments of insight know in some mysterious manner is both in the distant "there" and in the very present "here" of our existence?

To live in accord with the cosmic order, to travel onward in harmony with the law of our inmost being—these are the consequences of rta in terms of karma and dharma, twin keys to the heroic journey of our humanity. These are the self-imposed demands inherent in the phenomenal world because of the very nature of the transcendent realm of which the phenomenal world is an emanation.

As we turn to our journey in the realm of the phenomenal, in the worlds of manifestation, we may gain a new appreciation for the concepts of karma and dharma, perceiving in them both challenge and opportunity to move more quickly on our heroic way. For a certain heroism is called for, a bravery of the spirit to accept the challenge of the pathway that leads onward, a soul-courage to take up the opportunity that is our human birthright, the opportunity to win our immortality and join the gods, if I may put it thus, in their eonic labors.

It is truly the great adventure of the spirit in which we are engaged, and the very word "adventure" is rich in meanings we have forgotten or overlooked. It is a word that appears frequently in the legends that arose in Europe in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, legends telling of the quest for the Holy Grail. Some scholars, translating those legends from the medieval French, particularly Pauline Matarasso, have pointed out that the French word aventure, from the old French aventiure in Middle High German, both from the Latin adventura, translated into modern English as "adventure," raises problems both linguistic and interpretive, simply because it contains such a wealth of meaning that we have today no single word to comprehend. In essence, it meant both karma and dharma; and when, in the Grail stories, Perceval or Parzifal was told, "Go where adventure leads you," it is clear that the directive was intended as a command to the hero to act in accordance with the pattern established by his own past (what we would call karma) and also to fulfill his particular mission or destiny (what we would call his dharma). So, as Matarasso points out in her commentary of The Quest of the Holy Grail, the anonymous work attributed to the Cistercian monks:

The adventure . . . is the challenge which causes man to measure himself against standards more than human . . . the adventure is above all God working and manifesting himself in the physical world. To accept an adventure is to accept an encounter with a force which is in the proper sense of the word supernatural, an encounter which is always perilous for the sinner or the man of little faith and much presumption.

She adds, "I think it is true to say that the author of The Quest uses the concept of the adventure asa symbol of providence just as precisely and consistently as he uses the Holy Grail as a symbol of mystical experience." In her translation of the legend, therefore, she has used a variety of words,commenting, "I feel . . . bound to stress that beneath the multiplicity of terms there runs through the story like an unbroken thread the idea of providential guidance which man can either accept, refuse, or simply fail to see."

One could illustrate this idea by numerous references to the Grail legends as they appeared in Europe during that turbulent period of the early Middle Ages, a period not very different from our own, when new values were arising and a new consciousness coming to birth. Joseph Campbell comments at some length on the use of the term "adventure" in the Grail legends in reference both to the new values coming to birth at that time in Europe and to the changing perspectives of our modern age. In his work Creative Mythology (the fourth volume in his series Masks of God), Campbell points out in his discussion of the term "adventure" in connection with the Grail legends that it had reference to the fact that "the casual, chance, fragmentary events of an apparently undistinguished life disclose the form and dimension of a classic epic of destiny when the cosmic mirror is applied, and our own scattered lives today, as well, are then seen, also, as anamorphoses."

The use of the term "anamorphosis," by the way, is most interesting, since the word (from theGreek, "to form again or anew") often refers to a distorted image, taking us back to the Vedic concept of this phenomenal realm as an image, too often distorted by our perception, of the transcendental sphere of the gods.

All of this is an interesting study in itself, and of course it is closely related to a deeper study of karma as a central concept in understanding human destiny.

However, what I have sought to emphasize is that by following the advice of the Master K. H. as to the importance of a study of "Karma and Nirvana," we may derive a new understanding of the manner in which these principles may serve to guide us today. We may come to recognize that in meeting all that is appropriate to us as a result of our past—that which we call our karma—and in accepting the challenge of our inevitable destiny, the rightness of our self becoming nature—that which we call our dharma—we will have made clear the pathway that leads on to the gods. This is the nirvanic pathway, if you like, for it is essentially the way of bliss in which the separate self is extinguished in favor of that greater light of the Universal Self.

From the Vedic seers and rishis to St. Paul onward to the Gnostics, the alchemists, and those who penned the Grail legends, the story has been told of the human—the heroic—journey. The patterns of events in our lives, when we have eyes to see the patterning, reveal that, as Joseph Campbell puts it, "Beneath the surface effects of this world sit . . . the gods." For here we may learn to mirror that cosmic harmony that holds the stars in their orbits and reveals itself in the rhythms of tides and seasons.

In The Voice of the Silence, reference is made to a stage when "once thy foot hath pressed the bed of the Nirvanic stream." Then is asked the question: "What see'st thou before thine eye, O aspirant to god-like Wisdom?" And the traveler replies: "I see the PATH; its foot in mire, its summits lost in glorious light Nirvanic. And now I see the ever narrowing Portals on the hard, the thorny way to Jnana."

Hard and thorny it may appear to be, the road to jnana, knowing, to Gnosis or Sophia-Wisdom, but our destiny is no other than to walk onward, for

The way to final freedom is within thy SELF.
That way begins and ends outside of Self.


Joy Mills, MA, has been a student of Theosophy for over sixty years. She has held numerous positions within the Society, including president of the American and Australian sections, international vice president, and director of the Krotona School of Theosophy. She is the author of several books as well as articles that have appeared in Theosophical journals throughout the world.


Flowers in the Sky

Originally printed in the November - December 2003 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: O'Grady, John P. "Flowers in the Sky." Quest  91.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2003):216-219,226

John P. O'Grady

Theosophical Society - John P. O'Grady is a teacher ar Rocky Mountain College in Billings, Montana and the author of Grave Goods: Essays of a Peculiar Nature.We were out west and our directions were faulty. We had been seeking a mountain but somehow arrived at an old graveyard. Instead of a trailhead it was tombstones. The ground between the glancing markers was strewn with pine needles and fretted with morning sunlight. A weather-beaten sign nailed to an old tree delivered two gray words: "Pioneer Cemetery." No birds were singing, yet in the middle of this small enclosure was a solitary wildflower with small blue blossoms: forget-me-not, or as the plant is more commonly known in these parts, stickseed. The burial ground was serene and inviting. Had we been looking for a campsite, this might have been the place. Ah, but the day was still young and our minds were set on a mountain, so we continued on our way. The peak, as it turned out, was not far off. The sky was clear. Soon we were making our ascent. But that unexpected graveyard and its lone wildflower remained in my thoughts, right to the top of the mountain and beyond.

To judge from the records, a kind of "dark learning" is to be obtained by those who scale mountains. For reasons never to be fathomed, lofty summits serve as portals, if not to the "other world" then perchance to another style of awareness. Maybe it's the thin air, or the proximity to sky, or the mere physical exertion that relaxes the tension of consciousness—it's difficult to say with any certainty. "You have but a short time left to live," says Aurelius, "so live as on a mountain." Whatever the case, the religious landscapes of the world appear serrated into wondrous heights. Mount Olympus, according to Homer, is "neither shaken by winds, nor ever wet with rain, nor does snow fall upon it, but the air is outspread clear and cloudless." The Bible has its share of "power peaks," including Ararat, Horeb, and Tabor, while in China Taoism claims its Five Sacred Mountains, and Vulture Peak in India is revered as one of the Buddha's favorite resorts, where he delivered some of his most rarefied teachings.

Nowhere do mountains assume greater spiritual significance than in Japan, where adherents of Shugendo—a hybrid of Shinto, Taoism, Buddhism, with a little shamanism thrown in—regard mountains as ritual loci of power, veritable landscape mandalas, to be entered as much with the body as with the mind. Along similar lines, Ichiro Hori in his Folk Religion in Japan explains that the word for mountain—yama—is commonly employed in rural districts to refer to funerary rites. For example, the coffin is called yama-oke ("mountain box"); selecting the burial site is yama-gime ("choosing the mountain"); and digging the grave is yama-shigoto ("mountain work"). A hint is to be gleaned here as to the true nature of all mountaineering, similar to Socrates' famous definition of philosophy as the "practice of death."

Make no mistake, mountaineering in whatever form is risky. For the true adept, nothing material is ever gained from the arduous ascent, though all could be lost in the slip of a moment. Edward Whymper, the nineteenth-century Englishman who led the first successful ascent of the Matterhorn, concludes his classic Scrambles Amongst the Alps with these sobering words: "Climb if you will, but remember that courage and strength are naught without prudence, and that a momentary negligence may destroy the happiness of a lifetime. Do nothing in haste, look well to each step, and from the beginning think what may be the end." The hard-won insight behind these words is almost palpable: half of Whymper's climbing party perished on the descent, the result of a minor misstep.

The most elevated graveyard on earth is Mount Everest. More than a hundred and fifty bodies—each a mountaineering fatality—are believed to lie scattered across the upper reaches of its frozen slopes. The practice of climbers around there is to let the dead bury the dead. It is a tradition arising from necessity: to attempt recovery of bodies at such unforgiving heights is extremely dangerous. Among the oldest of these cloud-shrouded corpses are those of George Mallory and Andrew Irvine. At the time of their deaths in 1924 they were very near the summit. They may have made it to the top, thus becoming the first human beings to set foot upon the world's highest point. If so they beat out Sir Edmund Hillary by nearly three decades, but no one knows for sure. The tale perished with them—a reminder that the climber is not the master but the minister of the peak.

Those who climb mountains seem motivated by a venerable wisdom: What is gained with great difficulty is more valuable than what is acquired without effort. Or so one would think after perusing the literature. I'm not talking about those bestsellers that dish up harrowing accounts of doomed expeditions on Danali or K-2. No, I am referring to the fugitive writings of ordinary folks who, when they get a little time off from the workaday, spend it upon the more companionable mountains and then write down a few words about their experiences. Such accounts are usually deposited in containers and left on the summits, as a kind of votive offering. Mount Shasta in California provides a case in point.

Shasta is a big peak by anybody's standards—a glacier-clad volcano rising 14,162 feet above sea level. To climb it is arduous but not technically difficult. Lots of people have made it to the top. I'm one of them. But truth be told, each of these ordinary human beings was seeking something extraordinary. The summit register confirms this.

Actually, "register" is a highfalutin' term for the tattered spiral notebook I found crammed into a dented coffee can stashed in the uppermost rocks. Over time, weather takes its toll on the legibility of all such mountain documents—words suffer from exposure. This book was in worse shape than some of the exhausted climbers who stagger up to sign their names in it: all meaning was perched on a narrow ledge of coherence, about to tumble off. Even so, it was still possible to make out various entries in the Shasta register. Most of them were commonplace exclamations concerning the weather ("Glorious day!"), God ("Thank the Lord for getting me up here!"), and ego ("I'm on top of the world!"). But one or two entries did rise above the ordinary, in terms of ability to pique a reader's interest. At the bottom of the can, a brittle slip of paper preserved this fragment of a tale: ". . . end this way. I never thought I'd be writing about [. . .] for strangers to read, but . . . ." And then there was this text, surviving in its entirety save for the author's name: "Beautiful climb, perfect weather, hope to God I make it down. My sex change operation is at 9:00 sharp. Just think: Maybe I can be the first person to re-climb Shasta as another person." Ah, but who among us ever remains the same from one climb to the next, whether it be up a mountain or out of bed in the morning?

To gain some purchase on this question, consider the seventeenth century alchemist Thomas Vaughan, whose Lumen de Lumine, or A New Magical Light can be recommended as one of the great handbooks of mountaineering. At one point, after referring in cryptic fashion to a wondrous plant found only on the highest peaks of a shadowy range called the Mountains of the Moon, Vaughan writes: "Much indeed might be spoken concerning these mountains, if it were lawful to publish their mysteries; but one thing I shall not forbear to tell you. They are very dangerous places after night, for they are haunted with fires and other strange apparitions, occasioned—as I am told by the Magi—by certain spirits which dabble lasciviously with the sperm of the world and imprint their imaginations in it, producing many times fantastic and monstrous generations."

For my part, I never climb a mountain without the hope that I will discover on its summit one of Vaughan's rare and winsome moon-flowers. That I have yet to succeed does nothing to diminish my expectation. As for the psychological dangers he speaks of—those lasciviously dabbling spirits—they do exist and should be given heed, but one man's peril proves another's boon.

The philosopher William James loved to climb mountains. He was particularly fond of the Adirondacks. On a July night in 1898, while camping out with friends just below the summit of Mount Marcy, he had a run-in with a gang of mountain spirits. The story is recounted in a letter James wrote to his wife. Here's what happened.

After a delightfully strenuous day of clambering up and over the highest mountain in New York State, James not only was physically spent, but his mind was furiously at work on a series of lectures he had agreed to present at Edinburgh. Unable to sleep, he arose and ventured forth, alone into the night woods. "All fermented within me," he reports, "till it became a regular Walpurgisnacht. I spent a good deal of it in the woods, where the streaming moonlight lit up things in a magical checkered play, and it seemed as if the gods of all the nature-mythologies were holding an indescribable meeting in my breast with the moral gods of the inner life . . . ." A colloquy of gods was being held in his heart!

The ordinarily eloquent James suddenly was at a loss for words as he tried to explain to his wife what had come over him. Like a desperate climber on a difficult and unfamiliar pitch of rock, he started grasping for anything that might provide a hold: "The intense significance of some sort, of the whole scene, if one could only tell the significance; the intense inhuman remoteness of its inner life, and yet the intense appeal of it; its everlasting freshness and its immemorial antiquity and decay . . . ." Having arrived at the limits of linguistic ability, James concludes: "It was one of the happiest lonesome nights of my existence, and I understand now what a poet is."

The lectures he eventually delivered in Edinburgh were profoundly influenced by his encounter with those gods in the mountain dark. Later the talks were published under the title The Varieties of Religious Experience. The book was immediately recognized as a classic. James was now at the top of his profession, but it came at great cost: the gods had opened his mind to the poetic nature of reality, but the grueling traverse across that rugged Adirondack range had worked irreparable damage upon his health. His remaining years were marked by visionary intensity but drastically diminished physical vitality. There would be no more trips into his beloved mountains. When he died in 1910, an autopsy revealed the fatal lesions on his heart.

Hellroaring is the unsurpassed peak in its range, but you will not find its name on any map. Some say this omission was a mapmaker's error, while others claim it a stratagem on the part of locals to keep out unwanted visitors. Another piece of information not on the map: Hellroaring has had more than its share of climbing fatalities, giving rise to a considerable body of tragic lore, which hovers ominously over the mountain like a lenticular cloud. What you will find on the map, however, is Hellroaring's elevation—10,751 feet—and a labyrinth of contour lines that translate into a rocky finger of fate pointing skyward. There's no mistaking this peak once you've laid aside the map and are actually on the ground. So, if your heart is really set on climbing Hellroaring, you can find your way there, despite the obstacles.

We were up there just a few weeks ago. A sunny summer day, the eleventh of July. From our base camp, it took most of the morning to reach the top of the peak. It was ourselves alone and endless distant ridges. The air was calm. Pincushion clumps of alpine phlox were abloom in blue abundance, saturating the summit air with a fragrance sweeter than any breath of Persephone. Butterflies were everywhere, feeding on the nectar.

The summit register for Hellroaring is housed in a mountain-box more lavish than most: cast aluminum and embossed with the name of the mountaineering club that placed it here in 1961. The top of the box is hinged and held shut by two large thumb-nuts. When I bent down to raise the lid, a resting butterfly took wing. Inside the box was the usual oddball assortment of mementos left by climbers: business cards, empty pens, a set of keys, an old pair of sunglasses. And of course, there was the register itself—in this case, an ornate leather-bound journal. Its entries possessed an eloquence all but lost in contemporary alpine literature. Hellroaring's register was packed with the gnomic utterances of several generations of mountain sages: "Don't mess with what lies deep in the other." "Foolish people imagine what they imagine is someplace else." "Only a few among us have learned to love stones." Given this mountain's unfortunate climbing history, many of these entries can be assumed last words.

My attention was diverted from the book when I noticed a Ziploc bag lying at the bottom of the box. I reached for it and opened it. Inside was a photograph. Climbers often leave them on summits, and almost always these are pictures of people—yearbook mugshots, wedding photos, family reunions, that kind of thing. But the photo I found that day on top of Hellroaring was unique in my mountain experience: it was of a grave marker, located who knows where, bearing a simple inscription:

Heather Smallage
June 27, 1977 — Sept. 8, 1999

She May Have Died Here
But She Lived Here Too . . . .



The back of the photo was blank. No words upon which to anchor a narrative. The question, if not the ghost, arises: Who was Heather Smallage, and what happened to her? Tales too go the way of all flesh—and this one was lost in mountain air.

Only later do we learn the story—or at least a story. We happen upon it on the way home. We stop for breakfast in a log cabin tourist lodge at the edge of the mountains. A young waitress shows us to our table. As we are sitting, we spot a small memorial plaque hanging on the wall. It bears the name of Heather Smallage. Surprised, we ask our young waitress if she has any details. Yes, she does. She has them all, and delivers them in a tone of malicious joy.

"Oh yeah," she says, "her—the snooty college girl from back east. She worked here a couple summers. They say she was a poet and crazy about wildflowers, especially ones that grow on tops of mountains. She called them her 'flowers in the sky.' I've never seen them myself. She must have had her head in the clouds. People around here used to call her 'Sky Pilot.' Yeah, she loved her poetry and her flowers and—oh yeah, she loved the bartender too." She jerks a thumb toward the barroom door.

"They were going to be married, you know, and have kids and a whole life together. That never happened. One day the girl just didn't show up for work. People knew she had gone off the day before looking for her flowers in the sky. Nobody knew where exactly. Talk about stupid! It was three or four days before they found her body up on Hellroaring Peak. Looked like she slipped and fell, but that's not what killed her. They say she bled to death. If you know the spot you can still see the bloodstains on the rocks. Imagine the suffering!"

"How horrible!" we say. "Did you know her well?"

"Oh no," the young waitress replies, now yawning. "I never met her." Once again she jerks her thumb toward the barroom door: "My fianca told me the story."

As I resumed my perusal of Hellroaring's summit register, an index card dropped out from between the pages. The card showed no signs of weathering, and indeed looked brand new. It contained a short message, written in a neat hand. It was dated—July 11th. That was today! Had somebody already been here? Funny, we saw no one on the way up, nor any signs that any had been here in a long, long time. With only the date and no year to go by, this card could just as well have been placed in the register one hour ago, or one year ago, or even ten years ago. Maybe it had always been here—no telling. Anyhow, the card read: "Most extraordinary, right now, just me and ten thousand butterflies."

Yes, the butterflies, those innumerable small triumphs of transformation, faithful pollinators of the alpine phlox. Phlox—the word literally means "flame"—and the gaslight blue of its petals must be drawn from the same dark lamps that lit the way for Orpheus. That such a flower should abide up here on this deadly summit, so close to heaven, confirms that most enduring of all mountaineering maxims: "The way up is the way down."

Death among the ancient Greeks was personified as a beautiful youth. Because the immortal gods are by their very nature "without death," they hated this boy and banned him from Mount Olympus, a place he dearly loved for the wild beauty of its flowers. Thus he was forced to wander in the mortal realm, a lonely journey that continues to this day. In old paintings and motifs he can often be seen holding an inverted torch, its flame extinguished, or, as I like to envision it, the flame having fallen to the ground and shattered into innumerable slivers, now transfigured into the petals of certain flowers that grow only in those high and hard to reach places, closest to the heart of that outcast youth.


John P. O'Grady is a teacher ar Rocky Mountain College in Billings, Montana and the author of Grave Goods: Essays of a Peculiar Nature.


Blavatsky and Mount Rushmore

By John Algeo, National President

Theosophical Society - Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was a controversial Russian occultist, philosopher, and author who co-founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. She gained an international following as the leading theoretician of Theosophy, the esoteric movement that the society promotedWhat has Helena Petrovna Blavatsky got to do with Mount Rushmore, Stone Mountain, and Saint John the Divine? The answer to that question can be found on one wall of the Meditation Room at Olcott, the national center of the Theosophical Society in America, Wheaton, Illinois.

Upon the north wall of that room hangs a painting of Blavatsky made by Gutzon Borglum, the sculptor famous for reviving the Egyptian and Babylonian art of creating gigantic statues in living rock as commemorations of public figures. The story behind that painting is recounted in some old journal articles and in a letter from the sculptor himself.

But first some information about Borglum. John Gutzon de la Mothe Borglum (1867-1941) was the son of Danish immigrants. His father, James Borglum, came to Salt Lake City as a Mormon convert in 1864, together with his wife Ida. The next year her sister Christina joined them, and James married both sisters according to Mormon religious practice at that time. The Church sent them to the Idaho territory, where Gutzon was born to James's second wife. Two years later, the Borglums left the Mormon Church, and eventually, because of the laws against polygamy, Gutzon's mother left him with his father and sought a different life for herself.

When he was seventeen, Gutzon moved with his family to California, where he discovered a talent for art and began to train as a portrait painter. In his early twenties, he went to France to study and turned to sculpture. His works were displayed in prominent Paris salons, and he met Auguste Rodin.

In 1901, in his mid thirties, Gutzon settled in New York City. His work Mares of Diomedes won a gold medal at the 1904 Saint Louis World's Fair and was the first American sculpture added to the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. In 1907, he received a commission to create statuary for the Cathedral of Saint John the Divine in New York City, including statues of the twelve apostles. Abraham Lincoln was a favorite subject of Gutzon's, being treated by a marble head of Lincoln in the Capitol Rotunda in Washington and a bronze statue of the Seated Lincoln, for the 1911 dedication of which Teddy Roosevelt came to Newark, New Jersey. The following year, Gutzon's son was born and named Lincoln.

Just before World War I, Borglum was invited to create a monument to Confederate heroes on the side of Stone Mountain, near Atlanta, Georgia, but the start of the project—which was to depict General Robert E. Lee and his troops in procession—was delayed until after the war. In the early 1920s, disagreements arose between Borglum and the sponsors of the Stone Mountain project, so eventually he withdrew, and other artists finally did the project, completing it in 1970.

Borglum moved to Texas in 1925 and turned his attention to what was to become his major work: the four presidents on the side of Mount Rushmore, in South Dakota. The head of George Washington was unveiled in 1930, the Jefferson head in 1936, the Lincoln head in 1937, and the Roosevelt head in 1938. The project was completed in 1941, the year Gutzon died, by his son, Lincoln Borglum.

The Borglum painting of Blavatsky was noted in Theosophical circles in 1930. In January of that year, the Theosophist magazine (published then in Hollywood, California) had a reproduction of the painting as a frontispiece and a short article about it (51:475), including the following:

The photograph of Madame Blavatsky at the front of this issue is a reproduction of a portrait painted many years ago by Gutzon Borglum, at the time when his father was President of the Theosophical Lodge in Omaha, Nebraska.

When his father requested the portrait he first carefully prepared himself psychologically by reading and studying the teachings of H. P. B. and then secluded himself completely for three whole days: the splendid portrait is the result.

The article goes on to say that John Ingelman and May S. Rogers had raised money to buy the painting as a gift for Annie Besant.

The Path magazine of 1888 and 1889 has a number of references to Dr. J. M. Borglum, Gutzon's father. In 1888, he was vice president of the newly chartered Vedanta Theosophical Society in Omaha, Nebraska (3:27). At the national convention in Chicago on April 22, 1888, he was elected to the General Council or governing body of the Theosophical Society in America (3:67). By March 1889, he was serving as president of the Vedanta Theosophical Society (3:396). He was again a delegate at the national convention in Chicago on April 28-29, 1889 (4:62), and was reelected as president of the Vedanta Theosophical Society for 1890 (4:325). James Borglum was a leading member of the Theosophical Society in the period 1888-1890, about the time his son Gutzon was most productive as a painter.

About the same time as the article cited above, Gutzon Borglum wrote concerning the painting to J. G. Phelps Stokes, a New York City member of the Society (who had been recommended for membership by Beatrice Wood, an artist active in the Dada movement). A copy of that letter is affixed to the back of the portrait:

GUTZON - BORGLUM

Menger Hotel, San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 1930



Dear Mr. Stokes:

Thanks for your letter of January 14th, and also for the information that you conveyed to me about the portrait of Madam Blavatsky.

Yes, I did paint that portrait some years ago. It ought to carry my signature but maybe it doesn't. Some time when I am in your neighborhood, I will be very glad to sign the work.

I made it at the time wholly and solely for my father, who was very much impressed by Madam Blavatsky and at that time, I remember, was very much interested in Theosophy.

Your letter was sent to me at Stamford, Connecticut, and forwarded here. I still have my home there but have not lived there for three or four years on account of the extent of my western work.

I expect to pass through New York some time in July on my way to Europe. I know that is a bad time to be in New York but shall try to let you know of my presence.

Sincerely yours,

(Signed) Gutzon Borglum

 

J. G. Phelps Stokes, Esq.

100 William Street

New York City

GB/t

In December 1933, the American Theosophist (21:279), which also reported the death of Annie Besant that year, had the following bit of news:

Our members will be glad to know that Olcott has the privilege of being the home for the time being of the famous portrait of Madame Blavatsky painted by Gutzon Borglum.

[Following a reprint of much of the 1930 article cited above, the news note concludes:]

Following the death of the artist's father [in 1909] and the adjustment of the estate, Dr. Besant expressed the thought that the portrait should be in the possession of the Society. As a result of this suggestion several generous members combined together and made the purchase at a cost of about $1,000.

The painting, which at Dr. Besant's suggestion has been kept by Mr. and Mrs. Hotchener in their home, was recently shipped to Olcott where it will be a source of inspiration to many of our members.

The painting was probably done in or shortly after 1889, for it is modeled on a well-known photograph of H. P. Blavatsky, called the "Sphinx" picture, made on January 8, 1889, by the artist and photographer Enrico Resta ("4, Coburg Place, Bayswater, London, W. Opposite the Broad Walk, Kensington Gardens," as the back of one of the prints identifies the site of the studio). Several different, but very similar, pictures of the same pose seem to have been made that day. They were widely distributed, some with Blavatsky's autograph and inscriptions to the recipients, of which the Olcott archives include several. It seems likely that one of these photographs was sent to James Borglum during his presidency of the Vedanta Theosophical Society, and that James provided it to his son Gutzon as a model.

The painting has been at Olcott, and doubtless in its present location in the Meditation or Shrine Room (the latter term borrowed from our international headquarters at Adyar), since 1933. Its varnish has darkened considerably, as is apparent from comparing the painting today with the 1930 photograph of it; the painting is therefore due for cleaning to restore it to its original brightness.


Note: Thanks for help in tracking down this century-and-more-old story are due to several persons: Heidi C. Hofer of the Borglum Historical Center in South Dakota, who saw a reference to the painting on our Web site and asked us about it; Joy Mills, who pointed to the direction for finding information about it; Jeff Gresko, who discovered the letter from Borglum; Marie Johnson, who researched the journal references; Diana Cabigting, who tracked down James Borglum's affiliation with Vedanta Lodge; and Adele Algeo, who identified the photograph on which the painting is based. Information about Gutzon Borglum is available from the Borglum Historical Center, P. O. Box 650, Keystone, SD 57751, fax 605-666-4482 or e-mail borglum@gwtc.net.


There is but one worthy ambition for us all. Do better whatever we do. No matter how capable, we must work, think, study and do better. This alone leads to Mastery, Leadership and Independence.

—Gutzon Borglum


Four of a Kind: The Tarot of the Beatles

By Kevin Hendryx

There is something magical and sinister about repetitive siblings. Mythology is very strong on them. The Beatles inspire terror, awe, and reverence.

—Jonathan Miller

Linked indissolubly with the 1960s, split for thirty years, John Lennon dead twenty years—and still the Beatles remain timeless. Everything the Former Fabs do is faithfully followed by admirers, enemies, and the press alike, and their legacy as musicians, composers, and, yes, philosophers survives and is channeled by the many who have been transformed by their spirit. We need look no further than Berlin 1989, when their songs played as the Wall came down—a more bizarre parallel to the Rescue of Pepperland could not be scripted—to see that truly "nothing is Beatleproof."

John Lennon sang, "I don't believe in Tarot" (among other things) in his song "God" in 1970, shortly after the breakup of the Beatles. As with many of Lennon's pronouncements, he may have meant it at the time, during his embittered "primal scream" phase, but would not necessarily continue to believe so. By the end of John's life, he and Yoko Ono were again earnestly consulting the I Ching and having their fortunes told (and their pockets picked by charlatans) like the unrepentant flower children they were. The Beatles are still seen as the totemic icons of the 1960s, emissaries from the Age of Aquarius, whose coming coincided with a reawakened interest in the occult and mysticism. One of the many practices that suddenly gained new adherents was that of reading clues to one's personality and destiny from cards randomly selected from the Tarot deck.

The Tarot, the ancient precursor of today's playing cards, deals in archetypes and symbolism, especially in the twenty-two trump cards of the major arcana ("greater secrets"). All four Beatles, in varying degrees of enthusiasm or gullibility, became absorbed in the spiritual questing that marked the unfolding of the 1960s, and it is thus all the more fascinating to note how uncannily each member of the group, even the band as a unit, is mirrored by a particular major arcana card. As the Beatles recede as historical figures and enter the realm of myth and legend, it is appropriate to examine how they fit into the allegorical context of the Tarot.

Take what follows as an excursion into the collective unconscious or an exercise in voodoo musicology, whichever you like. As Pindar wrote, "In heaven, to learn is to see; on earth, to remember." Let us now try to remember a time when mortal minstrels dared conjure visions of heaven.

Ringo's card: The Star

Theosophical Society - Tarot Card.  The Star as is relates to Ringo Starr of the Beatles.  The card chosen for Richard Starkey (Ringo Starr) is number 17 in the sequence of the major arcana: the Star. More than just a serendipitous pun, this card represents hope, trust, and optimism. Its positive aspects include bright prospects, opportunity, and satisfaction. Anchored in the sky and cosmos, it is the first card to complement and complete the gifts of the Magician (see below). Seven smaller stars are depicted in the card's illustration, one for each note in the music of the spheres, while a young girl under a single radiant star pours the purifying water of life into the consciousness of humanity. The Star is one of the happiest cards, acting as a check on the influences of ill-omened cards around it.

The inversion, or reversal, of the Star card brings negative effects into play. These include bad luck, pessimism, disappointment, imbalance, lack of opportunity, and hope unfulfilled.

Interpretation: Ringo brought good-natured cheer and down-to-earth sensibilities to the Beatles. He was the only one of the four who came from a truly poor, working-class environment and never strayed far from his roots. At the same time, he proved capable of intuitive reasoning, astute insights, and droll malapropisms that frequently amazed and delighted his bandmates. Ringo harbored the fewest resentments and made the fewest enemies. An only child, even after the split he continued to refer to the others as "my three brothers." He provided a center for the others to rally around, musically and spiritually, and as the drummer he was especially important to John, the shaman. In public or private moments captured on film, John often stayed close to Ringo and looked to him for support or reassurance. The feeling was mutual, as Ringo later recalled: "He [John] knows me better than anybody else in the world--better than the other two." Ringo typified the ability of common persons to rise above their origins and achieve greatness. The reversed meanings of the Star, on the other hand, aptly sum up the failings of Ringo's solo career, as Beatle scholars will recognize.

Archetypal Song: "With a Little Help from My Friends," written specifically for Ringo by John and Paul, cemented his public persona as "history's most charming bit player." It features his best Beatles vocal and firmly projects all the exuberance and faith of his Tarot card.

George's card: The Hermit

Theosophical Society - Tarot Card.  The Hermit as it pertains to George Harrison of the Beatles.Next we turn over a card for George Harrison: the Hermit, the ninth card, representing both a seeker and teacher. Positive attributes of the Hermit include knowledge, deliberation, thriftiness, caution, silent counsel, and inner wisdom. The Hermit wears the hood and scourge of a penitent and carries the walking stick of a pilgrim. He stands on a summit and holds the lantern of truth, illuminating the path to heaven. Through his searching, the way is revealed to others. Selfless but also somewhat distant, the Hermit realizes that few are ready for the truth; his light can also blind, and secret knowledge must be hidden. Socrates' dictum "I know that I know nothing" could be the mantra of this reclusive card.

Negative aspects of the Hermit revolve around imprudence. A Hermit who loses his way in the dark shows hastiness, immaturity, and a lack of patience. He withdraws from his responsibilities toward others. He becomes a follower rather than a leader, and attainment yields to hollow pursuits.

Interpretation: George contributed a spiritual imperative to the Beatles' music, assuming a teacher's role in a group in which he was the junior member in age. He was the first to consider the potential of a life and purpose beyond material rewards and Western consumerism. Originally typecast as the almost invisible lead guitarist with a miserly streak, the "quiet Beatle" metamorphosed into a leading spokesman for Indian music and philosophy. As the Hermit, he is generally able to look back at the road his life has followed with tolerance and understanding, even a trace of amusement; but his eyes are fixed on a goal that still lies ahead.

Archetypal Song: "Within You without You" is George's most fully realized blending of classical Indian raga and Western pop idioms. "World music" is now so taken for granted that few remember, in the hot glare of the Beatles' joint fame, to credit George as being one of its earliest pioneers. Quoting in equal parts from the Bible and Hindu scriptures, this song reveals profound insights but ends in the sardonic laughter of those who listen but do not hear. It is a joke the Hermit is all too familiar with: "Of what use are words of wisdom to the man who is unwise? Of what use is a lamp to a man who is blind?" (Dhammapada).

Paul's card: The Fool

Theosophical Society - Tarot Card.  The Fool as it pertains to Paul McCartney of the Beatles.Our third Beatle, Paul McCartney, is represented by the Fool, a card denoting pure creativity, enthusiasm, theatricality, unpredictability, and inexperience seeking self-expression. The only unnumbered card in the Tarot deck, the Fool stands apart from the normal sequence, unconfined by boundaries. In part, this difference is supremely liberating; however, having a value of zero means the Fool counts for nothing by himself. He requires the addition of other cards, which are then modified by his influence. The Fool typically wears a gaudy disguise--his appearance is designed to deceive--thus he also represents concealed wisdom (as in "The Fool on the Hill").

There is an instinctive affinity with the Magician card (see below)--the sorcerer's apprentice and all that. The two are linked paths to the same sephira on the Tree of Life in the Hebrew Kabbalah, and their union produces original inspiration that is unmatched in the Tarot.

All is not bliss for the Fool. A reversed card indicates folly. Bad decisions are likely, as is negligence, frivolity, rashness, indiscipline, a tendency to show off, unrestrained excess, thoughtlessness, and a halting in life's progress. As the Dhammapada says: "How long is the night to the watchman; how long is the road to the weary; how long is the wandering of lives ending in death for the fool who cannot find the path!"

Interpretation: Paul needed the Beatles more than the others did. He thrived in the identity and framework provided by the group and flourished in the public acclaim of the concert stage. The Fool's creativity made Paul the most natural musician, albeit wholly untrained, in the band. His innate Celtic romanticism revealed itself in a love of story-telling songs (as opposed to sharing personal experiences) and in a love of sounds for their own sake. More than the others, he writes from the heart, not the mind, and his imagery is more frequently drawn from nature. He is pastoral and reflective whereas George could be acerbic and admonitory, or John would take refuge in the surreal and grotesque. In his songs, Beatles music best expresses the pure joy of living.

There is another level of meaning, too. The Fool may be a comedian, but comedians are often the loneliest of people, seeing a joke that no one else can share. The remorseless opposite mask to comedy is tragedy. Paul's life has been full of rewards and achievement, but the early death of his mother, the murder of his old writing partner, and the sad loss of his lifemate Linda were inconsolable blows.

Archetypal Song. "Penny Lane" shows the enthusiasm Paul gave to the group paired with his keen ear for songcrafting. Expansive whereas Lennon's comparable "Good Morning, Good Morning" is repressed and edgy, this nostalgic fairytale conjures up a fantastical Liverpool where even the everyday routines of ordinary people promise magic and delight. Baroque trumpets, piano glissandos, and ascending melodies whirl the listener out of mundane concerns; some experience akin to this must have been what caused Jung to write foretellingly, "Liverpool is the center of the Universe." Paul has never lost this knack for self-referential whimsy; a recent song such as "Flaming Pie" reminds us that, in nursery rhyme lore, it is "Simple" Simon, the Fool, who also encounters a "pieman."

John's card: The Magician

Theosophical Society - Tarot Card.  The Magician as it pertains to John Lennon of the Beatles.The Magician is the first card in the major arcana, so it is fittingly assigned to John Lennon, the founder and titular leader of the group. The Magician (also called the Sorcerer, the Juggler, or the Minstrel) is the card of human consciousness seeking to manifest its latent divinity. It is identified with the power to bring things into being, and with originality, dexterity, spontaneity, self-reliance, resolution, imagination, and transformation. The Magician is portrayed with his arms reaching to both sky and earth ("my Mother was of the Sky / my Father was of the Earth." a curious inversion of the standard mythic references, but one perhaps more personally meaningful), suggesting the Hermetic adage "as above, so below" and emphasizing the essential unity of all things ("but I am of the Universe").

The four symbols of the lesser arcana (cups, pentacles, batons, and swords) are displayed, an allusion to the four elements and the four letters of the unpronounceable name of God, the Tetragrammaton.

Just as creativity and power can be misused, there are less favorable aspects to the Magician. Typically, they are weakness of will, insecurity, delay, lack of interest, intrigue, deceit, and skills applied to destructive ends.

Interpretation: John was the wizard of the Beatles, the voyager to the otherworld who returned with visions and the power to energize those around him. He brought a restless creativity to the band and an Irish love of language and wordplay. Like many minstrels, he often sang in riddles, lest sacred mysteries be revealed to the unready or profane. The "fire in the head" of the ancient bards (as William Butler Yeats called it) was his special gift and burden. Because he was never long content with the way things were, he never ceased to challenge us to be better than we are. John sang of imagining possibilities. "Reality," he once said, "leaves a lot to the imagination." Without his initial dream, the Beatles would have never existed.

Archetypal Song. "Tomorrow Never Knows" is his most mind-bending and discorporeal song. The lyrics were borrowed freely from sacred texts such as the Tibetan Book of the Dead (Bardo Thodol), a collection of instructions to help departed souls navigate the afterlife state and escape the cycle of death and rebirth ("Go far into the Void and there rest in quietness" from the Tao Te Ching). John chants of ego dissolution and joining with the Infinite, wafting through a disorienting maelstrom of soundscapes, yet always anchored by Ringo's trance-inducing drum patterns. It was for precisely this reason that tribal shamans formed close attachments to their percussionists.

The evolution of the Beatles, and John in particular, was nothing short of astonishing, as this song, recorded just four years after their first single, makes clear. It was a long way from "Love, love me do / You know I love you" to "Turn off your mind, relax, and float downstream / It is not dying; it is not dying."

The Beatles' card, all together: The World

The World is the twenty-first and final card in the major arcana and the culmination of all the others. The World signifies attainment, completion, success, triumph in undertakings, rewards of hard work, admiration of others, an aerial voyage, and apotheosis. The card shows a young woman encircled in a wreath forming a mandorla, or vesica piscis--nature surrounded by the divine, the worlds of spirit and matter meeting. She has a leg raised in a dance, evoking Shiva Nataraja's dance of creation, and she holds a wand in each hand to illustrate the opposing principles of duality (yin/yang, light/dark, male/female). In the corners of the card are the tetramorphs, the four allegorical evangelist figures from Ezekiel's vision and the Revelation of Saint John: a bull, a lion, an eagle, and an angel.

In its imperfect form, the meaning of this card is, simply, imperfection, lack of vision, disappointment, failure to finish what is started, and a refusal to recognize the meanings revealed in the preceding cards.

Interpretation: It is tempting to identify the overtly feminine nature of this card with the universal woman or girl who is the subject of so many unpersonified Beatle love songs--an inarticulate longing for a unity or completeness that transcends time. John, for one, acknowledged that many of his pre-Yoko songs were so directed, and even dedicated the later composition "Woman" to "the other half of the sky." The number four symbolizes wholeness and is commonly encountered in esoteric systems: four elements, four seasons, four cardinal virtues, four points of the compass, and so on. The Beatles were casually linked with this tradition from an early date, the epithet "Fabulous Foursome" coming into use in 1963. As the Pied Pipers of a generation, they might easily be identified with the four evangelists.

Together, the band members were magic, as perceptive writers noted. "Beatlemania was a misnomer. Beatles fans were not so much hysterical as spellbound. The Beatles' music was a form of sympathetic magic," said John Lahr. We will not see their like again; such an alchemical mixture is not casually distilled or easily imitated. As Celia Farber recently commented, "The Ur-Band. They cannot be measured in terms of greatness because they are the measure itself."

So were the Beatles together. Apart, something intangible was missing. The solo careers of the former Fabs, despite occasional stellar moments and a brief, poignant reunion in 1995, were marred by a haunting sense of anticlimax. Contemplating the sundered ring of their fellowship is ineffably sad, although this, too, may be a necessary lesson of the Great Mystery that has yet to be revealed.

Archetypal Song: "All You Need Is Love" is a hippie cliché to some, a rallying cry to others. It stands as the ultimate, timeless message of the Beatles, a song of healing for a wounded world. The group's performance of "All You Need Is Love" on a global television broadcast in June 1967 was perhaps their finest hour on the public stage. But as with any zenith, what followed could only be a descent. Cracks would develop that would finally shatter the band into pieces.

The End

Normally, of course, a Tarot reading is very different, but the important thing in this one is the Fab Four's relevance to metaphysical tradition and their legacy as lovable moptops turned psychedelicized gurus.

Some musicians are just entertainers and others are something more. Prophetically, Non nobis solum, sed toti mundo nati, "Not for ourselves alone, but for the whole world are we born," was the motto of the Liverpool Institute, boyhood school of the future Sir Paul. In a lazily atheist age, the Beatles are perhaps responsible for introducing more Westerners to a forgotten spiritual heritage than any mainstream organized religion. Sometimes deliberately, sometimes by happy accident, they put out messages that echoed the Great Teachers. "Let it be," sang Paul, paraphrasing both a central tenet of Buddhism and the words spoken by the Virgin Mary at the Annunciation. Likewise, with the first line of "I Am the Walrus" John reached millions of people who never heard of Gurdjieff: "I am Thou, Thou art I, He is Ours, We both are His. So may all be for our Neighbor." And George's "The Inner Light" is virtually chapter 47 of Lao Tsu's Tao Te Ching set to music.

Maybe the Tarot can help us think about the Beatles in a different light, and reexamine their legacy in a context removed from the flip smugness of rock-crit journalese or hack pseudobiography. We remember that the movement we need is on our shoulders. "Think for yourself," George warned in 1965, "I won't be there with you." But the Beatles left signs along the road. They challenged their listeners to open their minds as well as move their feet. They preached a sermon on the text "You don't need preachers." You need love. And compassion. And truth. And a sense of humor doesn't hurt. And then the rest is, well, it's never easy--but you can imagine it to be.

"If the Beatles or the Sixties had a message, it was to learn to swim. Period. And once you learn to swim, swim. You make your own dream. That's the Beatles' story, isn't it?"

—John Lennon, 1980

 
 
 

Subcategories