The Theosophical Odyssey of D. M. Bennett, Part Two

Originally printed in the November - December  2001 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Bradford, Roderick. "The Theosophical Odyssey of D. M. Bennett, Part Two." Quest  89.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER  2001): 212-217.

By Roderick Bradford

We, who know something of his private life, and believe in the impartial judgment of some of our best friends in America, who knew him for years, maintain that he was made a martyr to, and has suffered for, that cause of freedom for which every right-minded man in America will stand up and will die for, if necessary. . . . we proclaim Mr. Bennett a kind, truthful, quiet, right-minded man, imperfect and liable to err, as every other mortal, but, at the same time scrupulously honest.

—H. P. Blavatsky
Collected Writings 4:79 -80

 

Theosophical Society - Roderick Bradford is a freelance writer and documentary video producer in San Diego, California. He has recently finished the manuscript of his first book, tentatively titled "TheTruth Seeker: The Biography of D. M. Bennett, the Nineteenth Century's Most Controversial Publisher and First-Amendment Martyr.The anniversary meeting of the Theosophical Society at which D. M.Bennett, the American freethinker, told his audience that the religions and morals of India were superior to those of Christianity infuriated Joseph Cook and his fellow missionaries. A full-blown brouhaha erupted after Cook published an article in the Times of India vilifying Bennett and denouncing Theosophy. Bennett was incensed by the article's "alluding to those private letters . . . the unfair remarks of Scribner's Monthly . . . replete with such malicious falsehoods as he [Cook] so well knows how to use." He and Olcott immediately drafted letters challenging Cook to a debate to be held on January 20, 1882. Bennett's letter, dated January 18, 1882, from the Crow's Nest bungalow, reads:

Sir: You have defamed my character, impugned my motives, and cast a slur upon the whole Free thought party who take the liberty of thinking for themselves. That the Indian public may know whether your several statements are true or false, I shall make on Friday evening, at 5:30, at the Framji Cowasji Institute, a public statement. On that occasion I invite you to meet me face to face and answer the statements I shall make. Your failure to do so would be construed into an inability to substantiate the reckless allegations flung out under the protection of a crowd of sympathizers. Should you plead other engagements, I may say that to meet your calumnies I have myself put off my engagement. Like yourself, I am on a voyage around the world, and have no time to waste.

For the whole truth, yours, etc., D. M. Bennett

Cook declined the invitation and returned Bennett's note unopened. The meeting went ahead as planned in order to refute the Cook slanders against Bennett and the Theosophical Society. Hundreds had to be turned away before the meeting started, and the Hall was packed to overflowing to hear the publisher and the Colonel speak. Prior to their speeches a reply from Cook was received and read to the audience:

 

Bombay, Jan. 20, 1882

Col. Olcott, of The Theosophical Society, Bombay,

Sir:

I am not open to challenges of which the evident object is to advertise infidelity. You ask me to sit on your platform with a man whose career has been described in an unanswerable article in Scribner's Monthly as "The Apotheosis of Dirt." No honorable man can keep company of this kind. For using this man as a weapon with which to attack Christianity the enlightened public sentiment of India will hold theTheosophical Society to a stern account. Men are measured by their heroes.

Several days before I received your communication I was definitely engaged to be in Poonah on the night proposed for your meeting in Bombay.

Yours, etc., Joseph Cook

During his speech, Bennett informed the audience of the history of Cook's attacks on free thinkers like himself, only because they did not believe in Christianity. Cook had been an enemy for several years and "has poured upon us all the vile epithets which he was able to command." As to his unfair trial in New York, at which Cook had been present, Bennett added, "I may say I owe, in part, at least, my conviction to the influence of Joseph Cook."

Bennett demonstrated Cook's hypocrisy by giving an overview of the "crimes of adultery and seduction" by Christian clergymen. Why wasn't Cook shocked at the crimes and immorality of the scandalous Henry Ward Beecher case? "He has never denounced Mr. Beecher in his lectures, and doubtless still recognizes him as a brother in Christ." Bennett answered Cook's repeated assertions that he was a "criminal" with the names of Socrates, Galileo, and Jesus Christ. "Does Mr. Cook, or any of his Christian friends," he argued "think any the less of Jesus because he was arrested, tried, and convicted, and executed for expressing his religious sentiments?" He gave a litany of freethinkers, including Thomas Paine, who were imprisoned but "committed no crime. . . . The catalogue of men who have been unjustly arrested, tried, convicted, imprisoned, or executed for exercising the right of thinking and expressing their thoughts is a very long one, and it embraces many of the best men who have lived."

As to Cook's remarks calling him a "poisoner of youth" and "promoter of vice," printed in the Times of India, Bennett denied ever sending a book or any "immoral circulars" to any Indian youth. "I have had no communication with the youth of Bombay, either to poison them or to give them an antidote for poison," he declared. As to Cook's statements regarding the decline of free thought: "I know this to be false, and I have good opportunities for knowing. Ten years ago there was but one Free thought journal published in the United States; now there are six."

Bennett also ridiculed Cook's attempts to "harmonize" Christianity and science. He found it "absurd and untruthful . . . to pretend that science has any connection with either the Bible or Christianity." The attempts of Cook and his fellow "Christian Scientists" to co-opt science to bolster their religion merely infuriated freethinkers. It was, after all, science that liberals believed would elevate mankind and that had always been an arrow in their quiver against superstition. He concluded his lengthy speech reviewing Christianity and using his encyclopedic knowledge of the Bible to show the audience there was nothing new about Christianity. Furthermore, he argued, Christianity had never been "a religion of love and peace, but the bloodiest religion in the world, fostering ignorance, retarding science, favoring slavery and opposing women's rights."

Damodar K. Mavalankar and Kavasji M. Shroff, the men who accompanied Olcott when he met Bennett at the steamship, also gave speeches that evening. Damodar was the Society's recording secretary and an intense young Brahmin who discarded his wealth and abandoned his caste to devote his life to Theosophy. An ascetic and seeker of occult knowledge, Damodar, according to Theosophical history, developed occult powers and eventually received messages from the Masters. Shroff was the secretary of the Bombay branch of the National Indian Association and the Bombay Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals. During his speech, he welcomed Cook to India and expressed admiration for Cook's scholarship, eloquence, and oratorical power. But he could not accept the Christian teachings. Shroff reminded Cook that "the progress of science has already given a death-blow to Christianity in Europe. . . .Christianity is not the religion for India."

Colonel Olcott spoke for an hour and a half, defending American Spiritualists and fully vindicating the Theosophical Society, showing Cook "to be simply an untruthful and malignant slanderer," Bennett reported. Following the meeting, Olcott went to Poonah, and was again maligned by Cook, who was also there to give speeches. The Colonel challenged Cook to debate him on the same platform. But the clergyman refused and went on to insult his audience at Poonah. After unsuccessfully attempting to induce the audience to join him in repeating the Lord's Prayer, a frustrated Cook blurted out a quip about "casting pearls before swine." Cook's bluster and inflammatory remarks alienated many, so his lecture tour of India was not as successful as his supporters had hoped.

+++++++

Bennett stayed in Bombay longer than planned, remaining at the Crow's Nest from January 10 to 26. While hoping to enjoy a few days rest, he spent most of his time responding to Cook's attacks—and also learning about Theosophy. In a letter to his skeptical readers in America, Bennett explained his fascination with "Occultism" and began reprinting extracts from Sinnett's book The Occult World. "Although hidden and mysterious," he wrote, " I like it for the reason that it does not claim to be miraculous or supernatural."

Admittedly anxious to see some of the paranormal phenomena he heard so much about, he was disappointed that he did not see any of the mysterious "adepts" or "Astral Brothers," as they were sometimes called."The nearest to a marvel I have had brought to my vision," he wrote, "is the writing in or upon letters received by mail by Col. Olcott." The Colonel told him that some of the letters he received by mail were occasionally mysteriously marked by one of the "invisible Brothers "living 2,000 miles away in the Himalayan Mountains. The letters were received unopened and parts often underlined in red ink with comments and suggestions about the content and the writer.

Bennett gave a detailed account of an occasion when letters arrived from the Post Office while he was sitting with Olcott. Olcott handed the letters to him for his inspection and they seemed "perfectly intact, and presented not the slightest appearance of having been opened." But after Olcott opened them with his penknife, Bennett saw the"mysterious words in red ink" and lengthy comments and "ever-attendant mystic signature." The letters came from different parts of India and Ceylon; while Bennett was skeptical, he didn't think it possible that all the red marks could have been written by the same man. He found that the "chances for collusion seemed extremely remote," and while it could be said that Olcott had "manipulated" the letters, he knew "the gentleman too well to believe him capable of such subterfuge. I believe him a strictly honest man. He possibly may be deceived himself, but he is not a deceiver."

Bennett knew it would be very hard for materialists to accept these paranormal incidents, but he thought it no harder than it would have been a century earlier to accept some of the scientific and technological wonders of the late nineteenth century. "I do not condemn this occult power as fraud or an impossibility," he declared and added,"because we of the Western world know nothing about it is not a sureproof that it has no existence."

In Bombay, Bennett heard accounts by numerous persons whom he regarded as "strictly truthful" about strange phenomena including bells, musical instruments, and "Brothers" appearing in their "astral" bodies.He was told Olcott and HPB were "entirely in rapport and recognition with these 'Astral brothers.' " Olcott assured him that, while he was still in New York, one of the masters had appeared in his "astral body."And after conversing, the Master gave Olcott an Indian shawl and handkerchief, which he showed Bennett. He was also shown a gold ring reportedly produced by Madame Blavatsky's occult power with the "aid of the Brothers."

While Bennett found Olcott an honest fellow seeker of truth, his assessment of HPB was somewhat less enthusiastic. Writing to his readers back home in America, he tried to explain Blavatsky's ability to communicate with the "Brothers," who seemingly regarded her as a"special protégé." Unlike American spiritualistic mediums, she claimed that paranormal phenomena were not produced by the dead but by living persons aided by "elementals" or "elementary spirits." And as nearly as he could understand, "she does not believe in personal immortality, and that as persons we retain our identity in the state after death." Her" distinction between personality and individuality," he confessed, "is almost too obscure for my obtuse brain." And although he admitted that some of her amazing statements and claims "stagger me not a little and put my credulity to the utmost stretch . . . I have learned to modify my prejudices. . . . I am ready to believe Hamlet was right when he assured his friend Horatio that there is in heaven and earth many things not dreamed of in his philosophy. I think I will reserve my verdict and wait for more facts."

+++++++

D. M. Bennett's skepticism concerning some of Olcott and Blavatsky's miraculous claims did not prevent him from applying to join the Theosophical Society. He approved of their work and "to show this sympathy and a desire to cooperate with them," he wrote, "I proposed to become a member of the society." After thoroughly discussing Theosophy with Colonel Olcott and Madame Blavatsky, he applied for membership. But the Cook controversy and hostile attacks by the press caused Olcott to hesitate in admitting his friend into the Society. Bennett also thought it might be harmful to the burgeoning Society to accept him as a member because of the negative publicity instigated by the "various slurs" and "foul slanders" uttered by Cook before the Bombay public and printed in the press. He expressed his concern to Olcott, who chronicled his own reservations in his Old Diary Leaves (2:331). Bennett's application would cause a troubling "dilemma" for himself and Theosophy, but would, as he admitted in his diary, "teach a lesson too much needed by us all."

Colonel Olcott feared the negative publicity generated by Cook and played out in the influential Indian press. They attacked and reviled Bennett "to such an extent," he noted, "that I hesitated to take him into membership, for fear that it might plunge us into another public wrangle, and thus interfere with our aim of peacefully settling down to our proper business of theosophical study and propaganda." His reluctance, he admitted, "was an instinct of worldly prudence, certainly not chivalric altruism." After discussing the issue with Blavatsky, "she was overshadowed by a Master who told me my duty and reproached me formy faulty judgment." The Colonel was reminded of his own imperfection and advised not to judge fellow men. "I knew that the applicant had been made the scapegoat of the whole anti-Christian party, and richly deserved all the sympathy and encouragement we could give him. I was sarcastically told to look through the whole list of our members and point out a single one without faults. That was enough; I returned to Mr. Bennett, gave him the application blank to sign, and HPB and I became his sponsors."

Apparently Sinnett also had some reservations about admitting Bennett to their ranks. He too was mildly chastened through a letter he received that month in Allahabad. He had been advised by the chela who wrote him earlier: "If you can see your way towards giving him [Bennett] a correct idea of the actual present and potential future state of Asiatic but more particularly of Indian thought, it will be gratifying to my Master." Shortly after he received a letter (no. 42) from that Master himself, enlightening him about Bennett's value to Theosophy in no uncertain terms: "Were he [Bennett] to die this minute and I'll use a Christian phraseology to make you comprehend me the better few hotter tears would drop from the eye of the recording Angel of Death over other such ill-used men, as the tear Bennett would receive for his share. Few men have suffered as he has; and as few have a more kind, unselfish and truthful heart." The Master, who signed himself "M," admonished Sinnett for seeing only Bennett's "unwashed hands, uncleaned nails and coarse language." And although Bennett was "not exactly an angel," he was morally superior to some "gentlemanly" members. "B is an honest man and of sincere heart," M asserted, "besides being one of tremendous moral courage and a martyr to boot."

About the matter of his admission, Bennett wrote, "It seems a conference was held upon the subject between Col. Olcott, Madam Blavatsky, and a few other members of the society who were present, and, as is the custom, Madam Blavatsky referred the matter to the Brothers for their advice. It seems that the desirability of every candidate for admission is referred to the Brothers, they approving of some and rejecting others. My case seems to have been laid before them, and they decided favorably upon it. The response was that I am an honest,industrious man, and well fitted to become a member of the Theosophical Society. I hope their opinion is well founded. At all events, I became a member." According to archival records of the Theosophical Society in Adyar, India, D. M. Bennett was formally admitted on January 14,1882.

In the March 1883 issue of the Theosophist, Olcott addressed what Bennett had written about his own admission. The Colonel corrected Bennett's claim that "every candidate for admission is referred to the Brothers." But "advice was indeed asked as to Mr.Bennett's admission," Olcott announced, because of the controversy surrounding the publisher of the Truth Seeker.

+++++++

After spending over two weeks at the Crow's Nest, D. M. Bennett departed from Bombay on January 26, 1882, and began his three thousand-mile-journey across the Indian continent. He traveled to Darjeeling, a scenic village at the foot of the Himalayas on a sightseeing visit. In Colombo, he found himself "famous" and learned that the Truth Seeker was popular and that several of his tracts had been translated into Sinhalese. He was well received by the local Buddhist priests, whose belief system he admired, although he found fault with their ubiquitous display of images of Buddha.

While in Colombo, he stayed at the Theosophical Society's hall,and enjoyed the "most comfortable quarters," including a cook and a room where he could write. He was surprised by all the new friends he found waiting at the stations for his arrival and providing carriages and paying his hotel and railway bills. And although he knew the Truth Seeker had subscribers in Colombo, he never dreamed he was so popular on the opposite side of the globe or that so many friends were anxious to greet him. He suspected Colonel Olcott had written on his behalf, advising those friends about the time of his arrival and asking them to meet him. "I think," Bennett wrote, "I have Col. H. S. Olcott to thank for much of this."

During his twelve days in Ceylon, Bennett was persuaded to travel to different cities and give lectures. He addressed an audience on the subject of education and women's rights, citing their accomplishments throughout the ages and informing them of the scholarship of Annie Besant and countless American women authors, editors, physicians, and lawyers. He concluded his speech by urging his listeners not to give up their religion for Christianity. He asked them to cooperate with Col.Olcott and the Theosophical Society, "whose march is in the right direction, and I am sure your lives will be spent in doing good, and that a rich reward will crown your efforts."

During his trip abroad, Bennett kept the readers of his journal apprised of his activities, including his Theosophical sojourn. His letters were printed weekly in the Truth Seeker, and his association with Colonel Olcott and Madame Blavatsky caused a good deal of criticism from subscribers. But he continued to defend his decision to join theTheosophical Society and its founders until his death, which came soon after he arrived home in New York in fall, 1882. There is no way to determine how devoted a Theosophist he would have remained, had he lived longer. His wife Mary also joined the Theosophical Society and continued as a member until her death in 1898. It is easy to understand D. M.Bennett's attraction to Theosophy, however, because of its idealistic motto: "There is no religion higher than truth."


Roderick Bradford (rodbradford51@hotmail.com) is a freelance writer and documentary video producer in San Diego,California. He has recently finished the manuscript of his first book, tentatively titled "The Truth Seeker: The Biography of D. M. Bennett,the Nineteenth Century's Most Controversial Publisher and First-Amendment Martyr." This article is abstracted from that work.


Inaugural Address November December 2001

Originally printed in the November - December  2001 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Burnier, Radha. "Inaugural Address November December 2001." Quest  89.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER  2001): 202-204

Radha Burnier

On the Commencement of her Fourth Term of Office as President of theTheosophical Society, Adyar, July 15, 2001

Theosophical Society - Radha Burnier was the president of the international Theosophical Society from 1980 till her death in 2013. The daughter of N. Sri Ram, who was president of the international Theosophical Society from 1953 to 1973, she was an associate of the great spiritual teacher J. KrishnamurtiIt is with a sense of humility and consciousness of the great responsibility cast on me as President of the Theosophical Society that I am accepting a fourth term of office. Starting with Col. Olcott, and followed by Annie Besant, we have had as Presidents and leaders men and women of exceptional endowments, who set the tone for the Society's work. Their example and discourse showed how the light of Theosophy illumines every field of human activity. Their thoughts and labors have inspired generations of people all over the world to devote themselves to world welfare rather than personal interest; all of them in their turn have activated others to live thought fully and unselfishly, and learn to tread the path to perfection, which is universal, without orthodoxies, dogmas, and meaningless rituals. It takes courage to break through old customs and out moded practices, and all outstanding Theosophists were courageous people, plowing new ground in the fields of religion, education, social relationships, and even politics. To all my distinguished predecessors I pay homage and sincerely hope that I shall prove worthy of them and of the trust reposed in me by the members who have now elected me.

Sometimes, standing on the beautiful beach at Adyar, we can see a great rush of water toward the shore, which is quickly and invisibly hauled back to the ocean by a strong undercurrent. At times there is a dramatic clash between the powerful forward swell and the unseen current carrying back the mass of water. The collision throws the waves high up,and then they fall with a crash. This seems symbolic of how the human mind repeatedly rushes toward the dry sands and rocks of sensory and material existence, not realizing that there is no escape from the mighty invisible energy that will pull it back into the vast ocean of reality. The collision between these cross currents periodically results in catastrophes that shake up the human mind and human society—but, alas only temporarily!

Such are the times when the challenges are most intense and the opportunities great. All of life is offering us opportunities all the time, but in small ways. And it takes a long while, even many incarnations, to be aware that even the small encounters with people,objects, or situations, both pleasant and seemingly unpleasant, are part of the benevolent scheme of Nature to awaken consciousness and to open our hearts to the truths of life.

We are witnessing today a blind rush for power, wealth, and enjoyment—irrespective of moral and ethical considerations. The violence, cruelty, corruption and selfishness are unprecedented because our age of technology makes a system of everything and manufactures increasingly efficient tools to be put to good or evil use.Nevertheless, by bringing into sharp focus the dire results of the struggle modern humanity carries on against Nature's laws and design, our era provides an exceptional opportunity for a deeper understanding of the human problem—the problem of egoism battling against the universe.

Krishnamurti often spoke of mediocrity as if it were a sin, or even a crime. Mediocrity, we may say, is insensitivity of mind, its failure to respond to the simple opportunities of daily life, which pave the way to spiritual awakening. Shut in a shell of self-concern, such a mind is callous and blunt to disasters and danger signals. The lesson of twentieth-century history is that the majority of people do terrible things—killing and even torturing, spying and betraying family and friends—because everybody else does it. The abominable cruelty systematically practiced on humans and animals is tolerated without a murmur by the majority of people because it is the norm of the age. Few rise up to affirm that what is wrong does not become right because a million people do it. Present-day culture, if at all it is culture, is stunting those faculties which put the human heart in touch with the source of life and health. As Light on the Path declares: "He that chooses evil, refuses to look within himself, shuts his ears to the melody of his heart." That melody is in every human heart, deeply hidden, perhaps silent, but it is there.

In the early days of the TS, members were advised by an Adept:

The Society, as a body, has a task before it which, unless performed with the utmost discretion, will cause the world of the indifferent and the selfish to rise up in arms against it. Theosophy has to fight intolerance, prejudice, ignorance, and selfishness, hidden under the mantle of hypocrisy. It has to throw all the light it can from the torch of Truth, with which its servants are entrusted. It must do this without fear or hesitation, dreading neither reproof nor condemnation.Theosophy, through its mouthpiece, the Society, has to tell the Truth in the very face of lie; to beard the tiger in its den, without thought or fear of evil consequences, and to set at defiance calumny and threats.

Many members of the Society have in fact stood up for causes which were scoffed at in their time—they braved calumny and sarcasm. But the work of the TS is not merely to try to rectify the ills and wrongs inhuman society, but also to encourage its members to go to the root of human problems, to find and understand their origin within themselves and learn to rise above the illusion-breeding, conditioned mind. Without such action it is not possible for humanity to become heir to the vast creative gifts and potential for wisdom inherent in consciousness.

One of the Objects of the Society is to investigate the hidden laws of Nature and the powers latent in man. What are these powers? Often the answer points to trivialities. But we have arrived at a stage in human history where it is not enough to undertake psychical research and arrive at some superficial findings about telepathy and other abilities that may be classified as the lower siddhis. We need to recognize the deeper meaning in the words of this Object, and study earnestly our hearts and those of our fellows, in order to avoid constantly deceiving ourselves into believing that unrealities are real. Slowly, as we plunge into the quiet depths in our own consciousness, there may be the beginning of reflection on the profound secrets of Nature, hidden in the material as well as subtle inner dimensions of both human beings and the universe.

If the universe is a mystery, it is a still greater mystery that evolution has arrived at the human mind with its irrepressible aspiration to know the truth and also to love the truth. With loss of faith in organized religion, with all its superstitions and emphasis on authority, people in general have come to trust only the truths of science, gathered by observation of the objective universe. The position has changed now with recognition that the observer has a direct impact on what is observed.

Life is not a cry, it is a song, say the wise ones. Behind the suffering and chaos, there is a plan and purpose, says Theosophy. Can we know it as a fact? Only by finding the truth about ourselves, and breaking down the internal barriers to perception. The words "universal brotherhood" are generally taken to mean that we must behave in an unbiased, friendly, and kindly manner. But it is much more than that; a true brotherhood is a living body or nucleus which is regenerative. The Universal Brotherhood of the Theosophical Society must not be a passive condition, but a dynamic, harmonizing power that embraces all in close kinship. That kinship is at a deep level; it is "the spiritual and psychic blending of man with Nature" which reveals the truth that lies hidden under the objects of sense and thereby promotes a spirit of unity and harmony. Regenerative universal brotherhood is the foundation for the emergence of a nonsectarian, nonauthoritarian religious feeling among the peoples of the world, counteracting the futile materialistic trend.

The statement was made in the Mahatma letters: "Modern science is our best ally. Yet it is generally that same science which is made the weapon to break our heads with." Since then, science has made great strides. A new picture is emerging as a modern generation of investigators and thinkers in the scientific field are putting forward views that tend to shatter the rigid materialism of the last two centuries. This change in scientific thinking helps to usher in a fresh sense of responsibility in humankind for the welfare of the earth and all its other inhabitants. Well-known writers like Professor Lewis Thomas are suggesting that the evolutionary process has been sustained,from the time of the earliest microbes, by a system of cooperation, communication, and interconnection in Nature and not by a bitter struggle for survival, as people have believed for more than a century. Others say that it cannot be taken for granted that violence is dominant in Nature; altruism and mutual support are very much a part of Nature's order. Professor Charles Birch emphasizes the place of feelings of compassion and sympathy and the existence of purpose in Nature. The concept that there is an inscrutable, universal intelligence and power, which may be called God, is no longer totally unacceptable to scientists. A whole stream of fresh thinking flowing from the scientific community promises to alter the education that future generations will receive. Science may indeed become the ally of the Wisdom-Religion; true religious awareness may possibly return to the world through the back door of science! As Arthur Hugh Clough wrote:

For while the tired waves, vainly breaking,
      Seem here no painful inch to gain,
Far back, through creeks and inlets making,
      Comes silent, flooding in the main.

And not by eastern windows only,
     When daylight comes, comes in the light.
In front, the sun climbs slow, how slowly,
     But westward, look, the land is bright!

Theosophy is in essence both science and religion. It is a call to use our reason to understand life in its varied aspects, knowing fullwell the limitations of reason. For something more than reason is needed to grasp the essence of a flower, a song, a person, let alone the truth of the vast, living universe of which we are a small part. As Annie Besant said: "Truth must come to each individual as the result of study, reflection, purity of life, and devotion to high ideals." The art of living must be practiced and the science of life learned by all of us in order to fulfill successfully the aims and objects of the Theosophical Society.


Christmas

Originally printed in the November - December  2001 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Cabigting, Ruben. "Christmas." Quest  89.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER  2001):205.

Seasonal Thoughts...

By Ruben Cabigting

Theosophical Society - Ruben Cabigting was a staff member at the national center of the Theosophical Society in America and a bishop in the Liberal Catholic ChurchCHRISTMAS is a great festival when the living Christ pours out divine love and spiritual energy through his angels upon people all over the world. Each and every one of us has indeed a great opportunity willingly to receive this gift on Christmas day.

Christmas is a time of peace to all people of goodwill. The Christmas spirit is the real feeling of brotherhood that is spread throughout the world especially on this occasion. Ideally, this feeling of peace and goodwill should be for the whole year, but since we cannot feel such noble Christmas heartiness at all times, at least there is a time each year when people practice it. We share our joys with the less fortunate on Christmas Day and help to realize the great brotherhood of humanity even for this brief time.

Mary, who bore Jesus in Bethlehem, is called our immaculate Lady,Star of the Sea, Queen of Heaven, Mother of God. We see her in pictures standing on the crescent moon, star-crowned; she nurses her child Jesus; and the cross appears on the back of the chair in which he sits on his mother's knee. The Virgo of the Zodiac is represented in ancient drawings as a woman suckling a child—the type of all future Madonnas with their divine Babes--showing the origin of the symbol.

The relation of the winter solstice to Jesus is also significant. The birth of Mithras was celebrated at the winter solstice with great rejoicing. And Horus was also born then, his birth being one of the greatest mysteries of the Egyptian religion, with pictures representing it on the walls of temples. At the winter solstice, the image of Horus was brought out of the sanctuary with special ceremonies, and similarly at Christmas the image of the infant Bambino is still brought out and exhibited in churches in Rome.

The story of the Nativity is mystical as well as allegorical. The Christ's life is a mystical experience, a birth that continually occurs in each of us as the inherent powers of the human Spiritual Self unfold. It is a universal spiritual process that is not confined or limited to only one particular time, place, or person.

Allegorically, the three Wise Men of the Gospel account are highly evolved intelligences who assist a candidate in the process of spiritual evolution. The Star of Bethlehem represents the presence of the One Initiator, the King of the World. The inn, which was full, typifies the worldly life of men, and the stable is the hall of initiation. The Virgin Mary represents the causal body, the vesture of light, within which all spiritual birth occurs. The obedient and gentle Joseph represents the disciplined mind. The domesticated animals in the stable represent the pure and controlled emotions. The shepherds represent spiritually evolved persons who come to witness the spiritual birth.

In a similar manner, the Christmas tree represents the nervous system, its lights are the various centers of the candidate that are activated during the process of initiation, and the star at the top of the tree is the Star of the One Initiator shining triumphantly.

The Christmas festival, when correctly considered, should take on a new meaning of rejoicing, giving, loving, forgiveness, sanctity, and solemnity, so that the whole world may realize brotherhood, oneness, harmony, peace, and goodwill. Merry Christmas to all.


Ruben Cabigting is a staff member at the national center of theTheosophical Society in America and a bishop in the Liberal Catholic Church. This article was adapted from one in The Liberal Catholic 68.3 (Christmas 2000): 7.


The Weather Coming Off All Things

Originally printed in the November - December  2001 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: O'Grady, John P. "The Weather Coming Off All Things." Quest  89.6 (NOVEMBER - DECEMBER  2001): 207-211.

By John P. O'Grady

Theosophical Society - John P. O'Grady is currently "breaking camp" in Pennsylvania and heading back to the mountains of California, where he will be working on a new collection of essays titled Occult Ecology: Reading Nature Darkly. This is his seventh contribution to the Quest magazine. PERHAPS THE PAST IS INTERRED IN THE PRESENT, as some have maintained, and the world is its own enduring monument. Material objects thus possess an inner or spiritual life, just as human beings do, and these things have their own memories, fully capable of being transmitted or passed along to one open to such impressions. Nobody would deny something like this is the case with words, those veritable graveyards of meaning, wherein every until such a Lazarus waiting to be called forth. Why shouldn't the same be true of material objects? At least they observe a kind of etiquette, most of the time, and don't force themselves upon us like some drunk with a story down at the Jolly-O Tavern. Indeed, the things that compose our world are not so rude as to speak directly, nor so coy as to conceal vital knowledge, but instead they give signs. Just like the weather.

On the other hand, there are some people upon whom even the most trifling of objects will advance like an emotional thunderstorm. For instance, my old friend Amy Ursi, the New Jersey psychic. Just as some people can feel in their bones the approach of an oncoming storm, so she responds in her gut to the atmospheric conditions she says surround material objects. Each one is enveloped by a mysterious vapor of presence, the kind of thing said to come up around graves or in dreams when the beloved dead come back to visit. By her account, this strange mist is borne aloft from the multitude of things, as if by winds, to form clouds that circulate in broad patterns across the landscape of the human heart. Lest you take this as a mere figure of speech, I hasten to add that Amy has a stormy temperament. I tend to take her at her word.

Now when it comes to weather in the ordinary sense, meteorologists look at a wide range of phenomena, everything from the jet stream right down to the dust devil swirling across your supermarket parking lot. They use highly sensitive instruments to compile data on minute changes in temperature, air pressure, and humidity. All of this is fed into computers, digested by highly sophisticated programs, then squeezed out in new and presumably more useful forms. These tokens are then "read" by the meteorologists to provide a forecast for your morning commute. Such predictions, shrouded in the same glamorous computer graphics favored by sportscasters, more often than not prove unreliable, yet they somehow suffice to win our confidence. You could say that when it comes to our mental possessions, the wrong ideas are preferable to none.

My old friend Amy is a kind of meteorologist of the soul. Because she is self-taught in these matters, her style of talking about them is more colorful than what passes on the nightly news. She has no degree in atmospheric science nor does she employ any fancy computer modeling; her instruments of choice are astrology and numerology. For her, the air is filled with all manner of unseen angel, demon, and disembodied soul, which—at least by her reckoning—should come as no surprise, since the air itself is invisible yet nobody doubts it is there. When skeptics challenge her, she just cites the until such Upanishad: "Like the wind, like the clouds, like thunder and lightning, all of which arise from space without physical shape and reach the light in their own form, so too those who rise above ordinary perception ascend to the light in their own form." Obscure as Amy can sometimes sound, when it comes to the things themselves she speaks clearly enough: "Be careful what you handle—there's a forecast in every touch."

Amy has the ability to "tune in" to objects, a curious knack she acquired when we were still in high school. During our senior year, she worked as a retail clerk up at the old EJ Korvettes in West Orange. Not long on the job, she realized she could tell, just by its feel, whether a customer's check was going to bounce. "It sets off this strange buzzing in my ear," I remember her saying. Turned out she was right every time, which much pleased her supervisors. They quickly promoted her to "Store Check Approval Officer," a position created just for her.The modest pay raise and enhanced prestige, such as could be had in those days at EJ Korvettes, were enough to convince Amy that she—the only person from our very large graduating class to get into Princeton—really didn't need to go to college. Instead, she embarked on an "alternative" career in psychic detection, which, when compared to the professions of our classmates—bankers, real estate developers, Hollywood actors, corporate headhunters, and politicians—seems far less wrongheaded than it once did.

Nowadays, of course, computer networks have pretty much killed the need for any extrasensory form of check clearing, but lucky for Amy her clairvoyant abilities extend well beyond the cash register. Give her a photograph of somebody she doesn't know, and you'll see what I mean. She puts it up to her forehead and after a few moments of "incubating the images in the henhouse of her mind"—at least that's how one debunkers' magazine described her methods—she provides a detailed account of events from the life of the person in the photo, such as when a broken arm, when a first kiss, when a parent's death, and even, on a good day, when that individual's own death. Amy has a similar flair when it comes to letters and, of late, e-mail, though she prefers to scan these messages in hardcopy rather than press her brow against the monitor. She's also pretty good at "smelling ghosts," able to tell—just by walking in the door and taking a whiff—if your house is haunted.

Amy is fond of saying that a person's breath is just a highly localized form of weather, worthy of at least a little mention on the nightly news if not its own cable channel. In her way of speaking, weather is an allegory for the soul. Sometimes I think she's right—a son one summer afternoon when I stepped out of a Center City Philadelphia movie theater into a furious rainstorm. The whole atmosphere had a greenish pall to it, and the water in the street was running deeper than the city's political grudges. I looked up at the sky just in time to see a dark funnel cloud casually making its way eastward, directly above the buildings along Chestnut Street, as if it were just another tourist from Kansas or Oklahoma come to see the Liberty Bell.

At the same instant I observed two young men not far down the street, engaged in a bitter dispute. They were yelling at each other. One of them abruptly pulled out a knife and plunged it into the thigh of the other, then ran off down a dismal side street, out of sight. The bewildered victim was left hurling curses up into the air as he tried to tend his wound. But then somewhere deep in the recesses of his mind, the idea took hold that he should give chase to his assailant so he gave up trying to staunch the flow of his blood onto the sidewalk, and instead limped off, to the best of his diminished ability, still hurling curses up into the air, yet making slow progress toward retribution, until he too disappeared down that same dismal side street.

Later that evening, the television news reported a tornado had touched down on the other side of the Delaware River, causing a bit of damage over in Camden but no injuries. What happens in New Jersey is big news. Yet over here in the City of Brotherly Love it was just another ordinary day—no mention of any stabbing, no report of a washed-out trail of blood and where it might have led. Instead, the fluffy-haired news anchor told us to stay tuned for tomorrow's forecast.

You've probably heard the stories about police departments that use psychics to help crack the really tough cases. Amy is one of the people they call. Contrary to public opinion, the cops don't have a problem with using paranormal methods to solve crimes. On the whole, they are without superstition but not without belief. Since they are pragmatists, they welcome aid from wherever it comes. And Amy always comes through.

Several years ago, an article appeared in one of those check-stand tabloids on the subject of "Psychic Investigators." Amy was just starting out and got some good press here. The article quoted an unnamed Bayonne police detective who had high praise for her abilities: "She hit it right on the head—I mean, I was there when she did it. I don't believe in any of this psychic crap, for the most part, but I think she does have a gift. I've been on this job for a long time and seen a lot of people claiming special powers, but I think Amy comes closest. I found her the most accurate of all of them when it comes to this business."

The case involved the murder of a telemarketing tycoon—or at least the evidence pointed that way—but no corpse had turned up, and the investigation was going nowhere. Having come to their wits' end, the cops brought in Amy. Since she does command a hefty fee, I've often wondered how they report such a charge on their expense forms. I suppose the word "consultation" is versatile enough. In contemporary usage it covers all manner of services rendered, everything from oracles to lawyers, prostitutes to anesthesiologists.

Anyway, the cops handed over to their psychic the one piece of crime-scene evidence they had a small bit of bone believed to have come from the victim. They asked Amy to describe the person and where the rest of the body might be found. The article then recounted how she picked up the bone, pressed it to her forehead, and suddenly screamed out: "A rat! It's a rat! All  I can see is this enormous rat in front of my eyes and it's coming right at me! What's going on, did you guys give me the wrong bone?"

Oh no, the cops assured her, that was the right bone all right,definitely human. "Listen, Amy," they said, "the rat you're seeing was probably what chewed the bone off the hand of the victim in the first place, before the killer was able to transport the body. That's what you're picking up. Take another look. Could you just go past that rat and tell us if you see the victim?" So that's what Amy did. Not only was she able to describe the victim, but she also told the cops exactly where the body lay, out there in the Jersey Meadowlands. They took it from there.

If all such cases went as smoothly as this, every police department would keep a psychic on staff full-time. Unfortunately, big problems arise when a "medium" is brought in, whether by the cops or by somebody who's just in an emotional crisis. Not that a true psychic will fail to"pick up on the vibes" in any case, but they often pick up on the wrong vibes. When it comes to perception, if you make your mind as hospitable to vagrant images as these psychics do, then you're exposing yourself to some pretty chancy stuff. They say it's like walking out of a dark cave into the bright light of an afternoon, or worse, staring directly into the sun to watch an eclipse: your eyes fill up with darkness and you're left groping around blindly. This is just a metaphor, but when something like this happens to a psychic, it's a major embarrassment for all concerned.

Like any sensitive seer, Amy occasionally locks on to information that, well, isn't exactly related to the case. Such as the time she was working with an elephant figurine. She blithely supplied her police audience with a wealth of lurid details about a ménage à trois that she was picking up on, a little drama somebody later described as a"pornographic Nancy Drew Meets the Hardy Boys." As the titillating scene was being fleshed out by Amy, the detective who had handed her the evidence in the first place began to fidget. You could see the thunderheads of anxiety building up over his head, until all attention in the room was on him.

Then suddenly—Boom!—he jumps up and puts a halt to the proceedings. "This is going nowhere," he blurts out as he snatches the figurine back from Amy and bolts from the room, leaving his fellow detectives—with one or two nervous exceptions—snickering indelight.

For her part, Amy has cultivated a degree of circumspection unrivaled in her field. As she once told a reporter, "I try not to tune in to the X-rated stuff. The police worry that I'm going to see things about their sex life or about who they went out with last night or who they're cheating on. So I make it clear right from the start, 'No X-rated stuff—I don't do that.' Or at least I try real hard not to. But sometimes stuff sneaks out.  It's not my fault."

And so, through sad experience, cops come to learn caution when they follow a psychic into the backcountry of common sense, where deadly pitfalls and precipices abound for the unwary. Nowhere is the Boy Scout motto more appropriate: "Be prepared."

Yet, when it comes to getting more than is bargained for in psychic inquiries, it's not just the cops who are at risk, but the psychic as well. Call it a professional liability, but Amy is living proof of the ancient wisdom that when we cultivate our virtues we simultaneously cultivate our flaws.

About ten years ago, she was consulted on a break-in that occurred over in Manhattan. Dozens of Aztec relics had been stolen from an antiquities dealer. The thieves left no fingerprints, not a singletrace. That's when the dealer brought in Amy. He told her that, in making their getaway, the crooks inadvertently had dropped a bit of their loot. He hoped she might tune in to this item and help solve the case. Amy said sure.

The dealer handed her a six-inch sacrificial knife. It was made unrivaled blackest obsidian and was very sharp. The dealer said, "Have at it."

So Amy lays hold on the handle and is immediately pierced by the image of a hill rising from the margin of a dark and tree-lined lake.Thousands of nondescript people are flocking to its summit, where an imposing temple looms over everything below. Directly in front of it is an altar, a huge greenish block of agate or jasper, its top side slightly convex, like the surface of a stony awesome eye. Behind it blaze a pair of ritual bonfires. The air is permeated with a vague stench, which brings to mind for Amy images of the house she grew up in behind the old Jack-in-the-Box restaurant on South Livingston Avenue. Here's her swing set, there's her dollhouse, and now out of the blue appears her long lost collie dog, Laddie. She is aghast to see her own memories mingling with those coming off the grim artifact, as if the whole thing were just some informal cocktail party in the imagination.

Next she observes a half dozen priests emerging from the temple, each one wearing a long cotton robe adorned with hieroglyphic emblems of mystic import. Five of these priests are shrouded in black, while the sixth is mantled in scarlet and holds in his hands the very knife Amy holds in hers. As the procession draws closer, she can see that each priest's hair is matted with blood, the gory tresses flowing wildly over their shoulders. At the center of this gruesome pomp walks a naked and startlingly handsome young man. Given the circumstances, he's just a little too enthusiastic. He's waving to the crowd like a rock star.

When the grim procession arrives at the altar, the five black-robed priests stretch out the eager young man, face upward, upon the glossy surface of the stone. They secure his head and limbs. Now the scarlet-robed one lifts the black knife and holds its flinty tip just above the young man's chest. A deafening roar goes up from the crowd.This young man is definitely the star of the show. There's no going back. Even if he were in some way to falter, have a change of mind and cry out with all his might as the dark blade slits open his chest and a holy hand plunges into the gushing wound to tear out his palpitating heart, nobody could hear it anyway.

Well, maybe Amy would hear it—but she drops the knife at that critical moment and thereby draws the vision to a close.

Needless to say, she didn't solve this particular case, but the dealer was still pleased with her performance. It gave him a pretty good story to attach to an otherwise undistinguished relic, thus quadrupling its value in the marketplace. Combined with the insurance settlement on the lost goods, this meant he came out way ahead. He paid Amy double for her good work. When word got out about the knife, she started getting all kinds of calls from people wanting her to tell them if this sliver of wood they had came from the Cross, or this knucklebone came from Saint Peter and not, as those without faith would have it, from some barnyard pig. A professor who claimed to be an expert on the Shroud of Turin wrote a letter to the Newark Star Ledger demanding that the Vatican grant Amy access to the relic, so the question of its authenticity might be settled once and for all.

Yes, Amy's business really took off, but nothing costs a person so much as something that is given, especially if by the gods. Imagine not having the power to forget, not being able to filter out the innumerable impressions that come via the senses and whatever other routes there are to perception, and instead, like Amy, possessing a Midas touch of memory. Everything you encountered then would immediately burst into image, thousands upon thousands of them, and you'd be swept up in a tornado of one thing turning into something else, an unbelievably violent flux in which nothing is ever fixed, no boundary ever secure. You'd be unable to distinguish between your own experience and that of somebody else—say, your butcher or the bastard who just cut you off in traffic—no longer able to know friend from foe, rich from poor, celebrity from nobody, false from true, weak from strong, foolish from wise, and—taking this where it must lead--one species from another. On and on it goes, until at last a terrible sameness cloaks the entire universe, so that not even the living and the dead can enjoy a blessed separation.

Loss of memory, we could conclude, might just be the greatest achievement of human consciousness. If only those flinty old senators from western states like Idaho and Utah had some sense of the fragility of the hard-won human ignorance in these matters, you could bet they'd be the first to demand the Clean Water Act be extended to include a certain River of Forgetfulness mentioned at the end of an ancient book,where all the disembodied souls about to be reincarnated are forced to drink a measure, that they might enter upon their new lives unencumbered by any clutter from the old.

Such is the nature of Amy's problem. Some say this is all just conjurer's shtick, but I don't know if it's that simple. After all, nobody is required to consult a fortuneteller, to obtain through prophecy or table rapping a treasure more easily acquired through prudence and down-to-earth discretion. No, when it comes to explaining why so many people in this day and age resort to palm readers, psychotherapists, and cult leaders, let's just say that nothing provides more comfort to a desperate person than to meet somebody who is evenmore desperate. This is not to impugn divination as an art, but only to note the pitiable hands into which it has fallen.

In Amy's defense, I would point out that her views about the weather coming off all things are compatible with those held by several ancient philosophers, most notably Anaximenes, who was the first to claim that the soul is made from air. Only a single sentence from his writings survives, but it's a lofty one: "As our soul, being air, both holds us together and controls us, so do breath and air encompass the whole cosmos." After all, we do say that the eyes are the windows of the soul, so it follows that the nose and mouth are the doorways. Thus our psychological houses are more open to the elements than we think. No wonder human beings, even when they have nothing else in common, will find some way to talk about the weather.

I've heard Amy say that when we die our souls fly off to the moon.Once upon a time it was thought that all lost objects—not just souls but garments, childhood toys, luggage, and wedding rings, as well ascourage, virtue, beauty, and passion—found their way to the moon, where they reside to this day, hidden to all eyes save for those of the deity who reigns there. It may be that even one or two ideas have found their way there. All these lost things pass their time on the moon as if in sleep, which is yet another kind of weather, says Amy, and they dream of their former existences back on the disburdening earth, flitting and fluttering around happy with themselves and doing as they please until such time as the dream becomes so vivid they wake up right where they belong, unable to tell if the whole she bang was not itself just one big dream.

As for me, I am relieved that I am for the most part oblivious to the things that cloud Amy's world. The weather around here affords me enough clear days that I can keep track of the moon moving swiftly through her phases, rather like the opening and closing of a vast and sympathetic eye, at times full with remembrance, and at others dark in a necessary fugue. Although nothing gives me greater pleasure than to hear my friend Amy's stories and recount them to others, I myself don't need to see the corpse candles and ghostly beacons that, she assures me, hover over every object, no matter how trivial.

Like I said, I tend to take her at her word.


John P. O'Grady is currently "breaking camp" in Pennsylvania and heading back to the mountains of California, where he will be working on a new collection of essays titled Occult Ecology: Reading Nature Darkly. This is his seventh contribution to the Quest magazine.

Grave Goods: Essays of Peculiar Nature is a collection by John P.O'Grady published by the University of Utah Press in 2001, including this essay (printed here by permission) and six others that first appeared in the Quest magazine. The sixteen pieces in this volume include ghost stories, macabre modern legends, and metaphysical investigations, all informed by the natural sciences, history,philosophy, literature, and mythology. They reveal the natural world as a place of unnatural surprises and strange beauty where Rip van Winkle, psychics, and ordinary people rub shoulders with the Buddha, Socrates, and Stephen King. O'Grady has been called "the cream of the next generation of American nature writers . . . with a wit that arcs between sweetly goofy and canine sharp." Cloth, $21.95, 170 pages. Available from the University of Utah Press at 800-773-6672.

 
 
 

Subcategories