Simon’s Crossing: The Death Ritual of My Beloved Animal Companion  

Printed in the Spring 2019  issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Pateros, Christina ,"Simon’s Crossing: The Death Ritual of My Beloved Animal Companion" Quest 107:3, pg 15-17

By Christina Pateros

Theosophical Society - Christina Pateros is a painter and healer. Her shamanic healing practice includes space and land clearing and blessing, and serves adults and children in life and in conscious living and dying.As I awakened, I realized that Simon, my beloved cat companion, was not licking my face, nor had he lain on my pillow cocooned around my head as he had done each night for the past thirteen years. It was his ritual, which had become mine. More than I knew.

I had a sick feeling in my belly, finding him tucked deep in the back of my bedroom closet. He had often hidden underneath the comforter on the bed for hours preceding the arrival of unfamiliar visitors to our home. But this was different. This time he stayed hidden and tucked away for days. I missed his nightly cuddling and early-morning greeting, although many of those early mornings had felt way too early for waking at the time. That morning I gently pulled him out of the closet and I held him, feeling very little life force. He purred intensely, but his eyes were distant as he laid lethargically in my arms.

Three vet visits, multiple exams, poking, prodding, invasive interventions, and tests led to a final phone conversation with the veterinarian, Dr. Levesque, that began with her saying, “The news is not good” followed by “He is not a surgical candidate. I would hate to have him suffer anymore. I’m recommending euthanasia.” Sobbing, I assured the doctor that I heard it all and understood, and that I would be there to pick Simon up soon.

I always promised Simon that I would be back—whether leaving for weeks at a time for travel or on a simple run to the grocery store. This time, I had assured him I’d be back after leaving him with the vet that morning for several hours for further tests—the tests that revealed the devastatingly sad results.

Huki and Simon

Huki came first, a sweet ginger and white kitten sleeping on the top tier of a kitty condo, away from the rambunctiousness of the rest of the kitten-filled room at the Animal Care League in Oak Park, Illinois. Our first family feline, who was quickly claimed by our school-aged daughter Lanie, is a sweet ball of love. Two years later, Simon, complementing Huki with grey and white downy fur, arrived and captured our hearts in that same kitten room.

In contrast to Huki, Simon was the life of the room, bouncing off the walls, jumping and leaping. While Huki was a lion—slow, big-hearted. and deliberate—Simon was a jaguar—cunning, quick. and agile. His flights through the air to catch gliding feathers on strings, his climbs to the highest shelves and cabinets, and his legendary tightrope walks along the exposed second-floor bannister (all while peering down at me in the room below) showed us his prowess, his fearlessness, and his desire for adventure. Simon sustained his essence right up until that final day.

Beloved family cat, brother, protector, and furry lover. “You always had something going on the side with Simon,” John, my beloved, quipped as we began to share sweet memories.

How happy I was to have him home, to hold him, love him, and allow him to hide away in solitude. The quiet darkness of the closet made sense to me now, away from sensory stimuli. And away from me. A hospice nurse with whom I once worked enlightened me about the importance of giving our dying loved ones the space to detach so that it might be a little easier to go. This, coupled with granting permission to the dying one, is powerful and sacred medicine. I honored Simon in the end by respecting his need to be in the closet away from me.

Here it was that I embraced his dying. Here it was so clear, the gift of planning his death. At home. In my arms.

My trust in Dr. Levesque and the veterinarians at the Boulder Valley Humane Society brought me to surprisingly immediate acceptance. More importantly, so did the messages I was receiving clearly from Simon. I knew that the best thing I could do for him was to accept and make space for being present with Simon and all those who loved him. 

Midwifing Death

The altar manifested with relative ease: a photo of his sweet face tucked in a crystal cluster and a white selenite rock candleholder aglow, illuminating his face with candlelight. Red roses in a vase formed the backdrop on the table in the center of our living space.

One call to Pet Loss at Home connected me to a local veterinarian, Dr. Robin Teague, and my request for an evening appointment time was confirmed. Calm infused our home as grace and gratitude for the life of our beloved Simon took over.

I discovered Pet Loss at Home, private pet euthanasia in the comfort of home, at a time I was researching alternatives for my clients and their pet companions. I connected directly to founder Karen Twyning, D.V.M. and discovered this wonderful resource so that animals can stay at home in their final days instead of living out their last breaths in the sterile veterinary-clinic environment. What a gift! “Say Good-bye in the Comfort of Home, 8 a.m.–8 p.m., Seven Days a Week,” reads the banner on their website, along with the toll-free phone number. Pet animal home hospice and euthanasia is available to anyone in most states.

Consciously, I had not digested what connecting with Karen and Pet Loss at Home would mean for my cat boys Simon and Huki. This was priceless alignment. It made all the difference in the world in my experience, and Simon’s to be sure, on the day of his crossing at home. I called the phone number from the website, which prompted me to enter my zip code, and within moments, Dr. Teague, a local veterinarian in Boulder, answered and scheduled with me for that evening.

My compact light-filled painting studio jumped forward clearly and bravely to be the place of ceremony. Three glass-encased candles, a seashell to hold the ashes of the frankincense-resin incense stick, and a vase to hold the brightly multicolored summer blooms and fresh sweet red roses we bought on the way home became a floor arrangement as the place was transformed into a space of honoring, of mourning, of unconditional love, of grace, and of death.

Simon’s energy body was already out of his physical body. That was clear when I connected into his energetic field, and was a huge relief. I performed the shamanic death rites over his body intermittently throughout the day. Following what I’d been practicing for nearly a decade, in alignment with my Andean shamanic teachers with whom I’ve apprenticed, I swirled one hand counterclockwise, beginning at his heart— the energetic home. Midwifing death was not new to me. Midwifing the death of a beloved one was.

The death-rites practice supports the natural process whereby the energetic luminous body gently detaches so that when the physical (electromagnetic) heart stops beating, the crossing to the light—home—is easeful. This death ritual of swirling spirals of energy detachment seemed as much for me as it was for Simon.

The last eleven years of midwifing death, as opportunities arose and clients called on me, have graced me with incredible privilege. I fall into an inexplicable calm in that place, ever since my first experience holding a starved woman in a Kolkata mission as she took her final breaths.

In 2011, I embarked on my inaugural journey to Peru, subsequently spending two weeks in the high Andean Mountains apprenticing with Q’ero medicine people. The mountain expedition was followed by a planned five-day Amazon jungle adventure. I visioned traveling to be with the plants and animals of the rain forest. I had not intended on ayahuasca psychedelic plant medicine and rebirth the first night and an intensely grueling death experience the second night. Nor had I planned to die in the Amazon, but the experience felt as real as it gets. One gift from it, which caused me to leave the group and the trip two days early, was to have awareness of living and dying consciously, aware and with grace and dignity.

This gift, which was one I would wish upon no one to have to experience, ultimately has allowed me to sit with the dying: calmly, compassionately, and peacefully supporting the dying one as well as loved ones.

Experiencing my own death in the Peruvian Amazon was the most sacred, most holy experience of life. With Simon, it was no different. Except that with Simon, I was also the bereaved.

Making preparations in the room whilst caressing Simon and moving spirals of energy took up the rest of the day. His favorite white plush blanket was placed atop the lambskin rug on which he had so often sprawled himself out, on many a winter’s day, sunning himself indoors. The candles and incense now burning, blinds drawn, the space was set. I sat and cried next to the blanket, tears rolling down my cheeks, further accepting that we were close to the arrival of Dr. Teague.

Permission to Die: Saying Good-bye 

Holding Simon and saying good-bye, I wept and thanked him for being such a loving, devoted companion. John also held him and said his good-bye.

Next was Lanie, beamed in from Brooklyn via live video conferencing. We wept together. Simon was sedate, accepting our ritual of good-byes, resolute, it seemed, to the end of his bodily existence. The miracle I had asked for earlier that day was arriving in the form of peace and death at home. Sometimes physical death is the healing. I wished in those moments of saying good-bye that I had known weeks before that his last licks would never be felt again. We never know when might be the last touch, hug, lick or kiss.

Huki lay atop my drawing table, sleeping deeply, curled in a ball. He had spent many of the previous ten days in the closet with Simon. Perhaps this was his way of detaching now. As Huki slept, a small procession of invited neighbors, young and old, flowed through to say good-bye.

Lexi, my older daughter (who was thirteen—Simon’s age at his passing—when he joined our family), arrived with her husband. She joined me in tears, grounding as she sat on the floor facing Simon, candles flickering and frankincense and flowers scenting the darkened air. Tears flowed throughout the room. Tears flowed too, from Paul, Lexi, and Lanie’s dad, as he said his good-byes from Chicago via video viewing.

The Ceremony

Dr. Teague arrived and seamlessly found a place in the room, gently explaining that, first, an injected sedative would slowly render Simon’s body still and relaxed before a second injection would stop his heart.

We chose silence, honoring these final moments. I told Simon I loved him and I thanked him for finding us and for being our sweet loving kitty. I asked him to show me a sign when he visited in spirit form. I closed his eyes and laid him on his side on the blanket after Dr. Teague confirmed that his body breathed no more life.

Without planning, I offered the flowers to everyone present, and asked that after blowing their love and gratitude into the petals, they place them around Simon’s body. Lanie again joined us from Brooklyn via live feed as we simultaneously smiled and wept with the beauty of the moment. In that light-hearted space, we remembered his favorite food: raw shrimp. “Put it in,” Dr. Teague said. Amidst the colorful petals, we placed one shrimp.

The blanket was folded around his body, flowers inside and atop. As pallbearers, Lexi and I carried his body to the waiting van. The incense had burned down. We blew out the candles and breathed with relief as we moved from that ceremonial space. We toasted Simon, shared stories, and remembered.

His ashes were delivered within days, and it felt just right to place the tin in the rectangular glittered box on the studio floor that he had loved to curl up in while I worked.

Huki stayed asleep throughout the ceremony. “I’ll be back,” I assure him when I leave. And when I look for signs from Simon, I realize that I see and feel him in every living thing in nature.


Christina Pateros is a painter and healer. Her shamanic healing practice includes space and land clearing and blessing, and serves adults and children in life and in conscious living and dying. She cofacilitates powerful ketamine-assisted psychotherapy sessions with an integrative psychiatrist as a part of her healing practice. She combines her art with healing, integrating creativity as a dynamic part of living as she guides groups in ceremony and teachings for empowered living. Christina lives in Boulder, Colorado and welcomes art collectors and healing clients worldwide: Christinapateros.com; Whispering-stones.com.


Members’ Forum: On Compassion and Ahimsa

Printed in the Spring 2019  issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Miles, Standish,"Members’ Forum: On Compassion and Ahimsa" Quest 107:2, pg 

By Miles Standish

I have been a member of the Theosophical Society since 1946. I joined because I felt drawn by the concept of compassion and ahimsa, although I was not yet familiar with the word ahimsa. The first Theosophical book I read (at age ten or eleven) was At the Feet of the Master, by J. Krishnamurti, containing what he said were instructions by his master. All of that book was highly influential for me, but perhaps the most influential part was the reference to “the still more cruel superstition that man needs flesh for food.” I was raised in a meat-eating family, but as soon as I was on my own, free of the restraints imposed by military service, I began eliminating flesh foods from my diet.

There was little or no science to back up the assertion that flesh foods are unnecessary, but the concept resonated strongly with me. Sadly, I didn’t realize that the production of dairy foods and eggs involves as much suffering as meat production. Even later, when I got cancer in 1972, I still did not know about the hazards of consuming dairy products.

The cruelty affects not only the animals but the humans who consume these products

Around 2012, I read The China Study, by Dr. T. Colin Campbell. He talked about experiments showing that with a moderate dose of a carcinogen, you can turn cancer on and turn it off by varying the amount of animal protein in the diet. Also, meat eating consistently causes the accumulation of plaque in the blood vessels, which eventually lead to cardiac “events.”

Campbell’s book does not address ahimsa per se, but all of us are victimized by the firmly ingrained superstition that we need flesh for food. This superstition is perpetuated by the animal-food production community and by the pharmaceutical industry, which sells drugs to lessen the effects. The government is drawn in through lobbying.

A big revelation was given to me by Professor Jane Plant, who reversed advanced breast cancer not once but several times by eliminating all dairy products from her diet. I think dairy products were highly instrumental in my falling prey to testicular cancer in 1972. I now try to keep to a vegan diet, and at age ninety-three have no disease calling for medication.

Several powerful documentary films show the health hazards, the gross cruelty, and the unsustainability of the animal-food industry. Three that I recommend are Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret; What the Health; and Peaceable Kingdom: The Journey Home. Another outstanding book on this topic is How Not to Die, by Dr. Michael Greger. 

I think the Theosophical Society would do great service to all life on the planet by becoming a leader in encouraging humans to move to a plant-based diet.


Miles Standish, a retired Air Force major, has been active in several branches and regional federations of the TSA.


Viewpoint: Ahimsa in Practice

Printed in the Spring 2019  issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Barbara, Hebert,"Viewpoint: Ahimsa in Practice" Quest 107:2, pg 10-11

By Barbara Hebert
National President 

Theosophical Society - Barbara B. Hebert currently serves as president of the Theosophical Society in America.  She has been a mental health practitioner and educator for many years.The focus of this issue of Quest is ahimsa. This word, familiar to many who tread the spiritual path, derives from the Sanskrit himsa, meaning to strike, injure, or harm. Ahimsa has the opposite meaning: to cause no harm or do no injury. Ahimsa is to have respect for all life and to avoid violence toward all others.

The national board of directors asked that Quest incorporate ahimsa as one of its topics because of the many board discussions regarding ahimsa and veganism. These discussions emanated from appeals by several members of the Theosophical Society in America to make veganism the primary diet at our national headquarters. While there are many reasons to consider veganism as a primary diet, the board decided to maintain the diet as is (ovo-lacto-vegetarian) while including substantial vegan options at meals. This decision was based primarily on the Society’s freedom of thought policy.

The Theosophical Society does not require any member to adhere to any specific practice, diet, or belief. Members have freedom of thought, belief, and action, as long as they are in sympathy with the Three Objects. Therefore the board decided not to require the change. But the board also determined that a thorough discussion of ahimsa would be useful to all on the spiritual path. Hence this issue.

Of course there are many books and videos on the importance of veganism, not just from a health perspective but also from ecological and ethical perspectives. The pioneering effort of many in moving from a meat diet to an ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet was monumental seventy-five to 100 years ago. Today many believe that maintaining an ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet is simply not enough and that as pioneers in the spiritual movement, we need to move away from all animal-based products. Once again, this is an individual decision, and it is hoped that a discussion regarding ahimsa will be valuable.

The First Object of the Theosophical Society is to encourage a nucleus of the universal brotherhood of humanity without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste, or color. This object, clearly defining that all are welcome to join the Society, certainly relates to other human beings. However, it also points to something much deeper: the unity of all life and the spiritual evolution of all beings through the various kingdoms of nature (mineral, plant, animal, human, and beyond). This unitive nature of all beings lies at the heart both of our First Object and of ahimsa.

Joy Mills, late president of the TSA, in an article published in the November 1996 Theosophist entitled “Purpose of the Society’s Objects,” writes: “Does not the First Object lead us to examine our own conduct, our own reactions, our own relationships with others and with all forms of life, to see whether we have come even close to the realization of the true nature of brotherhood based on an absolute knowledge of the unitary nature of all existence?”

This concept, shared in Theosophical teachings, reminds us that all life is one. This is the basis for the First Object: we, and everything around us, are expressions of the One Life—or whatever we may choose to call it.

Some might say, “I wish I could experience the Ultimate Reality,” or “I wish I could experience God.” Because our world is illusory, we believe that we are separated from the Ultimate Reality, but that is not entirely true. Take a moment and look around. Everything you see is the One Life; all of the things you see—your family, friends, strangers, trees, animals, flowers, birds, insects, rocks—are expressions of the Ultimate Reality made manifest in this phenomenal world. We are looking at aspects of the One Life. We are looking at God. And we are surrounded by it every minute of every single day, if we would only recognize it.

Since all beings in existence in this material world are expressions of the One Life, aren’t we compelled to have an attitude of respect and nonviolence for the life within those beings, whether plant, animal, human, or other? If we are to take our Theosophical principles to heart, this is a subject to be contemplated deeply.

We may wonder, which comes first: a recognition of the One Life in all beings or ahimsa? Then we may wonder, what difference does it make which comes first? One will eventually lead us to the other.

As we act in accordance with ahimsa toward other creatures, we are respecting and recognizing the One Life that is expressed in all forms in this physical world. By doing so, we transform our consciousness. We are practicing altruism and thus doing the work of this great organization to which we belong.

H.P. Blavatsky writes, as have many others, that the true work of the Theosophical Society is altruism. Altruism can be defined as the selfless concern for the well-being of others. In Theosophical teachings, altruism focuses on service to humanity and to all emanations of the One Life. But there are so many who are in need and so many ways to help. How do we decide upon an altruistic path?

Because of our principle of the freedom and autonomy of all members, there is no one specific altruistic action that the organization of the Theosophical Society will identify. Each of us must choose in our own way, guided by our own passions and interests, how we will help others. However, if we look a bit more deeply, it quickly becomes clear that one way in which each and every member of the Theosophical Society can, in addition to other altruistic acts, serve humanity is to facilitate the raising of consciousness.

Raising the consciousness of humanity—what a gargantuan task! How do we even begin? In order to change the consciousness of humanity, we must first change our own. We may call it self-transformation, self-regeneration, expansion of consciousness, or anything else, but whatever we call it, we must change ourselves so that we can change the world.

Assuming that the Theosophical teachings regarding the unity of all life are accurate (and, of course, I do make that assumption!), then it stands to reason that as one part of the whole changes, the rest must change as well, even if it is a miniscule change. It is much like putting a drop of dye into a container of water: the color of the water changes, even if just a tiny bit. Through this process of self-regeneration, self-transformation, or expansion of consciousness, we continue to add small drops of dye until eventually the color of the water in the entire container has been changed. In such a way, as we change ourselves, we change the world.

Changing ourselves and hence transforming the world is an act of altruism in which all of us can partake. This raising of consciousness is, in a way, an act of ahimsa. By undertaking this arduous process of self-regeneration, we promulgate respect for life and nonviolence towards ourselves and therefore toward all beings. In this way, we are truly living a Theosophical life.

These thoughts bring us back to the original topic of our discussion—veganism. As we gather information, contemplate the various aspects of the unitive nature of all life, and consider dietary implications, each of us will make personal decisions about diet as we move forward. These decisions will likely be based on our own understanding of our place in the world and our role in living altruistic lives. I wish us all well in our contemplative journeys.


From the Editor’s Desk

Printed in the Spring 2019  issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Richard, Smoley,"From the Editor’s Desk" Quest 107:2, pg 

Theosophical Society - Richard Smoley is editor of Quest: Journal of the Theosophical Society in America and a frequent lecturer for the Theosophical SocietyChristianity and Buddhism both speak of love and compassion, although in different proportions.

For Christianity, love has always been the primary value. The New Testament even says, “God is love” (1 John 4:8). But Buddhism, particularly in its Mahayana form, speaks more often about compassion.

This difference says something about the two religions. What is love? It is that which unites self and other, while preserving the integrity of each. (For more on this, see my book Conscious Love: Insights from Mystical Christianity.) Love does not presuppose suffering. You can love someone whether he or she is suffering or not.

Compassion, on the other hand, inevitably includes an element of “feeling sorry for.” It is hard to feel compassion for someone who is enjoying perfect bliss. Hence the centrality of compassion for Buddhism. The central premise of Buddhism is dukkha—suffering, or, if you like, dissatisfaction. All sentient beings—from the gods in the highest heaven down to the beings in the hell realms—are subject to dukkha. The only appropriate response is compassion.

How, then, is compassion related to love? The most elegant and profound answer to this question comes from Mahayana Buddhism, with its teaching of the four immeasurable catalysts of being. They are love, compassion, joy, and equanimity. They operate in a cycle.

Let us begin with equanimity. This is total freedom from attachment—“becoming impassive about those near and far,” as the thirteenth-century Tibetan sage Longchenpa puts it in his Trilogy of Finding Comfort and Ease.[*]

 We can see a difficulty here. Equanimity, taken to an extreme, can lead to a pervasive indifference or obliviousness.

 How do you counteract this inner torpor? With “a supreme, all-encompassing love greater than the love a mother has for her only child” for all beings. But love contains the potential danger of attachment, as we see in most human relationships.

What do you do then? Develop compassion by thinking of the suffering of all beings “in the same way as you are unable to bear mentally the suffering of your parents,” says Longchenpa. He adds, “the inability of bear the suffering of living beings is the indication (of compassion).”

Nevertheless, this relentless focus on suffering can become depressing. The way out of that is to cultivate joy:

             Ah, there is no need for me to install
            All these beings in happiness;
            Each of them having found his happiness,
            Might they from now onwards . . .
            Never be separated from this pleasure and happiness.

But with joy, taken to an extreme, “the mind is agitated and becomes overexcited. You have then to cultivate equanimity, which is free from the attachment to those near and far.” And the cycle begins anew. We can picture it in this way:

Theosophical Society - Cycle of Love, Compassion, Joy, Equanimity

Longchenpa advises starting with the cultivation of love, then moving on to compassion, joy, and equanimity. Eventually the practitioner “may then cultivate the immeasurably great properties in their order, outside their order, in a mixed order, or in leaps and bounds.”

 This teaching is the most profound and powerful that I know of about the relation of compassion to the other principal virtues. It is echoed in Aristotle’s teaching that all virtue is a mean between two extremes. Compassion is a mean between apathy and a sentimental but debilitating pity.

I think it would be wise to contemplate this teaching today, when many people overexcite themselves—even in the name of compassion—in the belief that this agitation is a virtue. Agitation and upset are never beneficial, even when supposedly in the service of the highest ideals.

Richard Smoley

 

[*] I am quoting from Longchenpa, Kindly Bent to Ease Us, Part One: Mind, trans. Herbert V. Guenther (Berkeley, Calif.: Dharma Publishing, 1975), chapter 7.


Subcategories